<< TOILET TEST ~ MAIN ~ GAP FOUND >>

WRIGHT RIGHTED

Reader Sunny D. reports:

I was watching The Einstein Factor last night. It’s one of the few shows that is actually watchable on the ABC. The host is funny in his quirky ways.

I am not sure if you are aware of the format. There are three contestants and also a Brains Trust (invited guests from all walks of life, writers, public servants, good for nothings etc). Yesterday among the Brains Trust was Dr Clare Wright.

I don’t know much about Ms Wright, but it wouldn’t be a stretch to describe her as your average latte-sipping, Chomsky-reading, “terrorism is a valid political expression”-believing armchair feminist.

One of the contestants had chosen Lawrence of Arabia as his main topic. Ms Wright remarked (I am paraphrasing): “Don’t you think it’s funny that today Lawrence would be in Guantanamo Bay for his beliefs”.

She ended this with a satisfied smirk, as if she had just said something very witty. To her utter disgust (and my pleasure) the contestant fired back with: “To the contrary, if Lawrence would have succeeded in his ideas, there wouldn’t be a need for Guantanamo Bay. There would be democracy in the Middle East.”

The consternation on the face of Ms Wright as she turned away from the contestant was telling. What an answer! In my high school days in LA, it was referred to as getting ‘bitch slapped’.

Perhaps she was Lawrenced.

Posted by Tim B. on 05/16/2005 at 11:02 AM
  1. There are few things more satisfying than Chomskybots getting “bitch-slapped” in full view of the public.

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2005 05 16 at 12:09 PM • permalink

  2. I’m not warming to her.

    “Clare is currently the Executive Officer for the History Council of Victoria. She is married to the acclaimed furniture designer/maker, Damien Wright, and has two spectacular children, Bernie (5) and Noah (3). Clare wants to be a writer when she grows up.”

    Posted by rexie on 2005 05 16 at 12:34 PM • permalink

  3. What would have made the moment nicer is if they would have done that tuba sound “wah wah wah waaahhh” right as the camera went to the reaction shot of her.

    Unless they did do the tuba sound. I don’t get that ABC here in the Delaware Valley.

    Posted by William Young on 2005 05 16 at 12:55 PM • permalink

  4. Ah. There’s nothing like a bon mot in the morning.  Who was that wise contestant?  I’d like to write him a fan letter.  (Does anyone do that anymore?)

    Posted by blerp on 2005 05 16 at 01:39 PM • permalink

  5. Oh thank God.  I thought at first Tim was making me a butt of jokes, Margo Kingston style.

    It should be noted that Claire Wright is married to a Wright and therefore is not a Wright by blood.  If she was, well, the clan would likely have to meet and take care of our own blood faults.

    I better go call the Scottish side of the family and tell them to put away the Claymore, it was a false alarm.  I imagine the Aussie side will be a bit disappointed though.  I know the USA side is.

    Posted by wronwright on 2005 05 16 at 02:10 PM • permalink

  6. No, no. Only boys get “Lawrenced”.

    Posted by Sigivald on 2005 05 16 at 03:43 PM • permalink

  7. I surprised the ABC didn’t cut that bit out - only to protect the bitch slapper of course.

    Posted by Michael42 on 2005 05 16 at 05:40 PM • permalink

  8. wronwright,

    Interesting coincidence: I’m Wright on my mother’s side and Clan Gunn on my father’s.

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2005 05 16 at 05:42 PM • permalink

  9. I saw that bit!  It was completely and utterly hilarious.

    Posted by murph on 2005 05 16 at 06:05 PM • permalink

  10. Thank you , Sunny D, you’ve made my morning.  Sounds like our educated friend did to Dr. Wright what the Turks did to Lawrence at Deraa.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2005 05 16 at 07:22 PM • permalink

  11. wronwright,

    Wack her anyway. It’s a justifiable “honor killing” and so the multi-cultis will understand.

    Posted by JDB on 2005 05 16 at 07:50 PM • permalink

  12. Nah, she wasn’t lawrenced, she was obviously silenced. Despicable crushing of dissent, now even on the ABC…can’t a Chomskybot go anywhere these days without being made to face reality? That poor woman, what did she ever do to deserve this?

    Posted by PW on 2005 05 16 at 08:00 PM • permalink

  13. Actually, the “Doctor” Clare Wright thing brings home the sad fact that these days, at least in the Anglosphere, you can progress right through the academic history mill and remain profoundly ignorant.  One of the most ignorant people I’ve ever known had her Ph.D. in history.  She could blather about discourses and hegemons, but the lightest literary or historical allusion in conversation - the small change of cultural reference between educated adults - sailed a mile over her head, unregarded.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2005 05 16 at 08:07 PM • permalink

  14. Ah. There’s nothing like a bon mot in the morning.  Who was that wise contestant?  I’d like to write him a fan letter.  (Does anyone do that anymore?)

    This guy.

    Posted by PW on 2005 05 16 at 08:13 PM • permalink

  15. Oh the shame and humiliation!Pity the poor Doctor being sat on her intellectual arse by a lumpen proletarian bloody sign writer.The ABC really must be much more selective when choosing its contestants to ensure only Socialist suckholes get a run.

    Posted by Lew on 2005 05 16 at 08:58 PM • permalink

  16. Sorry to keep on this one, but even Dr.Wrong’s original comment, as reported by Sunny, makes no sense at all.  Lawrence was ‘special ops’, working with local irregular militias, just like all those guys in Afghanistan: as far as I know, none of them ended up in Gitmo, nor would there be any reason for them to.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2005 05 16 at 09:26 PM • permalink

  17. The repeat is at 1330hrs today Tuesday.

    Posted by Paul on 2005 05 16 at 10:07 PM • permalink

  18. They repeat the Einstein Factor?!

    Posted by cuckoo on 2005 05 16 at 10:55 PM • permalink

  19. Its worth seeing the repeat, after his comment the silence was deafening.

    What I noticed was that on most questions the ‘panel’  just didnt have a clue.  So much for photographic memories and tertiary education.

    Posted by rog2 on 2005 05 16 at 11:55 PM • permalink

  20. Saw it! Excellent - smugness silenced.

    But what are “spectacular children”? Are they the height of ten storey buildings? Or do they glow in the dark? Or can they recite “The Seven Pillars of Wisdom” backwards verbatim?

    You bet

    Posted by you bet on 2005 05 17 at 01:39 AM • permalink

  21. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

    hehe lol

    Posted by Astonished on 2005 05 17 at 04:52 AM • permalink

  22. That emale address bounced back. Clare must be in hiding.

    Posted by Lucky Nutsacks on 2005 05 17 at 07:10 AM • permalink

  23. lawrenced; v., (from old commercialese) having been taken to the cleaners.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 05 17 at 08:44 AM • permalink

  24. Just as well Clare wasnt opining on Rog2 of Arabia;  the good doctor might have received a right ol’ rogering.

    Posted by rog2 on 2005 05 17 at 09:04 AM • permalink

  25. That old nerdy Labor bluestocking Baaarry Jones usually gets a guernsey on the panel.El Lawrence would not have had truck with Dr Wright - Doctor Who?

    Posted by crash on 2005 05 17 at 10:34 AM • permalink

  26. My understanding was that it was precisely because of TE Lawrence’s activities in the Middle East, that we do have Al Qaeda, Salafist, and Wahabist jihadist terror today.
    but hey, I’m willing to listen to the alternative arguments.

    Posted by davo on 2005 05 17 at 07:13 PM • permalink

  27. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.