<< CASE OF THE RUNAWAY SKULL ~ MAIN ~ MEAL SUPERSIZED >>

PANDAS PREVAIL

CBS News, January 2003:

They are soft, furry and all but extinct. Today there are only about a thousand pandas left in the world, reports CBS News Correspondent Barry Petersen. A few dozen are in zoos.

Blame man for encroaching on once wild parts of China and destroying their habitat. And, as more of China’s wilderness disappears, so do more of the pandas.

Reuters, June 2006:

Scientists say giant pandas may not be in as much danger of extinction as feared, with a new British-Chinese study finding there could be twice as many living in the wild as previously thought.

“This finding indicates that the species may have a significantly better chance of long-term viability than recently anticipated, and that this beautiful animal may have a brighter future,” the scientists said in a statement.

As a Professor Bruford warns, however: “It doesn’t mean the panda is out of the woods by any stretch of the imagination.” Quite so; it means the pandas are in the woods. Which is kind of what people were hoping for.

(Via allan)

Posted by Tim B. on 06/19/2006 at 10:58 PM
  1. Sorry, I don’t understand.  Does that mean that pandas are drowning like the polar bears?

    Is the earth warming, thinning the ice and allowing pandas to slip beneath the seas?

    Aweful!!

    I thank Al Gore for bringing this truth to light.

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2006 06 19 at 11:18 PM • permalink

  2. But what about the panda bear skulls?  Are they making good their escape?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 06 19 at 11:22 PM • permalink

  3. Drowning polar bears cannibalising pandas?

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 06 19 at 11:26 PM • permalink

  4. The bear patrols are working:

    Homer: Let the bears pay the bear tax. I pay the Homer tax.
    Lisa: That’s the homeowner tax.
    Homer: Well anyway, I’m still outraged!
    Homer: Ah, not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol must be working like a charm!
    Lisa: That’s specious reasoning, Dad.
    Homer: Thank you, honey.
    Lisa: By your logic, I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away!
    Homer: Uh-huh, and how does it work?
    Lisa: It doesn’t work.
    Homer: Uh-huh.
    Lisa: It’s just a stupid rock.
    Homer: Uh-huh.
    Lisa: But I don’t see any tigers around here, do you?
    Homer: (Looks around) Lisa, I’d like to buy your rock.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2006 06 19 at 11:39 PM • permalink

  5. Panda’s are fat, lazy animals, primarily because they sit on their arses all day munching bamboo which gives the just enough kilojoules to scratch their balls occasionally. Even mating is a chore. They are too lazy/uninterested to procreate that one zoo has resorted to

    Panda porn to get things going.

    Pandas, Pah!

    Posted by Nic on 2006 06 19 at 11:40 PM • permalink

  6. Maybe Barney Gumble is being an accessory to being a panda bear

    That would sure give the panda count inflated numbers.

    Posted by The (WHMECDM) President on 2006 06 19 at 11:43 PM • permalink

  7. AlburyShifton - you actually from Albury?

    Posted by The (WHMECDM) President on 2006 06 19 at 11:44 PM • permalink

  8. So now Pandas do shit in the woods, in ever-increasing numbers?  Why didn’t ‘Does a polar bear shit on the snow?’ ever catch on?

    Posted by cuckoo on 2006 06 19 at 11:53 PM • permalink

  9. Oh,  this environmental pandemonium has been surely averted by the profligate use of the panda ammonium bicarbonate. Hello, Panda!

    Posted by tmciolek on 2006 06 20 at 12:10 AM • permalink

  10. 8. Dunno Cuckoo, but you can see why it wasn’t “does a polar bear shit in the ice?” That might put you off your gin and tonic.

    Posted by Vanguard of the Commentariat on 2006 06 20 at 12:21 AM • permalink

  11. Let us all give praise to the Great Ones- the reef destroying Greenpeaceniks.

    Posted by anthony27 on 2006 06 20 at 12:22 AM • permalink

  12. What the hell is it with the bears?  I like bears as much as the next fella, but it seems that every other story is about the buggers and I’m wondering why the ecofreaks have become hung up on them.  Does no one give a damn anymore about snail darters?  How about that freakin’ spotted owl?  Surely there’s a bacterium or virus that’s about to bite the dust.

    Posted by saltydog on 2006 06 20 at 12:22 AM • permalink

  13. They are soft, furry and all but extinct…Blame man for encroaching on once wild parts of China and destroying their habitat.

