Joyless joy

-----------------------
The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info
-----------------------

Last updated on August 9th, 2017 at 05:05 am

Unhappy reaction to the Canadian election:

I think that this is awful, just awful. I am a native of the United States and I always looked up to Canada. How did this man, a conservative, get elected. How? This will change everything! I feel bad for Canada.
Joy Chaney, New Brunswick, NJ

A saner analysis is available from Mark Steyn (whose column, among other attributes, features the first known usage of the phrase right-wing death-beast in connection with any Canadian politician).

Posted by Tim B. on 01/25/2006 at 08:16 PM
    1. But HEAD TILTS?  Have we seen any Canadian Compassionate Head Tilts yet?

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 01 25 at 09:36 PM • permalink

 

    1. I am a native of the United States and I always looked up to Canada

      Well, don’t stop there, sweetie. Just move your little legs in the direction you’re facing. Stop when you get to a Harvey’s Hamburgers.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2006 01 25 at 09:36 PM • permalink

 

    1. I linked to the BBC group tantrum forums in the comments on the Canada Votes thread. My favourite one was-

      the problem was the uneducated majority that stuck itself to the scandal and ranted “lying liberals”

      Posted by Ross on 2006 01 25 at 09:37 PM • permalink

 

    1. Hey, Joy Chaney of Moonbat NJ, ask yourself how a conservative got elected president in the USA. Bet you can’t figure it out. Not with the help of your corrupt NJ (remember your Gov. giving freebies at taxpayer expense to his homosexual lover). And who was that Senator who had to resign because he was bribed (or was it a rep, it’s hard to keep track of all the Mafioso doings around New Brunswick.) Hell, I feel sorry for New Jersey, especially with dingbats like you hovering around. By the way, I can understand you’re looking with favor on Canada, considering the stink pot state you live in. (For those who don’t know, a drive along the NJ turnpike still holds the smell of the pig farms that a short time ago surrounded it.)

      Posted by stats on 2006 01 25 at 10:15 PM • permalink

 

    1. Where do disgruntled Canadian lefties (and, now that I think of it, Canadian deserters) run to?

      Posted by jic on 2006 01 25 at 10:16 PM • permalink

 

    1. ” . . . I always looked up to Canada.”

      Yes, generally, on a map, Canada is, indeed, above the U.S.

      Posted by cosmo on 2006 01 25 at 10:22 PM • permalink

 

    1. Damn.  Can’t run off to Canada, there are Conservatives there.  Not only that, but they capitalize them so they must be even worse than the ones in the US.  New Zealand is kind of pissy about who they let in, and Cuba’s just been done to death so it’s not nearly as chic as it used to be.  Besides, they put gays in concentration camps, just like George Bush does.  And Gitmo’s there, too… where to go?

      Has there been a run of permanent resident applications at Venezuelan embassies and consulates?  Better hsutle your little lefty butts to get a good place in line, boys and girls!

      Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2006 01 25 at 10:46 PM • permalink

 

    1. Democracy failed, again! What’s with this majority getting who they want business, I bet they even have jobs and mortgages to pay, selfish swine.

      Posted by HC44 on 2006 01 25 at 10:58 PM • permalink

 

    1. Can’t run off to Canada, there are Conservatives there.

      From the BBC discussion forum linked above:

      Added: Wednesday, 25 January, 2006, 19:07 GMT 19:07 UK

      I was planning a holiday in Canada this summer (my first outside Europe). My conscience now tells me I shouldn’t, despite living in a country with a conservative ‘New Labour’ pro-Bush government. Oh dear!

      Paul Connolly, Coventry, England

      More proof that mocking lefties is really a waste of time.  At least it’s fun.

      Posted by jic on 2006 01 25 at 10:59 PM • permalink

 

    1. I linked to the BBC group tantrum forums in the comments on the Canada Votes thread. My favourite one was-

      the problem was the uneducated majority that stuck itself to the scandal and ranted “lying liberals”

      Damn left-wing elitists. When they win it’s the “people speaking truth to power”, but when they lose, it’s “how could the people be so dumb?” or “the ignorant, uneducated dolts don’t know what’s good for them!”

      What a bunch of spoiled babies.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2006 01 25 at 11:08 PM • permalink

 

    1. Yeah, how dare that uneducated majority vote out the guys who stole millions in taxpayers’ money (AdScam etc.) to further their own political goals and wasted billions more (the gun registry, to name but one boondoggle).

      With the number of options for lefties-on-the-move rapidly shrinking, perhaps it’s time to invoke the Israel solution and just give them their own little country somewhere. Anybody know a suitable place?

      Posted by PW on 2006 01 25 at 11:14 PM • permalink

 

    1. Concerning the migration or pinko lefties please note that NZ both has troops in Iraq and a Foreign Minister who hates foreignors.

      Could someone please hand out the Right Honourable Winston Peter’s resume to Candian pinkos thinking of migrating down here.

      Mike A.
      Auckland, NZ

      Posted by Mike.A. on 2006 01 25 at 11:20 PM • permalink

 

    1. How about the moonbats’ ancestral homeland, the moon?

      Posted by Attmay on 2006 01 25 at 11:22 PM • permalink

 

    1. The Moon – Russia is about to start mining there.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2006 01 25 at 11:36 PM • permalink

 

    1. Drawing a bit of an o/t bow here, but while on the subject of lefties denying reality, the SMH ran a very indulgent letter (which they must have loved – it was far too lengthy, closer to 300 words than the prescribed 200) from Scott Poynting on Wednesday. He was extemporising on the theme of whipping up panic about ethnic gangs. According to Scott this sort of thing is just a beat up. At one point he says:
      “The criminal gang does not have to be directly linked to the serious crime; very remote linkages have been known to work in the case of a crime wave.”
      So there you have it. It’s not really happening. There are no videos. Nothing to see here. Just a politico-media beat up.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2006 01 25 at 11:55 PM • permalink

 

    1. I just want to make it emphatically clear that any AMERICAN who “looks up to Canada” is gay.

      As for where the brainless leftwing Canadian moonbats will retreat to now that Chimpy McMapleLeafBurton is the Prime Minister, I think it should be obvious:  Greenland!

      Posted by Supercat on 2006 01 25 at 11:58 PM • permalink

 

    1. As the Liberals warned Canadians – or, rather, shrieked at them – Stephen Harper will take away “a woman’s right to choose”! The unwanted boys you’ll be forced to have will grow up to be Bush cannon fodder in Iraq, and the unwanted girls will be sold as white slaves for Halliburton corporate cocktail parties round the pool at Dick Cheney’s ranch.

      Well I’ll be damned.  Steyn is stealing our shtick.

      Posted by wronwright on 2006 01 26 at 12:01 AM • permalink

 

    1. With the number of options for lefties-on-the-move rapidly shrinking, perhaps it’s time to invoke the Israel solution and just give them their own little country somewhere. Anybody know a suitable place?

      How about North Korea?  It seems ideal:

      Years of innovative population control measures mean that there is plenty of room for the newcomers.

      -It’s isolated from the all-consuming taint of Amerikkkan kkkukture, as shown by all that cute socialist realist art.

      -It has a humane, efficient, centrally-planned economy.

      -It is one of the last places on earth to preserve true Marxism against the scourge of Amerikkkan Imperialism.

      All in all, I think that the sooner all our lefties move to North Korea, the better.

      Posted by jic on 2006 01 26 at 12:03 AM • permalink

 

    1. As for where the brainless leftwing Canadian moonbats will retreat to now that Chimpy McMapleLeafBurton is the Prime Minister, I think it should be obvious:  Greenland!

      Aah, but Greenland is Danish territory, and Denmark is part of Pol Pot W. HitlerStalin’s terrorist war for oil.

      Posted by jic on 2006 01 26 at 12:16 AM • permalink

 

    1. Steyn’s probably correct in pooh poohing (geez, I HATE that expression) . . . in laughing off the idea of a Canadian right-wing death-beast; however, I am willing to allow Harper tentative status as a right-wing ankle-biter.

      Posted by paco on 2006 01 26 at 12:20 AM • permalink

 

    1. Mmmm, Danish…
      Wait, what were we talking about again?

      Posted by PW on 2006 01 26 at 12:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. perhaps it’s time to invoke the Israel solution and just give them their own little country somewhere. Anybody know a suitable place?

      Well if global warming is so bad then the Siberian tundra will be perfect for human habitation anytime soon.

      Posted by Ross on 2006 01 26 at 12:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. Where ever the Left go they won’t be happy.  Hell has some space left, they’ll be right at home.  They may be able to picket Old Nick for better conditions.  Leftie-heaven!

      Posted by stickit on 2006 01 26 at 12:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. No such thing as a Canadian RWDB?  Allow me to introduce you guys to Ralph Klein, premier of Alberta for the last 10 years or more.

      Posted by Steve at the pub on 2006 01 26 at 12:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. How about Don Cherry?

