NON-FLY WHITE GUYS

Wiggaz! Wiggaz galleries! Euro wiggaz!

(Via Florida Cracker)

Posted by Tim B. on 02/27/2008 at 02:51 AM

 

    1. Dog….that is wack!

      Posted by Penguin on 2008 02 27 at 03:12 AM • permalink

 

    1. Da laydee wiggahs iz a skreem, tu!

      Nice counterpoint to Iowahawks Hoosegow Honeys.

      Posted by Harry Bergeron on 2008 02 27 at 03:13 AM • permalink

 

    1. Bugger just found my favoirite pommie site has gone away.
      Chavscum was full of wiggers.All thats left…

      Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2008 02 27 at 03:17 AM • permalink

 

    1. Drongo?

      Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 02 27 at 03:17 AM • permalink

 

    1. Oh no, frollicking, that’s tragic! Chavscum was hilarious.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2008 02 27 at 03:19 AM • permalink

 

    1. Not one pic of Bill Clinton. Shame.

      Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2008 02 27 at 03:24 AM • permalink

 

    1. Heh. I hit chavscum straight away as well.

      Is there a David Attenborough type who can point out the subtle differences between chavs and wiggaz?

      Is wiggah the new chav?

      Posted by fidens on 2008 02 27 at 03:27 AM • permalink

 

    1. #8 fidens

      I’m not sure. I get the impression that “wiggaz” are comfortably middle-class and above, while chavs are thoroughly working class.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2008 02 27 at 03:33 AM • permalink

 

    1. Re: my #9

      I’m also certain there’s plenty of overlap between the two groups.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2008 02 27 at 03:36 AM • permalink

 

    1. Best collection of douchebags since the legendary Icy Hot Stuntaz.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2008 02 27 at 03:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. #9 – chavs are more welfare class than working class

      Posted by bondo on 2008 02 27 at 03:39 AM • permalink

 

    1. #12 bondo

      Yes, you’re right. Wiggaz are ghetto-wannabes, chavs are the real deal.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2008 02 27 at 03:41 AM • permalink

 

    1. GANGSTA!

      Posted by bondo on 2008 02 27 at 03:44 AM • permalink

 

    1. “Chav”, being a British-ism, is slightly alien to me. In the US, we have welfare-class “trailer trash”. Lest you think that term is overly harsh or bigoted, just spend a day listening to their ignorant, drunken rants.

      Yes, it IS everyone else’s gaddamn fault…

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2008 02 27 at 03:50 AM • permalink

 

    1. #14 bondo

      From the comments:

      MC Bitchtits

      Heh.

      Posted by Spiny Norman on 2008 02 27 at 03:53 AM • permalink

 

    1. Word.

      It reminds me of Black People Love Us from a few years back.

      Posted by Dan Lewis on 2008 02 27 at 03:53 AM • permalink

 

    1. Takes me back to my days in the hood.  Life was tough back then, you had to roll with a crew and pack a 9 to survive.  Those bitches from the Engineering faculty would constantly cross over to our turf (Science faculty) and try and muscle in on our customers and hoes.  Needless to say there are more than a few wannabe civil and mining engineering graduates that never made it out alive.

      Posted by bondo on 2008 02 27 at 04:03 AM • permalink

 

    1. Hey wuzzup, muthafukka, don’ be dissin’ my cuz an’ homies or I be poppin’ a cap in yo’ ass* ol’ school. Peace.

      *Why I’d want to, or what would be the possible effect of inserting a bottle lid in a burro I have no idea, but the jargon seems to sit well with this milleau.

      Seriouslt though, once again we downunder types have been left out- while our own home-grown skinny, translucent wanna-be gangstas appear to be of the same genus, I hazaerd they are emulating emulators- in this case the Persons Of Middle Eastern Appearance discriminated-against and marginalised youth of indeterminate ethnicity that make up a substantial demographic in the disadvantaged suburbs of SW Sydney, or as they are more commonly known “Lebos”.

      Given that the emulators are usually Bogans from more affluent and crackhouse-free areas, what about the epithet “Bogos” to describe this phenomenon?

      Posted by Habib on 2008 02 27 at 04:31 AM • permalink

 

    1. #8- I think you’ll find Chavs and Pikeys are pretty interchangeable.

      Posted by Habib on 2008 02 27 at 04:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. When I was renovating in the city I had some of these bastards playing that cacophonous crap they call music at all hours; rather than nail-gunning their heads together I left a very large magnet near their computer-driven beat-boxes; wiggaz response.