    I blame the pandas - for eating massive amounts of their habitat, for only carrying one cub, and for being utterly uninterested in copulating to produce more. This loser is an evolutionary dead end.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 06 20 at 12:31 AM • permalink

  14. No wonder they have trouble breeding, Pandas must have a terrible domestic violence problem. How else do you account for all the black eyes.

    Posted by The (WHMECDM) President on 2006 06 20 at 12:34 AM • permalink

  15. Saltydog,

    Bears are anthropomorphic. That means they look cuddly. From a sufficient distance. Don’t breathe too deeply, but that isn’t a problem on teevee.

    The Greens have finally figured out that no even semi-sane person gives a damn about fish too small to fry or weeds with names ending in -wort. Bears walking around on their hind legs and kissing their babies make good propaganda. That’s why the Pandamonium. They look like stuffed animals, and every sophomoric student who slept with a teddy bear as a child is a potential convert and voter.

    As a special bonus, even rightists have a soft spot for bears. They eat hippie hikers, thoughtfully peeling the Spandex™ off first, and thus earn our admiration three times: once for helping out, once for manual dexterity, and once for being tough enough to endure the stench.

    So bears make good teevee. I don’t advise trying to make their closer acquaintance unless your lucky charm has a caliber beginning with “4” or greater (English measure) or two digits (metric).

    Regards,
    Ric

    Posted by Ric Locke on 2006 06 20 at 12:39 AM • permalink

  16. #5- Sing Sing didn’t need any beary jazz mags to inspire him to partake in a chocolate cha-cha with Homer- maybe they prefer morbisly obese, bald and gassy cartoon characters to real-life fat female pandas with bamboo breath and more dags than a Big Brother audition.

    I think this is another example of the panda-ring by the media to critter calamity cretins.

    Posted by Habib on 2006 06 20 at 01:48 AM • permalink

  17. Remember Fight Club?,
    ” I want to put a bullet through the head of every animal that wont fuck to save its own species.” I think that’s how it goes.

    Posted by Daniel San on 2006 06 20 at 02:13 AM • permalink

  18. AlburyShifton - you actually from Albury?

    Nope - my screen-name’s kind of a family nickname.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 06 20 at 03:56 AM • permalink

  19. Populate the forests and zoos with plastic pandas living in harmony with plastic turkeys.

    Posted by perfectsense on 2006 06 20 at 04:52 AM • permalink

  20. Its always the same. So-called scientists jump up and down ranting about some frickin eco-disaster or another.  Three years down the road and they do a 180.  Three years from now they’ll be going on about how Avian Flu originates in panda shit.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2006 06 20 at 04:54 AM • permalink

  21. If pandas are in trouble when they are not out of the woods that means being IN the woods is harmful, right? 

    So we must cut the trees down. This will, de facto, get them out of the woods. The surplus land can then be used for a nice bitumen car park.  This will give the pandas good lines of sight for predators nor will they get lost in those pesky bamboo thickets.

    With the paper taken from the slaughtered trees we will print style manuals for the guidance of those who wish to avoid malaprop cliches.

    Works out kinda well, I reckon.

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 06 20 at 05:55 AM • permalink

  22. Sorry, (There I said it)

    This will not do!!!!!!

    We will have total destruction of all furry animals( apart from Kysar Trad and all the fuury faced fools)

    I recommend that the U.N. send out hunting parties( armed with rolled up minutes of Security council recommendations) to kill the damned bears.

    We can’t have good news stories.

    Bears will not multiply!!!

    What will Al Gore have to talk about?

    It will all be worth it for actuation of the coming one world government!!

    Posted by gubbaboy on 2006 06 20 at 07:33 AM • permalink

  23. Now we know why Walter Lantz never made any Randy Panda cartoons.  Such a hornpanda horndog character would have been totally fabricated & out of line with Pandaland reality.  With ‘reality based’ characters like notorious cannibal Chilly Willy and “Wendigo” Wally Walrus, Lantz beat Al Gore to the punch by 50 years or so.  There’s an inconvienent truth.

    http://lantz.goldenagecartoons.com/

    Posted by Carl H on 2006 06 20 at 08:04 AM • permalink

  24. Speaking of bears…

    A cute, little bunny rabbit stops off at the long drop dunny. There’s a small hole, a medium hole and a huge hole. The bunny squats over the middle hole.

