Finally, the age shows some balls

-----------------------
The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info
-----------------------

Last updated on August 5th, 2017 at 03:48 am

Or maybe only one. Check the front-page image of Alan Didak.

UPDATE. Debate rages in comments. Meanwhile, as Andrew Landeryou reveals, The Age is now concealing the controversial zone.

UPDATE II. Age communications director Nigel Henham offers an explanation.

Posted by Tim B. on 07/03/2007 at 01:19 AM
    1. Is he related to Mark Latham?

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:26 AM • permalink

 

    1. A hard ball get for The Age.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 01:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. Ahhh, sorry I had to be the first to post! 🙂

      I posted another “fashion perv” in SMH of a man’s *** escaping from his budgies” (Louis V outfit) Does anyone check?

      tim, I predict something is coming your way!

      Posted by 1.618 on 2007 07 03 at 01:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. I know AFL ‘footballers’ are a bunch of girl’s blouses, but one ball? How many does he have to share it with?

      Posted by Bonmot on 2007 07 03 at 01:32 AM • permalink

 

    1. Upon reflection I think it’s his cock.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 01:33 AM • permalink

 

    1. He didn’t notice any breeze? #5, if you’re correct I fear steroid abuse is rife in the AFL. But then again how come there’s never any punchups?

      (Just as well he doesn’t play either code of rugby and pack into the front row- unless the second rowers warm their hands first he’d probably yelp).

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. There was a similar picture of Hazelby printed in the West Australian a few years back. Haven’t these idiots heard of underwear?

      Posted by SandiM on 2007 07 03 at 01:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. #5 A life without reflection is a life not worth living – and sadly, I think IT is on the money once again.

      Former rugby league player Andrew Ettingshausen received $100 grand in 1991 because someone published a picture of his todger in some obscure magazine…

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 01:41 AM • permalink

 

    1. Nah, I reckon it’s his measuring stick. (Snap, IT.)

      If that’s what it is.
      Could be someone behind him’s hand…

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 01:41 AM • permalink

 

    1. Hey Tim…

      Update I: It’s his cock.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 01:42 AM • permalink

 

    1. In case anyone’s wondering here’s the link to Lathos lacking love lump.

      We had a bloke at the airport who lost one through sitting suddenly and having said appendage caught between the chair frame and the base- as he had a ‘mo and goatee he was called “Mandrake” but immediately became “Oddball”.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. #8 – $50k an inch for ET. I found that sum quite hard to swallow.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 01:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. Rugby League player Andrew Ettingshausen sued a magazine for $350,000 for publishing a picture of his cock.  On the basis of a going rate of $100,000 per inch what’s Didak up for?

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 07 03 at 01:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. If it is his willy and unless it’s frightfully chilly, it’d make micturation a chore- imagine having to snip hairs until you found one that bled?

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. Geez, I gotta hit refresh more often…

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 07 03 at 01:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. #13- If the photo’s to scale, I’d say about $12.75. Perhaps he was set upon by a myopic Mullah in a minge mutilating mania, who thought at the time he’d jagged the catch of the day.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:49 AM • permalink

 

    1. ET was initially awarded $350 k but it was reduced to a mere $100k on appeal.

      The court case was memorable for testimony by fellow player and expert witness Wayne Pearce: “I wouldn’t want my pecker in the paper.”

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 01:49 AM • permalink

 

    1. It’s this sort of filth that keeps the turnstiles turning and guarantees The Age will fight another day. Kudos to you, Andrew Jaspan, you cock fancying, bagpipe bonker.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 01:50 AM • permalink

 

    1. Running around with his “chop” hanging out.
      I thought this bloke was famous for hanging out with the HA’s when they’re shootin at stuff?

      Posted by Pickles on 2007 07 03 at 01:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. I’m betting it is his shorts. Light refraction.

      Posted by M Box on 2007 07 03 at 01:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. I got some juvenile mirth from the caption “Not Allowed Out”– it appears either meat or one veg ignored the edict.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:52 AM • permalink

 

    1. Is that Fatima I can see poking out of his shorts?

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 01:52 AM • permalink

 

    1. Let’s face it, it’s not exactly the first short pitched bouncer that’s been sighted at the MCG.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. #23, looks like the bowler’s dislodged a bail…

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 07 03 at 01:56 AM • permalink

 

    1. Collingwood kicking towards the members end.

      Didak says “I’m not cocky”.

      “Thank you I’ll be here all week! try the coq au vin.”

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 01:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. Just think- if he was signed to the West Coast, then selected for an international match, then arrested and released*, the headline could be “Test Eagle Free”.

