Wednesday, July 19, 2006
CONCLUDED DEBATE CONTINUES SOMEHOW
The Australian’s Alan Wood on latest glabal worming developments:
It has become quite fashionable of late to assert the global warming debate is over and an overwhelming scientific consensus prevails. This is simply untrue.
As acknowledged in an Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics report on climate change scenarios, also released on Monday, there are still considerable scientific uncertainties surrounding the nature and extent of future climate change.
The evil denialist also covers the recent debate over the relationship between warming and hockey sticks.
(Via Andrew Bolt, lately blogging at suitable Fisk speed)
UPDATE. Dissent in Santa Fe:
Most of the 140 scientists participating in this week’s second International Conference on Global Warming remain neutral on the politically charged issue of global climate change, according to Petr Chylek, a Los Alamos National Laboratory scientist who helped organize the event.
Bill Gray is not one of them.The Colorado State University hurricane expert thinks global warming— the idea that fossil fuel-burning humans are causing damaging climate change— is “foolishness."
The five-day conference ends Friday. Hey, look what’s making a comeback:
During Tuesday’s sessions, scientists made predictions about the next Ice Age ...