Contact

trblair-at-ozemail.com.au

Monthly Archives

Most recent entries

Links

Achewood
Acidman
Andrea Harris
Andrew Bartlweet
Andrew Bolt
Andrew Landeryou
Angie Schultz
Ask An Imam
The Australian
Bastards Inc.
Belmont Club
Bernard Slattery
Big Pharaoh
Bill Quick
The Bitch Girls
Bjørn Stærk
Blithering Bunny
Catallaxy
Cathy Seipp
Charles Austin
Chase Me Ladies
Chuck Simmins
Clive James
Club Troppo
Coalition of the Swilling
Colby Cosh
The Corner
Currency Lad
The Daily Grind
The Daily Telegraph
Damian Penny
Dave Barry
Dave Lee
David Frum
David M.
Dawn Eden
Day by Day
Decision '08
Derek Sapphire
Dissident Frogman
Dr Alice
Drooble
Ed Driscoll
Drunkablog
Dylan Kissane
El Cid
Environmental Republican
EURSOC
Flashman
Florida Cracker
Fraters Libertas
Free Will
Gay Patriot
Glenn Reynolds
Hablog
HispaLibertas
Hit & Run
Hugh Hewitt
Iain Dale
Iowahawk
Iraq the Model
Jack Lacton
Jack Marx
James Lileks
James Paterson
Jawa Report
Jeff Jarvis
Jennifer Marohasy
Jessica’s Well
J.F. Beck
Jim Treacher
Joanne Jacobs
Joe Hildebrand
John Hawkins
Jules Crittenden
Ken Layne
Ken Summers
Kitty Bukake
Kiwiblog
Les Enfants Terrible
Libertarian Leanings
Little Green Footballs
Lubos Motl
Mahmood's Den
Major John
Man of Lettuce
Mark Steyn
Mary Katharine Ham
Matt Welch
Megan McArdle
Melanie Phillips
Menorah Blog
Michael Jennings
Michael Totten
Michelle Malkin
Midwest Conservative Journal
Mike Jericho
Miranda Devine
Natalie Solent
Ned Wynn
Nick & Nora Charles
Ninme
Norm Geras
Oliver Kamm
Opinion Dominion
Opinion Journal
Pajamas Media
Patterico
Paul Bickford
Pejman Yousefzadeh
Peter Briffa
Peter Risdon
Pixy Misa
Pommygranate
Popular Mechanics
Posse Incitatus
Powerline
Protein Wisdom
Quentin George
Questions and Observations
Rajan Rishyakaran
Reason
Rezwan
Right Thinking
RightWingDeathBogan
Rob Hinkley
Roger L. Simon
Romeo Mike
Ron Hardin
Sam Ward
Samizdata
StraightShooters
Sheila O'Malley
Silent Running
Spartacus
Spin Starts Here
Stop the ACLU
Tim Newman
Tim Worstall
Time Goes By
Tony Pierce
Tony the Teacher
TramTown
Vampus
Venomous Kate
Virginia Postrel
Vodka Pundit
Warwick Hughes
The Weekly Standard
Whacking Day
Will Type For Food
Wog Blog
Wonkette
Zoe Brain
Zombie Time

Previous Tim

Tim Blair on Spleenville

Tim Blair on Blogspot

Search


Advanced Search

Syndicate

Statistics

This page has been viewed 30732026 times
Page rendered in 0.2036 seconds

Referrers

Powered by ExpressionEngine

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

SIR NICK’S FACTS CHECKED

Super expert global warming researcher Sir Nicholas Stern claims:

“You can’t export an American car to China: it does not satisfy the emissions standards.”

Really? That’ll be news to DaimlerChrysler and Cadillac, both of which maintain outlets in China. This idea that Chinese automotive standards are higher than those in the US turns out to be another leftist item of faith; here’s Seattle’s Joel Connelly:

We can’t sell American cars in China because they don’t meet the Middle Kingdom’s fuel efficiency standards.

And the HuffyPost’s Laurie David:

You can’t even sell many American cars in China because they don’t meet that country’s higher fuel standards. That’s right, China demands better mileage from its cars than we do!

For sure, Laurie and Joel and Sir Nick! When not banning US vehicles entirely, China apparently limits its intake of American road metal to fuel-sipping Caddy econopods:

During a ceremony at Beijing’s Imperial Ancestors’ Temple, a symbol of ancient China, General Motors officially launched Cadillac, its premium luxury brand for modern China.

Three new Cadillac models that will be sold in China - the CTS, SRX and XLR - were unveiled at the ceremony. All three products embody Cadillac’s distinctive bold design, purposeful innovation and balanced performance ...

All three models will start as imports from GM’s North American Operations. They will be built at the company’s Grand River manufacturing facility in Lansing, Michigan, and at its facility in Bowling Green, Kentucky.

That report is dated 2004, at which point Cadillac apparently first met China’s rigorous emission and mileage standards. Here’s a report on Ford and GM’s export plans from one year prior:

The top two US automakers announced plans to export thousands of vehicles to China as that country moves to open up its market to foreign competition.

By 2006, that export plan was paying off:

Ford Motor Company took another important step forward today in its commitment to grow in China by pledging to export more vehicles from the United States to China ...

In 2005, Chinese customers purchased 2,787 Ford Mavericks, an increase of nearly 50 percent over 2004 and enough to place Maverick among the best-sellers in the Chinese imported SUV segment. And the sales growth continues: Maverick sales in the first quarter of 2006 were up over 30 percent year-over-year. With 423 sales in calendar year 2005, Lincoln Navigator helped define the market for “President Class,” full-size SUVs.

The commitment to continue the export program was marked in a ceremony in Los Angeles attended by a Chinese delegation led by Madam Wu Yi, China’s Vice Premier and Minister of Health, and included a number of senior officials from China’s Ministry of Commerce.

If, according to Stern, Chinese cars are cleaner than US cars, shouldn’t they be easily exported to America? Not so:

Reached by phone in China, an employee of [Chinese carmaker] Brilliance’s export trade department said the automaker wants to export the Zhonghua.

“But right now the emissions criteria doesn’t meet US and European levels,” the worker said. “Getting those certifications is very expensive. Therefore, we don’t have a plan to develop these aspects right now.”

What’s that? Chinese vehicle emissions don’t meet US standards? We’ll need a second opinion:

Chinese carmakers are throttling back plans to export their cars into major overseas markets such as Western Europe and North America, according to research undertaken for a just-auto members’ management briefing.

The study found that Chinese carmakers’ attentions are instead currently focussed on the need to supply a growing domestic market.

Ambitious export plans have been revised in the light of the need to meet relatively stringent crash-testing and emissions regulations in developed markets.

If Stern can be so wrong on elementary matters such as these, how wrong might he be about climate change (which, according to him, will cause gender inequalities and forced marriage)?

(Via Contrail and Dave Surls; earlier post on this here)

Posted by Tim B. on 03/27/2007 at 11:05 AM
(77) CommentsPermalink
Page 1 of 1 pages