<< DANI VS FLANNY ~ MAIN ~ DEVENY DEVOLVES >>

THOSE UNITED NATIONS SCIENTISTS

The Washington Post reviews the work of top United Nations scientists, November 20:

The United Nations’ top AIDS scientists plan to acknowledge this week that they have long overestimated both the size and the course of the epidemic, which they now believe has been slowing for nearly a decade ...

The Washington Post reviews the work of top United Nations scientists, November 18:

The world will have to end its growth of carbon emissions within seven years and become mostly free of carbon-emitting technologies in about four decades to avoid killing as many as a quarter of the planet’s species from global warming, according to top United Nations’ scientists.

Posted by Tim B. on 11/20/2007 at 10:48 AM
  1. “We have top people working on that right now.”

    “What people?”

    Top people.”

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 11 20 at 11:05 AM • permalink

  2. Hey, just because they over-hyped one threat doesn’t mean they’re over-hyping this one!

    Posted by Rob Crawford on 2007 11 20 at 11:23 AM • permalink

  3. SO… how many billions are they going to try to extort from the West and hand over to corrupt third world despots? Anyone care to wager that any future “climate change” agreement will exclude from any restrictions China, India and the rest of the “developing world”?

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2007 11 20 at 11:31 AM • permalink

  4. Mmmm, yes, WaPo, because we know the U.N. exists to run a scientific institution. Why, the U.N. has as many physics Nobels as the South Vermont Institute of Cosmetology.

    Posted by Jim Whyte on 2007 11 20 at 11:33 AM • permalink

  5. Lead UN Global Warming Professor: Holy underware! Caron dioxide running amuck! Innocent polar bears drowning! We’ve got to protect our phony baloney jobs, gentlemen. We must do something about this, immediately, immediately, immediately!
    Underling scientists: Harrumph! Harrumph! Harrumph! Harrumph! Harrumph!
    Professor: I didn’t get a ‘harrumph’ out of that guy!
    Minion: Give the professor a ‘harrumph!’
    Lackey: Harrumph!
    Professor: You watch your ass.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 11 20 at 11:34 AM • permalink

  6. Related.

    Posted by Jim Whyte on 2007 11 20 at 11:35 AM • permalink

  7. #4 And the Sam Houston Institute of Technology too.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 11 20 at 11:37 AM • permalink

  8. Texas Bob: LOL. Or are you just Paco doing the sock-puppet thing?

    I think we need to be told ;o)

    Posted by Jim Whyte on 2007 11 20 at 11:38 AM • permalink

  9. Or for that matter, they’ve probably got more Nobel recipients than Fulbright United Climatology University.  Good old FUC-U.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 11 20 at 11:40 AM • permalink

  10. #8 Now Jim, what goes on between me and my socks is known only too me.
    And the lady that does my laundry.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 11 20 at 11:41 AM • permalink

  11. Hmmm, I wonder what is an easier problem to figure out:

    1) The prevalence and rate of spread of one specific disease caused by a known virus which can be accurately detected by a relatively inexpensive and proven test or

    2) the state of the climate in 50 or 100 years in a planetary system which has thousands of inputs, variables, and feedback loops all working simultaneously and which has never been modelled in detail successfully.

    Just curious.  And they wonder why we’re skeptics and don’t just take their word for things.

    “Hey, just because they over-hyped one threat doesn’t mean they’re over-hyping this one!”

    Yes, true, but the relative scope of the problems at hand would seem to indicate there ought to be more confidence in the AIDS analysis than the climate analysis, given the uncertainties and time frames involved.  Yet, the problem with the “consensus” on AIDS isn’t particularly confidence-inspiring as an indication of the UN’s ability to handle complex scientific issues.

    Posted by kcom on 2007 11 20 at 11:45 AM • permalink

  12. #7: Good ‘un, T-bob!

    Top United Nations Scientists. Isn’t that a bit like top pedophile daycare workers? Top congressional minds? Top prison-inmate ethicists?

    O/T, but what’s going on with those 13 Labor Party candidates who may be on the ballot illegally? And if they’re permitted to stand, does that make them ballotstards?

