<< BUDGETBUDGETBUDGET ~ MAIN ~ BOSS GOES GREEN >>

WORKERS UNITED

Posting has been slack here of late - curse you, demon work! - but at least I’m not on strike:

Sydney Morning Herald and Sun-Herald staff walked out this afternoon indefinitely.

“The company has pulled its third redundancy round in four years on us, including 35 redundancies,” Fairfax house committee co-chair Ruth Pollard said.

“So we decided to take action until they come back to the table with a reasonable set of proposals re the redundancies” ...

Staff will hold a rally from 8am at Fairfax headquarters in Sussex St in Sydney tomorrow.

A Sydney Morning Herald rally? Bring on the giant puppet heads!

Posted by Tim B. on 05/09/2007 at 08:41 AM
  1. Will there be head tilting?  I want pics!

    Posted by surfmaster on 2007 05 09 at 08:50 AM • permalink

  2. “There’s deep-seated resentment throughout the staff about the company’s decision to make 35 staff redundant and impose a seven-day rostering system across the two mastheads,” Ms Pollard said.

    Nah? The same SMH lambasting Howard’s IR reforms profiting from them? Surely not.

    Posted by Nic on 2007 05 09 at 08:53 AM • permalink

  3. I lived in Sydney nearly 30 years ago. The SMH was an unreadable leftist rag in those days, but they had a lock on classifieds and job ads.

    History and technology is a bummer, if you are on the wrong side of it, or great if you are on the right side of it.

    BTW, I’m pushing the Smoking Gun that blows AGW out of the water.

    http://gustofhotair.blogspot.com/

    Posted by phil_b on 2007 05 09 at 09:07 AM • permalink

  4. Isn’t “SMH journalists on strike” itself a redundancy?

    Posted by TallDave on 2007 05 09 at 09:08 AM • permalink

  5. Oh, Tim—here’s a beautiful (and more accurate) counterpoint to the ubiquitous “stranded polar bear” pic.

    I bet this one doesn’t get nearly as much use, tho.  Hehe.

    Posted by TallDave on 2007 05 09 at 09:11 AM • permalink

  6. Maybe Lileks would be an imported scab?  His writing would certainly improve those birdcage liners.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 05 09 at 09:18 AM • permalink

  7. Hehe, you beat me to it, JeffS.

    Curse you!

    Posted by Mr. Bingley on 2007 05 09 at 09:21 AM • permalink

  8. Talldave in Walt Disney they would have been lifelong friends.

    That was why I liked the movie Madagasgar the lion finally tried to eat the zebra.


    PS I’d like to see pics of the puppet heads too and how can they afford them aren’t they err redundant?

    Posted by hollingshead on 2007 05 09 at 09:42 AM • permalink

  9. Sydney Morning Herald and Sun-Herald staff walked out this afternoon indefinitely.

    Circulation rose 9% the first day.

     

    A Sydney Morning Herald rally?

    But… but… if there’s an underattended and overhyped rally and the SMH isn’t there to cover it, does it make a noise…?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 05 09 at 09:45 AM • permalink

  10. A private company making market-driven decisions in the interests of its economic viability? Whatever next.  Keeping that clenched fist raised, Ms Pollard will surely never be defeated.

    I wonder if she or any of the other strikers own shares, in anything?

    Posted by romeo on 2007 05 09 at 09:55 AM • permalink

  11. Do the SMH staffers actually qualify for unemployment benefits?  Is there any evidence they’ve actually been working at all?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 05 09 at 09:56 AM • permalink

  12. UnFairFax

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 05 09 at 10:00 AM • permalink

  13. How quaint. An indefinite strike. Takes me back to the good old days of the 70s when entire construction sites shut down in my town if the surf was good.

    Posted by mareeS on 2007 05 09 at 10:00 AM • permalink

  14. Ruth Pollard and her colleagues have spooned up leftist shite for decades and driven readers away in droves. I know that in fairy land this means you are a working class hero and keep your job forever. But in the real world, talking to customers as if they’re stupid has consequences. Perhaps if she’d read Milton Friedman instead of Karl Marx she’d have worked out a more sustainable way to comport herself at work.

    Maybe she can start a blog and attract readers in a true free market of ideas.

    Posted by Hanyu on 2007 05 09 at 10:14 AM • permalink

  15. ...Unsurprisingly, the accuracy of reporting improved substantially, whilst the snark and editorial content of the news pages are immensly decreased.

    I say fire ‘em all and see what happens. If you’re sliding down the drain, try something radical.

    Posted by brett_l on 2007 05 09 at 10:22 AM • permalink

  16. “The Department of Redundancy Department? They’re right up the stairs and down the hall to the left. But they’re closed. Oh. You’ve been transferred there? Sorry.”

    Posted by ErnieG on 2007 05 09 at 11:09 AM • permalink

  17. Hehe, you beat me to it, JeffS.

    Just trying to take care of our own, Mr. B!

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 05 09 at 11:19 AM • permalink

  18. Is it redundant to say “redundant” three times in two sentences?

    Posted by R C Dean on 2007 05 09 at 11:21 AM • permalink

  19. It’s important to have redundant systems on vehicles.

    Just sayin’.

    Posted by blogagog on 2007 05 09 at 11:32 AM • permalink

  20. I don’t know, not really, but um, how about trying out this idea?  How about the employees of the SMH ... and the management ... team up together ... to put out a good ... and unbiased ... newspaper ... that people would want to buy? 

    Wouldn’t that solve everyone’s problems?

    Posted by wronwright on 2007 05 09 at 11:39 AM • permalink

  21. If your employer suspects you of being redundant, why would you want to go out and prove it?

    Posted by Paul Zrimsek on 2007 05 09 at 11:51 AM • permalink

  22. #21 Paul, they’re not very bright at the SMH.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 05 09 at 12:07 PM • permalink

  23. Futile stuff. A bunch of my former fellow hacks standing in a circle, chanting “the workers united will never be defeated” and adressing one another as “comrade.” Communism, them were the days.

    Posted by mareeS on 2007 05 09 at 12:16 PM • permalink

  24. How can you use the term redundancy more than once???

    Shouldn’t they be called the unaccounted for?  net losers? left outs?

    Posted by Lonetown on 2007 05 09 at 12:32 PM • permalink

  25. I thought that Communism was dead as a mullet. But there’s still people around who live in our capitalist pig society and pine for communism.

    Maybe they should fuck off* emigrate?

    *Oops, I did it again.

    Posted by kae on 2007 05 09 at 01:18 PM • permalink

  26. #20 Now that’s just crazy talk.

    Posted by rbj1 on 2007 05 09 at 01:25 PM • permalink

  27. Sydney Morning Herald and Sun-Herald staff walked out this afternoon indefinitely.

    How could you tell?

    #21. That is an excellent point - maybe they can draw up yet another round of redundancies from this little strike experience?!

    Posted by Major John on 2007 05 09 at 02:00 PM • permalink

  28. I note that reporters and photographers were excluded from the job cuts.  What, there are no redundancies in their numbers?  Or it’s just easier to force the remaining support staff to take on ever increasing work loads for no more pay?

    In any case, it’s a newspaper about which no Australian here has had anything good to say, so who cares?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 05 09 at 02:31 PM • permalink

  29. but at least I’m not on strike:

    Yeah, more of a work-slowdown.

    Posted by Veeshir on 2007 05 09 at 02:40 PM • permalink

  30. *Oops, I did it again.

    How Britney of you.

    Hey, y’all cath this rock out rendition of ” Oops, I did it again

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 05 09 at 03:06 PM • permalink

  31. Then maybe you can c-a-t-c-h it, too. Guess one could say, well fuck, I did it again, too.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 05 09 at 03:08 PM • permalink

  32. Just trying to help out the newspapers down there.

    California Man Cuts Off Mom’s Head With Saw, Dies Trying to Cut Off His Own
    Great headline, no? (literally). Maybe the Islamist’s will pick up on this new technique, huh?

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 05 09 at 03:27 PM • permalink

  33. “Redundancy” would be a better word if there were a word “Dundancy” that meant exactly the same thing.

    Posted by Paul Zrimsek on 2007 05 09 at 03:30 PM • permalink

  34. #33

    Maybe that’s why some people call their boss a dunderhead.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 05 09 at 03:36 PM • permalink

  35. Oops!

    Ah, as always-or not.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 05 09 at 03:36 PM • permalink

  36. #32 El Cid:

    Holy Target Rich Environment.
    I’ll start with:
    Welcome to the US, where even our beheadings are done with modern technology!

    Posted by brett_l on 2007 05 09 at 03:42 PM • permalink

  37. We must stamp out and abolish redundancy!

    Posted by Neeniebug on 2007 05 09 at 03:43 PM • permalink

  38. “Declared redundant”?...

    What, “useless bag of shite” was to impolitic?

    Posted by mojo on 2007 05 09 at 03:54 PM • permalink

  39. More assistance for the ‘newsies’.

    Hamas Pulls ‘Mickey Mouse’ Look-Alike From Kids TV Show for ‘Review’

    Fox News

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 05 09 at 03:55 PM • permalink

  40. OT again. Good to hear that so-called Tim’s employer has agreed to go carbon neutral. Tim’s carbon offsets are expected to take up the forests indicated here in the purple.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 05 09 at 06:07 PM • permalink

  41. 32:

    A child and three other adults were in the three-bedroom home when police arrived. Several families rented rooms in the home, Knapp said.

    poor kid

    Posted by peter m on 2007 05 09 at 06:13 PM • permalink

  42. #37, then eliminate and prohibit it.

    Posted by Vexorg on 2007 05 09 at 06:17 PM • permalink

  43. You may say I’m redundant, but I’ll have you know I, and my esteemed college of scribes and erstwhile toilers under the banner of the Media, Arts & Entertainment Alliance are, indubitably and formidably, (sweeping gesture to the far horizon) On Strike!

    Posted by blogstrop on 2007 05 09 at 06:17 PM • permalink

  44. As long as they made Ed O’ Loughlin redundant, that is all that matters. Fucking idiot.

    Posted by The Best Infidel on 2007 05 09 at 06:25 PM • permalink

  45. Will the Margo Blog now get more contributors?

    or perhaps competitors?

    Posted by Rob Read on 2007 05 09 at 06:30 PM • permalink

  46. null

    Story continues…. 7 seven-day rostering system across the two mastheads

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 05 09 at 06:33 PM • permalink

  47. Heard a rumour Age boss Jaspen was locked out of the Budget lockup. Never booked, apparently.

    Great line from Mark Steyn, noting street protests over the French elections.

    ...lemmings striking for a steeper cliff.

    Posted by JAFA on 2007 05 09 at 06:33 PM • permalink

  48. Who needs giant puppet heads when you have Alan Ramsey?

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 05 09 at 06:38 PM • permalink

  49. We regret this interruption to the flow of information from the SMH, fountain of wisdom, wellspring of wellbeing, and pillar of pillocks. Here’s an interview we did earlier:
    Reporter: Would you please explain your climate initiative?
    ALP: Thanks. Our research, as you know,  indicates a need to clamp down on energy use and reduce CO2 emissions. We’ll identify two houses out of every hundred and make them reduce their carbon footprint by 60%.
    Reporter: How will you choose those two houses?
    ALP: That’s easy. You avoid all those where the people tell you to piss off, like the ones where the bikies and redneck-blue collar types live. Leave out the aggro foreigners to whom any suggestion is an affront to their culture. Don’t bother with those rich, gated communities who set the dogs on you. And the hippies don’t have the power connected any more. What we’re looking for is the middle-class, inoffensive, do-gooders who can be roped into a cause or told that it’s in their best interests to do as we say. Politics is a body contact sport, and they don’t want to get hurt, do they?
    Reporter: So, say you succeed and browbeat these two houses into reducing their emissions by 60%; is that really having much impact overall?
    ALP: No, but it makes electoral sense because it looks like we’re doing something while the other mob are just denialists.
    Reporter: I guess it’s like Australia, with 1.6% of the world’s emissions, reducing them by 60% while most countries find an excuse not to.
    ALP: Yes, but don’t print that. At least not until after the election.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2007 05 09 at 06:41 PM • permalink

  50. #49 Yes and now it seems that Rupert is losing his marbles.

    Whatever happened to clear logical thought and correct identification of cause and effect.

    I wonder what on earth Rupert thinks this crap will achieve? He says it’s good business, but really ... oh WTF /endmuse.

    Posted by Wand on 2007 05 09 at 06:50 PM • permalink

  51. QUIZ!

    IS THIS NEWS STORY:

    a) A wanky example of strike action;

    b) A striking example of wankers in action;

    c) An acting example of strikers wanking;

    d) All of the above1

    Posted by TimT on 2007 05 09 at 07:18 PM • permalink

  52. D

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 05 09 at 07:21 PM • permalink

  53. Seems to me a golden opportunity to return the classifieds to the front page, where they belong.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 05 09 at 07:34 PM • permalink

  54. #50

    Murdoch simply sees a maket advantage in it.  His actions are the precise reason that Adam Smith admired capitalism whilst simultaneously disliking capitalists.