      *Yes, I know it’s about as likely a set of circumstances as an Irishman being both sober and alive.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 01:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. I guess the Age could offer a retraction, but looks like Didak has already retracted.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 02:03 AM • permalink

 

    1. After a big night out, Hudson hands Didak a gun: “Here, hide this for me”…

      Posted by anthony_r on 2007 07 03 at 02:05 AM • permalink

 

    1. From the Age I would expect this sort of cock-up.

      Posted by lingus4 on 2007 07 03 at 02:06 AM • permalink

 

    1. Retraction

      The Age apologises for publishing a photograph of Alan Didak’s Mr Floppy on page one of Tuesday’s newspaper.

      However, the Age would like to advise Mr Didak in future to find a hammock for his tallywhacker, because aside from Andrew Jaspan, no-one wants to see his wonder weasel – or the twins.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 02:11 AM • permalink

 

    1. Further to #10, somehow I think this is going to be a very funny thread indeed…

      #22

      Is that Fatima I can see poking out of his shorts?

      Yes. Yes it is.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 07 03 at 02:17 AM • permalink

 

    1. #31 Dan the Man

      Dear old Fatima, she’s the gift that keeps on giving.

      Is she rage boy’s mum?

      Posted by Pickles on 2007 07 03 at 02:20 AM • permalink

 

    1. Would love to see one of Didak hanging out of Fatima’s daks.

      Posted by Pickles on 2007 07 03 at 02:21 AM • permalink

 

    1. Where is Islam Rage Boy in that photo?

      “That’s 1 small cock for didack, and 1 giant bill for The Age”

      Talk about 2 cockups!

      Or is that 1 cockdown and 1 cockup?

      Actually, both up, seeing how small the little fella is.

      I feel sorry for him – he plays for Eddie.

      Posted by peter m on 2007 07 03 at 02:26 AM • permalink

 

    1. Landeryou’s got more, including a note that The Age have covered it up (so to speak) in their online edition.

      A cock-up indeed.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 07 03 at 02:26 AM • permalink

 

    1. #33

      Be careful what you wish for…

      [Reaches for Photoshop]
      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 07 03 at 02:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. How about this for a headline:-

      “Didak’s Dick Daks Deficient, Displays Donger”

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 02:31 AM • permalink

 

    1. This blogs not so “mind-sodomisingly anodyne” now, is it?

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 02:31 AM • permalink

 

    1. just another one eyed collingwood fan.

      Posted by anonymous guest on 2007 07 03 at 02:34 AM • permalink

 

    1. Perhaps it was just a promo for a re-run of “Free Willy”.

      Or maybe he head it pays to advertise; in this case his email inbox is going to be chockers with offers for this.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 02:34 AM • permalink

 

    1. Is it a real Fatwa?

      Posted by 1.618 on 2007 07 03 at 02:34 AM • permalink

 

    1. p.s. I won’t draw my . pictures of this today!

      Posted by 1.618 on 2007 07 03 at 02:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. That’s looks very much like a Collingwood beanie.

      Posted by Apparatchik on 2007 07 03 at 02:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. Penis enlargement is dangerous and a waste of time. I amputated my hands and replaced them with those of a small Thai girl. I’ve never looked back. Strangely I am now also a whiz at making Tom Yum Gai and Pad Kee Mao.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 02:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. #44- Maybe that’s what this bloke was trying to do but the “donor” escaped. That or he just wore out his wanking spanners- it’s expalian the eyesight thingie as well.

      Posted by Habib on 2007 07 03 at 02:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. What? It’s just a fold in his shorts combined with the blurred hand in the foreground. Jesus.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 02:48 AM • permalink

 

    1. #46 – You’re a cock-eyed optomist if you believe that.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 02:49 AM • permalink

 

    1. See you in court, Jaspan...

      _                    _
      |_|                       |_|
      | |         /^^^\         | |
      _| |_      (| "o" |)      _| |_
      _| | | | _    (_---_)    _ | | | |_
      | | | | |' |    _| |_    | `| | | | |
      |          |   /     \   |          |
      \        /  / /(. .)\ \  \        /
      \    /  / /  | . |  \ \  \    /
      \  \/ /    ||Y||    \ \/  /
      \__/      || ||      \__/
      () ()
      || ||
      ooO Ooo

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 07 03 at 02:49 AM • permalink

 

    1. Habib
      He should change his name to Dangldik

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 02:50 AM • permalink

 

    1. Or just Dikdaks.

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 02:50 AM • permalink

 

    1. Don’t you hate spelling mistakes.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 02:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. #45
      That tool is just the shot for removing willnots (shit encrusted hairs on arse that willnot come off)

      Posted by Pickles on 2007 07 03 at 02:52 AM • permalink

 

    1. #30 Margos
      The retraction is brilliant.

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 02:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. #51 Optimist -> Tim -> Tom, Dick and Harry -> optomist

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 02:54 AM • permalink

 

    1. Any chance of a breast thread? I’ve run out of cock puns.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 02:56 AM • permalink

 

    1. #44

      Any chance of a breast thread? I’ve run out of cock puns.

      Cockless.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 07 03 at 02:57 AM • permalink

 

    1. No wonder Didak is in so much trouble, running around half cocked.

      Posted by Pickles on 2007 07 03 at 03:01 AM • permalink

 

    1. Cleavage. (for balance, only)

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 03:02 AM • permalink

 

    1. That thing hanging out of his shorts looks like a penis.
      Only smaller.

      Posted by Pickles on 2007 07 03 at 03:02 AM • permalink

 

    1. #58 So that’s how to find porn on the internet. Thanks!

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 03:04 AM • permalink

 

    1. Poor bloke got the Bobbitt treatment, if only metaphorically. Still, I would think the jock is a good thing when there are feet flying around at groin level.

      Also, I am assuming this is Australian rules football, which has no apparent rules, except that when you get to one end of the pitch the guy with the pith helmet runs out and does the two-finger-point-thing. Yes? Because I can go all day w/ the pith-helmet looks like a cock innuendo.

      Posted by brett_l on 2007 07 03 at 03:04 AM • permalink

 

    1. I’m with SandyM, what is it with these blokes who don’t wear jocks – aren’t they worried that their bits might get caught in something, like a scrum, or something?

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 03:05 AM • permalink

 

    1. Surely Didak’s middle name is Richard.

      Posted by lingus4 on 2007 07 03 at 03:05 AM • permalink

 

    1. Hey Blair – Debate? Debate finished eons ago. Do you dare mock consensus?

      We’ve moved on to what has to be done – and the consensus seems to be, some kind of marxist state where a few of us get to do whatever we want.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 03:07 AM • permalink

 

    1. #61

      pith-helmet looks like a cock innuendo

      Shhh, they don’t realise, just like those women who have never considered what their sharply defined bob looks like from behind.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 03:09 AM • permalink

 

    1. Come on guys and gals, he was just taking the little feller out for some air.

      Posted by surfmaster on 2007 07 03 at 03:14 AM • permalink

 

    1. Speaking of Marxism and dickless wonders – I was looking at the Live Earth deal. Could the US maybe trade Keith Urban, The Police, and Roger Waters to the UK for Metallica, the Beastie Boys, and draft pick to be named later? I mean, sure nobody wants ol’ Rog now that the Inflatable Pig has floated away, but c’mon. Also, does Snoop Dogg know he’s going to Germany yet? Does he know Amsterdam isn’t in Germany?

      Posted by brett_l on 2007 07 03 at 03:15 AM • permalink

 

    1. Our Overseas commenters will rue sleeping through this thread.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 03:16 AM • permalink

 

    1. #68 They should have gotten up to play. Sleep is for the weak or exhausted.

      Posted by Ash_ on 2007 07 03 at 03:21 AM • permalink

 

    1. #68

      Yes. Finally a thread related to Australian sport that they will not need explained.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 07 03 at 03:22 AM • permalink

 

    1. #20 looks like just a flap of his shorts to me

      Posted by KK on 2007 07 03 at 03:22 AM • permalink

 

    1. I don’t know what the drama is, it’s just a picture of Didak and if you look closely you can see the Member’s end.

      Posted by lingus4 on 2007 07 03 at 03:22 AM • permalink

 

    1. #70 Dan:
      Right. Everybody can tell dick jokes. Like my buddy who taught 2/3rds of a college class w/ his leg propped up on a desk before realizing he was on a commando mission with a hole in his pants where the seams joined. Poor guy. Thought he’d finally figured out how to keep the kids’ attention for more than 10 minutes. Turns out they were just staring at ‘the ref’.

      Posted by brett_l on 2007 07 03 at 03:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. I have no wish to be didaktic, but the slur and inyourendo should stop.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2007 07 03 at 03:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. #71 – Hmmm, I am coming around to your way of thinking. I will admit to little knowledge on what to look for (maybe a passing glance at the urinal, but who are you to judge?)- can our Sydney contributers confirm if that is indeed a cock?

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 03:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. It’s not dieback, it’s just ….

      Posted by blogstrop on 2007 07 03 at 03:39 AM • permalink

 

    1. Uhm, all I see is shorts. Then again, I don’t make it a personal point to stare at the groin of some dude… But then I decided – first time for everything. I stared and stared, but his balls seem a lot like a flap of the shorts.

      Which would be tragic that way.

      Posted by Rajan R on 2007 07 03 at 03:41 AM • permalink

 

    1. For no reason at all – pic of Cassie Lane. Didak’s ex.

      I will now officially out myself as a Cock Protrusion Denialist. The science is far from a consensus. I believe that cock shaped spike is caused by Short Flare.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 03:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. #78 I can’t see the balls in that picture, either.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 03:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. Jeez, haven’t you Aussies ever heard of jock straps?  Hell, in the US, the first thing you buy, when starting junior high, is one of those—to wear during PE class.  And God forbid if your PE teacher finds out that you don’t have one on.  (Can anyone say “twenty push-ups and make ‘em look good”?)

      Posted by David Crawford on 2007 07 03 at 03:47 AM • permalink

 

    1. I never really understood, until now, just what could pass for a schlong in Victoria.

      This may completely explain Steve Bracks….

      MarkL
      Canberra

      Posted by MarkL on 2007 07 03 at 03:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. O/T the doctor held in brisbane over UK terror plot has been named …. any guess what is 1st name is? (I was going to say christian name but I dont think that applies)

      Posted by lingus4 on 2007 07 03 at 03:56 AM • permalink

 

    1. #82 – Yeah, I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with blokes named Nigel.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 03 at 03:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. #82
      I wonder if he’d resigned from the hospital or was just pissing off before the authorities caught up with him. That would be interesting.
      And maybe a sign of guilt or innocence.

      By the way, Digging up the UK is in ABC at 6pm (AKA Time Team).

      Posted by kae on 2007 07 03 at 04:02 AM • permalink

 

    1. #83 And if it’s not Nigel, it’s either Frank, Phil, or Julian.

      Posted by Ash_ on 2007 07 03 at 04:09 AM • permalink

 

    1. OT Mother Earth gets a bikini wax:

      HUNDREDS of farmers have begun cutting down protected trees on their properties to protest against strict land-clearing laws designed to help Australia curb its rising greenhouse gas emissions.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 04:18 AM • permalink

 

    1. Apparently lately The Age has been doing more slashing than a Jihadist with a chainsaw when it comes to this particular Collingwood footballer.

      Posted by geoff on 2007 07 03 at 04:23 AM • permalink

 

    1. #83:

      I’ll take… Names that are in the Koran for $1000, Alex.

      Seriously, the Moslems could rival the French for fewest first names. But I’ll bet this guy was neither Jean-Luc nor Jean-Jacques.

      Posted by brett_l on 2007 07 03 at 04:28 AM • permalink

 

    1. #87—Geoff, that’s despicable.

      Fairfax journalists have no shame. If they did, they’d quit and get jobs as spammers.

      Posted by Evil Pundit on 2007 07 03 at 04:31 AM • permalink

 

    1. #83 As long as it isn’t one of those nonsensical names like Shantara, Shantakela or Shantalantadingdong, I’m not going to get too riled by it.

      Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 07 03 at 04:56 AM • permalink

 

    1. This guy should have had a wonderful career, after playing. Castrati reaching those really high notes. Doesn’t he know that should be accomplished BEFORE puberty?

      Posted by El Cid on 2007 07 03 at 05:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. Perhaps he just has an Unstable Coccyx?

      Posted by Pogria on 2007 07 03 at 05:32 AM • permalink

 

    1. #78

      You too, IT? There’ll be no conferences for you!

      I am of the strong belief that the photo has been tampered with – the protusion has changed colour and it has gone all weird and smudged.

      Make no mistake, Didak Donger Denialists will not be tolerated!

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 05:51 AM • permalink

 

    1. Aha! Debate shut down, just as I planned.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 03 at 06:35 AM • permalink

 

    1. Can’t this site’s animation experts confirm that piece chromosone split flap has been added post script. Otherwise I would have thought that all the young Didak dick spotters from over the past two decades would have confirmed what it really is. Immediate family members, the current fling, neighbours (they see more than you think) and second party relatives should all have a point of view. After all….isn’t incest approval part of the qualifying review to ensure Collingwood membership?

      Posted by mehaul on 2007 07 03 at 07:18 AM • permalink

 

    1. It’s just his shorts blowing in the wind – zoom in close and you’ll see.

      Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 03 at 08:22 AM • permalink

 

    1. #58: I’m with kae; however, I believe that even more ballast balance is needed. BTW, what are “cleavage cupcakes”? And is there such a thing as a “cleavage six-layer cake”?

      I’ve looked at the picture, and the whole thing is bollocks. Or rather, the whole thing isn’t bollocks, at all. Using my precision reading glasses (purchased for ten bucks at the CVS drugstore), I can say with certainty that it is just the gentleman’s shorts. This, of course, does not in any way invalidate the proposition that Kim is still a twat.

      Posted by paco on 2007 07 03 at 08:50 AM • permalink

 

    1. Agreed with WimpyCanadian.

      Posted by murph on 2007 07 03 at 08:55 AM • permalink

 

    1. Hey!  That guy has a cutout of Flat Fatima hanging out of his pants!

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 07 03 at 09:22 AM • permalink

 

    1. We should not allow a discussion of testicular airflow to distract us from important foreign policy issues.

      Posted by paco on 2007 07 03 at 09:28 AM • permalink

 

    1. This is probably a fixer-upper – you know, could use a few upgrades, like granite countertops, stainless-steel appliances, crucifixes in every room – but it’s a steal at $80,000,000.

      Contact our property sales subsidiary, Keepin’ It Real(ty). Agents welcome.

      Posted by paco on 2007 07 03 at 09:39 AM • permalink

 

    1. Ouch!  That’s not going to leave a mark.

      Posted by charles austin on 2007 07 03 at 09:59 AM • permalink

 

    1. #101 I’m interested, but I doubt I can afford many impaled turks.

      Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 03 at 10:12 AM • permalink

 

    1. Its not his privates at all. What you’re seeing is the edge of his shorts overlaid with the blur of someone arm that gives it a fleshy colour.

      And you people have got dirty minds.

      Posted by John A on 2007 07 03 at 11:25 AM • permalink

 

    1. “Didak’s Dick Daks Deficient, Displays Donger”

      #37 Variety is now covering the AFL, Habib? Who’d a thunk it?

      Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 03 at 11:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. BTW, I thought the phrase “leg before” was a cricket one, not a footie one.

      Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 03 at 11:41 AM • permalink

 

    1. #104, are you sure you’re looking at the right photo?  Because that’s not an arm.

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 07 03 at 11:55 AM • permalink

 

    1. O/T (and don’t say you’re not relieved): I told you global warming was just the beachhead in the Environauts’ was against sanity.

      Via the admirable TigerHawk. Check out his piece on Roswell, too. I hadn’t heard that one.

      Posted by paco on 2007 07 03 at 12:05 PM • permalink

 

    1. I looked and looked and looked—stared even.  Cleaned off my glasses and peered again..closer.
      Cant see anything that looks like a rooster.

      Posted by missred on 2007 07 03 at 12:40 PM • permalink

 

    1. Via the link at #100:

      You have to wonder about the sanity of the world when the highly educated, super-ambitious woman tipped to be the first female U.S. President seriously assures an equally bright and determined lawyer that she can protect herself from evil forces by wearing a mystic golden pendant.

      But in November 1998, Cherie demonstrated her love of magical-power dressing when she was pictured wearing a pendant, apparently bought on the advice of Hillary Clinton, America’s First Lady at the time, which used the ancient art of crystal healing to create a “bio-electric shield”.

      Cheers

      Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2007 07 03 at 06:39 PM • permalink

 

    1. #110

      The prospect of either Clinton or Obama in the White House disturbs me. They are like shallow two-dimensional characters from a poorly scripted TV show. There nothing to indicate that they could function in a real world that is beyond the script writer’s control.

      Posted by Contrail on 2007 07 03 at 07:11 PM • permalink

 

    1. #109: Cross examination in the Ettingshausen trial:

      Hughes QC: Is it a duck?
      Martyn: I don’t think it would be a duck.

      Whether it was a rooster was not investigated.

      Posted by TheRealBigAl on 2007 07 03 at 07:45 PM • permalink

 

    1. #112 TRBA: From memory, the great thing about Hughes QC’s question was that Martyn spoke with a Kiwi accent.

      Posted by ErnestBludger on 2007 07 03 at 08:59 PM • permalink

 

    1. It’s the blur of someone’s moving hand that is colouring the edge of his shorts.

      And yes, you people have dirty minds.

      Posted by John A on 2007 07 04 at 04:07 AM • permalink

 

    1. With all these footballers running around with their willies flapping in the breeze, no wonder we have dirty minds.

      Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 04 at 08:31 AM • permalink

 

Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.