The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info -----------------------
Last updated on June 15th, 2017 at 12:13 pm
Ted Lapkin replies to duck-drawing civilian advocate and Osama appeaser Michael Leunig:
Leunig seems to believe that any policy that results in harm to civilians is inherently unjust. But this logic would invalidate the Union cause during the American Civil War because Georgian civilians suffered during Sherman’s march to the sea. It would also deem the invasion of Normandy illegitimate because thousands of French civilians perished during the 1944 campaign to liberate Europe from Nazi tyranny. And this same line of reasoning would contend that there is no moral difference between the death of a Belgian child inadvertently killed by Allied artillery, and the death of a Jewish child in the gas chambers of Auschwitz. After all, a dead civilian is a dead civilian.
And a brain-dead civilian scratches out things like this. If a hospitalised heart-attack victim produced something similar, even Pope Benedict himself would yank out the feeding tube.
- This thread will NOT be complete without spongemonkeys.
- That was awesome.Posted by Aging Gamer on 04/26 at 10:41 PM • permalink
Memo to Lapkin: Give it up. Preach to the choir if you must, but otherwise just sit back and marvel at the colossal stupidity of the LLL drones.