    The bunny is doing his thing when a large bear lumbers into the dunny. He looks at the bunny as he squats over the large hole, and asks
    “Does the shit stick to your fur?”
    The terrified bunny gulps and replies, shakily,
    “Er, no.”
    “Good.” replies the bear as he sweeps up the rabbit and wipes his bum with him.*

    * when relating this story in person the action is performed after the “Good.”

    Posted by kae on 2006 06 20 at 08:39 AM • permalink

  25. #24 Kae. That is one of my all-time favorites! I’ve told it to every animal lover I’ve ever known. An I add that the bear flings the rabbit into the woods after wiping.

    Posted by Texas Bob on 2006 06 20 at 09:05 AM • permalink

  26. Pandas would be okay if you could find a way to keep them out of the garbage.  They’re basically raccoons.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2006 06 20 at 09:11 AM • permalink

  27. A world awash in polar bears, and overrun with pandas. Apocalyptic, looks like to me.

    #26 rhhardin: You’re literally correct. The panda is more closely related to the raccoon than to the bear.

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 09:26 AM • permalink

  28. We will be in trouble when bears learn to drive and use fire.  The day is coming.
    http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/0001/20060619/2119669603.htm

    Posted by Latino on 2006 06 20 at 09:38 AM • permalink

  29. ... there could be twice as many living in the wild as previously thought.

    See, it’s them hardy rustic redneck pandas in the woods what’s reproducin’.  It’s them nancyboy metrosexual city zoo pandas what can’t get it up…

    Of course, if them rural pandas embrace Islam that will just give Mark Steyn one more thing to worry about…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 06 20 at 09:46 AM • permalink

  30. #15 - Matun the old blind beggar learned the that the hard way. 

    (What can I say, I’m a Kipling fan)

    Posted by Achillea on 2006 06 20 at 10:31 AM • permalink

  31. I tried to envision it, but somehow, a panda bear rug in front of the fireplace doesn’t have quite the same cachet as, say, a polar bear rug or a grizzly bear rug would have.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 06 20 at 11:05 AM • permalink

  32. Wonder if global warming s leading to an increase in the bamboo forests the Pandas need to survive? Seems likely - warmer climate, more bamboo, ergo more Pandas.
    So it follows that Al Gore is campaigning for the extermination of Pandas. What a prick.

    Posted by Baldman on 2006 06 20 at 11:12 AM • permalink

  33. If Pandas tasted good, competent people would raise them.

    Posted by Andy Freeman on 2006 06 20 at 11:18 AM • permalink

  34. Does a bamboo thicket actually count as “woods”?

    Posted by mojo on 2006 06 20 at 12:42 PM • permalink

  35. #32: Speaking of Al Gore (if we must), he has declined to endorse Joe Liberman in the latter’s run for re-election in the Senate.

    Also a bit O/T: the chief military investigator has determined that there was no cover-up at Haditha (per the LA times), and the two bodies of the missing U.S. servicemen have been found (details gruesome). And “Yellow Jack” Murtha is naturally continuing to call for “redeployment”. Dick. I think there’s now a blog dedicated to getting rid of him.

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 12:52 PM • permalink

  36. Quite right paco. There are damn few Democrats with class, panache and brains. Lieberman is one.

    As to our troops…everything, everything within 3 miles of where those bodies were found, would be smoldering rubble, were I in charge…maybe that’s why I’m not.

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 06 20 at 01:03 PM • permalink

  37. Panda Bear’s aren’t really bears, so they’re liars as well.

    Posted by Ross on 2006 06 20 at 01:53 PM • permalink

  38. I hope pandas get off the endangered species list soon.  I can’t wait to try one.

    Posted by aaron_ on 2006 06 20 at 01:55 PM • permalink

  39. Speaking of Al Gore, I saw a funny kevin drum post.

    Posted by aaron_ on 2006 06 20 at 01:57 PM • permalink

  40. I’d thought about putting a hardy bamboo hedge across the back of my yard, but I dunno.  I have rabbits/squirrels/toads/enough pests to contend with.  Don’t really want to attract pandas.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 06 20 at 02:16 PM • permalink

  41. #35, paco, you don’t happen to have a link to that dump-Murtha blog, do you?  I’d love to contribute in any way possible to getting rid of that treasonous bastard.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 06 20 at 02:18 PM • permalink

  42. Now they will have to adjust the climate models to account for the additional bear farts. Dang!

    Posted by moptop on 2006 06 20 at 02:30 PM • permalink

  43. 41 RH

    Don’t know about a “Dump Murtha Blog” per se, but this is his Republican opponent…

    Diana Irey

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 06 20 at 02:36 PM • permalink

  44. #41:  I had forgotten where I found it, but a quick search turned it up (via My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy). Here you go.

