He still calls guantanamo home

The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info

Last updated on March 6th, 2018 at 12:30 am

Davey No-Mates isn’t welcome in Britain:

The Blair Government has not yet begun to process Guantanamo detainee David Hicks’s UK citizenship, despite an order two months ago to do so from the British High Court …

The British Government continues to oppose Mr Hicks’s quest to be accepted as a UK citizen.

Can’t imagine why. The boy would fit right in:

Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.

Posted by Tim B. on 02/19/2006 at 09:37 AM
    1. What’s the deal with wanting to go to Britain?  Wouldn’t Mr. Hicks be more comfortable in, say, Pakistan?

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 02 19 at 11:00 AM • permalink


    1. Whatever happened to “I still call Astraya -home”….

      Posted by crash on 2006 02 19 at 11:43 AM • permalink


    1. Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.

      Why don’t we just tell those four nut bags to go back to Islamia and live under sharia law there?  They can oppress all the women and children they like there.  But when they come to the West, they have to respect the opinions, ideas, wishes, and desires of each individual.

      Don’t like it?  Then leave.

      Posted by wronwright on 2006 02 19 at 12:30 PM • permalink


    1. Looks like the case will go all the way to the House of Lords.

      Posted by 2dogs on 2006 02 19 at 02:39 PM • permalink


    1. “Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today”.

      It’s worrying that Tim Costello the earnest pastor/charityman brother of the Treasurer, seems quite happy for ‘civil but not political’ sharia law to be given to Australian Moslems.  This was said at his Press Club speech last year.

      So we have naive Christian leaders thinking multiculturalism [mufticulturalism?] means abandoning our Western concepts of the treatment of women, marriage, children etc.

      He can’t seem to grasp that like the communists, *everything* is political to the Islamists, which is why they think the very confused West will be pushover..

      Posted by Barrie on 2006 02 19 at 11:03 PM • permalink


    1. If they want sharia law to be their form of “rules and standards” to live by, I believe there are some islands west of Scotland that are still no go areas due to past governments bio/nuclear testing. Also on these islands there are some gentically modified sheep and rabbits (sorry but I think I am making this up but there you go)for them to use as concubine.

      See how long they will enjoy Sharia law and all it entails whilst freezing their nuts off

      Posted by artful-dodger on 2006 02 19 at 11:05 PM • permalink


    1. David Hicks backed the wrong team, happens to us all at one time or another, LIVE WITH IT MATE!!!! (and I am using the term “mate” loosely)

      Posted by artful-dodger on 2006 02 19 at 11:07 PM • permalink


    1. Mr Howard has seemingly had a revelation on the road to …..I was going to say Morocco but that sounds like a Bing Crosby/Bob Hope film. Anyway he is saying that SOME Muslims are not making good Australians.
      Now it has only taken thirty years for him to realise the fact, how much longer will it take for him to ACT on the fact.And that it is a few more than just a few who are not doing the right thing.
      And that the majority of us have been trying to point this out for years.

      Posted by waussie on 2006 02 20 at 12:12 AM • permalink


    1. Just had a thought that there might be a few like DH in Guantanamo who are having ‘difficulties’ with the home country. Does anybody have any info? Wouldn’t it be interesting if the place turned out to be an international jail by default: “Thank you, Boosh, but we do not want those thieves and rapists back here. You keep them there. Very grateful.”
      O/T, heard an interview with a former UN staffer on the ABC last night who’s written a book on his time under Kofi. He didn’t enjoy it much. I was surprised to hear the UN get so thoroughly slagged off on Aunty – then again, it was Sunday evening.

      Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2006 02 20 at 12:14 AM • permalink


    1. Cancel his Australian citizenship.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2006 02 20 at 05:29 AM • permalink


    1. Who is this ‘David Hicks’ person? There WAS an Australian of that name, but it converted to Islam and renamed itself ‘Mohammed Daoud’.

      Apparently, quadrupeds find the name ‘Mohammed’ has irresistible sexual allure.


      Posted by MarkL on 2006 02 20 at 06:01 AM • permalink


    1. There is a certain grim irony in sending (formerly) Australian criminals to England.

      If he ever gets cut loose in England, my money is on him being on the first available plane back to Oz to the welcoming open chequebook of “60 Minutes”.

      It would be justice to have the government refuse him entry because of being an undesireable foreigner and of bad character.

      Posted by Pedro the Ignorant on 2006 02 20 at 09:19 AM • permalink


    1. Sixty minutes wouldn’t spit on him..
      It’ll be zbz and abc who roll out the red carpet…

      Posted by crash on 2006 02 20 at 10:23 AM • permalink


    1. Dont be stoopid, David Hicks isn’t a terrorist.

      Posted by anthony27 on 2006 02 20 at 10:53 AM • permalink


    1. I have to admire the first glimmer of backbone of the Brits.  They may not have the guts to deport anyone but at least, for now, they appear firm in refusing entry to a known terrorist.

      Posted by Patricia on 2006 02 20 at 02:20 PM • permalink


    1. Anthony27 #14, that picture … HUH?  What was going on there?

      Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2006 02 20 at 04:10 PM • permalink


    1. #16 I think it was sarcasm. that’s a picture of DH

      Posted by daddy dave on 2006 02 20 at 04:45 PM • permalink


    1. Yeah?  But what’s he DOING in it?

      Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2006 02 20 at 05:45 PM • permalink


    1. he’s holding a rocket launcher

      Posted by daddy dave on 2006 02 20 at 05:48 PM • permalink


    1. nb that doesn’t make him a ‘terrorist’ as such, just a Taliban footsoldier.

      Posted by daddy dave on 2006 02 20 at 06:15 PM • permalink


    1. Heh heh… Just so we are clear, it was sarcasm.

      Posted by anthony27 on 2006 02 20 at 09:23 PM • permalink


    1. Dumb fuck Hicks is showing his military prowess by wrapping the sling of the RPG around his arm to minimise the recoil……
      from a RECOILESS Rifle!!!!
      He deserved a quick double tap and naught else.
      Still does come to think of it.

      Posted by 81Alpha on 2006 02 21 at 12:22 AM • permalink


    1. He’d make a good bore sight.

      Posted by CB on 2006 02 21 at 05:50 AM • permalink


    1. #8…
      Some/?many Muslim people are OK- it’s Islam that is bad

      Posted by nhhhn on 2006 02 21 at 06:43 AM • permalink


    1. #24 there’s no argument about that.

      Posted by daddy dave on 2006 02 21 at 03:18 PM • permalink


    1. So who-all was he fixing to shoot, with that there recoilless rifle thingy?  And why’s it got 100 yards of straps attached to it?

      Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2006 02 21 at 05:36 PM • permalink


    1. CB let’s just hope he’s being recalibrated at Gitmo.
      Stoop I believe the pic was taken when our esteemed jihadi was poof arsing about in the Balkans looking for trouble.
      Shows the quality of their training that the nob is misusing the sling.
      He ended up in the ‘Ghan where he was fighting for the Taliban and was taken prisoner by the Yanks, bless ‘em.

      Posted by 81Alpha on 2006 02 21 at 11:28 PM • permalink


    1. Pity they didn’t cap him.  Is it too late?

      Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2006 02 22 at 02:55 PM • permalink


Page 1 of 1 pages