The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info -----------------------
Last updated on August 8th, 2017 at 05:18 pm
It’s waxual harassment at Madame Tussauds!
(Via reader Alex)
- Most guys would have done the same … if only for the photo!Posted by blogstrop on 2006 11 27 at 07:49 AM • permalink
- Hmmmm.
1. To my knowledge the wax dummies are not anatomically correct. Mainly because there’s no reason to.
2. But a *porn star* wax museum probably would have to be and would probably offer a greater visitor draw than the regular one would.
3. Note to self; do not share potentially litigious photos with girlfriend because if she becomes an ex-girlfriend she’ll have reason for getting my ass in real trouble.
Posted by memomachine on 2006 11 27 at 09:04 AM • permalink
- KK, and jow do you know?Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2006 11 27 at 09:13 AM • permalink
- Looks to me like Bryan was just doing what every tourist does at Madame Tussaud’s. I remember being proudly photographed giving the Pierce-Brosnan-as-007 statue bunny ears (hey, I was twelve) and my brother has a photograph of him pretending to push the wax Manuel (from Fawlty Towers) over the railing.
The difference here is that this fellow was touching the exhibits, so to speak. Geez, how desperate do you have to be to smooch a wax Kylie Minogue?
Posted by Tungsten Monk on 2006 11 27 at 10:45 AM • permalink
- I dunno, what with all the plastic surgery and idiocy going on these days in Hollywood, who can tell the difference between an entertainer and a wax dummy?Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 11 27 at 11:03 AM • permalink
- Touche’, paco!Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 11 27 at 11:51 AM • permalink
- Memo to employees: Getting hot n’ heavy with waxworks will end in a mess.Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2006 11 27 at 09:46 PM • permalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Members: