Just swords? what, no walnuts?

-----------------------
The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info
-----------------------

Last updated on August 8th, 2017 at 04:54 pm

The Jerusalem Post reports:

A hitherto unknown group calling itself the Just Swords of Islam issued a warning to Palestinian women in the Gaza Strip over the weekend that they must wear the hijab or face being targeted by the group’s members.

Whose own faces aren’t all bagged up inside Islamic freedom sacks.

In pamphlets distributed in various parts of the Gaza Strip, the group also claimed responsibility for attacks on 12 Internet cafes over the past few days.

Not exactly modern types, our Just Swords of Islam.

The group said its followers last week threw acid at the face of a young woman who was dressed “immodestly” in the center of Gaza City. They also destroyed a car belonging to a young man who was playing his radio tape too loudly.

These “Just Sword” people sound like the grouchy old guy at the end of the street who’s a little too protective of his lawn. Although even he rarely throws acid at the immodestly-dressed.

Addressing female students, the group said: “We will have no mercy on any woman who violates the traditions of Islam and who also hang out in Internet cafes.”

Hanging out is forbidden, yet hanging is encouraged for the lamest of “crimes”. The Western left will demand action over this, surely.

Posted by Tim B. on 12/04/2006 at 11:33 AM
    1. A hitherto unknown group calling itself the Just Swords of Islam issued a warning to Palestinian women in the Gaza Strip over the weekend that they must wear the hijab or face being targeted by the group’s members.

      Targeted with what? Oh, I get it. The “swords” bit is phallic. This is a rape gang pre-emptively justifying any and all sexual assaults they intend to engage in.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2006 12 04 at 11:44 AM • permalink

 

    1. Any comments from the usual leftards?  Or are they too busy buying burqas?

      Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 04 at 11:45 AM • permalink

 

    1. Aw, fundy Islamic cultures are so cute and authentic and everything, aren’t they?

      Posted by Patricia on 2006 12 04 at 11:45 AM • permalink

 

    1. Reading this, I honestly don’t know who I am more furious at: Muslims or the lefties that defend them. How can any sane person not see that it truly is us against them? Its like cancer on steroids and its spreading faster than Madonna’s thighs. Sooner or later (with sooner being most likely) the West is going to be faced with the line in the sand.  And I pray to God that He’ll give into my hands some of the acid throwing chicken bastards. I swear I’ll make the SOB beg me to throw acid in his. A cockroach deserves more mercy.

      Posted by Texas Bob on 2006 12 04 at 11:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. A hitherto unknown group calling itself the Just Swords of Islam . . .

      Maybe the “Teeny Dicks of Islam” would be more appropriate. What, did these guys get so tired of being smacked around by the IDF that they’ve donned their wife-beater t-shirts and decided to go after their own womenfolk in a futile attempt to bolster their delusions of virility? You guys are L-O-S-E-R-S, get it? It’s been spelled out for you, now; deal with it.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 04 at 11:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. Islamic freedom sacks

      I am so stealing that.  Also “Teeny Dicks of Islam”.  Thanks, guys, reading this blog is like opening up Christmas presents every day.

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 12 04 at 11:58 AM • permalink

 

    1. And here’s more evidence of Muslim radicals and their commitment to free speech.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 04 at 12:06 PM • permalink

 

    1. Infidel!  You spread the rumor that the Just Swords go about without our faces covered?  But I say to you, the Lions of Islam are brave enough to wear masks whenever we go outside.  Indeed, and the bravest among us don’t even go out very much!  Like brother Nasrallah, who even now is steadfast in his hiding.  Or Abu Saddam, who stoutly sat quietly in his hole hoping the Americans would pass by and not see him.  Or great Osama, who you sometimes hear about but who has the courage to not let anyone know where he is.  Yes, you hear him sometimes, but see him not, yet if he came out he would certainly startle you.  In this, he is like the boldest of field mice that you hear in the walls sometimes.

      Yes, and now we have progressed beyond our earlier feats of hiding and running away from the Jews and Americans, and have moved to threatening unarmed women!  If there be any among you who can match the courage of the Arab Warrior, please please please don’t hurt us, we were only kidding.

      Posted by bgates on 2006 12 04 at 12:11 PM • permalink

 

    1. Well, to be fair to the Just Swords, I do like their policy on car radios.  When my teeth are rattling because some twit has his 1000 watt stereo cranked up to 11, I favor a policy of destroying that car.

      On the other hand, I like immodestly dressed women.

      Posted by rbj1 on 2006 12 04 at 12:13 PM • permalink

 

    1. #9: I see your point; that kind of insensitive lout bothers me, too. Maybe it would be better all the way ‘round if these fellows formed a group called, say, the Just Swords of the Volume Control Knob, and just leave the immodestly-dressed women to us alone.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 04 at 12:18 PM • permalink

 

    1. Mrrrggrrhhm. I’m growing blue hair and morphing into Marge Simpson. Only Homie on a bad trip would be as stupid as the Just Swords of Islam. Aren’t we over these idiots yet? I certainly am. Wish them all a merry Christmas and may the reindeer piss on their heads.

      Posted by mareeS on 2006 12 04 at 12:56 PM • permalink

 

    1. In the west if you have a problem with seeing women, you just wear blinkers or move somewhere really quiet, in the regions inhabited by the koranimals they throw acid at the women.

      Somehow I just doubt the two “systems” can get along.

      Posted by Rob Read on 2006 12 04 at 01:00 PM • permalink

 

    1. Swords R Us of Islam… Pricks, every one of them.

      Posted by Latino on 2006 12 04 at 01:04 PM • permalink

 

    1. Well, I fell better now. I vented my frustration on one of our muslim local nationals who cleans the toilets by introducing him to the American custom know as The Swirly
      What the heck does فباسم الله ، هذا هو المجنون الامريكى mean anyhow?

      Posted by Texas Bob on 2006 12 04 at 01:11 PM • permalink

 

    1. Just Swords of the Volume Control Knob

      I think just calling them the Knobs of Islam pretty well sums it all up.

      Posted by R C Dean on 2006 12 04 at 01:12 PM • permalink

 

    1. #11: Wish them all a merry Christmas and may the reindeer piss on their heads. What a great Christmas carol that would make!

      #15: It does, indeed, sum them up! LOL!

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 04 at 01:27 PM • permalink

 

    1. Just Swords?
      Sounds like a new shop at the mall. Some jihadi will wander in looking for an AK-47 or some semtex and he’ll be told, “Sorry, we only carry swords. Dueling swords, military swords, beheading swords. Just swords.”

      Posted by Merlin on 2006 12 04 at 01:33 PM • permalink

 

    1. #17 Merlin: What that guy wants is Swords ‘n Things, on the upper level, next to Banana Republic.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 04 at 01:51 PM • permalink

 

    1. Must be Presbyterians.

      Posted by PW on 2006 12 04 at 02:31 PM • permalink

 

    1. Any comments from the usual leftards?

      Oh, I’m sure “whyisitso” will be coming by any minute now to wonder where the Palestinian police is in all this.

      Posted by PW on 2006 12 04 at 02:34 PM • permalink

 

    1. GIVE THEM A STATE!!!!!!!!!

      Posted by stats on 2006 12 04 at 02:36 PM • permalink

 

    1. They also destroyed a car belonging to a young man who was playing his radio tape too loudly.

      Even a broken clock is right twice a day…

      Posted by Dave S. on 2006 12 04 at 02:43 PM • permalink

 

    1. Islamism is an extreme maledom cult without the bourbon, black leather vests and any real attraction to women.  Allah is the ultimate Master/Dominator whose man-slaves bow to him in homo-erotic rears in the air devotion.

      While I’m no arch feminist, I think it’d help if we all start referring to Allah as a She, just to confuse their sexual kink and gender attitudes.  Her will be done and so forth.

      Posted by Cat on 2006 12 04 at 02:57 PM • permalink

 

    1. Oh, I’m sure “whyisitso” will be coming by any minute now to wonder where the Palestinian police is in all this.

      Well, I’m equally sure whyisitso will be glad to find out where the real thugs and schoolyard bullies are.

      Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 04 at 03:03 PM • permalink

 

    1. How long till the inevitable splinter group called Islamic Swords of Justice appears?

      Posted by PW on 2006 12 04 at 03:23 PM • permalink

 

    1. Man, these guys know what to do with forks!

      Posted by Rafe on 2006 12 04 at 04:13 PM • permalink

 

    1. #14 Texas Bob: we’ll have to get MentalFloss to confirm this, but I believe he was thanking you for the shampoo and rinse.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 04 at 04:40 PM • permalink

 

    1. Is it any wonder that the only voices we hear out of the Muslim community with the courage to speak out against terrorism come, in the main, from the women—at least those who made it to some place safe before being murdered by the goat-lovin’ knobs passing themselves off as human men.  It enrages me that they still have to fight for their very lives here in the west, where the rabid voices of the “hear me roar” feminist movement—who so bravely go on and on about their viginas in front of all the world—stay mute about their mutilated “sisters”.

      Of course, there are few of these women, given the Darwinian practice of eliminating any female of the species who dares to open her mouth in protest at being treated like chattel.  Is it really surprising that those who manage to make it past puberty feel that a burqa offers them safety and freedom?  Pavlov could have learned a thing or two from this culture.

      Posted by saltydog on 2006 12 04 at 04:56 PM • permalink

 

    1. Is it any wonder that the only voices we hear out of the Muslim community with the courage to speak out against terrorism come, in the main, from the women—at least those who made it to some place safe before being murdered by the goat-lovin’ knobs passing themselves off as human men.

      Because Islam is sanctified mysogyny (in ways even the most misguided “Christians” could only wish for). How many Muslim men are going to willingly give up that position of dominance? Speaking of “dominance”, why do you think Islam has become so popular in prisons?

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2006 12 04 at 05:18 PM • permalink

 

    1. I think the solution is simple. Hand guns for all Palestinian women. Let’s see these jerk-offs try to perform these barbaric acts when they’re being shot at. And, let’s see them abuse and repress their women when they’re armed.

      Posted by Nicholas on 2006 12 04 at 05:52 PM • permalink

 

    1. And as always, when Palestinians are murdered by other Palestinians, you can bet you will hear their deaths used as anti-Israel propaganda: “100000000000 Palestinians have died since the conflict began, versus only 4 Israelis and an Israeli goat who was slightly wounded as a result of the Palestinians home-made toy Tonka Rockets.”.

      Context means nothing.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2006 12 04 at 05:52 PM • permalink

 

    1. The Jerusalem Post reports

      Well of course it does. You wouldn’t read it here. The Syrian Sydney Morning Herald reports:

      Israeli troops kill one Palestinian

      screams the headline which continues:

      Israeli troops have shot dead a Palestinian civilian during a raid in the West Bank to arrest a militant, Palestinian security sources say.

      Of course if you continue reading six long paragraphs, after the bit about the coffee shop and the civilian bystanders, you’ll see a passing mention that the person shot was a wanted terrorist armed with a gun. You know – a civilian (according to “Palestinian sources”) Not exactly sitting there sipping his latte.

      Thanks Fairfax for more balanced reporting on those charming Palestinian victims of Israeli brutality…

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2006 12 04 at 06:09 PM • permalink

 

    1. “GIVE THEM A STATE!!!!!!!!!”

      Hey, fuck that noise.  The so-called Palestinians had a chance for a state of their own, and they didn’t want it.

      Give the Pal-losers one way tickets to Jordan or Syria, and let their fellow Muslims/Arabs take ‘em in…if they will.

      I don’t want my government spending dime one to give these assholes a state of their own, or anything else.

      Posted by Dave Surls on 2006 12 04 at 06:30 PM • permalink

 

    1. Dave, the Paleostinians have managed to get themselves thrown out of every Arab state they’ve settled in.  The only purpose they serve, to other Arabs, is as proxies to kill, and be killed by, the hated Jooooos.

      Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2006 12 04 at 07:04 PM • permalink

 

    1. If only they had their own country they would be magically transformed into peace loving and tolerant shopkeepers and accountants.  Think of the diversity!

      Posted by bondo on 2006 12 04 at 07:52 PM • permalink

 

    1. Give them a country…then there will be no excuses, ‘root causes’, blah, blah. But, of course, there will…the Left and loony Right are their most trusted allibi.

      Posted by dover_beach on 2006 12 04 at 08:18 PM • permalink

 

    1. Give them a country

      I hear there’s plenty of room in Antarctica.

      Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 04 at 09:08 PM • permalink

 

    1. #33

      Give the Pal-losers one way tickets to Jordan or Syria, and let their fellow Muslims/Arabs take ‘em in…if they will.

      Funny you should mention that. In September 1970, Jordan killed between 3-5000 Palestinians in what came to be known as “Black September”. Their attitudes to their ‘fellow Arabs’ is pretty well known in the area and it ain’t pretty.

      Of course most other people don’t know anything about it.

      If Israel however hurts the toenail of a potential suicide bomber, boy will you hear all about it!

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2006 12 04 at 09:19 PM • permalink

 

    1. They also destroyed a car belonging to a young man who was playing his radio tape too loudly.

      Wimps. They only targeted the car?! If ever “justifiable” and “homicide” belonged in the same sentence…

      That inner city apartment seemed like a good idea when I viewed it during the day

      Posted by RexW on 2006 12 04 at 10:11 PM • permalink

 

    1. #37- NOT in australian antarctic territory- they might take offence at our immodest penguins. i believe there aren’t any gendarmes in the french slice so it should be pretty easy to redisignate it as a sensitive urban zone

      Posted by eeniemeenie on 2006 12 04 at 10:16 PM • permalink

 

    1. #40: Well, they’re going to have a jolly time trying to set icebergs on fire.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 05 at 12:08 AM • permalink

 

    1. Well see, Just Swords of Islam is a lie.
      Clearly these Lyin’s of Allah have acid in their armoury too, plus paranoia, ahtred etc etc…

      Where’s the Eugenics Society when you need it?

      Posted by carpefraise on 2006 12 05 at 12:34 AM • permalink

 

    1. Salty Dog I agree with you about the silence of the Western feminists, there was a Somali character in the Vagina monologues, but her part was cut.

      No, it’s called Just Swords of Islam to differentiate their market niche from their hated rivals Swords ‘R’ Us, Bombe Depot and of course Death Ba’athists and Beyond.

      Posted by kiwinews on 2006 12 05 at 01:08 AM • permalink

 

    1. Surely all these Mom n’ Pop sects will be swallowed by Wahhabi Mart.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2006 12 05 at 01:14 AM • permalink

 

    1. # 4. How can any sane person not see that it truly is us against them?

      Indeed, it is you against them.  But maybe you should convince President Bush and co. to stop supporting your enemy in Saudia Arabia and several other Gulf States…he might come in as a handy ally.  Oh, then again, since he’s losing in Iraq maybe you’d better find another friend.

      As to the Western Left, I’m sure they would defend women being terrorised by Islamic extremists…if the IDF (the D stands for Death) would refrain from running them over with bulldozers.  Come to think of it, the Zionists do a far better job of killing, maiming and terrorising Muslim women than the Islamists could ever hope to do.

      Posted by Tim McVeigh on 2006 12 05 at 03:58 AM • permalink

 

    1. Mr. McVeigh is a fine example of what I mean when I talk about those who evade the evidence.  Note how he actively evades the fact that there are Palestinian men who think nothing of throwing acid into a woman’s face.  Instead he harps on the stupidity of a western girl who didn’t have sense enough to get out of the way of a bulldozer—and blames the driver.

      Consider all that he must ignore to make a statement “like the Zionists do a far better job of killing, maiming and terrorising Muslim women”.  First he must ignore what the many Palestinian terror groups have done—and continue to do—to the civilian women and children in Israel.  He must ignore the right to self-defense.  He must ignore the fact that if Israel were as depraved as the terrorists, it could have wiped out every man, woman and child in Gaza and the West Bank several times over.  He must ignore the stated goals, and the overt actions of all of the various terror organizations in Gaza and the West Bank.  He must ignore the fact that (as someone reminded us above) other Arab nations that could easily have taken in the population in these areas, not only haven’t done so, but have cynically used the Palestinians as political pawns—and have persecuted those Palestinians they have taken in.

      He also goes on about Saudi Arabia.  I happen to agree with him that Saudi Arabia is an evil on a par with Iran that ought to be confronted.  But what would Mr. McVeigh have to say if we actually confronted Saudi Arabia?  Would he applaud any action taken against them?  Or would he add it to his list of taunts?  Does he mean what he says, or does he use it as a talking point because he knows it is safe to do so?  Would he back a plan to kick out the Saudi backed Wahhabi propaganda machine by closing down the Mosques, schools, and “charities” they have built in the U.S. as a base to spread their evil?  Or would he use that to beat us over the head about what racists we are and how we are hypocrites because we won’t allow Muslim “freedom of speech”—while staying quiet about gagging anyone who speaks up against them?

