The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info -----------------------
Last updated on June 24th, 2017 at 10:14 am
Michael Moore – who supported Ralph Nader in 2000 (then later claimed to have been a Gore Democrat) and backed Wesley Clark in 2004 – now urges his remaining fans to vote for Obama:
If you live in Pennsylvania, can you do me a favor? Will you please cast my vote—and yours—on Tuesday for Senator Barack Obama?
The slender – and ominously cashed up – Arugulan American and Big Mac Mikey; they’re an odd duo. Then again, Maximum Mike earns that description all by himself, which may explain why he requests two votes. The double-wide documentarian is no longer a fan of Mrs Bill:
Over the past two months, the actions and words of Hillary Clinton have gone from being merely disappointing to downright disgusting.
Disgusting? She’s still got a way to go before matching Much Moore. It’s too bad Democrats don’t have the option of voting for Chelsea Clinton, lately described by one Philadelphia admirer as having “the ass of life”.
The Democrats go trawling for votes at gay and lesbian bars. The Republicans go to veteran conventions and church meetings. Pretty much shows the difference between the two parties.
Posted by wronwright on 2008 04 21 at 02:21 PM • permalink
Just wait ‘til Chelsea finds out how many closeted gay Republicans there are. That ass of life is gonna fall hard.
Posted by Gary from Jersey on 2008 04 21 at 02:25 PM • permalink
- Michael Moore Speaks
to His Public Via
His Spokesman Lyle:They peddled all our Secrets,
Sold favors to their donors,
And shamed our highest office
With presidential boners.They left us unprotected
From those who want us dead;
Despite this, I’ve decided
To back Barack instead.Though they are despicable,
Ms Rodham and the whore,
I say, Vote Obama:
He hates this country more.
- I must correct you, sir.
The article clearly states that the Philadelphia homosexual denizen thought that Hillary had the “ass of life”.
Which she may well have; I know I don’t have it.
The article states in another place that some woman grabbed Chelsea’s ass during her nocturnal politicking.
Any way you look at it, there’s far too much intrusion of ass into our plitical system.
Any way you look at it, there’s far too much intrusion of ass into our plitical system.
Not least of which are the number of asses holding office.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 21 at 02:41 PM • permalink
And speaking of asses (or, in this case, a double ass), Michael The Moor’s endorsement of Obama is great news! With a little luck, he’ll produce a documentary about Obama that’ll tank his polls even more.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 21 at 02:45 PM • permalink
“Ass of life”? Is that like the “jaws of life”? Do they use it to pry people out of car wrecks?
Posted by Rob Crawford on 2008 04 21 at 04:07 PM • permalink
Chelsea was mobbed by local gays and lesbians … “I grabbed her ass,” one young woman exclaimed to her friends after snapping a picture with her arm around the former first daughter.
‘Man-handling’ the former US President’s daughter?
Get that, Aunty?
Or is that acceptable behaviour cos they’re same-sex (read: both wymmin), even if of different preference in partners?At least, Bill’s activities seemed to be mutually consensual …
Educated gay men don’t buy the slice and dice Clinton politics that pits African Americans against gays and lesbians. Obama bravely took the African-American community to task for its homophobia in his speech at Ebeneezer church in Atlanta. This trumps Clinton’s warmed over ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’ compromised rights philosophy.
Gays for Obama.
The Left plays wedge politics?
I thought Howard was always accused of that by the Oz Left.
Ooh, it’s getting nasty out there!
Hacker redirects Obama’s official website to HillaryClinton.com
I wonder how far the meltdown will go.
Posted by Evil Pundit on 2008 04 21 at 05:52 PM • permalink
- OT, having always been accused of having too Cavalier an attitude over the years, it’s rather nice to finally get some recognition. I’m more than happy to drop the Left-Right tags and adopt Roundheads v Cavaliers.
via the always interesting Mr Bolt.
Moore joins a long line of America haters who want Obama as president. These aren’t just Bush-haters. Fill-up Adams, for example, has been anti-American since he crawled out of the primordial slime, stood up and went looking for Gough Whitlam.
You have to ask why Obama is the No.1 choice of America’s enemies.
I wonder if “Michael Moore” +slender what result in a Google whacking?
Posted by andycanuck on 2008 04 21 at 07:36 PM • permalink
Bryla, Bryla, Bryla… Remember Michael Dukakis and George McGovern?
You will.
Posted by richard mcenroe on 2008 04 21 at 08:26 PM • permalink
#25 – Yes, and they’ll finally have an ally in the White House.
Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2008 04 21 at 09:14 PM • permalink
Because he’s going to win.
Folks, Bryla has pretty much come out of the closet. In spite of his, ummmm, “Christian” beliefs, our good friend is in fact a hater.