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 12:00 PM • permalink

  13. Probably a quarter of the planet’s species have already contracted AIDS and it’s only a matter of time now.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2007 11 20 at 12:01 PM • permalink

  14. The world will have to end its growth of carbon emissions within seven years and become mostly free of carbon-emitting technologies in about four decades

    Do they read what they write?  What they’re advocating is no less than a return to the Stone Age.  Or is that the point?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 11 20 at 12:11 PM • permalink

  15. I think these are the tops to which the article refers.

    Posted by missred on 2007 11 20 at 12:29 PM • permalink

  16. ok, given it is the UN, perhaps these

    Posted by missred on 2007 11 20 at 12:31 PM • permalink

  17. I like how he admits that chasing funding was responsible for the hyperbole.  You don’t say?  Just like the climo-tards as well.

    OT: Don’t know if you’ve been to Drudge this AM, but there’s a picture of Obama with a guy standing behind him holding a “Change We Can Believe In” poster who is a lib-tard caricature: Compassionate Head Tilt, hat with millions of stickers proving his sincerity, and that super-sensitive look that says, “There is no way you can feel as deeply as I do about anything: I have ABSOLUTE MORAL AUTHORITY!”

    I busted a gut… because it’s true: I can’t feel anything as deeply as he does, because I can THINK.

    “To those who feel, life is a tragedy.  To those who think, it is a comedy.” - I Forget

    Posted by Hucbald on 2007 11 20 at 12:37 PM • permalink

  18. Here are the Top UN Scientists.

    Posted by ErnieG on 2007 11 20 at 12:41 PM • permalink

  19. Hey, just because they over-hyped one every threat doesn’t mean they’re over-hyping this one!

    There. Fixed it for you.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2007 11 20 at 12:45 PM • permalink

  20. Can anyone brighter than me (not a stretch LOL) explain today’s Google header? Moving left to right (up yours China !) I think we’ve got a factory chimney (Boo!), couple of drunken lookin’ skyscrapers and the first ‘G’ of Google in blue with a sickly looking planet (or maybe a marble ? Perhaps an early plum pudding?)representing the first ‘O’:- All this side is given a sickly pink/chocolate hue.

    (Oh, and there’s half a river, also pinky-chocolatey and thus,I guess, DEAD)

    The second ‘O’ is either Earth in full health, or a shinier marble, or some kind of toothpaste-and-snot pudding. The river is now blue and we’ve got a wind turbine (accurately represented with static blades generating no electricity but a ton of lovely subsidy). The second ‘G’ appears to be a blue lobster doing yoga, then a green question mark for the ‘L’ (not a clue on this one) covering something that’s either a healthy skyscraper (no wino buildings in turbine-land!), maybe an oil derrick or possibly a giant robot’s erection (excited by the prospect of some hot action with said turbine perhaps). Finally the ‘E’ seems to represent some kind of communist Pac-man.

    It’s not bloody Earth Day again is it?

    Posted by Bugaboot on 2007 11 20 at 01:20 PM • permalink

  21. ..killing as many as a quarter of the planet’s species from global warming, ..

    Yeah, right. 

    Name six that we really need.

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 11 20 at 01:24 PM • permalink

  22. #1 richard

    That’s an easy quotation to get wrong:

    It’s “Top… men!”

    Posted by Hucbald on 2007 11 20 at 01:27 PM • permalink

  23. killing as many as a quarter of the planet’s species from global warming

    Here’s a thought experiment.  What if that quarter included flies, mosquitos, and cockroaches?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 11 20 at 02:06 PM • permalink

  24. to avoid killing as many as a quarter of the planet’s species from global warming

    Or as few as none.

    “As many as” is a great weasel phrase.

    I’m going out bar-hopping tonight. I could bed as many as fourteen women. I’m such a stud.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2007 11 20 at 02:15 PM • permalink

  25. “As many as a quarter” is a great way to put it.

    Because that allows any number from a quarter down to [I]zero, so you’re very unlikely to be wrong.

    I’m sure their worst-case guess (“estimate” is too kind a term for such things, as we don’t even know with any precision how many species we have, let alone how fast they might or might not die out in case of “change”) allows for a quarter of species to die… but so what?

    Promulgating a worst-case guess as a reason to Act Decisively And At Great Expense Right Now Now Now suggests that they have no good, firm grounds for action, or they’d provide them. It reeks of scaremongery.

    (Unrelatedly, death to bbcode. Let us use HTML as God intended!)

    Posted by Sigivald on 2007 11 20 at 02:16 PM • permalink

  26. #12 Paco:

    O/T, but what’s going on with those 13 Labor Party candidates who may be on the ballot illegally? And if they’re permitted to stand, does that make them ballotstards?

    Paco, since it’s not Liberal or National candidates, sweet f*** all will happen and if they’re permitted to stand, despite not being capable of following the rules, it will end in a court catfight I think.

    Not to mention, this may well get attention in the media. They’re being a teensy-tiny bit harsher on Rudd this week.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 11 20 at 02:37 PM • permalink

  27. I’m putting my money on the possibility that the UN sckientists over-estimated the AIDS threat, but under-estimated the climate threat!!!one!

    Because the same forces of funding extraction, morality plays, and the excitement of scaremongering wouldn’t apply. Nope, no chance of a Nobel prize in store for climate change.

    Like a green Mother Teresa to the Earfth, but without all that tedious hands-on caregiving and devotion to the less fortunate.

    Posted by Big Dan on 2007 11 20 at 03:00 PM • permalink

  28. But what if I want to kill a quarter of the planet’s species? After all, there are lots and lots I don’t even like and, as they are wont to remind us, the planet is seriously overcrowded.

    Now:

    “These are extremely serious findings,” said IPCC Chairman Rajendra K. Pachauri.

    Ten years down the road:

    “There was a tendency toward alarmism, and that fit perhaps a certain fundraising agenda,” said Helen Epstein…

    Posted by Kyda Sylvester on 2007 11 20 at 03:06 PM • permalink

  29. #26: You’re right, Ash. I was forgetting that little technicalities concerning eligibility only apply to the Right.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 03:16 PM • permalink

  30. #29 Only because us on the Right are always picking on the poow widdle Weft, Paco, and we have the audacity to actually believe the rules apply to everyone, not just everyone except us.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 11 20 at 03:41 PM • permalink

  31. “Your stupid brains!  Stupid!  Stupid!”—Top UN Scientist.

    *SLAP*

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 11 20 at 04:00 PM • permalink

  32. O/T, but what’s going on with those 13 Labor Party candidates who may be on the ballot illegally?

    Because most of these pelicans were working for state government authorities, they were all listed as still current contacts or employees of prescribed or statutory authorities. This is more an inditement of the ineptitude and incompetence of state ALP governments than wilful deception by the ALP. I doubt that ALP Campaign HQ would leave something as important as valid nomination processes to chance or potential grounds for electorate invalidity.

    Posted by CB on 2007 11 20 at 04:11 PM • permalink

  33. #32: “Pelicans”! Excellent.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 04:18 PM • permalink

  34. ‘Pelican’ is the title of a magazine produced by the University of Western Australia’s Student Guild. Sophomoric, overblown, self-important,  generally out of touch with reality. CB, you hit the bull’s eye!

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 11 20 at 04:41 PM • permalink

  35. People of the world must reduce their sexual activity by 20% by 2020 and achieve a sex-free status by 2050 if we’re to save a quarter of all animal life on the planet. Developing countries excluded. Sadly, I’ll probably be following the guidelines.

    Posted by Dminor on 2007 11 20 at 04:50 PM • permalink

  36. First photo - top UN scientist.  Although I suspect he knows more about global warming than the UN braintards.

    Posted by surfmaster on 2007 11 20 at 04:53 PM • permalink

  37. #32 looks like this might be a stuff up by the Liberal party.  Apparently this has not been verified and relies only on visiting stat authority websites.  If true, that is plain stupid by the libs, and shades of the 1996 election when the then treasurer (ALP) put out a fake letter claiming some stitch up or other by Howard that was a total fabrication.  beyond stupid.  If nothing else, it clouds the issue surrounding Newhouse which appears to be correct.

    Posted by entropy on 2007 11 20 at 05:24 PM • permalink

  38. according to top United Nations’ scientists.

    Poor bastards. Since the Iraq Oil Skim game got cut off, they’re really scrambling aren’t they?

    Thank God for them, alGor dropped in their collective laps. Prior to AL, they didn’t know and could care less what the hell a carbon credit was or is. CO2, was code for their afternoon piece of ass.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 20 at 05:26 PM • permalink

  39. #37 Entropy: Well, that wouldn’t be much of a surprise. The one thing almost any politician can (and frequently does)hit when he squeezes the trigger is his own foot.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 05:35 PM • permalink

  40. Top UN scientists investigate decrease in world’s species.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 05:46 PM • permalink

  41. I’m worried about my financial adviser.
    It seems that I should be cutting down on household expenditures. I asked him where to start.
    “Leave food, home improvements and entertainment until next year. We’ll look at those later, along with clothes, petrol, cars, insurances, electricity, other sevices. For the moment we’ll concentrate on gifts and postage stamps, which at 1.6% of your budget is way too high. Fix that and we’re well on the way to solving all your problems.”
    “I see” I replied. “It’s just like Australia’s 1.5% of global emissions. Nail that and everything will be ok.”
    “You’ve got it!” he said with an air of triumph.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2007 11 20 at 05:57 PM • permalink

  42. #41 Is your financial advisor somehow associated with Planning Acquisition of Currently owned Objects?

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 11 20 at 06:03 PM • permalink

  43. 1:  “as many as a quarter of the planets species”
    Warmerists should rejoice. After all, HUmas are part of the worlds species.  They’ve been saying tyhere are too many of us already.  So shouldn’t they be *encouraging Global Warmering*?

    2:  It’s not scientists, per se. It’s the politics of it all. We live in a time where the “soft sciences” are seen as equivalent to the physical sciences. The current scientific climate (pardon the deliberate pun), is the equivalent of Lysenkoism in the Stanlinist era. It put the USSR back by decades. You couldn’t be skeptical of Lysenko without ending up in a gulag.

    3: and the Japanese are hunting whales for *science* not as some flexing of their political muscles….. riggght.

    Posted by wanglese on 2007 11 20 at 06:06 PM • permalink

  44. Planetary Acquisition/Conquest Organization - taking over the world since 1991!

    Posted by mojo on 2007 11 20 at 06:09 PM • permalink

  45. Cut the bullshit…It’s NOT a matter of Global Warming, it IS a matter of Global Authoritarian (actually totalitarianism) Leadership…and the U.N. wants it.

    It will settle for nothing less.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 20 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  46. Planetary Acquisition/Conquest Organization - taking over the world since 1991!

    * Not available in Canada.

    Posted by surfmaster on 2007 11 20 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  47. I’m proud of the fact that after two overseas operations involving the UN, I don’t wear their tainted ribbons on my chest. It’s funny as hell watching representatives from the ‘developing’ countries lecturing on the evils of western society and capitalism when the majority of them find that the concept of public sanitation and electricity eludes them.

    Posted by CB on 2007 11 20 at 07:09 PM • permalink

  48. today UN TOP Scientists have discovered a link from clouds and rain.

    Posted by Old school on 2007 11 20 at 07:20 PM • permalink

  49. 48 - Hey, I’ve discovered a link between lack of bathing and offensive body odour! I’m a Top UN Scientist too!

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 11 20 at 07:36 PM • permalink

  50. After dealing with Central Florida traffic today, not to mention what passes for customer service, I’m ready for at least a decimation of the population myself.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2007 11 20 at 07:43 PM • permalink

  51. A top UN scientist introduces his UN report to the UN.

    Posted by dean martin on 2007 11 20 at 07:48 PM • permalink

  52. # 50 - Andrea, does decimation mean ten percent?

    Posted by surfmaster on 2007 11 20 at 07:54 PM • permalink

  53. If elected, Hillary will cure single-handedly all global-climate-warming-change concerns.

    That is, you wont hear a goddamn thing of the subject for at least four more years.

    Same goes for homelessness, childhood hunger, America’s standing in the world, the horrors of unilateralism, the forclosure “crisis”, and the weak dollar.

    Posted by Thomas on 2007 11 20 at 08:00 PM • permalink

  54. It’s a wonder these people manage to run up any old apocaylptic

    Posted by lotocoti on 2007 11 20 at 08:14 PM • permalink

  55. Bugger, I’ll try that again.
    apocalyptic nonsense:
    More than a decade ago, Edward O Wilson, the Harvard naturalist, first estimated that about 30,000 species were going extinct each year - an extinction rate of about three an hour.
    and not face any rational scrutiny.
    From this chuckleathon.

    Posted by lotocoti on 2007 11 20 at 08:21 PM • permalink

  56. #40 Yeah.. looks like Hansen and Manne to me. 

    They had it easy back then, didn’t they?


    BTW who’s the one on the right??