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 02:43 PM • permalink

  45. #35, paco, you don’t happen to have a link to that dump-Murtha blog, do you?  I’d love to contribute in any way possible to getting rid of that treasonous bastard.—Posted by RebeccaH

    Rebecca, knowing paco, he probably made that up to make himself appear informed.

    If you’re thinking for a way to help those people who oppose Congressman Murtha, I heartily recommend you sending a note of appreciation to Jean Schmidt.  Jean is a Congresswoman who represents Cincinnati.  She fought a slugfest of an election last year against a former Gulf War veteran, a darling of the left.  She then came out slugging still more, castigating Murtha for his treasonous statements.  She has been soundly trashed by the leftwing voices in Cincinnati and elsewhere.  But conservatives love her.

    Here’s her web site.  A note of appreciation or even a tainted campaign donation from Buddhist temple funds would be helpful.

    Jean Schmidt

    Posted by wronwright on 2006 06 20 at 02:57 PM • permalink

  46. #45: Hey, I didn’t make up the link! When I make stuff up, you can be sure that I leave no trail.

    Good idea about Schmidt, though. Was that one of Kos’s “victories” (i.e., his candidate lost by only 10% or less)?

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 03:06 PM • permalink

  47. Here’s the typical leftwing take on Jean Schmidt, in response to her attack on Murtha.

    To which I say:  GOOD.  GLAD TO HAVE SOMEONE LIKE JEAN.

    Posted by wronwright on 2006 06 20 at 03:08 PM • permalink

  48. Yes, I believe this was one of Kos’s victories.  Paul Hackett is a war veteran who ran on the Democratic ticket.  He almost defeated Schmidt in a predominantly Republican voter base.  Consequenlty, the MSM trumpeted that as the beginning of the end for the Bush presidency.  Piffle.

    Here’s an excellent column by a very excellent columnist, Peter Bronson, about Jean.  Please remember that name.  He’s a local version of Mark Steyn and writes excellent and humorous columns about the antics of the left.

    Posted by wronwright on 2006 06 20 at 03:20 PM • permalink

  49. #47: Good for her, indeed. I’ll send her a note letting her know that my clan supports her right down to the last Paco.

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 03:21 PM • permalink

  50. Thanks, paco and wronwright.  Excellent links.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 06 20 at 03:28 PM • permalink

  51. Hello, I started the “Dump Murtha Blog” called Murtha Must Go! I’m a dad of a deployed Iraqi Freedom Soldier, and I could no longer abide by his seditious rhetoric.

    Posted by Psycmeistr on 2006 06 20 at 03:35 PM • permalink

  52. By the way, I guess I’m not supposed to notice this, but Diana Irey is, er, considerably better looking than Murtha.

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 03:37 PM • permalink

  53. #51: Give ‘em hell, man! My son’s finalizing his Marine enlistment papers next Monday, and maybe the best I can do for him and your son and other military personnel is to help get rid of idiots like Murtha.

    Posted by paco on 2006 06 20 at 03:40 PM • permalink

  54. Hoorah!

    Posted by Psycmeistr on 2006 06 20 at 03:46 PM • permalink

  55. Dammit, someone beat me to the Fight Club quote.

    On the whole, I’m with those with no use for the furry freeloaders.  If they can’t learn to eat more than one type of grass and can’t be bothered to screw once in a while, then bollocks to ‘em.  If they were ugly, they could vanish from the globe tomorrow and not even Al Gore would notice or care.

    Posted by WingDynasty on 2006 06 20 at 03:59 PM • permalink

  56. Psycmeistr

    Obviously your son, as in all those who protect our freedoms NOW and will in the future, including Vets on Tim’s Blog and at least one active duty 3rd pull in Iraq, (I believe) Texas Bob...COME(s) FROM GREAT FAMILY STOCK.

    Bless all of you.

    Oh yeah and of course those who start “Blogs” dedicated to getting rid of the UN-American Left who/whom pray for the U.S. to fail.

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 06 20 at 04:03 PM • permalink

  57. Oh my, did I type the UN-American Left and the word ‘pray’, in the same sentence?

    Posted by El Cid on 2006 06 20 at 04:06 PM • permalink

  58. From #28’s link: 

    Skelton said bears in the suburbs north of Vancouver have been coming out of hibernation as hungry as ever but later than usual but this spring because of a heavier than normal snowpack from the winter.

