Eight out of ten imams agree

-----------------------
The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info
-----------------------

Last updated on July 24th, 2017 at 07:14 am

Certain information isn’t being quickly processed by Australian imams:

Eight Islamic spiritual leaders who preach to hundreds of Muslims in Victoria each day refuse to accept that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the September 11 attacks.

Responding to a survey, the imams from suburban and regional mosques ignored bin Laden’s own confession.

Asked if bin Laden were responsible for the attacks that killed almost 3000 people, Carlton mosque imam Rexhep Idrizi said: “We don’t know.”

Acting Werribee mosque imam Riyad Ahmad said: “I have it only from one side. I’m not sure really.”

Fitzroy mosque acting imam Bilgim Alpay said: “I don’t know. It’s very hard to answer. There are a lot of political games.”

These people are idiots. Andrew Bolt has more:

To make it worse, the Islamic Council of Victoria has again showed it is no sound ally in this battle either. Asked to explain today’s findings, spokesman Waleed Aly said the imams merely had “a furious mistrust of mainstream media”.

Maybe they should read blogs. Except blogs are probably Haraam. Hey, what about this guy:

A balaclava-clad man, apparently with an Australian accent, has appeared on Arab television warning that more terrorist attacks will be launched on the West.

In a videotaped message aired on the Dubai-based Al-Arabiya satellite channel the masked man, speaking in what sounds like an Australian accent, attacked US President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair over their countries’ involvement in Iraq, it was reported today.

Could be a fake (ie, a tape produced in Australia by someone not connected to psycho groups in Iraq or elsewhere). The crazy eyes are a nice touch, however:
image

Posted by Tim B. on 08/10/2005 at 10:34 AM
(32) Comments • Permalink