<< POKEMAN V FORKMAN ~ MAIN ~ STATE CONSUMED >>

OBEY THE MANNE

Throw a few clichés Robert Manne’s way and he purrs like a kitten:

Because we are now balanced between Howard’s neo-liberal and his own social-democratic future, where the value of freedom is balanced against equality, and the animal energy of the market is tempered by the virtue of compassion, Rudd believes we have reached what he famously called a “fork in the road”. Because for him the ugliness of the neo-liberal future is symbolised by the Howard Government’s new anti-family workplace laws, he believes we have already crossed what he called “a bridge too far”.

Just for Robert, let’s repeat Rudd’s finest use yet of his brilliant fork/bridge formulation:

This fork in the road has emerged because John Howard has taken a bridge too far — a bridge too far on industrial relations, a bridge too far when it comes to Iraq, and a bridge too far on climate change by not going far enough.

Intellectuals love that sort of crap, evidently. In fact, Manne loves it so much he’s called for a crushing of dissent:

For those who long to see Australia change direction, Rudd deserves, in my opinion, not the customary carping of the intelligentsia but our wholehearted support.

Cease your criticism, intelligent carp! