<< ONLY NOW CAN WE LAUGH ~ MAIN ~ BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT FLANNERY >>
WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST
Four people are under arrest following the London car bomb discoveries and subsequent Glasgow smashco fiasco:
A witness to the attack said on BBC television that one of the car’s occupants had been ablaze from head to foot, and as he struggled with the police, “was throwing punches and shouting ‘Allah, Allah.’ ”
We shouldn’t read too much in to this; the guy was on fire, after all. He could well have just been screaming, “AAAHHH! AAAHHH!” like a common Presbyterian. The article, from the NYT, continues:
In July 2005, four suicide bombers killed 52 people on London’s transit system, and another set of attacks failed two weeks later, bringing home to Britain fears of homegrown terrorist attacks among its disenfranchised South Asian population. Witnesses said the two men in the Glasgow attack were South Asian.
The 2005 bombers weren’t “disenfranchised”. Dismantled, yes, after their suicide attacks; but franchise-wise, they were enfranchised right up to the level of Mercedes-Benz ownership. Speaking of which:
The alert began early Friday, when the two cars, Mercedes sedans, were found in the central West End theater and nightclub district ...
Sajjan M. Gohel, a security expert, said the police were pursuing a theory that the two car bombs had been designed to explode one after the other — the first to bring people into the street and the second to cause great loss of life. The fact that Thursday night at Tiger Tiger was ladies’ night, he said, recalled a conspiracy in 2004 in which British-born bombers said they wanted to attack women at a nightclub, whom they viewed as promiscuous, in conversations monitored by British intelligence.
And there’s this:
Saturday was the first full day of the school summer vacations; thousands of people were awaiting flights in Glasgow.
When it comes to mass murder, these chaps follow the old seafaring notion: women and children first. Scots weren’t about to stand for any Jeepish airport antics, according to witness Lynsey McBean:
“We saw a green Cherokee drive straight into the front door of the airport but it got jammed. They were obviously trying to get it farther inside the airport as the wheels were spinning and smoke was coming from them. One of the men, I think it was the driver, brought out a plastic petrol canister and poured it under the car. He then set light to it.
“At that point a policeman came over, the passenger got out of the car and punched him. At that point I began to run away. But when I looked back several people had run over to try and stop the men.”
Thus a difference between cultures is made clear. Now unburdened by office, Tony Blair makes a few points:
Tony Blair has launched a powerful attack on ‘absurd’ British Islamists who have nurtured a false ‘sense of grievance’ that they are being oppressed by Britain and the United States ...
‘The reason we are finding it hard to win this battle is that we’re not actually fighting it properly. We’re not actually standing up to these people and saying, “It’s not just your methods that are wrong, your ideas are absurd. Nobody is oppressing you. Your sense of grievance isn’t justified.”’
They’ll be aggrieved about that.
UPDATE. Further Glasgow fiasco details:
The driver had revved the engine but, unable to move any further, grabbed a can of petrol and poured it over himself and the flames beneath the vehicle.
“It was terrifying,” [witness James Stark] said. Onlookers hurled abuse at the two men as they were led away by police. They were later arrested.
The two men, that is, not the abusive onlookers. Well, so I assume; this is modern Britain we’re talking about here.
UPDATE II. A fifth goon has now been arrested. Also:
Britain’s Sky News and The Sun, Daily Express and Daily Telegraph newspapers reported that two of the men arrested were hospital doctors. Police refused to comment on the claim.
UPDATE III. Mark Steyn:
The next editor of Webster’s might like to include a new New York Times definition of “disenfranchised”: “complacent liberal assumption designed to reassure readers that they can fit this story into all the old cliches about the usual root causes”.
Go Tony!
Let’s see…“Tiger Tiger” and “Ladies Night”...
Sounds like a justified case of cat meat to me.
