The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info -----------------------
Last updated on August 5th, 2017 at 08:53 am
Emmanuel Sivan reviews a puzzling Seymour Hersh piece in the New Yorker:
Sharp-eyed reporters in Beirut read the article in astonishment. Siniora, of the Lebanese Sunni establishment, was assisting allies of Al-Qaida who had split off from a pro-Syrian organization? And the United States was aware of this and might even be planning it, in order to strike at Hezbollah? And all this was in the context of aid to the Sunni forces in the Middle East in their conflict with Shi’ites backed, according to Hersh, by Iran? A world turned on its head. How could it be? But it was published in The New Yorker, a magazine known for its meticulous fact-checking. The Lebanese reporters began investigating the story on their own.
Hersh said he heard the story from Robert Fisk …
There’s your problem, Seymour.
- What, doubt the probity of Robert Fisk? How could you not doubt the probity of Robert Fisk?Posted by mythusmage on 2007 06 20 at 09:26 AM • permalink
- My sister’s friends brothers cousin who lives with a skank whose mothers live in lover’s friends sisters boyfriend actually shook hands with someone whose uncle thought they heard fisk say this, so it probable is true(ish).Posted by surfmaster on 2007 06 20 at 09:34 AM • permalink
- But it was published in The New Yorker, a magazine known for its meticulous fact-checking.
Not when Seymour Hersh is writing. Seriously, is there another journalist whose reputation is more out of whack with his actual abilities than Hersh? For all we’re justifiably ragging on Fisk and others, none of them are afforded the same kind of gravitas (for lack of a better word) that Hersh is, even though his track record for accuracy is no better.
- I’ve never understood why anyone takes Seymour Hersh seriously. He periodically comes out with these wild, unverifiable tales, gets a bunch of press for a few days, and then disappears into obscurity again. His reports never pan out, never change anything, never lead to anything more and generally are forgotten in short order. And yet, the next time he pops his head up the press panders to him again. It’s a mystery.
I’ve never understood why anyone takes Seymour Hersh seriously.
He feeds the left’s preferred narrative. Basically, he knows his audience and panders to it.
Posted by Rob Crawford on 2007 06 20 at 05:51 PM • permalink
I’ve never understood why anyone takes Seymour Hersh seriously.
And he never lets mere facts get in the way of the metanarrative.
Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2007 06 20 at 09:35 PM • permalink
- If you see one hersh will want to see more.Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 06 20 at 10:48 PM • permalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Members: