Narrowsheet

-----------------------
The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info
-----------------------

Last updated on August 6th, 2017 at 05:34 am

Shrinkage at the SMH:

The size of The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper will be reduced from its current broadsheet size next year as part of a significant restructure by publisher Fairfax Media.

The changes will include another round of redundancies at the SMH and The Sun-Herald, the third in less than 3 years.

Under the change, the current A3 height of the SMH and its sister publication, The Age, will remain the same – as will the price – but the width of the pages will be cut.

Never mind the quality …

Posted by Tim B. on 04/25/2007 at 09:40 PM
    1. They’re going to foolscap.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 04 25 at 10:48 PM • permalink

 

    1. Ich bin ein Berliner.

      Posted by Phranger on 2007 04 25 at 10:56 PM • permalink

 

    1. Anyone can tell you that width is just as important as length.

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 04 25 at 11:06 PM • permalink

 

    1. I think consumers would get much better use out of both the SMH and The Age if the paper came on a cardboard roll with perforated edges for ripping bits off.

      Posted by Hank Reardon on 2007 04 25 at 11:11 PM • permalink

 

    1. The fish n’ chip and bird cage industry have been rocked by this heartless downsizing.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 04 25 at 11:13 PM • permalink

 

    1. #2
      Ich bin ein Binliner?

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 25 at 11:14 PM • permalink

 

    1. The changes will include another round of redundancies at the SMH and The Sun-Herald, the third in less than 3 years.

      Wonder what the ‘root causes’ are on that one, fuckers?

      Strange that they are not trumpeting the smaller size as a response to our impending climatic doom.

      Posted by Nic on 2007 04 25 at 11:17 PM • permalink

 

    1. #7 my thoughts exactly.  My boss alway manages to at least give the appearance of a polished turd, why not he SMH?

      (it will save paper, thus helping gaia!)

      Posted by entropy on 2007 04 25 at 11:20 PM • permalink

 

    1. He said the company had not finalised what the new size would be although The New York Times was cited as an example of the type of narrower broadsheet that Fairfax is paying “particular attention” to.

      What? Ideas imposed from the USA? Shouldn’t they be ‘butting out’ of Australian work practices?

      “Fairfax said it will cut up to 35 production staff from the Herald and Sun-Herald as part of a reintregration of production staff across the two papers.

      “This will greatly streamline production and achieve greater quality and efficiency,’’ Mr Kirk said.

      WTF? The usual bleeding hearts opposing Howard’s evil IR laws, are wait for it, using these laws for their own gain. They could always have the courage of their convictions and………….

      Posted by Nic on 2007 04 25 at 11:24 PM • permalink

 

    1. Just so long as there is no compromise on softness and absorbency.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 04 25 at 11:34 PM • permalink

 

    1. I’m surprised they didn’t downsize to an A4 double-sided piece of recycled paper.

      Posted by Ash_ on 2007 04 25 at 11:38 PM • permalink

 

    1. The changes will include another round of redundancies

      Oh, my mistake – I thought they meant that either the Age or the SMH was going to be closed. Entirely.  Aren’t they redundant?

      Posted by Major John on 2007 04 25 at 11:46 PM • permalink

 

    1. Curse you, Hank, you caught me in mid-type…

      But maybe they could put out a softer two-ply edition!  hah~!

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 04 25 at 11:48 PM • permalink

 

    1. If they want to boost circulation, perhaps the SMH should consider a merger with a more successful and credible newspaper? The Green Left Weekly comes to mind.

      Posted by Art Vandelay on 2007 04 25 at 11:48 PM • permalink

 

    1. Sheryl Crow may want to make use of the leftover bits.

      Posted by north01 on 2007 04 25 at 11:59 PM • permalink

 

    1. They reduce the size but the price stays the same.  I have lodged a complaint with the ACCC on price gouging.  Fancy announcing publicly you will deliver a smaller product and expect me to pay the exact same price as the previous, larger, more useful product.  Almost as bad as reducing toilet roll sheets and claiming improved performance!

      Posted by peter m on 2007 04 26 at 12:09 AM • permalink

 

    1. #13.
      Richard, I’m sure we aren’t the only two people to think along those lines.
      Another use I gleened when I was about 12 years old (true story) was when my dad purchased a couple of editions of the SMH. Confused at the interruption to his routine of buying The Telegraph I asked him why he was buying a different newspaper now. His reply “thought they would make good drop sheets for painting the laundry and bathroom”

      Posted by Hank Reardon on 2007 04 26 at 12:13 AM • permalink

 

    1. The narrow format should match their narrow minds perfectly.

      Posted by Bonmot on 2007 04 26 at 12:13 AM • permalink

 

    1. Fairfax said it will cut up to 35 production staff from the Herald and Sun-Herald as part of a reintregration of production staff across the two papers.