Posted by Mr. Bingley on 2007 07 01 at 11:58 AM • permalinkNice to see that Scots still like a fight. I was afraid everyone on the Sceptered Isle who wasn’t “South Asian” had been gelded.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2007 07 01 at 11:58 AM • permalinkNot only is Tony right, this whole situation is absurd, in fact this whole situation is hilarious and I’m not going to apologise for saying that. What “terror” have these morons managed to inflict so far? They’re down three car bombs and the only serious casualties have been a couple of wannabe martyrs who got set on fire. This whole fiasco gave me a cheap laugh on another an otherwise bleak day of news. Too bad the Brits can’t hang the bastards, there’s always the danger that these dolts might smuggle their sperm out of prison and contaminate the next generation with their stupidity.
Did I mention “Wood’s law of law-breaking” with respect to the two mercedes bomb attempts?
No, well hear it is:
Never break two laws at the same time.
In other words, when parking a car bomb, don’t park it illegally.
Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 12:37 PM • permalinkBuenos dias, Gordon Brown. Al Qaeda thinks you’re Spanish.
This is your inauguration party. AQ is convinced that if they pressure you, you will flee from Britain;‘s commitments in the MidEast; you know, the ones you undercut when you gutted British defence spending.
The only question is, how soon will they be right.
Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 07 01 at 12:39 PM • permalink#3
Tiger, Tiger burning bright
Outside the club on ladies night
What mortal hand and eyes
Could flame this fateful Mercede.In what Glaswegian skies
Burn the fire of Cherokee
On what wings dare he ignite
At the airport in daylightPosted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 12:47 PM • permalink#4 Andrea, as I pointed out on another thread, Glasgow isn’t a good place for Presbitarians. There a rum bunch, the Glaswegians.
Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 12:49 PM • permalinkThe two men, that is, not the abusive onlookers. Well, so I assume; this is modern Britain we’re talking about here.
Tim, is that what’s called a ‘misplaced mahdifier’ in the newspaper biz?
Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 01 at 12:54 PM • permalink#6, I see now why they killed off that screechy, annoying rodent. Listening to that, I’ve learned anew the meaning of “nails on a blackboard”.
It must be a grand relief to Tony Blair to at last say what he really thinks without fear of political backlash. It’s about time more of our political leaders started speaking up about the myth of “Islamophobia”, and start telling Muslim communities in the West to stop worrying about “backlash” and start worrying about the snakes in their midst.
Onlookers hurled abuse at the two men as they were led away by police.
It’s a pity they didn’t hurl their dirks at them, or at least pelt them with five-day old haggis.
I’m reminded of a line from Saki: “Waldo is one of those people who would be enormously improved by death. ” Substitute “terrorists” for “Waldo”, and I’d say spot on.
“It’s not just your methods that are wrong, your ideas are absurd. Nobody is oppressing you. Your sense of grievance isn’t justified.”
Cue Rage Boy!
Posted by nofixedabode on 2007 07 01 at 01:15 PM • permalink#14 Have a good Canada Day, Andycanuk
Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 01:41 PM • permalinkToo bad the onlookers didn’t have the chance to throw those, ummmmmm, “yoots” back into the burning car. It would have made for a nice photo on some front page: “Disenfranchised Scots Hold Impromptu Protest and BBQ”.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 07 01 at 01:42 PM • permalinkRe #20, paco, pump up Gorezilla any more, and he’ll take off like the Goodyear blimp.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 07 01 at 01:43 PM • permalinkAttempting to explode innocent cars and airport terminals? I believe we have found the Islamist chapter of Earth First.
Posted by SwampWoman on 2007 07 01 at 01:45 PM • permalink#22 Mmmmmmmmm, BBQ. Toss in some hawg ribs and pass the beer.
Posted by SwampWoman on 2007 07 01 at 01:47 PM • permalink#20) paco- Well, that’s our Algore! But you do have to admire how he can maintain his courageous aspect in the face of all those hostile cameras!!!
Posted by nofixedabode on 2007 07 01 at 01:54 PM • permalink#15
It must be a grand relief to Tony Blair to at last say what he really thinks without fear of political backlash.
I see this as a failure of his leadership while in office; it also demonstrates the difference between a leader and a politician.
