<< MOVING BACK SUGGESTED ~ MAIN ~ RISE UP, WERIB STREET! >>

QUESTIONS ON MIND

The Margo Kingston Revival rolls on:

Hello. What does the Australian flag represent? Would you wear it on your face or around your neck? Why or why not?

These questions are in my mind this Australia Day because Today Tonight just rang again to see if I’d be, again, the sole person they could find with ambivalent feelilngs about the matter ...

And ambivalent spelling, which is your guarantee this is 100% genuine Margo and not some cheap spellcheck-aware imposter. As it happens, Margo isn’t ambivalent about the flag at all:

Because of my angle of vision, I see the flag as symbolising the war on Iraq, the war on refugees and Howard’s war on the rule of law, once fundamental to our British Heritage, and on human rights for all Australians.

“The war on Iraq”, Margo? The war in which Iraqi and coalition troops are fighting on the same side? Is Iraq’s government fighting ... Iraq?

But that’s just me.

And it’s wonderful to have you back. One thing, though; how come you’ve ditched “G’day” as a greeting? Is it too Australian, and thus symbolic of “the war on Iraq, the war on refugees and Howard’s war on the rule of law”? As in her earlier era, Margo’s people provide a wealth of insightful commentary:

Martin Gifford: “Personally, I do not consider myself to be an Australian - I’m a human being, an Earthling, and a Universian.”

Bryan Law: “What’s a Humvee?”

Solomon Wakeling: “I am boiling some chamomile. I have not been up this late in weeks.”

And from Margo herself ...

Margo: “I wish I had had some (any) commercial savvy, because then I wouldn’t have bankrupted myself in a deluded rush to maintain momentum post-independence before funding came through.”

Weirdly, Today Tonight’s go-to gal for flag-ragging also offered a tennis tip:

Margo: “I reckon Gonzalez can win it. He’s hot as - can he stay there?”

Naturally, Gonzalez lost in straight sets.

(Via Rod F.)

Posted by Tim B. on 01/31/2007 at 09:54 AM
  1. If Margo can be induced to wear the flag around her neck, can I hoist it? Please, pretty please?!?

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 10:05 AM • permalink

  2. Martin Gifford: “Personally, I do not consider myself to be an Australian - I’m a human being, an Earthling, and a Universian.”

    And a dumbass, don’t forget that. And wouldn’t it be “Parallel-Universian”?

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 10:07 AM • permalink

  3. And let’s not forget to turn the italics off, shall we?

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 10:08 AM • permalink

  4. Now I know you’re pulling my leg, Blair. There’s no such thing as a Solomon Wakeling.

    Staying up late boiling chamomile? Got to be some sort of parody.

    Posted by SoberHT on 2007 01 31 at 10:18 AM • permalink

  5. Because of my angle of vision, I see the flag as symbolising the war on Iraq, the war on refugees and Howard’s war on the rule of law, once fundamental to our British Heritage, and on human rights for all Australians.

    Then get up off the floor, dimwit.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 01 31 at 10:20 AM • permalink

  6. What a pack of spineless, nutless wonders.

    Posted by Latino on 2007 01 31 at 10:25 AM • permalink

  7. Margo asks one Webdiarist: “Reckon red, white and blue suits today’s Australia?”

    Is Margo proposing some sort of Queer Eye for the Nation-State Guy change here? Is red, white and blue so “last century”?

    Posted by Villeurbanne on 2007 01 31 at 10:26 AM • permalink

  8. “Hello. What does the Australian flag represent? Would you wear it on your face or around your neck? Why or why not?”

    Well, no, but that’s because I’m an American.  However, I do see the American flag as representing our liberty, constitution, and the people.  I do not confuse the flag with any specific presidency.  I’m sure it is similar with clear thinking Aussies.

    Posted by rbj1 on 2007 01 31 at 10:26 AM • permalink

  9. #4: Now I know you’re pulling my leg, Blair. There’s no such thing as a Solomon Wakeling.

    Mark: wasn’t that a character in The Lord of the Rings? You know, the one who couldn’t sleep because he was constantly drinking chamomile tea?