      Posted by cohenite on 2008 02 27 at 04:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. #11, dave
      yea, skinny boys with pretensious scowls scare me.  too funny

      Posted by missred on 2008 02 27 at 04:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. Every so often evolution has a malady and this is a prime example.

      Posted by Howzat on 2008 02 27 at 05:05 AM • permalink

 

    1. It seems to me that over the last several decades of our great multi-culti experiment we’ve managed to separate the chaff (or is that chav?) from the wheat. All that is left is the worst of each of the contributing cultures. Britain is experiencing the same problem. It’s taken generations to build the structure of the liberties hinted at in the Magna Carta and evolved through the Common Law. It’s taken decades for the culture that built them to be watered down to the point that our middle class youth identify more with African Americans than Australians, and Serbian protesters think it appropriate to splash swastikas all over the Australian flag. We are about to endure three more years of cultural engineering at the hands of the “every culture has equal validity” goons who will use the very freedoms created by a thousand years of Anglo-Saxon legal/political progression to undermine it. /end rant

      Posted by Richard Sharpe on 2008 02 27 at 05:57 AM • permalink

 

    1. #24
      Not a rant but eloquent, spellbinding well-spoken, articulate.

      Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 02 27 at 06:04 AM • permalink

 

    1. I think the various Anglospheric incarnations of this phenomenon can be categorized under the umbrella of “douchebag.” I’m not sure if this is an Americanism, but for our foreign brothers, I’ll elaborate. A “douchebag” is a greasy, smirking specimen of the male gender, fond of the shiny and the tacky, possessing unwarranted arrogance and above all oblivious to his own douchebaggitude. The degrees of douchebaggery range from the thermonuclear douche-osity of a Kevin Federline to the subtle hint of vinaigrette of a Jeremy Pivin.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2008 02 27 at 06:11 AM • permalink

 

    1. Oi! If youse cant connect with da Youf, well u no what they say:  If its 2 loud your 2 old!!!11!!1

      CU on MySpace youse old farts!!1!!1!

      Posted by Kaboom on 2008 02 27 at 06:13 AM • permalink

 

    1. Thats teh hawtnezz!!!11!!1!

      Posted by Dave S. on 2008 02 27 at 06:19 AM • permalink

 

    1. So young to have such terrible deformed arthritic hands. And how sad to be labelled wankers when they can’t.

      Posted by Contrail on 2008 02 27 at 06:24 AM • permalink

 

    1. Completely off topic, but I have recently come to the conclusion that Matthew Clarke and Lara Bingle should immediately get married and do their best to reduce Australia’s per capita greenhouse gas emissions.  Maybe enough young lads for a cricket team, with a similar number of daughters to thrillingly occupy entropy’s sons.

      Just thought I had to share that opinion.

      Posted by entropy on 2008 02 27 at 06:30 AM • permalink

 

    1. No worries man, I send summun aroun dere an tell dat chick to cool it soes you not distracted when youse overseas. I show you how it’s done.

      Posted by blogstrop on 2008 02 27 at 06:40 AM • permalink

 

    1. Arse-hats on backwards?

      Posted by egg_ on 2008 02 27 at 06:56 AM • permalink

 

    1. #24 Is it fair to say that those who embrace cultural equivalence also think eugenics is a crime against nature, and any attempt by humanity at apotheosis is a sin against god? Is this why hard green is like religious fundamentalism? And who the hell is Professor Bunyip? Is someone going to tell me, or do I have to begin an analysis of “Ode To a Grecian Urn”?

      Posted by cohenite on 2008 02 27 at 07:10 AM • permalink

 

    1. Here in da westside, we call’um bogs man!!!!

      Posted by Cashew on 2008 02 27 at 07:34 AM • permalink

 

    1. Nobody knows who Professor Bunyip was.  He was a fantastic blogger that stopped writing a few years ago.  The prof was a university lecturer that told many sad tales of discussions in the staff room, usually involving fellow profs and lecturers in esoteric subjects like “womyn’s studies” that were always hilarious, as were tales of his various voluptuous and willing students.  Mrs Bunyip always ruled the roost, however, and there was the odd reference to the Great Bunyip.  The Bunyip’s best feature was his cutting wit, usually at the expense of tossers like Robert Manne, Mike Carlton etc.

      Anyway, there was a lot of speculation that Professor Bunyip was actually Imre Salisinsky, and that the blog was stopped when he started working for News Limited.

      Posted by entropy on 2008 02 27 at 07:38 AM • permalink

 

    1. #35 Thank you entropy. One day I hope they solve you, and I mean that in the nicest way.