Posted by Harry Bergeron on 2007 07 01 at 02:14 PM • permalink#31
The muslims are angry. Since when haven’t they been?They don’t appear to be angry at the terrorists, just the terrorists being associated with muslims.
Mr. Sarwar is playing the usual good-cop, bad-cop routine that happens with every
muslimterrorist action.Stuff them
Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 03:18 PM • permalinkdisenfranchised South Asian population
I looked up the word “disenfranchised” at dictionary.com. Their definition of the word is:
adjective
deprived of the rights of citizenship especially the right to vote; “labor was voiceless”; “disenfrenchised masses took to the streets”Now how, exactly, were these two skells deprived of their rights to citizenship? Hell, no one, other than the cops, know who these mutts are. And that includes which country they are citizens of. New York Times, thy name is crap.
Posted by David Crawford on 2007 07 01 at 03:20 PM • permalink#29. Yes. I had no strong feelings either way about Blair till now. Throw him on the same heap with Daladier and Baldwin.
Craven placeman.
Posted by Harry Eagar on 2007 07 01 at 03:22 PM • permalinkHmmm ... Blair is going to be a diplomat now, in negotiations in the Middle East. If he continues this sort of candid speech, I see interesting times ahead. As T. S. Eliot noted, “Human kind cannot bear very much reality”, and that goes double for Homo cholerensis mohammedensis.
Posted by Urbs in Horto on 2007 07 01 at 03:32 PM • permalinkOh no! Islamic Arms Race Intensifies. I need to wave something white. A marshmallow on a stick should do the trick.
Posted by SwampWoman on 2007 07 01 at 03:39 PM • permalink#29, I’m not trying to hold Tony Blair up as some kind of exemplar. He holds lots of ideas I don’t agree with. But in the matter of the Islamic war against the West, I feel he did what he could against a lot of opposition. It’s an unpleasant fact that a leader who is not also a politician is not a leader for long.
...bringing home to Britain fears of homegrown terrorist attacks among its disenfranchised South Asian population
Those damn Vietnamese. Or maybe they’re Sri Lankans? Anyway, I take this as a sign that all the competent terrorists by now have been dispatched to hell to look for their 72 virgins.
Posted by Shaky Barnes on 2007 07 01 at 04:22 PM • permalink#7, AussieJim
This whole fiasco gave me a cheap laugh on another an otherwise bleak day of news.
Too right. The only thing missing is the Benny Hill backing music.
Posted by HisHineness on 2007 07 01 at 04:27 PM • permalink#11 Im skeptical - couldn’t this be a complicated plot devised by the neocons, jews and the British government so that they can use it to oppress muslims?
Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. And blow up an airport.
Posted by Shaky Barnes on 2007 07 01 at 04:29 PM • permalink#21 Same to you, Wimpy. Although it’s dropped about 15°C from last week in T.O. (That had me wondering if Al was in town, but I was too lazy to go looking for references.)
BTW, is one allowed to have chianti with barbecue of terrorist? (Not much fat on them, though, to aid with the grilling except for the head, of course, which is also rather bony.)
Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 01 at 05:12 PM • permalinkAnother good catch by Jim Treacher (first-rate wit and ace spotter of high-irony).
Dig this line: “‘We are seething with anger about this,’ said Osama Saeed, Scottish spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain.” Or, as this Scottish immigrant probably put it before it was translated: “Bismillah, but we’ve aw’ ta’en a gude bit maddy o’re yur anti-mooslim clishmaclaiver!”
“It was terrifying,” [witness James Stark] said. Onlookers hurled abuse at the two men as they were led away by police. They were later arrested.
You see, we are far, far to civil to the UNcivil. Lopping their fool heads off and then sending the video to al Jazzera, would be more of an impact statement. Would this have been the case, I’m sure “rage boy” would have had a stroke.No, wait maybe a heart attack. DAMN! There is nothing in their skull so stroke wouldn’t do and they have no heart, that’s out. Hmmm. Got it, “rage boy” would have died of Goat AIDS.
#6 -
Brief O/T: Farfour’s last moments.
Only someone with a heart of stone can possibly watch that and not laugh out loud.
Posted by Jeffersonian on 2007 07 01 at 06:01 PM • permalinkI’m just wondering if that SUV had the “War on Terrorism” bumper sticker attached that John Edwards keeps telling us about. It would be nice if somebody asked him.
Posted by lizardflix on 2007 07 01 at 06:10 PM • permalinkAttention Media Watch, right wing attack on Presbyterian Terrorists underway.
Posted by surfmaster on 2007 07 01 at 06:18 PM • permalinkIt would have been nice if Blair (Tony) had said this stuff whilst in office.
Posted by Harry Buttle on 2007 07 01 at 06:29 PM • permalinkFascinating op-ed about what life is really like in Saudi Arabia by a former hard-line radical Muslim. Here’s an edited extract, rather long, but necessary to give the flavour:
I was repeatedly astounded at the stares Faye [the author’s wife] got from Saudi men and I from Saudi women. Faye was not immodest in her dress. Out of respect for local custom, she wore the long black abaya and covered her hair in a black scarf…Yet on two occasions she was accosted by passing Saudi youths from their cars. On another occasion a man pulled up beside our car and offered her his phone number. In supermarkets I only had to be away from Faye for five minutes and Saudi men would hiss or whisper obscenities as they walked past. When Faye discussed her experiences with local women at the British Council they said: “Welcome to Saudi Arabia.”...
After a month in Jeddah I heard from an Asian taxi driver about a Filipino worker who had brought his new bride to live with him in Jeddah. After visiting the Balad shopping district the couple caught a taxi home. Some way through their journey the Saudi driver complained that the car was not working properly and perhaps the man could help push it. The passenger obliged. Within seconds the Saudi driver had sped off with the man’s wife in his car and, months later, there was still no clue as to her whereabouts. We had heard stories of the abduction of women from taxis by sex-deprived Saudi youths.
Why had the veil and segregation not prevented such behaviour? My Saudi acquaintances, many of them university graduates, argued strongly that, on the contrary, it was the veil and other social norms that were responsible for such widespread sexual frustration among Saudi youth.
At work the British Council introduced free internet access for educational purposes. Within days the students had downloaded the most obscene pornography from sites banned in Saudi Arabia, but easily accessed via the British Council’s satellite connection. Segregation of the sexes, made worse by the veil, had spawned a culture of pent-up sexual frustration that expressed itself in the unhealthiest ways.
Using Bluetooth technology on mobile phones, strangers sent pornographic clips to one another. Many of the clips were recordings of homosexual acts between Saudis and many featured young Saudis in orgies in Lebanon and Egypt. The obsession with sex in Saudi Arabia had reached worrying levels: rape and abuse of both sexes occurred frequently, some cases even reaching the usually censored national press.
Posted by walterplinge on 2007 07 01 at 06:35 PM • permalinkAssuming the NHS service doesn’t kill him in the first place, ann j?
Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 01 at 06:48 PM • permalink... bringing home to Britain fears of homegrown terrorist attacks among its disenfranchised South Asian population
You know, somehow I don’t think the native British would fear terrorist attacks among its immigrants…it’s that the terrorists keep insisting on bringing them to the rest of the population.
Sorry if this was meanted earlier but it seems that two of the five people arrested aredoctors.
—Nora
Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2007 07 01 at 06:59 PM • permalinkHad an American soldier at the golf course yesterday. 2 weeks leave before going back to Iraq. He, his wife mother and father.
Shook his hand and thanked him. Bought his whole families lunch. Alas, he didn’t like our course, little tough it is…but at least, one, it got his mind off what he did do, and will go back to do. Two, in my view he has earned the right to complain about any damn thing he wants.
#59 Since poverty is the root cause of terrorism, it’s obvious those Presbyterian doctors are not being paid enough.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 01 at 07:31 PM • permalinkSome smart ass foursome, behind this young man and his family said…“well if we hit into them, I guess we should say..Incoming”
I said, I wouldn’t do that, if I were you.