      Looks like they’ve already sacked a proofreader.

      Posted by ilibcc on 2007 04 26 at 12:21 AM • permalink

 

    1. FauxFacts Lite edition?

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 12:24 AM • permalink

 

    1. Never mind the quality …

      that cut’s already happened.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 12:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. Two ply or three ply, it’d be much better without the print – no more black streaks on your arse.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 12:29 AM • permalink

 

    1. O/T
      I hate it when you shut a spreadsheet and you forget to save it.

      *sigh*

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 12:31 AM • permalink

 

    1. Is this what Australians call “cutting the cheese”?

      Posted by andycanuck on 2007 04 26 at 12:34 AM • permalink

 

    1. David Kirk’s speech reads like a random jargon generator. His conclusion:

      And at the end of the day, we will move forward together.

      That’s positively Churchillian.

      Posted by ilibcc on 2007 04 26 at 12:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. #25
      And at the end of the day, we will move forward together.

      Leaving the smallest room in the house with FauxFacts sheets behind us …

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 12:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. And at the end of the day, we will move forward together.

      So, did he use any of the following:

      going forward
      at this point in time
      ladder of opportunity

      or so many more which right now escape me…

      look here.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 12:42 AM • permalink

 

    1. I’d love a dollar for every time
      move forward
      is uttered around the world every day by brain dead middle management.

      Posted by Bonmot on 2007 04 26 at 12:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. #28, sometimes they say “going forward”.

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 04 26 at 12:45 AM • permalink

 

    1. Corporate definitions.

      More boardroom bingo.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 12:45 AM • permalink

 

    1. Weasel Words Ripped My Flesh! – more boardroom bull.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 12:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. Some of the staff are coming to that fork-in-the-road where the company is right-sized …

      Moving forward, let’s play buzzword bingo …

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 12:49 AM • permalink

 

    1. A couple of weeks ago I warned (jokingly, of course!) that the SMH had jumped right past Tabloid to Comic. Looks like they are going to do it in stages, after all.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2007 04 26 at 12:49 AM • permalink

 

    1. And at the end of the day, we will move forward together while we stay sharply focused on the big picture and conscious of the end-game.

      Posted by Bonmot on 2007 04 26 at 12:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. I’ll do one post.
      Just cause.

      Fairfax, don’t wash in hot water!

      Posted by 1.618 on 2007 04 26 at 12:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. Egg_ and bonmot

      Well don, you have it down pat.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 01:05 AM • permalink

 

    1. With all that “moving forward” perhaps David Kirk thinks he is still captain of the All Blecks and scrumhalf behind a dominant forward pack.

      Posted by craigo on 2007 04 26 at 01:16 AM • permalink

 

    1. #36
      Ta

      Our friends at the Age
      With not so many a sage
      And smaller page
      To line the bird cage

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 01:19 AM • permalink

 

    1. David Kirk: Look, there’s no doubt this is a rebuilding year. We’re nursing some nagging injuries, but at the end of the day, when all is said and done, we’re just taking it one edition at a time. The intangibles will be the key to our rebuilding, and never let it be said that circulation statistics aren’t misleading. This is a game for the ages and remember we don’t play these games on paper. All I’m asking for is 110% committment from everyone and the results will speak for themselves.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 04 26 at 01:23 AM • permalink

 

    1. #39 IT

      show off.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 01:28 AM • permalink

 

    1. Here’s an SMH-letters writer in love with managerial platitudes:

      Roll on, election day

      The Herald carries a remarkable paragraph. Is the quote from Menzies, Whitlam, Curtin or Keating? Here it is: “Australia at its best would see every single individual, irrespective of their gender or race or ability or country of origin, achieving their full potential and using their greatest strengths in the service of something bigger than they are, that they believe in.”

      Inspiring and reassuring? These words were spoken by Therese Rein, the wife of the aspiring prime minister (“If Rudd wins, his wife will run the empire – her own”, April 24). Bring on the election, because we need to see more of this woman.

      S.M.E. Wright Woollahra

      This guy would have hours of entertainment if he just googled mission statement generator.

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 04 26 at 01:52 AM • permalink

 

    1. Captain Kirk
      Shirks no work
      He’s no jerk:
      Without fear or favour
      Shows no bias towards Labor

      /sarc

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 01:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. #41- Typical of the sort of dolt who reads the SMH- he/she/it wants to see and hear more from a woman who isn’t running for election. If the unthinkable happens and Kevni weasels his way into the Lodge, his missus would be best advised to shut the fuck up, no-one voted for you and therefore no-one is interested in what you think.