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 11 20 at 08:35 PM • permalink

  57. #46 Ha he ha..:-) Canada, the wimpiest country on the planet….
    or at least it used to be. I adopted my subriquet before our entry to the ‘Ghan. No wimpiness there. I’m even thinking of changing my nom de plume.

    Now, if only a Consevative majority and it’s the world, I tell you, THE WORLD! Mwahhaaahaa!

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 11 20 at 08:44 PM • permalink

  58. Has anyone ever written a future-history novel in which the UN and the EU finally get all the power they dream of, and promptly go to war against each other?  Behind all the noble speeches, blue logos and Beethoven theme tunes, they’re really just like two rival Mafia families, or the Chinese and the Russians during the Cold War.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2007 11 20 at 08:48 PM • permalink

  59. #57 Wimpy - I would sacrifice my 3rd born for a PMSH majority and let you change your ndp

    ndp -  mmmh… what is this guy up to??

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 11 20 at 08:54 PM • permalink

  60. #58: Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle wrote something not too far from that: “Fallen Angels”, where new age nitwits ended up controlling the government and the education systems.
    Well worth a read IMHO.

    Posted by wanglese on 2007 11 20 at 09:00 PM • permalink

  61. Here’s one of those lierUN Scientists - hint: He’s not a “Doctor”.

    Interestingly, Verolme is scarce on teh IPCC qweb site now.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 11 20 at 09:01 PM • permalink

  62. #60
    With the bonus mini ice age hastened by uncontrolled gaia-worship and scientific alarmism.

    Posted by lotocoti on 2007 11 20 at 09:06 PM • permalink

  63. Hey, the only thing the UN can get its act together on is anti-Israel motions. Everything else is merely rabid anti-Western.

    Stop funding the UN and kick it into the Sargasso.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 11 20 at 09:06 PM • permalink

  64. Memo to UN scientists:

    Listen chaps, can we just revisit the advice I gave you during that last AIDS frenzy?

    If you keep swallowing that stuff in the heat of the moment you’re going to continue to spread some real nasties.

    A little discipline, please.

    Posted by Henry boy on 2007 11 20 at 09:13 PM • permalink

  65. #
    Professors Larry, Moe and Curly Joe. I believe!

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 10:20 PM • permalink

  66. oops that should be #18

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 10:20 PM • permalink

  67. #65: Soit’nly!

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 10:33 PM • permalink

  68. #60 Thanks for the tip, but is it meant to be fiction?

    where new age nitwits ended up controlling the government and the education systems.

    I live in Victoria, and we’ve been like that for years.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2007 11 20 at 10:36 PM • permalink

  69. #24 Haw.

    Press stud?

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 10:47 PM • permalink

  70. #68 Fallen Angel’s a bit dated now (I suspect that ‘to proxmire’ had a more contemporary resonance, something about smelly dairy cow subsidies) but there is a quite a piquant touch delivered by the frequent brown outs experienced by everyone and the complete lack of central heating as Winnipeg slowly gets enclosed by a wall of ice.

    Posted by entropy on 2007 11 20 at 10:48 PM • permalink

  71. #58: Has anyone ever written a future-history novel in which the UN and the EU finally get all the power they dream of, and promptly go to war against each other?

    With what? Banana quotas?

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 20 at 10:48 PM • permalink

  72. #21

    Name six that we really need.

    1.  Us
    2.  Cows
    3.  Sheeps
    4.  Pigs
    5.  Prawns
    6.  Chooks

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 10:52 PM • permalink

  73. O/T
    I found this film of Kevvie after he loses on Saturday….

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 10:54 PM • permalink

  74. #32 CB Haven’t heard people described as Pelicans for a long time. But perhaps in the case of the ALP and leftys in general seagulls would be better, it seems to capture their sense of entitlement.

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 11:06 PM • permalink

  75. OT Ian Smith dead.

    natural causes, not torn to pieces by his oppressed subjects (which is what would happen to his successor if he didn’t have all those bodyguards)

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 11 20 at 11:08 PM • permalink

  76. #70 Entropy
    Um, that’s climate change.

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 20 at 11:23 PM • permalink

  77. 75, rememeber Smith making way for Mugabe, and the glorious future that awaited that country?
    The poor bastards trapped there certainly don’t.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2007 11 20 at 11:40 PM • permalink

  78. You left out a dash:

    Top UN-scientists.

