<< IT CAUSES DROUGHT! IT CAUSES RAIN! ~ MAIN ~ GROWTH ENCOURAGED, SHUNNED >>
“RAPE” ENJOYED
A post at Muslim Village Australia links to John Laws’ interview with Hizbie spokesman Wassim Doureihi. Rave review follows in comments: “He literally raped John with his words. I personally enjoyed it a lot.”
(Via Dan Lewis, who notes: “It would seem the Islamic community are still unclear about this whole rape thing.”)
Interesting that JL asks Mr. Doureihi why he doesn’t go live in a Muslim country and initiate the Caliphate there, and D. smoothly replies that he’s a human being before he’s an Australian or even a Muslim, and says, in so many words, that he doesn’t want to live in a dictatorship. And yet, he believes in the global caliphate, which means literally becoming a slave of God (and whatever imams happen to be in charge).
Not only do these zealots lie to everyone else, they lie to themselves.
I guess after boning camels and goats for 100’s of years, imagining some geriatric pensioner bent over in all sorts of compromising positions must provide some sort of turn on for these young, virile muslim lads…
But he’s setting a very low bar for getting his jollies isn’t he???
But then who am I to speak, when seeing knobs like this bloke and members of his brotherhood marched in front of a firing squad with a new nibblies provided would sound like a half decent day…
Interesting that JL asks Mr. Doureihi why he doesn’t go live in a Muslim country and initiate the Caliphate there, and D. smoothly replies that he’s a human being before he’s an Australian or even a Muslim, and says, in so many words, that he doesn’t want to live in a dictatorship.
No, that’s not it. He wants to ruin what others have. Ol’ Mo (bees pee upon him) declared that it’s Islam’s role to rule the world; Doureihi intends to do his part.
Posted by Rob Crawford on 2007 02 04 at 11:25 AM • permalinkIt’s a pity someone a little sharper than Laws wasn’t interviewing this guy.
Is Laws going senile?
Posted by James Waterton on 2007 02 04 at 01:19 PM • permalinkFirstly, how dare the Islamic women use the word Bikini in their burqkinni concept for life saving. This is my culture steel someone elses culture in fashion, thank you.
Australians would call this style of swimwear neck to knees.
Are we introducing Catholic Swimmers? Church of Englandkinnis? Budahkinnis as well on the life surfing fronts? Since when did a religion infiltrate the humble bikinni?
Can these Islamic females “life savers” give DRABC to swimmers/male? Isn’t this against the Islamic Law?Muslim Village is a great site. If anyone doubts that Australia has those ratbag elements who bombed the London transport system, then read the posts at Muslim Village. Nearly all do not believe Muslims would do anything bad, such as fly planes into tall buildings, rape people or set off bombs in crowded markets. All these things are done by the Americans and the Jews, which reveals what they being told in the mosques.
#11 Absolutely.
I’m not a regular reader, but do duck over there every now and then after a major “Islamic news event”. In this case, I wanted to see what they thought of Mamdouh Habib, but stumbled across that piece instead.
Personally, I’m a bit tired of the John Laws programme. His show seems to be about 2% editorial, 2% talkback callers and the rest is just endless commercials and traffic updates. It got worse this morning. A nine year old calls up “Hi John, I’m on my way to the Dore Centre” John: “Ah, Professor Dore is a good friend of mine” (read: Advertiser).
What’s amazing is how freakishly out of touch they guys over at MuslimVillage really are.
They genuinely believe that Wassim was “brilliant” and that he “hammered” John Laws who they imagine is “squirming with anguish” under the force of Wassim’s words.
They simply have no concpet that almost every non-muslim who reads a transcript of that interview would find the concepts Wassim promotes as that of blunt, theocratic Islamic Supremacy.
And yet they think this guy will win them friends? Deluded!
My favourite bit is when John Laws asks Wassim whether he believes it is appropriate to stone women to death (which HT implicitly does).
Wassim replies with possibly the most piss-weak response I’ve ever heard - “We want to remove the GST” (a sales tax!)
Laws said something along the lines of ‘that if HT’s agenda is all about “the Muslim world” and nothing to do with Australia (which is his catch-all get-out-of-shit-free card he plays continuously), then why on earth does it have policies about the Australian GST’?
Lovely.
People bitch and moan about the “us-and-them” mentality, but if you ever want to see that ‘they’ truly are different to ‘us’ in their values, you could do a lot worse that listen to Wassim’s smooth, articulate, eloquent advocacy… of an Islamic form of fascism.
#6 I have to defend ``literally’’ against the know-it-all Mrs. Allgood.
The word ``literally’’ is being used figuratively, meaning that the word ``raped’’ is not too strong a word, is justified, as would be the case if it were literally a rape.
I do think the guy is probably thinking of rapping, not raping, though. A simple mix-up.
