Indian unacceptable

The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info

Last updated on July 2nd, 2017 at 08:58 am

As observed last month, Indian cricketers waved flags (in the manner of rabid nationalists!) following their victory over Australia in Perth. It’s taken until today for noted nationalism opponent Peter Roebuck to record his feelings about this:

The sight of Harbhajan Singh running on the field in Perth brandishing an Indian flag was unacceptable.

Careful, pal. He is the head of a family and responsible for raising nine people, after all.

Posted by Tim B. on 02/02/2008 at 07:40 AM
    1. I like to stay (relatively) polite and not vent toooo much, but I’d just like to take a moment to say that Peter Roebuck is a bloody moron.

      What a load of condescending tripe.

      How about he stop fellating the Indians and start writing about the bloody game for a change?

      Better yet, how about he just bugger off and shut up for a change.

      I’m not a huge cricket fan, but even I knew the names of the greats. I’d never heard of this blowhard until this blew up.

      Spanky, the tribe has spoken. You are hereby voted off the island.

      Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2008 02 02 at 07:53 AM • permalink


    1. Spanky, exactly what is wrong with someone representing their country celebrating their country’s success by having their flag out on display?

      Would it have been alright for him to carry an Aussie flag perhaps?

      Posted by Ash_ on 2008 02 02 at 07:57 AM • permalink


    1. I thought flag waving was banned in Aus? Especially at national events… like Austrlaia Day and sport and so on.

      and psst, Tim, in the brackets… I think it should be “in the manner of rabid…”

      Posted by kae on 2008 02 02 at 08:04 AM • permalink


    1. gak.
      Austrlaia Day. You knew what I meant.

      Posted by kae on 2008 02 02 at 08:05 AM • permalink


    1. I get the feeling Roebuck dug himself a hole with over the top criticism of Australia after the Sydney test. Realising this he is trying to recover some sort of consistency of thought in the face of behaviour by India that is similar or exceeds that for which Australia was upbraided. In the process he is making himself sound like a complete idiot.

      Posted by Francis H on 2008 02 02 at 08:12 AM • permalink


    1. #5.  He is, was and still is a complete idiot.  This poor old pom still believes what the poor old poms think, it is ok to lose.  Sorry this is the new world and we don’t want to lose.  Go Australia.  Roebuck is a spanker (pardon the joke).

      Posted by Cashew on 2008 02 02 at 08:48 AM • permalink


    1. In other ‘Indian unacceptable’ news, this just in regarding Britain’s only Indian bishop – Dr Nazir-Ali:

      Bishop of Rochester under police protection after receiving ‘death threats’ for criticising Islam.

      The Bishop of Rochester is under police protection after receiving death threats following his claims that parts of Britain are ‘no-go areas’ for non-Muslims.

      Thesis proved.

      Posted by C.L. on 2008 02 02 at 09:09 AM • permalink


    1. Sweet Jesus, Tim!

      You’ve just come back from a cancer operation and you’re still moaning about Roebuck?

      The last column by Roebuck on the matter castigated the Indians and Harbhajan Singh in particular for threatening the integrity of World Cricket and that isn’t enough? What’s he supposed to do, throw bricks at the Indian tour bus?

      Oh and Cashew spare me the comments about Roebuck being a Pom. He’s an Australian citizen and proud of the fact.

      That whole article which you took one line out of was a castigation of the behavior of BCCI as well as Singh in particular. I remember Roebuck singling out Singh for criticism for his part in the race row in the first place.

      I note that Punter has been on his best behaviour since the Sydney Test, which suggests that the Australian selectors certainly made it clear their displeasure even if they publicly supported their man.

      There is a massive imbalance in the game caused by India’s domination of the financials of world cricket. Even Sri Lanka is dependent on India to even run a Test cricket side as SL cricket is basically bust.

      With the money pouring into the Indian Premier League and retired players suddenly dusting off their pads for one last paycheck, the last thing World Cricket needs is India abandoning the Tour, because it would cost Cricket Australia a fortune.

      But, the behaviour of the BBCI will come under scrutiny for what it has done.

      Meanwhile, the first ODI showed that the Indians were pitiful and Australia steamrollered them for 75 runs. Now that’s more like it!

      Posted by John A on 2008 02 02 at 09:18 AM • permalink


    1. #8 John A. Please take your pedantic, sweet jesus logic, and retire from the crease with the title ‘self acclaimed dickhead’ S’il vous plait.

      Posted by mehaul on 2008 02 02 at 09:49 AM • permalink


    1. #8 John A


      It wasn’t an ODI – it was a 20/20 match

      Posted by aussiemagpie on 2008 02 02 at 10:02 AM • permalink


    1. 20/20 sucks

      Posted by eeniemeenie on 2008 02 02 at 10:09 AM • permalink


    1. and i agree with Ash- there’s nothing wrong with him ‘brandishing’ the indian flag, it’s his attitude that’s he problem- and roebuck’s sanctimonious drivel

      Posted by eeniemeenie on 2008 02 02 at 10:12 AM • permalink


    1. A Ducati and Cricket. Yep, THE Blair is back.

      Posted by El Cid on 2008 02 02 at 10:13 AM • permalink


    1. “it’s his attitude that’s the problem”

      Calling someone a motherf***er after they call him a faggot?

      Seems pretty reasonable to me.

      Posted by AlexanderH on 2008 02 02 at 11:16 AM • permalink


    1. The furious back-peddling by Spanky continues. Funny what a few weeks of being shunned by the industry you rely on for your living will do for your perspective.

      Posted by AlphaMikeFoxtrot on 2008 02 02 at 04:08 PM • permalink


    1. God, this is going to go on all day, isn’t it?

      Posted by mr creosote on 2008 02 02 at 04:35 PM • permalink


    1. You’re right. It was Twenty20 not an ODI. And BCCI not BBCI (that’s the BBC Interactive wing of Indian Cricket, obviously)

      And the Indians couldn’t bat for toffee and Australia rolled them over for an embarrassing score.

      Posted by John A on 2008 02 02 at 08:53 PM • permalink


    1. 20/20 is a joke. A win or a loss signifies nothing.

      Nobody will remember whether or not a game was even played in a month’s time, much less who won.

      It is a grubby money making exercise and I cringe with embarrassment watching normally technically proficient batsmen swinging wildly like drunken beach cricketers and field placings that look like they were thought up by an Afghan camel driver.

      I can live with it being played at club or even State level, it sells the beer and makes a dollar at the gates, but “International 20/20”? FFS.

      P.S. Stop digging, Spanky.

      Posted by Pedro the Ignorant on 2008 02 02 at 09:08 PM • permalink


    1. Journalist, edit thyself.

      Posted by MentalFloss on 2008 02 02 at 09:10 PM • permalink


  1. I agree with you, Pedro. Unfortunately, however, it looks as though twenty/20 may be around for longer than few months. The crowd attendance and television audience numbers were huge.

    Posted by Dan J. on 2008 02 02 at 10:19 PM • permalink