One, you may not like the way your ball comes back to you. Two, you will have a bit more to deal with, then that one soldier…like all the staff here….gave an evil grin.
Point taken, by this asshat.
This attack could have been averted if it wasn’t for the miserable economic outlook of British doctors.
The breeding grounds of terrorism are to be found in the poverty of back streets, where fundamentalism offers a false, easy sense of pride and identity to young men who feel denied of any hope or any economic opportunity for themselves. A war on world poverty may well do more for the security of the west than a war on terror.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 01 at 07:39 PM • permalinkarticle, from the NYT -
A witness to the attack said on BBC television that one of the car’s occupants had been ablaze from head to foot, and as he struggled with the police, “was throwing punches and shouting ‘Allah, Allah.’ ”
Tim Blair -
We shouldn’t read too much in to this; the guy was on fire, after all. He could well have just been screaming, “AAAHHH! AAAHHH!” like a common Presbyterian.
This is a hoot, so funny I choked on my diet A&W root beer. It truly is Tim’s humorous comments that have prompt me, paco, Nic—um, ok, not Nic—and many others to also make fun while bringing attention to important issues such as clueless news media overly reluctant to name the background of alleged terrorists.
Posted by wronwright on 2007 07 01 at 07:45 PM • permalink#61; #63
I know the Brit’s National Health Service has its problems but geez…
But the lessons to be learned here are these:
1. Nationalised health care is a bad idea.
2. There is a secret, violent jihadi lurking in a large number of Presbys
—NoraPosted by The Thin Man Returns on 2007 07 01 at 07:48 PM • permalink‘The reason we are finding it hard to win this battle is that we’re not actually fighting it properly. We’re not actually standing up to these people and saying, “It’s not just your methods that are wrong, your ideas are absurd. Nobody is oppressing you. Your sense of grievance isn’t justified.”’
Once again, Tony Blair demonstrates his incredible ignorance of Islam.
To describe the widely held Muslim feelings of grievance as absurd is itself absurd.
One might as well describe a shark as absurd for biting people.‘Persecution is worse than slaughter”- or “persecution is worse than killing” (Al-Quran; 2:217) goes hand in hand with “fight them until persecution is no more, and all religion is for Allah. (2:193).
According the the Quran, Muslims slaughtering infidels for “Islamophobia” or hindering in any way the spread of Islam is fully justified.According to Muslim logic, “persecution” would cover “Islamophobia” and hindering the spread of Islam by telling the truth about Islam or not converting to Islam or not allowing Islam to dominate.
Islam creates a way of thinking in its followers that truly is alien.
I still say that any Muslim that purposely becomes a suicide bomber is a first class
L O S E R
who is trying to take an easy way out of a difficult life while making himself seem courageous and successful. Take away this sense of accomplishment and martyrdom from the Muslim community and the pool of losers would go down. Well, okay, the pool remains the same, but the % of those willing to die while killing other innocent people would go down.
The battle to reform starts within the Muslim community itself.
Posted by wronwright on 2007 07 01 at 08:05 PM • permalink#45 I find them best wrapped in bacon and grilled over a BBQ. But make sure you wash them well first, because you don’t know where they’ve been.
Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 08:08 PM • permalink#59
The majority of the five terror suspects being held in police custody in connection with bomb attacks in London and Glasgow are not British and at least one is still at large, according to Sky sources.
Hold on a minute. How can one of the five held in custody still be at large?Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 08:19 PM • permalink#Soixante-neuf
Islam doesn’t talk about “islamophobia” except in extolling good muslims to make kaffir fear muslims.
David Koresh and the Branch Davidians at Waco were not as sick as Mo and his ummah at Madina.
Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 01 at 08:26 PM • permalink#77 Glasgow is a lousy place to start a fight - I know an Aussie who was beaten up for walking past a Glasgow pub wearing the wrong coloured jumper.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 01 at 08:42 PM • permalinkOr a great place to start a fight, depending on your point of view.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 01 at 08:43 PM • permalinkHey 1.6 - You’d be looking for this one.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 01 at 08:56 PM • permalinkI always figured those guys were just hungry and shouting, “Allah’s Snackbar!! Allah’s Snackbar!!”
Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2007 07 01 at 09:02 PM • permalinkThis little primer could be used.
Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2007 07 01 at 09:03 PM • permalinkAll joking aside, what really disturbs me is the fact that ill patients are put at risk by being treated by these Drs. We already have the case of Dt Patel killing his patients in Townsville- what was his religion? I would like to know- now.
There was a Kurdish Dr in Southern Iraq charged with murdering many of his patients- now they have destroyed whatever trust we have of ‘South Asian’ Drs, many who are good and decent men- I suppose that was the aim- create another victim situation of poor Drs not able to do their work.It is amazing that so many Drs/paediatricians have taken up the call to Jihad- in Iran, Abu Mazen . many of the Egyptian ‘Muslim brotherhood’ and others whom I cannot recall at present- how can any man take up medicine and then seek to destroy life.
We need to be very very concerned and nurses in particular need to be very alert and observant when these Drs on duty. They are often on short term contracts and rotation so problems may not be realised or followed up correctly.
Oh. So they are the same then, Ash_. Thanks.
Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 01 at 09:43 PM • permalinkLate to the party again. (sigh)
So Laurel & Hardy tried to force a Jeep Cherokee into the Glasgow Airport and then couldn’t blow it up? AMATEURS!!
Everyone knows for maximum flammability, you need a Ford Pinto!!
Posted by Tex Lovera on 2007 07 01 at 10:01 PM • permalinkOh no!
Someone tipped over the italics jar!
Thread dead!Posted by Pedro the Ignorant on 2007 07 01 at 10:04 PM • permalinkSo two of the arrested were doctors. What happened to “First do no harm”? I guess migrant doctors are not bound by the hippocratic oath.
Posted by brian_smaller on 2007 07 01 at 10:42 PM • permalinkOne might wonder is the Global Jihad has entered a new phase after nearly 40 years of terror attacks. The attacks are wearing, but don’t seem to have really worked anywhere…except maybe Spain.
It’s like the ‘global’ part of this thing has been handed over to the amateurs and local Jihadi wannabe’s.
If I was running AQ, I’d be just keeping up the skeer thru terror while I was trying to take over another country.
Afghanistan and Somalia didn’t work out, Iraq is problematical, and many of the other Arab states are starting to worry about riding the tiger.
Maybe Indonesia or Pakistan as a target?
“Nobody is oppressing you. Your sense of grievance isn’t justified.”’
Not even close, Mr Tony. The only time the ‘grievance’ schtick gets pulled out and displayed is when there are stupid, moronic, degenerate cultural rotists around to play to.
This is about reestablishment and expansion of the caliphate. Nothing else.
The Fuckowittic Oath:
I do solemnly swear to first do no harm - then get myself a Jeep Cherokee, fill it up with fuel and nails, then, at the beginning of school holidays, fail to drive it into an airport terminal, and set it and myself alight, throw some punches while yelling allah, before being led away to an ambulance while being abused by Glaswegians - then spend painful months in a burns unit being treated by your work colleagues.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 01 at 10:56 PM • permalink#92 Ash
The hosts at Muslim Village are probably more attractive than Monica Attard.
For your judgement: Ahmed Kilani (MV)/Monica Attard (MW).
Posted by flying pigs over mecca on 2007 07 01 at 11:27 PM • permalinkDear Terrorist Arseholes,
Just a quick word. Firstly you really suck at being human beings. Secondly you really, really suck at being terrorists.
Now get busy and SUCK MY NUTS.
Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 01 at 11:29 PM • permalink#102: I am thanking you for the invitation Mr. Infidel Tiger. Is this wide enough?
#54 They’ve been buggering each other for a long time, walter.
Did you ever read the passage in Lawrence’s ‘Seven Pillars of Wisdom’ about his Arab ‘irregular cavalry’ (quoting from memory) being happy to get out of the towns so they could satisfy themselves ‘in their own clean bodies’?
Posted by Harry Eagar on 2007 07 02 at 12:19 AM • permalink#95
So two of the arrested were doctors. What happened to “First do no harm”? I guess migrant doctors are not bound by the hippocratic oath.
The Islamic version that these gentlemen swore is the hypocritic oath.
Posted by stahlblume on 2007 07 02 at 12:42 AM • permalinkAs I’m sure modern day feminists would agree, women and children should be prepared to take one in the guts for the glorious wonders of multiculturalism.
Posted by Jim Geones on 2007 07 02 at 01:05 AM • permalinkIt’s a small price to pay for cheap Pakistani cuisine.
Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 02 at 01:14 AM • permalinkI hope someone of high rank mentions to the staff at the hospital where burn boy is that, while EU rules prohibit executing terrorists, they don’t prohibit issuing a pardon to someone who kills a terrorist.
Posted by Warmongering Lunatic on 2007 07 02 at 01:26 AM • permalinkHope they’re not wasting precious NHS resources with anaesthetic and the like. Salt would be more than adequate for those wounds.
Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 02 at 01:43 AM • permalinkSalt and vinegar are excellent sometimes - other times, chicken salt.
Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 07 02 at 01:49 AM • permalinkThere have been some wonderful advances in condiments and spices.
#115 - You have wiped away my look of lofty disdain and replaced it with a wry smirk.
Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 07 02 at 02:08 AM • permalinkSo they wanted to blow up the nightclub on Ladies Night.
If you can’t fuck ‘em, kill ‘em.
Posted by carpefraise on 2007 07 02 at 04:07 AM • permalinkDid you know that the burning jihadi smelt like roast pork. He we are again, another attempt by the morons of Islam to make some kind of statement. During the Blitz on London something like 50000 bombs were dropped. Islamists don’t realise what they are up against, if they think the spirit of western society is as fragile as their own. These acts of evil stupidity will only frustrate said terrorists and lead them to more desperate measures if the so called moderates of Islam don’t stand up against their OWN problems. (Yes this vermin do it in the name of Islam) Through your mute responses to these atrocities you will be seen as complicit.
it seems that two of the five people arrested are doctors.
So I guess these affluent, enfranchised Vietnamese Presbyterian physicians forgot to take the Hippocratic oath?
Posted by Shaky Barnes on 2007 07 02 at 09:20 AM • permalinkMore commentary on the “disenfranchised” lie, this time from Joel Mowbray writing to Power Line:
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/018108.phpIn a 1,600 word story about homegrown terrorism inside the UK, it took roughly 1,400 words before Cowell and Bonner mentioned “Muslims.” “Islam” is nowhere to be found.
Posted by andycanuck on 2007 07 02 at 09:39 AM • permalinkAl-Qaeda smeats its match:
As thousands of Glaswegians queued, moaned and sneakily sipped Buckfast on a rainy Saturday afternoon, one man stood vigilant outside the airport terminal. Baggage supervisor, hero, smoker. John Smeaton.
Little did he know, as he happily dragged on his fag, that two crazed al-Qaeda operatives were preparing to meet their maker. But they didn’t meet their maker. Instead they met BAA’s answer to Jack Bauer.
As the Jeep’s engine revved and the passenger started chucking the petrol containers out the windows like he was Santa in Shettleston, one man stepped in to help The Law take control.
The site is also collecting pledges to buy him 1000 pints. Hmm.
(via Mr Eugenides who tells us the two wannabes will also be charged under Scotland’s tough anti-smoking laws. Heh. (yes that part’s a joke))
Bold Italics! Has to be a first!!! Can we get
strikeon everything, too?Posted by nofixedabode on 2007 07 02 at 11:29 AM • permalinkHere’s the vids of John Smeaton trying to imitate McPaco.
Cheers
Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2007 07 02 at 06:08 PM • permalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
Members:
Login | Register
| Member List
Disenfranchised? That again? The New Duranty Times keeps using that word, but it does not mean what they think it means.