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 10:33 AM • permalink

  10. #5: the war on refugees

    What, are Australian coastal defenses turning their heavy artillery on bamboo rafts filled with Indonesians yearning to be free? Isn’t it possible that these people are, in reality, scouts charged with the mission of finding suitable locations for the landing of Indonesian armored units? Has this been fact-checked by Terry Lane yet?

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 10:37 AM • permalink

  11. ” . . . a human being, an Earthling, and a Universian.”

    But, as I’m not up to any of the heavy lifting involved in being a truly independent being—like providing for my own defense, guaranteeing my own freedom to speak, floating my own currency, crime prevention, etc.—I’ll be happy to sponge all of this institutional security from a country and a people to which I owe no particular allegience or duty . . . whatever . . . yawn.

    What was it that Dutch or Belgian guy said about not being any good at fighting for freedom, just good at enjoying it?

    Posted by cosmo on 2007 01 31 at 11:25 AM • permalink

  12. Paco:

    I wonder if the war against refugees has an ‘exit strategy’?

    Posted by cosmo on 2007 01 31 at 11:27 AM • permalink

  13. Because of my angle of vision, I see the flag as symbolising the war on Iraq, the war on refugees and Howard’s war on the rule of law, once fundamental to our British Heritage, and on human rights for all Australians.

    And I see clueless moonbats questioning the propriety of flying the Australian flag as symbolising mankind’s need to go back to survival of the fittest and culling the weak.  But that’s just me.

    How did such a group of weak minded and weak knee people without a shred of patriotism even come into existence?

    (looks suspiciously in the direction of Australia)

    Posted by wronwright on 2007 01 31 at 11:35 AM • permalink

  14. #9 #4: Now I know you’re pulling my leg, Blair. There’s no such thing as a Solomon Wakeling.
    Mark: wasn’t that a character in The Lord of the Rings?

    Sounds more like a Charles Dickens character to me.  You know, sort of like Uriah Heep or Pumblechook.  Come to think of it, trick her out in a crinoline and mob cap, and Margo herself would be a perfect Dickens character.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 01 31 at 11:50 AM • permalink

  15. #14: Come to think of it, trick her out in a crinoline and mob cap, and Margo herself would be a perfect Dickens character.

    Holy cow! Madame Defargue, sitting at the foot of the guillotine, knitting!

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 12:09 PM • permalink

  16. G’day

    is highly divisive.

    I certainly believe that it should be banned in public places.  Of course, I don’t mind if people say it to themselves in private.

    Just imagine if someone said

    G’day

    at the BDO and a a bunch of white racist youths started beating up on Moslems or other scumbuckets.

    You’d all be laughing on the other side of your faces then!

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 01 31 at 12:16 PM • permalink

  17. Oh fuck I thought I turned off the fucking italics

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 01 31 at 12:18 PM • permalink

  18. You know, I felt the US flag still stood for the good stuff, even when “History’s Greatest Monster” was President.  I wasn’t ashamed of the flag when Bill Clinton was busy being . . . well, Bill Clinton, either.

    Maybe Ozzies feel that way about their flag.  It’s probably a good way to check to see who really is an Ozzie and who isn’t, eh?

    Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2007 01 31 at 12:44 PM • permalink

  19. #17: Say it with me, Jack: Perview is My fiend.

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 01:14 PM • permalink

  20. “Solomon Wakeling” is Dickensian enough, but for some reason the name puts me in mind of Harry Potter.  or better yet, H.P. Lovecraft.  “Solomon Wakeling turned and peered into the eldritch gloom…”

    Posted by dub kitty on 2007 01 31 at 01:28 PM • permalink

  21. </ital> who’s burning through the italics budget?

    Posted by paulris on 2007 01 31 at 01:36 PM • permalink

  22. “And it’s wonderful to have you back.”

    No, it is not. It is bad. It is killing trees and making use of pixels and boldfacing and italics, and all for the publicizing of utter dreck.

    In my opinion.