It’s simple, really.
Bryla supports Obama.
Bryla agrees that Obama is the “No. 1 choice of America’s enemies”.
Thus, Bryla agrees with America’s enemies, which makes him an enemy of America. A laughable one, mind you, and not worth the price of a round of 5.56mm ammo. But an enemy nonetheless.
Enemies, with very rare exception, hate each other. As Bryla is an enemy of America, he hates America.
Somewhat simplistic, perhaps. But still valid, I think.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 21 at 09:41 PM • permalink
TRJ, I don’t agree that Obama is an “enemy” of the USA, I just didn’t want to quibble.
To become President, Obama is going to need a majority vote from those American citizens who can be bothered. Are they all “enemies” too?
In my Christian life I’m strongly attracted to the life and example of Martin Luther King Jr. I notice Obama is too.
I don’t hate America. I love it. It’s only the myopic and bloody foreign policy and domestic policies of the militarist greed-heads that give me the shits, and I follow MLK’s example that those forces will be defeated by the goodwill and thirst for justice of the majority of ordinary Americans.
One manifestation of which will be President Obama from 2009-2017.
- Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 04 21 at 10:12 PM • permalink
- Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 04 21 at 10:20 PM • permalink
- Bryla,
America’s foreign and defense policies, and the civil and military forces to implement them, are what have stood between freedom and tyranny since 1941. Freedom would have been crushed without US willingness to do the messy stuff that you so deplore. No doubt you would have made your peace with the Commissars, Nazi or Communist, and parroted their lies like a good little boy, had we not stood for freedom but rather let things drop.And if you doubt that I speak truly, compare those we saved from tyranny with those we were not able to save. Start by comparing South Korea with North Korea.In an age where armed doctrines are on the march, doctrines that will kill millions for being classified as abstract enemies, Jews or Kulaks or Hereditary Enemies of the People (a Maoist classification) or Kufr, and tyrannize billions more, pacifism and the refusal to support the fight against tyranny are immoral.Posted by Michael Lonie on 2008 04 21 at 10:48 PM • permalink
TRJ, I don’t agree that Obama is an “enemy” of the USA, I just didn’t want to quibble.
That’s not what I said, Bryla. That’s a pathetic attempt to backtrack. And I wasn’t quibbling either.
To become President, Obama is going to need a majority vote from those American citizens who can be bothered. Are they all “enemies” too?
Two points. First, I referred to “America’s enemies”, just as you did. I did not intend to refer to those who vote for him, as I was speaking to YOU, and because you aren’t American. But, yeah, I could have said that better.
Second, Obama needs to win a majority of the Electoral College, not a majority of voters. If you’re going to support Obama, you’d best know the rules he’s dealing with, lest you be disappointed.
In my Christian life I’m strongly attracted to the life and example of Martin Luther King Jr. I notice Obama is too.
And your point is? That you and Obama are soul mates? That you heart him? We knew that, but whatever.
BTW, the phrase “in my [insert term] life…” generally refers to something that is separate and distinct from your normal life. For example, “In my other life, I am a volunteer fire fighter.”
So when you say “In my Christian life….”, it implies that there are times when you are not Christian. Is that what you meant, or did you just bang on the keyboard too fast?
I don’t hate America. I love it. It’s only the myopic and bloody foreign policy and domestic policies of the militarist greed-heads that give me the shits, and I follow MLK’s example that those forces will be defeated by the goodwill and thirst for justice of the majority of ordinary Americans.
I disagree, you *do* hate America, as it is, because you want the world to suit your narcissistic little soul. You just want to change America into something that fits your fantasy world. Which would not be America, by definition.
And I strongly suspect that MLK would have punched Obama squarely in the nose, for being the hollow shell that he is.
One manifestation of which will be President Obama from 2009-2017.
Perhaps. I rather doubt it, given his recent faux pas, and the earlier revelations about his, ummmmm, less than sterling character. But if it makes you feel better, assert away. It costs me nothing, and I might have the chance for some amusement at your expense next November.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 21 at 11:13 PM • permalink
- Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 04 21 at 11:21 PM • permalink
PS: Bryla, you should realize that you are following a pattern here.
Most every time that Tim posts something ominous or negative about Obama’s chances to win the nomination (let alone the election), comments that have truth in them, in you pop, and drop a “No, no, Obama is going to win!!!!!” sort of comment. No proof on your part, just assertions and emotional reactions.
It’s like you’re trying to convince yourself, and not us, with lots of positive reinforcement. Interesting, eh?
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 21 at 11:22 PM • permalink
Back O/T….three guesses as to who wrote this:
“The ass of life”? If you rub it, does it grant you three wishes?