    Posted by Nicholas on 2007 11 20 at 11:47 PM • permalink

  79. This woman is being groomed to take over Paco Enterprises when I retire.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 21 at 12:05 AM • permalink

  80. A case of the UN’s top scienticians shouting

    ‘the old apocalyptic doom mongering is dead, long live the new apocalypse doom mongering’

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 11 21 at 12:28 AM • permalink

  81. Top UN child care scientist, Mary P. Oppins.

    Posted by dean martin on 2007 11 21 at 03:23 AM • permalink

  82. Okay, so a Saudi rape victim is punished. Who would you expect to be speaking out about it? Larvatus Prodeo feminist collective? the Office for Women perhaps? Or maybe…

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 11 21 at 03:24 AM • permalink

  83. ...members of the ChimpyBush administration? Must be a cynical attempt at generating poll numbers.

    Posted by dean martin on 2007 11 21 at 03:33 AM • permalink

  84. O/T
    Never mind, the ALP will be sure to give us some hard times for Kevvie to govern under.

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 21 at 03:46 AM • permalink

  85. #82/83 concern? they should be apologising.

    I’m sure you’ll agree that when the incident is deconstructed, recontextualised and proper weight is given to hanging chads and the complete lack of proactive consideration for polar bears, it is clearly Chimpy McHitlerBush who is to blame.

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 11 21 at 03:46 AM • permalink

  86. on a serious note- that poor woman. what a twisted, sickening affair.

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 11 21 at 03:51 AM • permalink

  87. #77 Smith is always vilified whenever mentioned by the press. Mugabe, not so much. But I’ve yet to see a side-by-side comparison of the state of the nation, before vs. now.
    I’m no rocket scientist, but I can tell the difference between a pecan pie and a cow patty.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 11 21 at 04:11 AM • permalink

  88. Top UN Climate Official trying to tell us Kyoto is working, straight after admitting overall emissions have gone up instead of down.

    And I apologise in advance for linking to Fairfax, where that annoying Rudd/Labor add seems to be everywhere. At least you won’t have to suffer through that toe-curling pinging from the TV version.

    Posted by Dminor on 2007 11 21 at 06:04 AM • permalink

  89. FFS the snarling, lying, sneering red kezza who verballed JWH last night is now blowing kisses, pulling his pants down and offering his arse up to Krudd.

    the ABC is beneath contempt.

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 11 21 at 06:09 AM • permalink

  90. o/t

    this must be a tough one for the British Bolshevik Committee to swallow - LINK

    Posted by murph on 2007 11 21 at 08:41 AM • permalink

  91. Wimpy - I would sacrifice my 3rd born for a PMSH majority and let you change your ndp

    But DAAAAAD!

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 11 21 at 12:50 PM • permalink

  92. #88 Dminor

    Top UN Climate Official trying to tell us Kyoto is working, straight after admitting overall emissions have gone up instead of down.

    They must be seeing an increase in the revenue stream of their extortion racket.

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2007 11 21 at 01:47 PM • permalink

  93. “The United Nations’ top AIDS scientists plan to acknowledge this week that they have long overestimated both the size and the course of the epidemic, which they now believe has been slowing for nearly a decade ...”

    Crystal ball on the blink, eh?

    “The world will have to end its growth of carbon emissions within seven years and become mostly free of carbon-emitting technologies in about four decades to avoid killing as many as a quarter of the planet’s species from global warming, according to top United Nations’ scientists.”

    Eenie-beenie, chili-weenie, the spirits are about to speak!

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2007 11 21 at 02:39 PM • permalink

  94. #70 - “proxmire” as a verb was used in a few SF works of the time.  Senator Proxmire never met a government program he liked unless is had to do with (as you so correctly note) dairy subsidies.  A favorite target of his was funding for space exploration, thus when a project was killed of before fruition it was proxmired.

    Hell, I’d sooner see my tax dollars go to producing grainy pictures of asteroids than 4th grade banana condom classes and performance art denouncing white male taxpayers.  Building and shooting off big impressive rockets is way cooler than most of what the rest of the budget goes to.

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2007 11 21 at 06:08 PM • permalink

  95. We were right before we were wrong.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 11 21 at 08:34 PM • permalink

  96. WC, what’s the matter with you?  Don’t you understand they they’re right even when they’re wrong?  Now gather up all your money, shove it into a paper bag, and mail it to the UN right away!

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2007 11 21 at 09:59 PM • permalink

  97. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.