    Posted by m on 2007 01 31 at 01:37 PM • permalink

  23. These questions are in my mind this Australia Day because Today Tonight just rang again to see if I’d be, again, the sole person they could find with ambivalent feelilngs about the matter ...

    Well, let me get this right.  There are, what, 300,000?, 3,000,000?, people in Australia?  In all those people Today Tonight could find only one person with ambivalent feelings about the flag?  Shit, I bet they could find more people with strong feelings against Shake N Bake chicken.

    All this proves is Margo is a publicity whore.  Unless it involves a paycheck.  Then it just shows she needs to eat.  She’d probably hand wash paco’s Fruit of the Looms if there was a check in it for her.

    Posted by wronwright on 2007 01 31 at 01:40 PM • permalink

  24. ” . . . a human being, an Earthling, and a Universian.”

    A human being, an Earthling and a Universian walk into a bar. The bartender says “What is this? Some kind of a joke?”

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2007 01 31 at 01:44 PM • permalink

  25. attempt to close italics.

    Posted by rbj1 on 2007 01 31 at 01:47 PM • permalink

  26. http://timblair.net/ee/index.php/weblog/comments/questions_on_mind/#213397

    RebeccaH, you never want to get up off the floor after one of those nights. Of course, there’s always the possibility I didn’t try preview…

    Oh man… Italics when drunk isn’t cool. It makes my little 21 year old (yeah, I’m a baby) head spin!

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 01 31 at 01:51 PM • permalink

  27. Didn’t work.  We now return you to your regularly scheduled Margo piling on bashing. (Gaa, what an awful picture).

    Seriously, does Australia have some sort of quota for hiring talentless hacks as writers?  This is easier than shooting fish in a barrel.
    1) Read something Margo wrote
    2) Apply logic
    3) something
    4) Profit!

    Posted by rbj1 on 2007 01 31 at 01:51 PM • permalink

  28. Martin Gifford: “Personally, I do not consider myself to be an Australian ...”

    If only the department of immigration would agree with him.

    Posted by 2dogs on 2007 01 31 at 01:51 PM • permalink

  29. #12: I wonder if the war against refugees has an ‘exit strategy’?

    Or an “entrance” strategy, for that matter.

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 01:54 PM • permalink

  30. “I wish I had had some (any) commercial savvy, because then I wouldn’t have bankrupted myself in a deluded rush to maintain momentum post-independence before funding came through.”

    Not expecting back that no-interest loan to Webdiary Ltd. anytime soon, is she?

    Posted by PW on 2007 01 31 at 02:21 PM • permalink

  31. Good lord! Is there a Margo “look”? I just came out of a meeting with representatives from another federal agency, and the woman in charge looked as if she had just had her hair done with a butcher knife by a blind man with delerium tremens.

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 02:23 PM • permalink

  32. The Personal History And Experience Of Solomon Wakeling

    By Charles Dickens

    CHAPTER 1
    I Am Boiling

    Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show, but I’m betting on me. To begin my life with the beginning of my life, I record that I was born (as I have been informed and believe) on a Friday, at twelve o’clock at night. It was remarked that the chamomile began to boil, and I began to cry, simultaneously. I would not be up again that late for weeks.

    to be continued, and continued, and continued, no doubt….

    Posted by SoberHT on 2007 01 31 at 02:47 PM • permalink

  33. If the bitch is the only one with a problem about the flag, why is anyone paying her to hear about it?  She admits she can’t see straight.  She admits she doesn’t understand how to mind her own business.  She obviously can’t write a complete sentence (which requires having a complete thought).  She causes profligate use of italics.  Name one thing that recommends her.

    “I’m a Human being, an Earthling, and a Universian.”

    What a load of crap.  What the hell does that mean?  Every man, woman, and child, could say the same thing.  Utterly meaningless.  One might as well say they are carbon-based stardust.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 01 31 at 02:55 PM • permalink

  34. “Reckon red, white and blue suits today’s Australia?” Someone’s been spending her leisure time perusing the Spanking Blog.