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 21 at 11:34 PM • permalink
Bryla is an enemy of the US, and of Australia.
The proof is in his allegedly “pacifist” protest actions. He and his cronies only protest against Australia and its allies—never against the violence of our enemies.
This one-sided protest reflects the one-sided bias of his mind.
Posted by Evil Pundit on 2008 04 22 at 02:11 AM • permalink
“We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men (and women) are created equal with the inalianable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
Of course I’m active in Australia, and concerned with how my own country behaves. That is the duty of a citizen.
Australia’s alliance with the USA is a legitmate aspect of our behaviour to address and seek to modify.
Peace is promoted through the pursuit of justice at home, and just relations with our neighbours. Evil is defeated through non-compliance, and the implementation of just relations.
Hate and fear are poisons to be avoided.
Pickles, not this year mate. Doctor’s orders. Next year (I hope).
#41 – That’s a bit slack. Won’t your wife give you money for the bus fare?
Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2008 04 22 at 03:22 AM • permalink
Lefties such as yourself have targeted the US no matter who was in the White House. It has been that way since Harry Truman stood up to Stalin over the Berlin blockade. Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush #1, Clinton and Bush #2 – all have been abused and accused by the left in Australia. I’m old enough to recall the left’s bitter hatred of JFK because of Cuba and Vietnam. Today’s left-wing moonbat Jimmy Carter was once reviled simply for being the president of the US. Carter controlled Pine Gap during a time when many lefties blamed the CIA for Whitlam’s dismissal.
So don’t pull this “it’s only the myopic and bloody foreign policy and domestic policies of the militarist greed-heads that give me the shits” unless you are saying every president in the past 60 years fits the bill. If that’s the case then you damning a whole country because Americans have voted in those people 15 times in a row.
- #44
“Americans have voted in those people 15 times in a row”
Precisely Contrail!
Somehow, Bryla and his friends seem to dissociate the American people from their Presidents and government.
They completely miss the point, that these reps. and presidents are actually “chosen to be elected” as we see it happening now, and once chosen, being elected by the people.
“Evil is defeated through non-compliance, and the implementation of just relations.” That’s a whole lot of nuance there. The kind that makes words float up into the air and dissipate into nothing. Just how is Obama comparable to MLK?
Posted by dean martin on 2008 04 22 at 07:53 AM • permalink
More seriously, nobody’s saying that Carter = Reagan = Clinton = Bush by any objective standards, just that lefties from the crowd that you tend to travel among are so deluded and so far left-of-center that those four guys apparently look functionally identical to them, as inferred from their reactions over the past few decades.
That, or it really isn’t about the Presidents themselves, but rather about some good oldfashioned anti-America hate regardless of the personalities involved. So, what’s your assessment of the crowd you’re running with; are they merely politically myopic or are they fundamentally bigoted?
- Bill Clinton stains blue dresses
Cold blooded is his wife.
Their daughter sees the newscasts,
She has the ass of life.Posted by dean martin on 2008 04 22 at 08:34 AM • permalink
….. are they merely politically myopic or are they fundamentally bigoted?
I know you asked Bryla, PW, but my response to your question is “Yes”.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 04 22 at 09:21 AM • permalink
I just voted, but not for Obama. He isn’t on the Republican ballot.
Posted by rightwingprof on 2008 04 22 at 11:23 AM • permalink
- Ass of life – huh.
Here’s a few of the former first daughter’s challengers.Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2008 04 22 at 05:26 PM • permalink
- An empty-suited waffle fan
Ward heeler, yo! He’s Oprah’s man
Sometimes answers to ‘Obama’
Apt to reply with ‘So’s Yo Mama!’
Taking on Der Hildabeast
A thankless task, to say the least
Dodged the press (waffle, ibid)
after debate, ran and hid
Tonite they count the votes in Penn.
I don’t think Waffleman can win
But he’s still swinging. He’s no quitter!
Nor rifle-clinging, white and bitter
In Chicago had a great life
Til the public heard his wife
Til the world could see his preacher
and his bomber terror-teacher
He came so far but finds it strange
That all he’s got now’s hope for change
I don’t know if this works in Australian English, but it’s not so much an “ass of life” as much as it’s a…
Rodham Bottom .
Baby got back.
Word.
Posted by zeppenwolf on 2008 04 23 at 01:00 AM • permalink
“We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men (and women) are created equal with the inalianable (sic) right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
So Bryla based on these self evident truths why aren’t you haranguing your equals in North Korea, Vietnam, China and Cuba where hundreds of millions struggle to have the freedoms that you insist on abusing.
I personally think you have had too much fun on this blog and should be sent to Coventry.
Your stupidity and hypocrisy is beyond sufferable limits.
…now urges his remaining
fansfan …fixed it