Tim Blair

Monthly Archives

• January 2011
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
• August 2007
• July 2007
• June 2007
• May 2007
• April 2007
• March 2007
• February 2007
• January 2007
• December 2006
• November 2006
• October 2006
• September 2006
• August 2006
• July 2006
• June 2006
• May 2006
• April 2006
• March 2006
• February 2006
• January 2006
• December 2005
• November 2005
• October 2005
• September 2005
• August 2005
• July 2005
• June 2005
• May 2005
• April 2005
• March 2005
• February 2005
• January 2005
• December 2004
• Complete Archives

Most recent entries

• Admin note: the long night of waiting is over
• WEEK ONE
• DAY ONE
• SITE MOVED
• BIG LOSERS STILL BIG LOSERS
• GLOBAL CHEF WANTS LOCAL FOOD
• CITIES RATED
• DISPUTES NOTED
• SHALLOW ANALYSIS
• THE REFFOS RUDD REJECTS
• GOOD NEWS FOR ALL
• PITY THE FUEL
• HONEYMOON SURVIVED
• BAD SHOES NOW GOOD
• JOCK PAULL

Syndicate

• RSS 1.0
• RSS 2.0
• Atom

Statistics

• This page has been viewed 13337805 times
• Page rendered in 0.1790 seconds
• Referrers

Powered by ExpressionEngine

<< BULKER AFLOAT ~ MAIN ~ SMARTEST GUYS AT ONE PARTICULAR TABLE IN A BAR >>

THEY MAKE IT SO DIFFICULT

Want to invest in climate change? Bad luck, wannabe carbon zillionaires; you’re probably overqualified.

1. Tim Blair would have a field day with that caption.

   Ah, they know ye well, lad.

   Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 07 02 at 01:00 PM • permalink



2. Invest in climate change.

   Buy a PACO Water Wings franchise

   Solar powered refrigerators perhaps.

   Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 07 02 at 01:15 PM • permalink



3. Not only are the fish in the barrel, they are staked to the ground, the shotgun is already lined up and held 1/2 an inch from the fish.

   Posted by rbj1 on 2007 07 02 at 01:53 PM • permalink



4. If their climate change index was based on an actual climate change factor like tropospheric temperature anomoly, I’d happily short it.

   As it is, it gives the investment return on “ethanol, geothermal power & other alternative fuels, hydro-electric power”, etc

   Too much risk in that sector as you don’t know how long it will take for their customers to get a clue.

   Posted by 2dogs on 2007 07 02 at 03:30 PM • permalink



5. Judging by the chameleon being in a wooly hat, scarf and covered in snow it would appear they have zero knowledge of what climate change is supposedly about. Maybe it’s a contrarian investment strategy.

   Posted by alien kiwi on 2007 07 02 at 03:43 PM • permalink



6. you’re probably overqualified.

   Oh, HO! That’s what you think!

   Posted by paco on 2007 07 02 at 04:30 PM • permalink



7. She’s right about Bundy.

   Posted by walterplinge on 2007 07 02 at 05:54 PM • permalink



8. Finally, truth in advertising from the Green movement…

   Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 07 02 at 08:20 PM • permalink



9. Want to invest in climate change?

   Actually I’d prefer to invest in stopping climate change, thanks all the same.

   Posted by blandwagon on 2007 07 02 at 09:17 PM • permalink



10. This is excellent:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6263690.stm

    Study suggests ordinary people more concerned about “graffiti, crime and dog mess” than climate change / global warmongering.

    Posted by Baron on 2007 07 03 at 06:07 AM • permalink



11. Somewhat as funny as SingTel’s “Embrace your right to FREE SPEECH” bus stop ad campaigns. The free speech, of course, referred to free campus calls.

    Posted by Rajan R on 2007 07 03 at 12:52 PM • permalink



Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.