The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info -----------------------
Last updated on August 9th, 2017 at 02:08 pm
J.F. Beck has an interesting update on barrister, blogger, and blustering bandwidth bandit Walter Jeremy Sear.
- Pete sez:
If copyright was enforced we bloggers and most of the internet industry would be “stuffed”.
and suitably “mounted”, one presumes…or perhaps just holding hands.
(please, Ma’am, not another Wally-Go-Round”)
Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 03 27 at 03:50 PM • permalink
- While I am tiring of Sear and his nonsense he made a comment on Beck’s site which deserves reflection:
Sear said:
And finally, of course, the whole context of this is my objecting to my material being used by Iain Hall in his relentless stalking campaign against me. I don’t have a problem with you or any reasonable person using my images where appropriate – I DO have a problem with some creep using them maliciously.
If you had someone like Hall following you around, you’d get fed up with him taking your material after a while, too.
Relentless stalking campaign? Following him around? Very serious allegations indeed.
I will make a prediction: Sear has never seen Hall in the flesh.
- The pimple face lefty twit will go off and cry on Loewy’s shoulder. As for the mutt, Tim should have done a photoshop rescue and placed it on a hot tin roof near Ayer’s rock. That would have solved the legal problem.
Or done what was done to “Les Miserables” wait 100 years and produce a royalty free musical depriving Hugo’s great grand children of some dollars.
- Sear is not a thief. I prefer to think of him as a victim of circumstance just doing what he has to do – something along the lines of the jolly swagman from Waltzing Matilda.Posted by Margos Maid on 2006 03 27 at 07:55 PM • permalink
- What are the rules on taking images from the Internet exactly? I found one on Google Images that I used for a joke email; I tracked it back to its original site, but it had been removed from there. I would have liked to ask the creator’s permission.Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2006 03 28 at 12:38 AM • permalink
- With assertions like that made in public, could not Hall have grounds for an action against Jeremy?Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 03 28 at 12:49 AM • permalink
- He is clearly not talking about physical stalking but being stalked and followed around the net – which certainly appears a pretty accurate description from what I can gather. And it has certainly been relentless. However, if a deregatory comment like that was sufficient basis for action I think most posters to this forum would be in extreme danger!
Page 1 of 1 pages
What an asshole!
The fucking cat was up a tree stalking native birds.
Plummet away, I say