      More proof of Global Warming™!

    Or not.

    I blame George Bush.

    Posted by Barbara Skolaut on 2006 06 20 at 04:28 PM • permalink

  59. Speaking of CBS…they are finally getting rid of Dan Rathergate.

    Now they’ll have that other heavyweight, Katie Couric. Point gun at foot…pull trigger.

    Posted by rinardman on 2006 06 20 at 05:22 PM • permalink

  60. #51, got you bookmarked.

    Goodbye, Dan Rather, and good riddance.

    Maybe ol’ Dan can take up a new career, making documentaries on furry, fluffy, bearlike things.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 06 20 at 06:11 PM • permalink

  61. Anyone remember a comedy sketch many years ago which at the time I thought was one of the funniest I have seen.  I think it was on an English show (Not the Nine O’clock news maybe…scratch head.)

    Two big Pandas in a zoo.  Standing in front of a tunnel entrance. Conversation starts.
    Panda 1 – The tunnel is almost finished to get out of here.
    Panda 2 – That’s great but lets practice our cover story again.
    Panda 1 (Using a obviously fake French accent)- I am Jacque from Dieppe and going to visit my mother in Paris…….Oh no,  I just cant do it (shaking his head), my accent will give me away.

    Something like that anyway.

    Could not stop laughing for days.

    Posted by The Big Fish on 2006 06 20 at 06:14 PM • permalink

  62. OT—truthout (James Taranto’s suggests for a motto: “If you want the truth, get out of here”) stands back up:

    What appears to have happened is that - and this is where Truthout blundered - in our haste to report the indictment we never considered the possibility that Patrick Fitzgerald would not make an announcement. We simply assumed - and we should not have done so - that he would tell the press. He did not. Fitzgerald appears to have used the indictment, and more importantly, the fear that it would go public, to extract information about the Plame outing case from Rove.

    snip

    The electronic communication from Fitzgerald to Luskin, coming immediately on the heels of our Monday morning, June 12 article “Sealed vs. Sealed” that became the basis for the mainstream media’s de facto exoneration of Karl Rove was, our sources told us, negotiated quickly over the phone later that afternoon. Luskin contacted Fitzgerald, reportedly providing concessions that Fitzgerald considered to be of high value, and Fitzgerald reportedly reciprocated with the political cover Rove wanted in the form of a letter that was faxed to Luskin’s office.

    Our sources provided us with additional detail, saying that Fitzgerald is apparently examining closely Dick Cheney’s role in the Valerie Plame matter, and apparently sought information and evidence from Karl Rove that would provide documentation of Cheney’s involvement. Rove apparently was reluctant to cooperate and Fitzgerald, it appears, was pressuring him to do so, our sources told us.

    The gist seems to be that Rove, to save his own skin, is selling out the Vice President. Yeah, that’s believable.

    Please return now to your regular programming.

    Posted by Kyda Sylvester on 2006 06 20 at 06:55 PM • permalink

  63. Pandas always remind me of Collingwood.

    Show no sign of fear or mercy. Do not flinch. Shoot them all.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 06 20 at 08:04 PM • permalink

  64. Pandas always remind me of Collingwood.

    They remind me of PVP.

    Posted by Rob Crawford on 2006 06 20 at 08:39 PM • permalink

  65. What do you think they taste like?

    Posted by Aaron - Freewill on 2006 06 20 at 08:56 PM • permalink

  66. They taste like chicken with bamboo shoots. (Unless they’ve been trapped).

    Only a bit tough and stringy.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 06 20 at 09:09 PM • permalink

  67. Panda bears are related to Koala bears only without the pockets. Which makes them the only true bears.

    Unlike those big, boorish, meat-eating, picnic-basket thieving, North American, imposter bastards.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 06 20 at 09:59 PM • permalink

  68. Until you get out of the towns and cities and into the more remote forests and reserves. Then they are a bit like the other bears.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 06 20 at 10:06 PM • permalink

  69. ABC news (in the US) is asking people to write in with their stories about global warming:

    Global Warming Affecting Your Life? E-Mail Us

    ABC News wants to hear from you. We’re currently producing a report on the increasing changes in our physical environment, and are looking for interesting examples of people coping with the differences in their daily lives. Has your life been directly affected by global warming?