    Cheers

    Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2007 01 31 at 03:12 PM • permalink

  35. #32: Ok, now I’m hooked. Do I have to wait for the Oxford University Press edition?

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 03:21 PM • permalink

  36. When I look at the U.S. flag I don’t think of George Bush, I think of George Washington.  I think of the great men who founded this nation and the sacrifices they made personally so I can enjoy freedom today.

    Which is why flag haters hate it.

    If the unwashed masses are reminded of the bravery, values and sacrifices these countries were founded on then it’s harder to destroy it.

    I think I’ll go buy an Australian flag just to annoy all the right people.

    Posted by tabitharuth on 2007 01 31 at 03:36 PM • permalink

  37. It’s great having Margo back. Several new loonies have come out the woodwork to be regular contributors over there which easily fills my moonbat entertainment quota.
    What better quote could you find anywhere that proves ones leftwing moonbat credentials than “What is a Humvee?”
    Sensational!

    Posted by Hank Reardon on 2007 01 31 at 03:51 PM • permalink

  38. Dumber’n a sack of hammers.

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2007 01 31 at 04:06 PM • permalink

  39. When I look at the U.S. flag I don’t think of George Bush, I think of George Washington.

    Damn, now I’m hoping that a future Bush family offspring to enter politics will be named George Washington Bush. That’ll really send the Left ‘round the bend.

    Posted by PW on 2007 01 31 at 04:25 PM • permalink

  40. #35

    No need to wait when you own a handy Publish-All-Crap-Omatic™! Instantly publishes every world classic with the words “Wakeling” or “Universian” in the title!

    From PACO™, the Company that Cares™©®!

    Posted by SoberHT on 2007 01 31 at 04:29 PM • permalink

  41. it would be great if margo covered up her face with the aussie flag.

    Posted by vinny on 2007 01 31 at 04:33 PM • permalink

  42. Oh good lord, don’t tell me mark from Monroe is hawking PACO products too.  It’s bad enough that andycanuck puts up a PACO Industries booth outside every meeting room in the White House.  I cringe every time I see that big neon logo “you want it, you know you do”.

    paco, are you recruiting salesmen at the minion social hook ups again?

    Posted by wronwright on 2007 01 31 at 04:55 PM • permalink

  43. Die, Earthling!

    Posted by Dminor on 2007 01 31 at 04:59 PM • permalink

  44. Martin Gifford, how many humans actually live in your ‘Universalia’? 
    Yet another moonbat leftist with Fairies at the bottom of his garden - which turn into Raving Martyr Bombers unnoticed.

    Every day we see last century’s Leftists transmuted into dangerous New Age Utopians -nothing much has changed except the labels.

    Posted by Barrie on 2007 01 31 at 05:25 PM • permalink

  45. #42: paco, are you recruiting salesmen at the minion social hook ups again?

    What, weren’t you invited to the Paco Parties, held in the homes of people aspiring to wealth beyond the dreams of avarice? Well, permit me to correct that oversight, right now! Rebecca is hosting the next one tomorrow night (if she lines up three more junior sales associates, she gets a customized white Cadillac, with killer mag wheels and gold-toned “Paco Enterprises” insignia). Of course, if you’re content to   make just a few hundred thousand dollars a year as a tax attorney, and to remain in the midst of the lowing herd of bovine non-entities, that’s ok: it’s your right. But if you want to soar above that herd, like an eagle of ostentatious capitalist excess, join us for one of our Paco products swahrays!

    Posted by paco on 2007 01 31 at 05:33 PM • permalink

  46. Feelilngs, whoa whoa whoa, feelilngs, trying to forget my feelilngs of love…

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2007 01 31 at 05:49 PM • permalink

  47. • Solomon Wakeling: “I am boiling some chamomile. I have not been up this late in weeks.”

    The brave chamomille will tell you nothing!

    Posted by Craig Mc on 2007 01 31 at 05:52 PM • permalink

  48. Because of my angle of vision

    Amazed she can see anything with her head up her arse.

