<< KING OF THE LEFT ~ MAIN ~ ADS PLACED >>

STATES RATED

Al Gore’s home state ranks way down at 43rd for greenishness (Texas - once described by Gore as the “No. 1 most polluted state in America” - beats Tennessee by nine places). Click for the complete list; bike-path republic Vermont wins.

UPDATE. West Virginia triumphs again!

Posted by Tim B. on 10/22/2007 at 08:39 AM
  1. Go West Virginia!!!

    Posted by Pogria on 2007 10 22 at 08:45 AM • permalink

  2. Ohio? #39?

    I think someone’s been neglecting their duties…

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 10 22 at 08:47 AM • permalink

  3. Texas? 34?

    I blame Bush.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 10 22 at 08:48 AM • permalink

  4. Ohio is only 39.  Not 50?  I must start the rubber tire bonfires, pronto.  Just in time for Halloween.

    Posted by wronwright on 2007 10 22 at 08:49 AM • permalink

  5. #4 Now that’s exactly what I meant Wronwright. The Dark Lord won’t be impressed with 39 instead of 50.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 10 22 at 08:50 AM • permalink

  6. Tennessee has BBQ, that’s why. All of that sweet delicious, pork laden smoke, MMMMM.

    Posted by Nic on 2007 10 22 at 08:58 AM • permalink

  7. Ash,

    The problem appears to be that states that surround Ohio—Kentucky (#45), Indiana (#49), and West Virginia (#50)—are somehow receiving some of our BBQ and SUV pollution.  I suspect shenanigans by rightwing conspirators in those states.

    I’m going to build a rabbit hatch in the back yard to prove it.  You can expect to see the results of my experiment in Loose Change III.

    Posted by wronwright on 2007 10 22 at 09:00 AM • permalink

  8. “Is Lone Star State Nation’s Dirtiest? Gore Says Yes, Data Say Otherwise”

    Al is a congenital…make that a pathological liar.

    Well OK…BOTH!

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 10 22 at 09:01 AM • permalink

  9. #7 Wronwright, right wing? Conspirators? Shenanigans? It just wouldn’t happen!!!

    So I don’t have to actually watch it, would you mind just giving me the summary of your experiment results?

    The Dark Lord has banned me from watching highly inaccurate documentaries because of it’s affect on my delicate constitution.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 10 22 at 09:05 AM • permalink

  10. #9 I meant effect there, didn’t I? Dman perveiw.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 10 22 at 09:07 AM • permalink

  11. Vermont- is that a silent ‘t’?

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 10 22 at 09:21 AM • permalink

  12. We’d be a lot greener here in Tennessee if it weren’t for this drought.

    Posted by Some0Seppo on 2007 10 22 at 09:29 AM • permalink

  13. Washington is #3, God knows why.  The I5 corridor is having pollution problems, such that the state started testing vehicle emissions a few years back.  But only for west side residents; us east siders are not s obligated.

    And then there are all those dams on the rivers.  The west siders want them down, in order to save the salmon (and destroy the power production, transportation, and agriculture industries, but, hey, it only affects people).

    So I’m suspicious as well.  Especially since Oregon is #2…..and Idaho is #12.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 10 22 at 09:29 AM • permalink

  14. Ohio? Psssh. Once I set up my Pernicious Atmospheric Clean-air Obliterators (fueled by recycled Ted Kennedy speeches), Virginia will take the lead in greenhouse gasses, thereby creating an enormous demand for my Passive Ambient Cleansing Orbs .

    Paco Environmental Products: Creating Demand Out of Thin Air

    Posted by paco on 2007 10 22 at 09:32 AM • permalink

  15. Seriously, though, one would think that Idaho should rank higher; it has a low population, and much of the lands are national forest or designated wilderness, and what lands aren’t are often restricted in development and/or use (agriculture and logging) by multiple environmental agencies (National Marines Fisheries Service) and watch dog groups.  Also, industry is limited to a few specific ares. 

    Indeed, that silly Forbes survey says:

    Idaho has the lowest carbon footprint per capita in the land, and it scores high marks for air quality and the per capita number of hybrid-electric and alternative fuel vehicles registered in the state. It falters a bit in energy efficiency policy though. In addition, the state is not part of the Western governors’ initiative to establish a market-based system to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

    So Idaho fails because their policies doesn’t match greenie standards, although physically, the state should be higher.  Unlike Washington, who happens to have many programs practically forcing greenie energy policies down our throats.

    That sounds like an arbitrary and highly subjective judgment to me.  Of course, no one would do that, huh?  *snort*

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 10 22 at 09:38 AM • permalink

  16. Shut up Al! Of course Texas would have more pollution. It’s the friggin size of 5 smaller states. You could probably stuff 12 Tennessees in there or 26 Ohios.  Let’s talk pollution by square mile. Texas is probably right up there with Idaho.  And if all of the damn yankee squatters and illegal aliens would take their brood and go home, we’d be giving Alaska a run for its money.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2007 10 22 at 10:00 AM • permalink

  17. O/T tomorrows newspoll- 58/42 to Labor- does anyone really believe this?

    Posted by eeniemeenie on 2007 10 22 at 10:01 AM • permalink

  18. Notice the states at the top end are all states with high tax rates and powerful environmental lobbies.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 10 22 at 10:27 AM • permalink

  19. Re #18, alas, Rebecca, I live in #3, and I can verify your statement as being all too valid.

    Makes me want to go out and burn some tires.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 10 22 at 10:34 AM • permalink

  20. #19 TRJS, do it. I’ll bail you out.

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 10 22 at 10:37 AM • permalink

  21. Whooooo Hooooooooo #5 here
    and i am doing my best to knock it out of the top ten!

    Posted by missred on 2007 10 22 at 11:39 AM • permalink

  22. Hummm, Virginia’s 23.  Now if we didn’t have all that pollution/hot air coming out of The People’s Republic of Northern Virginia (not to be confused with the rest of the state), we’d probably be #3. 

    Elizabeth
    Imperial Keeper

    Posted by Elizabeth Imperial Keeper on 2007 10 22 at 01:00 PM • permalink

  23. Georgia is at #29?  Oh, come on! We’re trying to legislate the eradication of several endangered species AS I SPEAK! That’s gotta bump us up at least a few notches!

    Posted by MikeTheLibrarian on 2007 10 22 at 01:50 PM • permalink

  24. So how did New Jersey, which is 90% chemical waste dump, get #7? Makes you wonder what the criteria were.

    Posted by rightwingprof on 2007 10 22 at 02:23 PM • permalink

  25. #15 The_Real_JeffS

    You mean the poll has a political bias? Who would ever have imagined…

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2007 10 22 at 02:34 PM • permalink

  26. #24 rightwingprof

    That’s a dead giveaway, isn’t it?

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2007 10 22 at 02:37 PM • permalink

  27. New York is ninth.  Amazing what you can do when you drive all the icky industry and people out. Too bad the census will cost us a couple more House seats in 2010.  Looks like you can’t tax your way to prosperity or political dominance.

    Posted by MarkD on 2007 10 22 at 03:05 PM • permalink

  28. Isn’t Vermont one of the states with the highest levels of gun ownership?

    Go green, buy a gun!

    Posted by pog-ma-thon on 2007 10 22 at 09:08 PM • permalink

  29. #24 - do you know why NJ has all the toxic waste sites while CA has all the lawyers?

    NJ got first pick. (ba-DUM tish!)

    Thank you, I’ll be here all week, and don’t forget to tip your waitress!

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2007 10 23 at 01:25 PM • permalink

  30. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.