      Posted by Dave S. on 2006 01 26 at 01:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. For those who don’t know Don Cherry, he’s a pugnacious hockey analyst for Hockey Night in Canada, a former coach and player. Kind of like Canada’s Howard Cosell, but likable. Here’s some stuff about him from the CBC website:

      Iraq: Cherry is a proud Canadian and friend of the United States. This fierce national love affair has made him a patriotic symbol to his legion of fans, but has also landed him in hot water. One such occasion came on March 22, 2003, during a controversial instalment of Coach’s Corner. Hockey talk was brushed aside in favour of world affairs—more specifically, a heated debate over the U.S.-led war with Iraq. Cherry began by criticizing Montreal fans for booing the American national anthem before a game earlier in the week. The conversation quickly turned to the war when Ron MacLean said “everybody wants to know what you think.” The Coach, wearing a sparkling U.S.-flag-inspired tie, berated MacLean about being neutral on the war, then slammed the Canadian government for not supporting the U.S. in the war. The exchange sparked strong sentiments from both supporters and detractors. CBC Television called the discussion “uninformed and irrelevant,” and the duo were asked to stick to hockey.

      Left-wing pinkos: Cherry is particularly sour on those people he feels are trying to take the toughness out of hockey. Every season he rails against whiny “left-wing pinkos” and the preachy “politically correct” for, among other things, trying to take fighting out of the game, forcing players to wear visors, and censoring his notorious rants. Cherry says he speaks for the “average Joes” who work in factories and farms and relax in taverns. He says his constituency is the “working guy.” Coincidentally, the real left-wing pinkos also say they speak for the working guy.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2006 01 26 at 01:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. How did this man, a conservative, get elected. How?

      erm… lemme see… how does that work again? oh yeah, quite a few people voted for him.  i know, i know, it’s a shabby system, but until stalin is resurrected it’ll have to do

      Posted by KK on 2006 01 26 at 02:03 AM • permalink

 

    1. Holy cow, what will the sensitive lefties do when they notice that the brave and progressive countries in this hemisphere generally don’t have any Starbucks or two-ply tp.  Those darn right wing fascists, with their hambugers and 800 cable stations have overrun all that is decent.  Dare we say that Gramici might have been wrong.

      Posted by Pat Patterson on 2006 01 26 at 02:26 AM • permalink

 

    1. That leaves North Korea and the English Department at Yale – to pinch from J.P. O’Rourke.

      Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 01 26 at 02:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. #11 Margolia…

      Posted by crash on 2006 01 26 at 02:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. #11, HamasLand.

      Posted by stats on 2006 01 26 at 10:23 AM • permalink

 

    1. #24 & 26:

      Puts me in mind of a trip I made to Canada many years ago. I liked most of the Canadians I met, except for two: one, a sixtiesh geezer who ran a parking lot, unaccountably assumed that I’d be fascinated by his animadversions on Lyndon Johnson, then dead some five years; the other was a camp-ground manager somewhere in Ontario (can’t remember the exact place). This latter fellow was a warm admirer of Castro. Well, another camper – from Alberta, as it happens – sidled up and absolutely lit into the guy, charging him with gross ignorance of communism in general, and of Castro, in particular. We in the states sometimes forget, or are simply unaware, that western Canada, to put it mildly, is not exactly a hotbed of feverish leftism.

      Posted by paco on 2006 01 26 at 11:26 AM • permalink

 

    1. Where do disgruntled Canadian lefties (and, now that I think of it, Canadian deserters) run to?

      I recommend Antarctica.  The climate’s pretty much the same, and hey, with global warmening and all, they’ll be building backyard swimming pools in no time.

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 01 26 at 01:49 PM • permalink

 

    1. Alright, before someone goes off the deep end, lets reminds ourselves that he’s a Canadian Conservative.

      That means Harper is only 57% of a Real Conservative.  That is if I’ve calculated the exchange rate properly.

      Let’s see, multiply, carry the naught, Yep!

      Posted by joe bagadonuts on 2006 01 26 at 02:13 PM • permalink

 

    1. As an American, I am very concerned about the Canada electing a Conservative minority government.  Does this mean that the vast hordes of American leftists, progressives and liberals who moved to Canada to escape the repressive Bush regime will now be thrown out?  Do we have to take them back in?  Can we send them to Venezuela or Bolivia or someplace like that?

      Posted by Room 237 on 2006 01 26 at 06:26 PM • permalink

 

    1. Sigh Nouveau Zelande….

      Posted by crash on 2006 01 27 at 04:58 AM • permalink

 

    1. It has that certain something-je ne sais quoi…..

      Posted by crash on 2006 01 27 at 04:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. I think they should go somewhere where they’ll be welcomed.  Zimbabwe or the University of Massachusetts at Amherst spring to mind.  The living quarters are a bit better in Amherst, but they’ll have to put up with a few, whining non-Lefties.  On the other hand, I expect Zimbabwe to be vewy, vewy quiet vewy, vewy soon.

      Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 01 27 at 11:31 AM • permalink

 

Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.