    Posted by kae on 2007 01 31 at 06:12 PM • permalink

  49. When-oh-when is someone going to set up a Kingston/Quiggin/Sear “Don’t Go There” sports tipping service.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2007 01 31 at 06:34 PM • permalink

  50. Hank Reardon (registering as #1, like all the other post-italicized comments, on my setup):

    “It’s great having Margo back. . . . fills my moonbat entertainment quota.”

    What’s your secret? How do you read them and survive whole? It’s so sapping.

    Posted by m on 2007 01 31 at 07:08 PM • permalink

  51. This creature was interviewed on the Channel 7 program,Today Tonight,last night.The poor woman must be one of the ugliest human beings I have ever laid eyes on.She really does deserve pity and her appearance may go some way to explaining her warped view of the world.Having seen her I may now have to reconsider my previously strongly held views regarding the wearing of the burqua.

    Posted by Lew on 2007 01 31 at 07:12 PM • permalink

  52. Can Margo not get a better picture of herself? On her own website? ALL of us could get good pictures, with enough shopping around and photoshopping. Hers is just dreadful.

    Posted by m on 2007 01 31 at 07:12 PM • permalink

  53. on the rule of law, once fundamental to our British Heritage,

    On any other day Margo would be screaming for the Union Jack to be removed from the Australian flag because it represented the most evil empire the world has seen. Margo is nothing if not consistent - consistently dim-witted. It never ceases to amaze me that someone with child’s view of the world could have been a commentator in a major metro newspaper. Oh look, here comes Leunig from Wearabea.

    Posted by Contrail on 2007 01 31 at 07:14 PM • permalink

  54. Here’s some Margo from the linked blathering:

    “See anyone, I mean anyone, amongst today’s pollies and celebrities who’s game to advocate a change in the flag, or even a return to the use of the flag as a symbol of Australian nationhood too important to paint on one’s face or warp around one’s shoulders?”

    Discuss. Add needed verbs, nouns, adjective, adverbs, prepositions, etc. as needed.

    I thought English was the language spoken in Australia.

    Posted by m on 2007 01 31 at 07:23 PM • permalink

  55. #54

    The Kingston’s English is our highest grammatical standard.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2007 01 31 at 07:44 PM • permalink

  56. #52 m.Believe me the photo on the website is a masterpiece of photoshopping.The real thing as seen on TV last night had to be seen to be believed.My bull-terrier,who has considerable personal form when it comes to ugliness,saw her and immediately went under the house,he hasn’t as yet emerged.

    Posted by Lew on 2007 01 31 at 08:03 PM • permalink

  57. Would you wear it on your face or around your neck? Why or why not?


    On my face, like a Burqa?

    Never!! I’d stick it on my boobs and have a sticker on my bum.

    I’d roll my towel that has an Ozz flag as print and wear it as a hat on the beach.

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 01 31 at 08:08 PM • permalink

  58. What does this, excuse the vernacular, dumb bitch, think a flag is for, if not for wearing, flying, making love on,cherishing?

    Oh, I forgot, representing a patrimony and set of values.

    What does the Australian flag represent to her then? Racist patriarchal hegemony… and the green crescent flag???

    Also, she writes only with self-reference ... my ambivalent feelings… Is she also ambi-pacifist? That is, pacifist but wants others to defend her.

    But, hey, that’s just self-referential me.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 01 31 at 08:41 PM • permalink

  59. Tim, I think Margo meant Gonzales was “hot” in another sense. It’s the only way it makes sense. This is my introduction to her but she seems like some aging hippy.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 01 31 at 08:45 PM • permalink

  60. I couldn’t give a continental about Margo’s view on the flag, but this is intriguing:

    • Margo: “I reckon Gonzalez can win it. He’s hot as - can he stay there?”

    That may be the most vicious public statement ever made. How on God’s green earth did poor Gonzalez ever make it on to court after having the frighteners put on him like that?

    Webdiary with a sports column? That and a TV Guide and Fairfax would fold.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 01 31 at 08:47 PM • permalink

  61. #10 No Paco, it’s the Abu Sayef scoputing party.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 01 31 at 08:48 PM • permalink

  62. A human being, an Earthling and a Universian Universarian walk into a bar. The bartender says “What is this? Some kind of a joke?”