Heh.
This comment prays:
May Allah strenghten (sic)...wassims vocabulary so he can dumbfound them even more!
A subsequent comment:
Enough with the praise already. It may go to his head.
Followed by:
we as Muslims are warned about bestowing too much praise on a person lest they succumb to the whispers of Shaitaan [Satan].
No wonder the Islamic world is full of over-achievers.
Wassim went to some lengths to state that Muslims should be allowed to implement Shari’a if the followers wanted live under it-When JL asked if he would condone cross amputation of limbs for theft and stoning of woman, his response was to say that they would remove all income tax and GST.totally avoided the truth
The oily little turd went on to say that in Islam there is no income tax- failed to mentionm that for many under Islam there is no work and they still have to pay Jizya and that slave labour is the norm for many under its yoke.
Still I hope the give him lots of mainstream air time- I am sure all the youing and free willl be rushing to bury themselves under a Burqha
HNNHistory News Network Because the Past is the Present, and the Future too.Donations Archives Newsletter Contact About Us FAQs Search HNN: Breaking News
Departments
Lifted from Dissecting Leftism and Daniel MandelThis is an example of Muslims winning hearts and minds- ask ther Christians and Jews in Bethlehem for a reference Wassim
Center for History and New Media
Log InDeja vu
Daniel MandelCHRISTIANS UNDER MUSLIM RULE: BETHLEHEM & BEYOND
The situation of Christians in the Muslim Middle East, as I have outlined earlier, continues to deteriorate, not least within the Palestinian Authority. To Khaled Abu Toameh’s earlier account of the depopulating of Bethlehem’s Christian community can be added his more recent piece describing their ongoing plight as a minority of 15% in a city in which they were once a majority. As Toameh reports, incidents include fire-bombing of Christian homes, theft of lands, and physical violence and intimidation of those Christians brave enough to complain or seek redress. Further bleak details also emerge in Elizabeth Day’s account.More general analysis of the Christian predicament in the region comes from the Spiegel Online and Zlatica Hoke, the latter including some little-known details regarding Israeli Christians, a rare exception to the trend of Middle Eastern Christian demographic collapse, demoralization and emigration.
I agree with James W.
While I’ve never heard his radio shows, I quite like what little I know of Lawsy (well Full-up Adams hates him, so that’s a credit in my book), but he missed a lot of good opportunities to probe the guy’s preposterous and inconsistent claims, and in the end came off looking like he didn’t do his homework.
I’m surprised the researchers couldn’t have pushed the quotes in question to a screen in front of him when they were refuted. I was waiting for this to happen and was surprised there was no backup.
#21 Personally I think that the lack of difficult questions to Muslim apologists in the MSM is too common to be a coincidence. For some reason they indulge their constant stupidities as though they were 3 year olds.
Not sure if any of you remember an interview with Tim on JJJ about the Mohammed cartoons. The interviewer asked the head of the Muslim Student association at Sydney Uni whether he thought the acceptance of constant anti-jewish cartoons in the Islamic world made their furore over the Motoons a bit of a double standard.
His answer: Silence….......... I’m sorry I don’t understand the question.
Quesion repeated
Answer: Silence….......I don’t understand the question
Needless to say the MSM “Muslim in a corner alarm” went off and the interviewer apologised and backed off.
#13
My favourite bit is when John Laws asks Wassim whether he believes it is appropriate to stone women to death (which HT implicitly does). Wassim replies with possibly the most piss-weak response I’ve ever heard - “We want to remove the GST” (a sales tax!)
He meant the GST on stones. Wassim is also advocating free public transport for suicide bombers travelling to and from their destiny. It will be one ticket to the point of explosion and 73 tickets for the return journey.
#21 Underscore - yeah, Laws seemed to be flying blind most of the time and, whilst making some valid points about the barbarity of Sharia law, clearly hadn’t done any research and allowed the interviewee to guide the course of the interview in his favour from woe to go.
The Muslims on that forum were right; the guy had it all over Laws. Happily, there is no shortage of articulate critics of conservative Islam. Many of the regular contributors here could have done a better job than Laws, I reckon - and I mean that quite sincerely.
Posted by James Waterton on 2007 02 05 at 06:02 AM • permalink#21
I’m surprised the researchers couldn’t have pushed the quotes in question to a screen in front of him when they were refuted.
You are quite right, and I forgot that interviewers can be prompted by off-air experts and researchers.
When the Israel/Hezbollah war was on in Lebanon, Laws was behind the Israeli effort, however very short on knowledge. Not his fault I suppose, he can’t be expected to know everything, however it does seem the researchers aren’t adequately briefing him.
I wonder how Alan Jones would have done versus this twat.
Page 1 of 1 pages
Members:
Login | Register
| Member List
John Laws is cat meat.