      And is Mr. McVeigh for developing our own resources for power, such as drilling in Alaska and building nuclear power plants as fast as possible, so that we could rid ourselves of the Saudis?

      The cynicism, the sheer immorality displayed by Tim McVeigh in his comment—without so much as a blush or twitch—is stunning.  I’m sick of the evil lurking among us, playing at moral indignation while standing up for murderers.

      Posted by saltydog on 2006 12 05 at 05:32 AM • permalink

 

    1. #45 Tim McMiranda.  Indeed, it is you against them. 
      Indeed, it is you with them. Good luck with that.

      You are so right Salty and you say it with much more eloquence than I could ever muster. I’d have simply said he’s a dipshit troll trying to get a rise.

      Posted by Texas Bob on 2006 12 05 at 05:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. “Tim McVeigh” shows his Nazi-luvvin’ roots. In a world ruled by Sharia, he’d be a good little informant.

      Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 12 05 at 07:04 AM • permalink

 

    1. These are probably friends of his, too.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2006 12 05 at 07:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. Oh, and don’t wear that Tim McVeigh badge too proudly or insouciantly either. Truth will out.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2006 12 05 at 07:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. #47, Texas Bob:

      Thanks.  I would add that the craven Mr. McVeigh works at his computer spewing his bile in safety under the umbrella of protection provided by you and the rest of his betters.  Too bad we can’t pick and choose who gets space under the umbrella.

      Posted by saltydog on 2006 12 05 at 07:44 AM • permalink

 

    1. #10 & #9

      “Just Knobs”

      works for me.

      (I haven’t been able to get in for hours! Who locked me out? Eh? I didn’t do anything wrong. I wasn’t there, it wasn’t me, I didn’t do it.)

      Posted by kae on 2006 12 05 at 07:48 AM • permalink

 

    1. give them a state. israel gave them gaza & look what they did with it.  let syria give them a bit of its empty territory.  if the israelis can make the desert bloom, surely those guided by the hand of allah can do even better.  what’s that?  they’ve had centuries & no dice? oh well

      Posted by KK on 2006 12 05 at 08:11 AM • permalink

 

    1. Bloody well said, Saltydog.

      Posted by ekb87 on 2006 12 05 at 08:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. 46: Bravo! A little “salt” on this mynah bird’s tail is exactly what the vet ordered.

      Posted by paco on 2006 12 05 at 08:45 AM • permalink

 

    1. “Immodestly Dressed Women” – wbagnfarb*

      *“Would Be A Good Name For A Rock Band”
      (Idea shamelessly stolen from Dave Barry)

      Posted by ErnieG on 2006 12 05 at 09:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. Yes, it’s “Just Swords” because they found that the “slightly-used suicide vests: used but all are wearable” weren’t moving for some strange reason.

      Posted by andycanuck on 2006 12 05 at 10:05 AM • permalink

 

    1. Nicely said, saltydog!

      Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 05 at 10:36 AM • permalink

 

    1. #55

      Paco, in Aus Indian Mynahs are known as the rats of the skies. (I think sparrows are the mice.) Both were imported to Aus.

      Posted by kae on 2006 12 05 at 05:19 PM • permalink

 

    1. “The actions of two Muslim students who urinated on a Bible and set it on fire were “stupid”, a Victorian Islamic leader said”

      Just ripped the above off The australian Website, what a laugh, now can we hang them even though they are very young? I bet the Taliban would do it in a heartbeat

      Posted by artful-dodger on 2006 12 05 at 11:29 PM • permalink

 

    1. #46 Salty Dog.

      Very well said.  But to what effect?  Our friend is either a Pali or Pali sympathizer.  No amount of fine, cogent reasoning will keep them from their Academy rounds.

      Posted by gregbash on 2006 12 06 at 02:06 AM • permalink

 

    1. #61, gregbash;

      I’m sure you are right and I am preaching to the choir, but it sure as hell felt good to get it off my chest.  That’s all the effect I need.

      Posted by saltydog on 2006 12 06 at 05:14 AM • permalink

 

    1. # 46. Mr. McVeigh is a fine example of what I mean when I talk about those who evade the evidence.  Note how he actively evades the fact that there are Palestinian men who think nothing of throwing acid into a woman’s face.