    The earthling says: No, I’ll have a lime and bitters.

    The human being syas: Yes, I’ll have a lime and bitters.

    The universarian thinks: Oh, so tiresome. And takes the other two guys drinks.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 01 31 at 08:58 PM • permalink

  63. I reckon this is the flag that the Margonauts think best represents Australia under the stewardship of John “Eyebrows O’ Death” Howard- note also the right eyesocket is bigger, representing the extra scrutiny the right puts all dissidents under.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 01 31 at 08:59 PM • permalink

  64. #61 PIMF

    Of course, the 1835 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary lists scoputing as a North Yorkshire aport, played between poachers and gamekeepers in the early 18th Century.

    remember the old traditional song: “Ascoputing we will go ...”

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 01 31 at 09:02 PM • permalink

  65. #54 - wrong, they speak Strine there.

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2007 01 31 at 09:03 PM • permalink

  66. Martin Gifford: “Personally, I do not consider myself to be an Australian - I’m a human being, an Earthling, and a Universian.”

    Oooooooh Martin, how wonderfully broadminded of you. How progressive! Your vision of the global village you live in is so inspiring in its outlook and so warm and humane. I’m truly impressed.

    Now give me your passport, you self indulgent juvenile and f**k off and live anywhere in Africa.

    Moron.

    Posted by Penguin on 2007 01 31 at 09:17 PM • permalink

  67. PIMF. should that read “Maroon?”

    It’s so bloody hard to keep all the running gags straight in my head.

    Posted by Penguin on 2007 01 31 at 09:19 PM • permalink

  68. Or perhaps “Margoon”?

    Posted by Habib on 2007 01 31 at 09:31 PM • permalink

  69. BTW- all of you shallow types making fun of Margo’s appearance, for shame.

    I’ll have you know she takes pride in her looks, and has just undergone a makeover.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 01 31 at 09:34 PM • permalink

  70. Yesterday a defiant Mr Clark, who told the court during the two-week trial that he was in Melbourne, 270km away, at the time of the rapes - described the finding as “the lowest point in the history of this country”.

    Geoff Clark found guilty of rape in Civil Court. (my bolds)

    Posted by kae on 2007 01 31 at 10:44 PM • permalink

  71. Sorry, forgot the O/T bit…

    Posted by kae on 2007 01 31 at 10:45 PM • permalink

  72. Solomon really needs to get himself a t-shirt announcing the important fact he has an aboriginal t-shirt. He could hold a chamomile smoking ceremony to launch it. And release a statement for the press communicating the fact that John Howard refused to announce it, therefore suppressing his important news.

    Posted by stahlblume on 2007 01 31 at 10:51 PM • permalink

  73. O’T again…

    Police arrest terror kidnap plot suspects

    Posted by kae on 2007 01 31 at 10:53 PM • permalink

  74. Solomon awoke. At least he thought he was awake. His eyes seemed to be gummed shut and, despite the fact his head was pounding as though he was being hit with a moonbat, not so much as a groan could escape his parched lips.

    “Why am I so damned weak?” he lamented to himself as he became aware of a fly buzzing lazily overhead. “I’ve been to countless Chamomile Anonymous meetings. Jenny Macklin is a great sponsor. I’ve never met a woman with such a deep grasp of blandness. But I just can’t break free of it’s eveil grip!

    “It’s that aroma, damn it. Every time someone buys a packet from ‘Lipton’ in that alley behind the yarts centre and brews up that heady mix of chamomile and Evian… that smell like compost after a week in the sun destroys my resolve!”

    Finally, a groan escaped his clenched throat as he managed to open one eye.

    “****!” he thought to himself (for Solomon had long ago been taught by his mummy to replace all expletives in his thoughts with hand-crocheted asterisks).

    “Either I’ve been unconscious for days and that’s the second dead hooker’s corpse I’ve woken up next to… or I got so hammered last night I’ve slept with Margo Kingston”.