    Posted by murph on 2007 05 09 at 07:40 PM • permalink

  55. No doubt tomorrow’s one-page edition will report the hundreds of thousands of people who attended the Fairfax protest…

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 05 09 at 09:19 PM • permalink

  56. “The Workers! United!
    Will Never Be Rehired!
    The Workers! United!
    Will Never Be Rehired!
    The Workers! United!
    Will Never Be Rehired!
    The Workers! United!
    Will Never Be Rehired!

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 05 09 at 09:24 PM • permalink

  57. Go ahead. Go on strike. After all, you’re not exactly and essential service.

    Posted by Miranda Divide on 2007 05 09 at 09:54 PM • permalink

  58. As well as not being and essential service, compared to John Denver, he has sold very few CDs.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 05 09 at 10:37 PM • permalink

  59. Can we expect to see those high profile Fairfax Socialists,Carlton and Fitzsimons,join the Comrades at the barricades? Perhaps not,they may have signed private contracts (sort of like up-market AWA’s for the elite)that happily prevent one from taking strike action and thus losing money in the futile pursuit of justice for plebs.

    Posted by Lew on 2007 05 09 at 11:16 PM • permalink

  60. Guess what? The indefinite strike appears to have ended pretty damn quick.
    Herald journalists return to work

    Posted by hazza on 2007 05 10 at 01:09 AM • permalink

  61. Jeez, this is extremely disappointing.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 05 10 at 01:49 AM • permalink

  62. The best day of my life was one where the non-worker of Radio JJJ went on strike. 

    No announcers, no reporters, no whingey-whiney Howard-haterLeftie Pacifist Feminist drivel, nothing - just one great indie rock song after another for the whole day. 

    Bliss!

    Posted by Apparatchik on 2007 05 10 at 02:10 AM • permalink

  63. 60-It’s good to see AP taking the pic to highlight the strike. Good pay when they strike?

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 05 10 at 03:43 AM • permalink

  64. Fairfax doesn’t need protection: Murdoch


    null

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 05 10 at 03:46 AM • permalink

  65. Everyone has their price.  Pay anyone enough money and they will leave quietly.

    Either Fairfax is being stingy, or the journalists have an over-inflated sense of their worth.

    Posted by mr creosote on 2007 05 10 at 08:16 AM • permalink

  66. #62- My thoughts exactly- it was almost worth 8c that day, but didn’t last long. I’m currently besieging them with complaints- every time I hear one of the perpetual undergraduates that plague this network editorialise on some issue, I put it in writing to station and corporation management, and the minister. I figure if enough people annoy them they’ll shed the mouthy onair onanists and revert to a music format; it’s supposed to be a yoof network for fucks sake, and they wilfully ignore the fact that the 18-35 demographic is staunchly conservative and vote Liberal (and hate hiphop and crap whiny hippies like Missy Fucking Higgins). Their Newtowncentric lean is appealing to a small and shrinking audience of humanities students and lecturers, and assorted failures.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 05 10 at 08:53 AM • permalink

  67. I worked at the SMH for about 18 months around 1977. In the graphics department. One day a guy chomping on an apple came dragging his feet through the department and mumbled something like ‘all out’. And kept going. I asked what did he say and as everyone bent down and picked up their lunch boxes someone repeated ‘all out’. This was a first for me, a country boy from Townsville. So… I followed the many hundreds of workers into the bowels of the SMH to hear one comrade after another talk to the reason for the about to be voted on strike. It seems some apprentice had hit a supervisor and had been sacked on the spot. It also seems that this was the second time this apprentice had hit a supervisor and had been sacked on the spot. As the meeting went on and on and on and on and on I noticed comrades slipping out of the windows that opened at our head height and allowed those exiting to stand up at street level and I suppose go to the beach.
    So we all voted to go on strike for 3 days. The next day I went down to buy a paper expecting to see no SMH there and there it was about 80% of its normal size and still with all the bits I liked to read. It seems the management was able to produce a paper without 90% of its work staff. That was one of a number of Union experiences I had that help mould me into the anti left mongrel my children now identify as their Father.

    Posted by Macosghair on 2007 05 10 at 09:09 PM • permalink

  68. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.