      I didn’t evade Mr Dog, I just don’t think it that important when compared to the 3,808 deaths and 29,456 injuries suffered by Palestinians at the hands of the Israeli Death Force since 2000.  I’m sure if you were to visit hospital wards in Gaza and the West Bank you would encounter many women with disfigured faces…disfigurement caused by Zionist weapons.

      Instead he harps on the stupidity of a western girl who didn’t have sense enough to get out of the way of a bulldozer—and blames the driver.

      I guess then it must have been the fault of British ISM activist Tom Hurndall for not getting out of the way of an IDF bullet that was fired at his head?

      Consider all that he must ignore to make a statement “like the Zionists do a far better job of killing, maiming and terrorising Muslim women”.  First he must ignore what the many Palestinian terror groups have done—and continue to do—to the civilian women and children in Israel.

      Not at all.  They have upheld your principle of self-defence.

      He must ignore the right to self-defense.  He must ignore the fact that if Israel were as depraved as the terrorists, it could have wiped out every man, woman and child in Gaza and the West Bank several times over.

      Tens of thousands killed and an entire land stolen…I’m not that demanding a task master…the Zionists deserve a rest.

      He must ignore the fact that (as someone reminded us above) other Arab nations that could easily have taken in the population in these areas, not only haven’t done so, but have cynically used the Palestinians as political pawns—and have persecuted those Palestinians they have taken in.

      Yes, the corrupt, undemocratic regimes the USA supports have persecuted the Palestinians.  Your point is?

      He also goes on about Saudi Arabia.  I happen to agree with him that Saudi Arabia is an evil on a par with Iran that ought to be confronted.  But what would Mr. McVeigh have to say if we actually confronted Saudi Arabia?  Would he applaud any action taken against them?  Or would he add it to his list of taunts?  Does he mean what he says, or does he use it as a talking point because he knows it is safe to do so?  Would he back a plan to kick out the Saudi backed Wahhabi propaganda machine by closing down the Mosques, schools, and “charities” they have built in the U.S. as a base to spread their evil?  Or would he use that to beat us over the head about what racists we are and how we are hypocrites because we won’t allow Muslim “freedom of speech”—while staying quiet about gagging anyone who speaks up against them? 

      No, i wouldn’t back a plan to further demonise Muslims and restrict civil liberties in the USA.  Just as your idols Bush and co. would not confront their allies in the Persian Gulf.  I mean, if they were serious they would have invaded Saudi Arabia after 9/11. Many of the hijackers were from there.

      And is Mr. McVeigh for developing our own resources for power, such as drilling in Alaska and building nuclear power plants as fast as possible, so that we could rid ourselves of the Saudis?

      Absolutely not.  Why would I want to create immediate and potential environmental disasters on a grand scale when the US imports most of its oil from Canada, Mexico and Venezuala?

      The cynicism, the sheer immorality displayed by Tim McVeigh in his comment—without so much as a blush or twitch—is stunning.  I’m sick of the evil lurking among us, playing at moral indignation while standing up for murderers.

      Right back at ya dawg.  And the US electorate were sick of that evil too, which is why the Republicans are history.

      Posted by Tim McVeigh on 2006 12 06 at 06:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. “Tens of thousands killed and an entire land stolen…”

      Yeah, but eventually we’ll drive the Muslim invaders off all the lands they’ve stolen over the past few centuries, and back onto the Arabian pennsula where they belong; paying them back a thousandfold for every westerner they’ve killed since the seventh century.

      Israel is just step one.

      Posted by Dave Surls on 2006 12 06 at 08:36 PM • permalink

 

    1. “I guess then it must have been the fault of British ISM activist Tom Hurndall for not getting out of the way of an IDF bullet that was fired at his head?”

      ISM members are terrorist auxilliaries (and traitors to their country if they’re Americans).

      They should be shot on sight…or run over by bulldozers when expedient.

      Posted by Dave Surls on 2006 12 06 at 08:40 PM • permalink

 

    1. which is why the Republicans are history.

      Funny. I didn’t notice mass rounding up and liquidating of Republicans after the elections. Is that your political pals’ plans, “McVeigh”?

      Hey hey, Tim McVeigh, how many kids did you kill today? Answer: none, because you’re taking a dirt nap for all the ones you killed yesterday.

      Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 12 06 at 10:03 PM • permalink

 

Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.