    Posted by RexW on 2007 01 31 at 10:56 PM • permalink

  75. These questions are in my mind this Australia Day because Today Tonight just rang again to see if I’d be, again, the sole person they could find with ambivalent feelilngs about the matter ...

    Remember Frontline? I can imagine it went more like this:

    Producer:, “now come on, who can we get? You know, punches the demographics, woman, nutbag who will immediately annoy our viewers. Being a lezzo or from some other arty farty group’d be great”

    Assistant: We can get Margo Kingston

    Producer: You’re a genius!

    Posted by Nic on 2007 01 31 at 10:57 PM • permalink

  76. #70 Kae.

    Shows how much that gang rapist knows, the lowest point in our history was when we allowed PACO Enterprises to purchase Vegemite on behalf of Kraft Foods USA.

    But oh yes, we wait, making light of the fate of our beloved yeast spread. Yes, we may appear placid and friendly, but this outrage has been added to ‘the list.’ We are patient, we are resolute, justice will be served when least expected, and the knife that brings the reckoning will then spread our joy thinly on light golden toast.

    We wait. The wheels are turning.

    Posted by Penguin on 2007 01 31 at 11:02 PM • permalink

  77. More O/T

    Film maker, Nicholas Hammond, is to make a film of the Bilal Skaf rape in 2000 (the one where 14 ‘youths’ raped a girl 25 times).

    He promises to “be provocative and highlight the misunderstandings between Muslims and non-Muslims”

    from
    The Daily Telegraph

    Posted by pommygranate on 2007 01 31 at 11:04 PM • permalink

  78. #77

    And they are being funded with yartz money.

    The Wrong Girl - the story of the relationship between one of the victims and her legal representative.

    Posted by kae on 2007 01 31 at 11:06 PM • permalink

  79. #77 Pommygranate.

    I thought that’s what the trial achieved.

    Posted by Penguin on 2007 01 31 at 11:08 PM • permalink

  80. Thought I was watching ABC last week when TT had Margo and Richard Neville on the same night! What’s happened since Naomi left. BTW did she save the waawaa (or whatever the kid’s name) from the cannibals?

    Posted by ozconservative on 2007 01 31 at 11:12 PM • permalink

  81. #79 Penguin

    Evidently not.  I’m sure Nick (Friedrich von Trapp in The Sound of Music) will highlight ‘cultural differences’ as a mitigating factor. 

    I would so love to be proved wrong.

    Posted by pommygranate on 2007 01 31 at 11:13 PM • permalink

  82. Has anybody read this explanation of the whole sorry saga? How a blog could become such a basket-case is mind-boggling…

    Posted by mark on 2007 01 31 at 11:55 PM • permalink

  83. Werribee recently held a plebiscite on the national flag, but couldn’t decide between these two.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 01 at 01:30 AM • permalink

  84. #82 The back troubles & mood enhancers mentioned could go a long way to explaining the overriding need she felt to make a safe space for the spineless. And the witless & the meek. But people keep abusing the space!

    Posted by stahlblume on 2007 02 01 at 02:04 AM • permalink

  85. #83- oops, wrong thread.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 01 at 02:12 AM • permalink

  86. I’m late, I know, but thank God Magrok’s back!  I find all those Muslim/ABC/Age/SMH threads depressing.

    But a thread on Mograk will brighten and RWDB’s day!

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2007 02 01 at 05:28 AM • permalink

  87. #50. I had a think about that. It’s just fulfilling to get a good stream of material for highlighting to marginal others the thoughts and agenda of the left.
    I truly believe that most people in the american democrats and our ALP think along very similar philosphical lines to the Margo Kingston’s and Michael Moore’s of this world but are just smart enough to realise that the average punter out there won’t buy it.
    In order for our side to be elected or re-elected it is crucial that moonbats spout their stupidity loud and clear.

    Posted by Hank Reardon on 2007 02 01 at 06:55 AM • permalink

  88. Hello. What does the Australian flag represent?

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and say “Australia”.

    Posted by Warmongering Lunatic on 2007 02 01 at 09:39 PM • permalink

  89. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.