      I’d say separation/divorce would be on the cards anyway, as she’s not bailing out of her taxpayer funded cash cow.

      what she should have said was “Australia at its best would see every single individual, irrespective of their gender or race or ability or country of origin, achieving their full potential and using their greatest strengths in the service of something bigger than they are, that they believe in- like signing up for my dodgy employment agency- I’ve got a hankering for a solid gold bidet, and hubby could do with a personality implant.”

      Posted by Habib on 2007 04 26 at 02:09 AM • permalink

 

    1. And now for some good news—

      Controversial US rapper Snoop Dogg is being denied entry to Australia after failing a character test, the federal government says.
      The cancellation of the rapper, record producer and actor’s visa means he will not be able to appear at the MTV Australian Video Music Awards this weekend, as planned.

      Herald-Sun

      Posted by walterplinge on 2007 04 26 at 02:10 AM • permalink

 

    1. #43 Habib,

      I’d say separation/divorce would be on the cards anyway,

      Wow.  Do you reckon she’ll have to sleep in the car with the kids?

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 04 26 at 02:11 AM • permalink

 

    1. Slightly O/T, but does anyone else share my belief that shaking hands with the Attack Squirrel would be very similar to fondling an eel fillet?

      Posted by Habib on 2007 04 26 at 02:12 AM • permalink

 

    1. Changing the size of these publications and not some of the content, will do . . . .?
      Wait for it, Goebbel Warming, has made us do it.
      Along with the redundancies, I would say it is more about economic necessity than public convenience.

      Posted by BJM on 2007 04 26 at 02:12 AM • permalink

 

    1. If sheikh el Hillbilly can come and go as he pleases, why not da Shizzle? After all he doesn’t as overtly promote violence and has a better attitude to bitches an’ hoes.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 04 26 at 02:14 AM • permalink

 

    1. Real class, this family—

      The mother of David Hicks’s children will face court this afternoon following a pub brawl.

      Jodie Sparrow, 34, was allegedly involved in an altercation during a night out at a tavern in the outer Adelaide suburb of Salisbury in 2005.

      …She met Hicks when she was 17 – in 1992 at a rodeo north of Adelaide.

      …They separated in 1996 and Ms Sparrow says she has had no contact with the father of their children since 1999

      Here.

      Posted by walterplinge on 2007 04 26 at 02:18 AM • permalink

 

    1. #49- no risk at least of Hicksie becoming embroiled in such bogan relaxations, his adoption of the prophet would proscribe him from pubs (except to maybe blow up some beery infidels).

      Posted by Habib on 2007 04 26 at 02:26 AM • permalink

 

    1. #48
      On the money, as usual …

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 02:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. On the topic of newspapers, this photo is on The Australian’s website’s front page. It’s natural to focus on the face when looking at a person, but divert your attention the the ear and neck region. *shudder*

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 04 26 at 03:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. #8 entropy

      #7 my thoughts exactly.  My boss alway manages to at least give the appearance of a polished turd, why not he SMH?

      (it will save paper, thus helping gaia!)

      I hope your boss uses only one square when polishing!

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 04 26 at 03:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. #52 That should be “to the ear and neck region”. It seems that, after all, preview is not my friend.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 04 26 at 03:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. #41,

      Will we see arch-capitalist Mrs Rudd be subjected to the same scorn Janette Howard has received. After all, aren’t both women making ‘choices’?

      Posted by Nic on 2007 04 26 at 03:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. Totally OT (although it is in a newspaper – is that a save?): Japan ‘gave GIs comfort women’

      I was going to say that this revelation should stop the Democrats in congress being so self-righteous towards Japan, but then realised that they’ll just view it as another reason to hate the U.S.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 04 26 at 03:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. I knew the Geelong Advertiser would blow smh out of the water.

      Posted by dean martin on 2007 04 26 at 03:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. #49 Walterplinge

      The mother of David Hicks’s children will face court this afternoon following a pub brawl

      What do you reckon are her chances of getting some of that Hicks high power silk and legal big guns to do a bit of pro bono for her?

      Nil? Yeah, I thought so too.

      Posted by Bonmot on 2007 04 26 at 05:11 AM • permalink

 

    1. O/T but the leftoids have penned another wankfest in theatre land. Written by a chap who writes for the Gaurdian so you know it will be heavy on the “truthiness”.

      Usual crap, if the facts dont fit, make them up.
      Might be as big a hit as the “Dancing Davo show”  was here in Oz with its audience of 25.

      Also an older one shown on Channel 4 in the UK.

      Seems to be a few of these about, I suspect Progressive Artist Co-operative Organisation is behind this lot.

      Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2007 04 26 at 05:32 AM • permalink

 

    1. #52 MZ, was that photo from the Special Olympics, category Grossly Deformed?

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 04 26 at 05:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. Retrench me, retrench me, retrench me. Yes, deep inside the good ship Fairfax I am waiting for the new captain Brian McCarthy, formerly of the SS Rural Press, to step aboard and hand out our redundancy slips. It will be a blessing.