    We want to hear and see your stories. Have you noticed changes in your own backyard or hometown? The differences can be large or small — altered blooming schedules, unusual animals that have arrived in your community, higher water levels encroaching on your property.

    Seymour Butts from Florida wrote in and complained about all the polar bear refugees arriving in his neighbourhood from the previously frozen north.

    I think we should all help ABC news with this worthy endeavour…

    Posted by Art Vandelay on 2006 06 20 at 10:21 PM • permalink

  70. This link is probably better:

    Witnessing the Impact of Global Warming in Your Life?

    Posted by Art Vandelay on 2006 06 20 at 10:23 PM • permalink

  71. You never hear a word about molluscs.  Not everything can have big brown eyes and keep the cold away from Gisele Bundchen.  A mollusc can feel threatened too. And they have IQs which go off the scale. 

    More muscular limpets have saved drowning swimmers; the mussel gives anonymously; the cuttlefish’ trump is empathy; oysters are big readers.  It is little known that the whole phylum mollusca struggles with depression.

    But who cares about that?

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 06 20 at 10:55 PM • permalink

  72. #71

    Who knew the black dog stalked phylum mollusca?

    Posted by kae on 2006 06 20 at 11:08 PM • permalink

  73. Yes indeed.

    For that matter what about the Poriferans?

    They have been sitting around quietly since the Late Precambrian Period and no one has ever heard a single complaint from them despite their ignominious treatment. In fact they have no mouths, having abandoned the need for speech an aeon or two ago.

    They breed by hermaphroditic sexual reproduction and therefore have nothing to talk about. Most hang around the same place all their lives so they have nothing to fight about. They only trade sperm and eggs, each individual produces both, and that trade is in an open market place so they have no need of a legal system. Fossil evidence shows the last known Poriferan lawyer went out of business 500,000 years ago.

    So who takes the case of these highly advanced animals? You never hear a word from the press about these stoic, tolerant and peace-loving folk.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 06 20 at 11:39 PM • permalink

  74. #71 Indeed
    A little water colour painting, depth permitting, does wonders, they tell me.

    #73
    Poriferans got there well before us, geoff. No gossiping or talking trash, no resort to chatrooms or singles bars and no resort to lawyers.  Evolution, if I may be cheekily teleological, climaxed 541997994 years ago.

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 06 21 at 12:02 AM • permalink

  75. Sorry kae #72

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 06 21 at 12:04 AM • permalink

  76. #75

    You really get a good ejimikation here, y’know. It’s really broad. So many things that I didn’t know. It’s great.

    Posted by kae on 2006 06 21 at 12:26 AM • permalink

  77. Sure kae #679 except that my ariffmatick isn’t strong.

    I have been to the Mountain (at P.J. O’Rourke’s place) but really, we should sit at the feet of Molluscs.  They know.

    (Then crawl over to the poisonous sucking tentacles of the Poriferans.)

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 06 21 at 12:59 AM • permalink

  78. #77
    Oh, I stopped wif the ariffmatick at skool when they started with the logarifms, about 30 odd years ago. I only use maffs when I have to.

    Posted by kae on 2006 06 21 at 01:06 AM • permalink

  79. Very tender, with hints of bamboo.  I love bamboo shoots, so I figure tender panda fillets would be very tasty.

    Posted by aaron_ on 2006 06 21 at 02:02 AM • permalink

  80. i must say i do get sick and tired of these lying, exaggerating scientists/naturalists guilding the lilly with their hysterical rants to attract attention and research funds!!!!!

    Posted by casanova on 2006 06 21 at 02:26 AM • permalink

  81. #80 casanova

    Will you be bitching when it is discovered that the Poriferans can cure your otherwise terminal disease?

    Just send me your credit card number and we’ll put you on the queue.

    Posted by Inurbanus on 2006 06 21 at 03:40 AM • permalink

  82. Tim, you have to stop Panda-ing to this cheer squad of invective addicted, boot-putting-in, how should I put this? ... Blogophiles.
    If you want to be taken as seriously as The Age, you will have to knuckle down to some proper, fact checked, reality based treatises on racism, multiculturalism and human rights. And Howard is the new Hitler, again!

    Posted by blogstrop on 2006 06 21 at 07:51 AM • permalink

  83. 48
    snurk snurk
    He said “piffle.”  ksnksnksnksnksnk!!

    Posted by Huck Foley on 2006 06 22 at 10:23 PM • permalink

  84. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.