      Posted by cohenite on 2008 02 27 at 07:46 AM • permalink

 

    1. #19: “Bogos” to describe this phenomenon?

      Or “Bogaz”.

      Posted by paco on 2008 02 27 at 08:32 AM • permalink

 

    1. Wiggaz.  Wankstas.  It really is the end times.

      Posted by RebeccaH on 2008 02 27 at 10:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. #35 womyn’s studies

      During ABC RN’s comedy hour, Wife Life Matters, presented by Dick Lady Aedy*, we were introduced to The Porn Report, whereupon, of course, we were instructed in ABC feminist nanny-style how we are to partake.

      The co-authors of this report look like they shouldn’t be allowed to reproduce … McKee looks like the aforementioned type who’d fantasize about making love with Cate Blanchett’s nuggets, instead of her smoo …

      This must be a two-part comedy series, as it appears close on the heels of The Philosophers Zone’s feminist perspective on love (self-parody?) influenced ‘by the work of Michelle Le Doeuff, the French feminist philosopher’ and citing cases such as Frankenstein’s Monster’s penchant for necrophilia …

      Perhaps, Aunty will introduce The Porn Report as a regular program, along with The Law Report, The Medical Report, et al … with handy tips such as dildo lubrication aids and how to bag celebrity nuggets, non?

      *Formerly Gerald-in-Doggie

      Posted by egg_ on 2008 02 27 at 10:43 AM • permalink

 

    1. Habib— “Milieu,” dear boy.

      *sigh* No one expects officers to talk English good.

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2008 02 27 at 10:45 AM • permalink

 

    1. #8, #9 “Is wiggah the new chav?”

      Or the new Spiv, for that matter. Chavs and trailer trash seem geneticly welfare class, while Wiggahs are distincly middle class, while pissing on all the advantages thereof.

      While chavs and trailer trash might get slight sympathy on grounds that “they don’t know no bettah”, wiggahs get no such break since they are such pitiful wanabees.

      They remind me of hippies circa 1970, rejecting their middle-class roots, while feeding off them all the same. Both went declasse by choice, and in the future economy wiggahs may get their wish.

      Posted by Harry Bergeron on 2008 02 27 at 12:30 PM • permalink

 

    1. Chavs and trailer trash seem geneticly welfare class, while Wiggahs are distincly middle class, while pissing on all the advantages thereof.

      Wiggas are essentially rednecks who take their cues from the inner city instead of the back-country hollers.

      Posted by Rob Crawford on 2008 02 27 at 12:49 PM • permalink

 

    1. Wiggas are wanna-bee black ganstas. The irony hits em hard when they get to a detention facility of any sort, be that prison or jail.

      The black gangstas just use em for sex toys. Unless they hook up with the white gangsters. Then they get used as sex toys and afterward, sold to the black gangstas as sex toys.

      Life is harsh. Life is ridiculously harsh for posers.

      Posted by Grimmy on 2008 02 27 at 02:00 PM • permalink

 

    1. Wiggas are wanna-bee black ganstas. The irony hits em hard when they get to a detention facility of any sort, be that prison or jail.

      They wouldn’t have to go to jail to experience the irony. There are streets in Washington, or New York, or Los Angeles where they would have trouble walking one block 50 feet.

      Posted by ErnieG on 2008 02 27 at 02:13 PM • permalink

 

    1. They remind me of hippies circa 1970, rejecting their middle-class roots, while feeding off them all the same. Both went declasse by choice

      As someone who actually did grow up in “the hood”, I can’t tell you how much I despise these slummers. There wasn’t a day that went by that I didn’t pray, strive and vow to get the fuck out of that hellhole and have a nice, boring, middle-class life surrounded by nice, boring, middle-class people.

      The other class of people I despise is the people I grew up with who ended up in prison or dead. Fuck ‘em. They had a choice. And fuck the liberals who excuse their behavior because of “hopelessness” and “despair.” They seemed pretty damn cheerful when they were stomping my ass.

      Posted by Dave S. on 2008 02 27 at 02:20 PM • permalink

 

    1. And now, Venezuelan wiggaz!:

      “You gotta right
      To Fight
      For the PARTY!”

      Posted by richard mcenroe on 2008 02 27 at 03:50 PM • permalink

 

  1. #19, Habib, Your Bogans must be very different to ours if they can even be compared to a wigger with a straight face.

    Ours still wear flannies and ripped jeans.

    Posted by The_Wizard_of_WOZ on 2008 02 28 at 02:03 AM • permalink