      Alas, there are so many others with their beaks open like a nest full of baby starlings it leaves you wondering about the loyalty of the Fairfax crew.

      Posted by Contrail on 2007 04 26 at 05:57 AM • permalink

 

    1. #61 Contrail, I am deeply shocked to hear of this. I had a mental image of fairfaxian esprit de corps, of ideological effervescence overflowing the glass, of stolid yeomen yeopersons of the press, no doubt members of various “Australian Working Families” (a group invoked frequently by the family-less ALP spokeswoman – it is another image hard to grasp, perhaps a bit like a rugby scrum: mum and dad front row forwards, eldest daughter as hooker, siblings as second row and lock, grandma and pa as breakaways) – and now you tell me Fairfax employees are just like all the rest?
      I’m shocked to the core.
      Next you’ll be saying that the ALP only want governement because the lurks, the prestige, and the pay are all better.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2007 04 26 at 06:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. # 62,

      eldest daughter as hooker.

      Sounds like Fairfax to me.

      Posted by Nic on 2007 04 26 at 06:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. #62 – I’d like to see a line-out to that bunch…

      Posted by Major John on 2007 04 26 at 08:48 AM • permalink

 

    1. I’m not surprised that liberal newspapers are finding a constantly shrinking circulation.  The same thing is happening with liberal news shows.

      Yet conservative newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal find it’s readership steadily increasing.  Same with conservative news shows such as FOX News.

      People want the facts.  Not a liberal organization’s opinion of what the facts are.

      Posted by wronwright on 2007 04 26 at 09:15 AM • permalink

 

    1. Shrinkage at the SMH:

      Stay away from cold water. George Costanza had the same problem on the Seinfeld show.

      Posted by El Cid on 2007 04 26 at 09:22 AM • permalink

 

    1. Muzzie—East German Women’s Olympic Swimming Team.  Old pic.

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 04 26 at 09:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. thisis wonderful news – less space for the worthless opinionizing that passes for news at the smage

      Posted by KK on 2007 04 26 at 09:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. In conjunction with the introduction of the narrowed page sizes, Fairfax Media is planning to shorten its name to Fax Media and get into an alternative distribution model.

      Posted by PW on 2007 04 26 at 12:23 PM • permalink

 

    1. Maybe they’re trying to conserve on profit, like the New York Times.

      They’ve managed a 48% reduction in their stock price over 3 years.  If they could come up with a diet that does that, they would have a winner.

      Posted by MarkD on 2007 04 26 at 12:44 PM • permalink

 

    1. they will have a problem if their conservative commentators- Miranda Devine, Paul Sheehan, Gerard Henderson, et al either jump or are pushed. The pretense of having balanced commentary will be stripped away and they’ll drift rapidly further left.
      But I hope that doesn’t happen because those people make the paper worth a gander from time to time.

      Posted by daddy dave on 2007 04 26 at 05:00 PM • permalink

 

    1. I guess they’re following the example of Charmin toilet paper. Appropriate.

      Posted by JimC on 2007 04 26 at 05:01 PM • permalink

 

    1. #69

      In conjunction with the introduction of the narrowed page sizes, Fairfax Media is planning to shorten its name to Faux Media and get into an alternative distribution model.

      Fixed.

      Posted by kae on 2007 04 26 at 05:34 PM • permalink

 

    1. #6: Berliner is trade lingo for a long, narrow newspaper format. The Guardian switched to it some time ago, now the Age appears aping that rag’s dimensions in addition to its politics.

      Posted by Phranger on 2007 04 26 at 06:58 PM • permalink

 

    1. #62

      Beneath the bloated pink elite at Fairax are ordinary working folk who go in every day because they are paid to. They are not part of the crusade for a world ruled by a triumverate of gays, jihadists and trade unionists.

      Posted by Contrail on 2007 04 26 at 08:42 PM • permalink

 

    1. SMH stands for: Shrinking Morning Herald

      Buy a copy Today! Sponsored by Cold Power!

      El-cid you got it! lol

      Posted by 1.618 on 2007 04 26 at 09:12 PM • permalink

 

    1. #75, Contrail,

      You are right. My annoyance at Fairfax and its agenda is not ameliorated by banners such as ‘I’m Kevin and I’m here to help’ followed by this  photograph that is quite different from that of the giggling transvestite of late, emphasising rather,his ‘saintliness’

      Posted by Nic on 2007 04 26 at 10:12 PM • permalink

 

    1. #74
      Tks for the info
      (U got my recycled pun on Kennedy’s speech, no doubt).

      Posted by egg_ on 2007 04 26 at 11:22 PM • permalink

 

    1. Shrinkage is always a problem.

      Posted by Hump B Bare on 2007 04 27 at 04:58 AM • permalink

 

Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.