Personal matters newsworthy

-----------------------
The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info
-----------------------

Last updated on March 5th, 2018 at 01:44 pm

Sydney Morning Herald editor-in-chief Mark Scott claimed the moral high ground following last month’s John Brogdengrope/slur/sleaze/suicide bid debacle:

“These are difficult stories to cover. When John Brogden confessed to our reporter on Sunday night, confirming on the record his behaviour at that Australian Hotels Association party and his racial slur, it was clearly a major political story,” Mr Scott said.

“We gave it full page one coverage and also covered the press conference and fall-out from his resignation in comprehensive detail.

“Yesterday, however, our focus moved to the crisis facing the state Liberal Party and the leadership battle. We had only one reporter doing a follow-up in Mr Brogden’s electorate, talking to voters on their reaction to events.

“We were chasing the political story not the personal story.”

So what story is the Sydney Morning Herald chasing today?

Britain’s tabloids claim to have uncovered England’s secret weapon in the Ashes series – a woman who kept Shane Warne up all night during the fourth Test.

Julia Reynolds has told The Sun and Daily Mirror newspapers she left Warne exhausted after an all-night sex session the day before he was dismissed for a golden duck in the first innings of the Trent Bridge Test.

“Shane said he bluffed it but I’d arranged to be with him again that night and it was good sex again, though the night before had taken its toll. He was really up for it in room 811 and cricket was the last thing on his mind. He ordered a bottle of champagne with one glass, thinking that might put Ponting off the scent … “

Warne’s wife Simone recently left him after a string of affairs, many allegedly involving text messages.

And all of them reported by the SMH, which has different rules for politicians and sportsmen.

UPDATE. Alan R.M. Jones has more on media double standards.

Posted by Tim B. on 09/22/2005 at 11:33 AM
    1. the day before he was dismissed for a golden duck

      Oh, come on! I know cricket jargon is the goofiest in the world, but you’re just making shit up now.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 22 at 12:39 PM • permalink

 

    1. golden _uck

      Posted by benson swears a lot on 2005 09 22 at 12:47 PM • permalink

 

    1. Bah. Compare us to them.

      Us – Warney’s shagged out cos he’s been up all night – ahem – shagging. What a champ!

      Them – Kevin Pietersen is out all night imbibing a few apple ciders after their big win and is spotted coming out of a London club appearing to have wet himself.

      Say no more.

      Posted by James Waterton on 2005 09 22 at 01:13 PM • permalink

 

    1. All night sex! Champagne! Golden ducks! There’s obviously more to this cricket business than meets the eye. Unless, as Dave S. says, you’re just making $hit up. Of course, given my vast ignorance on the subject, you could make stuff up ‘til the golden ducks come waddling home, I’d never know.

      Posted by paco on 2005 09 22 at 01:26 PM • permalink

 

    1. #4 paco-

      Are you typing from the monastery?

      Warne’s wife Simone recently left him after a string of affairs, many allegedly involving text messages.

      OK- What a perve-he’s having affairs with text messages-this is below doing it with the duck in my estimation.

      Posted by madawaskan on 2005 09 22 at 01:54 PM • permalink

 

    1. #5:

      Mad, next you’ll be telling me they were really text “massages”. Oh, I really MUST talk the abbot into letting me check out this cricket business.

      Posted by paco on 2005 09 22 at 02:39 PM • permalink

 

    1. The shape of a zero, the score Warne made, irresistibly reminded the Victorians of a duck’s egg. He was out the first ball he faced (leg before wicket, but we won’t go there—`leg over before wicket’ was one headline for the story, `Warnie tries out his googlies’ another), which is a golden duck on the Olympic model (out for 0 second ball is a silver duck).

      Posted by Andrew R on 2005 09 22 at 06:55 PM • permalink

 

    1. “Well, we don’t have to offer him the duck.., we could just, you know, put it in the room, and if he’s interested…” — James Clavell, Shogun

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 09 22 at 07:40 PM • permalink

 

    1. You sure you don’t mean-

      Well, we don’t have to offer him the duck.., we could just, you know, put it in the room, and if he’s interested…” -James Carville, Primary Colors

      Posted by madawaskan on 2005 09 22 at 07:43 PM • permalink

 

    1. plastic duck?

      Posted by fred1922 on 2005 09 22 at 07:47 PM • permalink

 

    1. #7

      i’ve never heard of a silver duck……what about a 9th ball duck…..zinc duck??

      Posted by vinny on 2005 09 22 at 07:52 PM • permalink

 

    1. Any duck after six balls is called a Tavare.

      Posted by Andrew R on 2005 09 22 at 08:06 PM • permalink

 

    1. How come they don’t get hats any more when they pull a hat trick?

      Posted by kae on 2005 09 22 at 08:07 PM • permalink

 

    1. I like Warnie more and more each day. He is obviously doing his best to emulate the great Keith Miller.
      As for media double standards – its not just the journalists/editors who are at it. Check out the SMH polls sometime.
      When Brogden and Justin Harrison made racially offensive remarks the Herald readers wanted them sacked. Sartor? Last time I looked it was running 50:50.
      Chatterers can rationalise any issue. Their morals are that fluid.

      Posted by Harold on 2005 09 22 at 09:03 PM • permalink

 

    1. The shape of a zero, the score Warne made, irresistibly reminded the Victorians of a duck’s egg. He was out the first ball he faced (leg before wicket, but we won’t go there—`leg over before wicket’ was one headline for the story, `Warnie tries out his googlies’ another), which is a golden duck on the Olympic model (out for 0 second ball is a silver duck).

      Oh, well, that clears it right up.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 22 at 09:06 PM • permalink

 

    1. I can’t let this go –

      If it reminded them of a duck’s egg, because it looked like a duck’s egg, then why did they call it a duck? Why didn’t they call it an egg? It doesn’t look like a freakin’ duck!

      This is like that damn rhyming slang.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 22 at 09:12 PM • permalink

 

    1. `Duck’, short for `duck’s egg’. `Pair’, short for `pair of spectacles’ (two ducks). `Maiden’, short for `maiden over’. Surely American English sometimes uses the first word of a familiar phrase to stand for the phrase.

      Posted by Andrew R on 2005 09 22 at 09:20 PM • permalink

 

    1. `Duck’, short for `duck’s egg’. `Pair’, short for `pair of spectacles’ (two ducks). `Maiden’, short for `maiden over’. Surely American English sometimes uses the first word of a familiar phrase to stand for the phrase.

      Oh, sure. In American football, a touchdown is worth 6 points (7 after the PAT). A 6 looks like an upside-down apostrophe, so it’s called an “upside.” Two sixes look like a Route 66 sign, so a two-touchdown game is a “route.” Three touchdowns (an exceptional performance,) or 666, is the Mark of the Beast, so it’s a “mark.” A player is happy to get an upside, thrilled to get a route, and ecstatic about a mark.

      The whole team is credited likewise, so for example, the Falcons could defeat the Bears two routes and a redneck* to an upside, or 17-7.

      *redneck, from “redneck grin”, or a field goal.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 22 at 10:39 PM • permalink

 

    1. Of course any player would be thrilled to get a route.  Especially if they’ve been married as long as I have.

      Posted by slammer on 2005 09 23 at 12:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. I loved Alan Jones’s designation of Latham as “the anti-Howard.” It should be immortalised.

      Posted by Susan Norton on 2005 09 23 at 01:25 AM • permalink

 

    1. When the media shows a prurient interest in the sex lives of politicans, the chance to cause political embarassment is the principal motivation. But when the scandal involves sportsmen, the purpose is to provdie readers with pure titillation. This is because most sportsmen are young, fit, in peak athletic condition and usually good-looking. Nobody puts themselves in the place of a middle-aged, balding, overweight politican shagging some dolly all night; but when a footballer does it, we’re full of admiration and envy. There but for the spite of God, etc.

      When Matty Johns mentioned on the Sydney
      Footy Showrecently, the size of RL player, Jason Ryles’ dick, a frisson of excitement went through the studio audience. We all want to know our sporting heros are well-hung. But mention Mark Latham’s shrivelled member, and the reaction is one of disgust. That’s the way it goes.

      Posted by mr magoo on 2005 09 23 at 01:28 AM • permalink

 

    1. Well Mr Magoo i know you used the qualifier “most” but I’m still trying to connect the words “young, fit, in peak athletic condition and usually good-looking” with old puddin’ Warney. Not having much luck.

      Posted by Francis H on 2005 09 23 at 04:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. Francis H try -celebrity.In a sporting fashion at least.
      Dave S,isn’t it obvious,a maiden over is one in which the batsmen don’t score.
      A googly is a particular way of bowling (or delivering it).

      Posted by crash on 2005 09 23 at 06:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. Even when they get stuck into Warney and other celebs over extra-curricular activities, it is with a self-righteous head-tilt to the poor wife.

      And then they splash this – as if poor Mrs W hasn’t suffered enough!

      Posted by Flying Giraffe on 2005 09 23 at 07:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. The whole team is credited likewise, so for example, the Falcons could defeat the Bears two routes and a redneck* to an upside, or 17-7.

      Errm, two routes and a redneck are 31 points, of course.

      Posted by PW on 2005 09 23 at 08:14 AM • permalink

 

    1. Right you are, sir – I originally typed “two upsides and a redneck” and thought, “How silly, two upsides are a route”, then botched the edit.

      You would, of course, say “two routes” rather than “a yachtrace” only if one or more of the tarpapers was muffed or they went for deuce instead. It would be silly otherwise.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 23 at 11:48 AM • permalink

 

    1. BTW, cricket is how Britain maintained its Empire. Its subjects were so confused by trying to decipher its jargon that they were kept from planning rebellions. That’s why we said “Fuck it” and invented baseball.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 23 at 11:55 AM • permalink

 

    1. Come on Dave, you should know all the founding fathers were into cricket in a big way.

      I believe John Adams even used it to make an analogy about the Constitution.

      Of course, said analogy was, “Hey, none of us understands Cricket, but we still love it, right?”

      Posted by Quentin George on 2005 09 23 at 08:10 PM • permalink

 

    1. #19, slammer, is that spelling intentional? I nearly wet myself laughing!

      ROFL! I’ve got a spare melways if you need assistance.

      Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2005 09 24 at 09:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. OK, I know the “root” thing. But “melways”?

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 24 at 09:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. Melways is the ultimate Melbourne street directory. You can have your UBD or your Gregory’s, but when you are down here, you want Melways.

      The best thing about it is that it’s in scale.

      And I have a 2005 one.

      I love my melways.

      Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2005 09 24 at 10:00 AM • permalink

 

    1. Ah, so it’s like a DeLorme here in Maine.

      The best thing about it is that it’s in scale.

      So’s mine. It’s 1:1. When I use it the whole state goes dark.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2005 09 24 at 12:59 PM • permalink

 

Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the “pending” list and you won’t be able to log in. All accounts that are “pending” for more than one week will be deleted.