Code pink punked

The content on this webpage contains paid/affiliate links. When you click on any of our affiliate link, we/I may get a small compensation at no cost to you. See our affiliate disclosure for more info

Last updated on August 9th, 2017 at 05:58 am

Anti-war group Code Pink are so low on numbers they have to conscript a pro-liberation Iranian. Who—if she actually was a member of Code Pink, instead of a photoshopped import—would by herself raise Code Pink’s collective Hot or Not rating from Invasion of the Leprous Mutant Warthogs to Buy You a Drink, Ladies?

UPDATE. These alarming images of genuine Code Pinkos demonstrate why the group sourced an attractive outsider.

Posted by Tim B. on 01/21/2006 at 07:52 AM
    1. Notice how they not only changed her face, they made her look like those French surgeons had changed her face and botched the job…

      Posted by Mike G on 2006 01 21 at 09:34 AM • permalink


    1. Had they caught the Bush government so much as changing an innocent apostrophe, you’d never hear the end of it.

      By contrast, they have been caught red
      (pink?) handed, yet this will all be forgotten about shortly.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2006 01 21 at 09:39 AM • permalink


    1. They hired Mary Mapes?

      Posted by Rittenhouse on 2006 01 21 at 09:46 AM • permalink


    1. Totally irrelevant: check out the review of Male Like Me in the New York Times today, and notice what happens when their computerized linker thingy links to the author of the 50s bestseller Black Like Me, John Howard Griffin.  (2nd paragraph.)

      Reminds me of when I’d read the Reuters versions of Variety stories; Variety (famous for its own shorthand, e.g., helmer=director) invariably shortened Australia to Oz, and Reuters automatically turned Oz back into Australia.  Which meant every once in a while they ran a story about that Judy Garland classic The Wizard of Australia.

      Posted by Mike G on 2006 01 21 at 10:29 AM • permalink


    1. OT landeryou has been useful :O linking to this hysterical story of the great value PR advice Hamas got for a large amount of money
      expensive stupidity

      Posted by KK on 2006 01 21 at 10:40 AM • permalink


    1. The good news is that Code Pink understands that sex appeal requires the participation of females who have some degree of sexual attraction.  Unlike the majority of their members.

      The bad news is that Code Pink remains a collection of idiot leftards who shed their integrity with their clothes, and really don’t care who they disrepect in Their Quest™.

      Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 01 21 at 11:19 AM • permalink


    1. The ends always justify the means because the lefties are on the side of Truth, Justice, and the International Way. Even dead voters agree.

      Posted by Some0Seppo on 2006 01 21 at 11:31 AM • permalink


    1. That’s just sad.  Not only do they have to photoshop attractive women into their pictures, they’re fully aware that they don’t have any of their own.  It just sucks to be Code Pinker.

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 01 21 at 11:43 AM • permalink


    1. MoveOn photoshops British troops.
      Code Pink photoshops attractive straight women.
      What part of “reality-based” do I not get?

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 01 21 at 12:24 PM • permalink


    1. I love the photo in which one Code Pinko is holding a sign saying “Peace Takes Brains”. I suppose the other side of the sign says, “And Turns Them Into Stupid-Soup”

      Posted by paco on 2006 01 21 at 01:04 PM • permalink


    1. There has not been a less attractive group of females since Cindy Sheehan stood between two mirrors.

      Posted by Latino on 2006 01 21 at 01:53 PM • permalink


    1. Latino, I hold you responsible for my laughing out a mouthful of tea onto my cat…

      Posted by ushie on 2006 01 21 at 02:26 PM • permalink


    1. They should amalgamate with PETA.

      Posted by Ahriman on 2006 01 21 at 05:46 PM • permalink


    1. #5 KK,
      Very interesting.  Hamas seems to be picking up the essence of contemporary Western political strategy: when in trouble don’t change the substance, change the image.  I think it will take more self-control than Hamas has got to keep up the pretence that they are not antisemitic.

      I noticed a complaint by that PR flack for Hamas in the story that those nasty Israelis killed 4,000 Palestinians while the Palis killed 1,000 Israelis.  Tsk, tsk, imagine that.  The Arabs start a war and the Israelis fight back.  Some people just don’t know their place.  It never seems to occur to these clowns that if they didn’t start a war the Israelis wouldn’t be killing them.  It is a subtle point of logic I suppose, too subtle for Pali minds.

      Posted by Michael Lonie on 2006 01 21 at 06:53 PM • permalink


    1. This is all anyone ever needs to know about peace demonstrations.

      Posted by quillpen on 2006 01 21 at 07:20 PM • permalink


    1. Do they ever have an event where more than a very few people attend?  And the guy in that one pic looks like about the only type these hags could attract.  ‘Mr. ‘70s Loser’ I think.

      Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 01 21 at 07:42 PM • permalink


    1. #2 – Had they caught the Bush government so much as changing an innocent apostrophe, you’d never hear the end of it. 
      Dan is right – remember the fuss Janet Albrechtsen had to go through concerning whether the WSJ Online was or was not the WSJ, in an article about Chrenkoff?

      Posted by blogstrop on 2006 01 21 at 08:02 PM • permalink


    1. JorgX

      And the guy in that one pic looks like about the only type these hags could attract.  ‘Mr. ‘70s Loser’ I think.

      And what’s he doing wearing Wronwright’s beret?

      Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2006 01 21 at 08:27 PM • permalink


    1. It appears that the range of types for Code Pink members goes from “shopworn Earth mother” to “troll with birth defects”.

      If I were as ugly as some of those women, I’d do my best to make sure a camera never came near me, as a service to mankind.

      Posted by Billy Hollis on 2006 01 21 at 08:40 PM • permalink


    1. I thought the 60’s were over, man?

      Posted by Looneyc on 2006 01 21 at 08:52 PM • permalink


    1. Their domain sums it up nicely don’t you think?

      Posted by Looneyc on 2006 01 21 at 09:06 PM • permalink


    1. Looneyc – did you see the photos from their picketing of the Hummer dealership? Path-etic!

      You can just feel their utter irrelevance and impotence seeping through the photos.

      Idiot & probable future idiot

      Posted by James Waterton on 2006 01 22 at 02:10 AM • permalink


    1. Those—those pictures—my lord, the horror . . .

      My eyes, what is happening to my eyes. . .


      Posted by stuartfullerton on 2006 01 22 at 02:15 AM • permalink


    1. #5
      Nashat Aqtash = onomatopaeic meaning pulp of juiced fruit.

      sorry, I couldn’t help it.

      The ‘spin doctor’ is an idiot.

      Posted by kae on 2006 01 22 at 03:35 AM • permalink


    1. Who says there’s no such thing as deja vu?

      Posted by Habib on 2006 01 22 at 10:40 PM • permalink


Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.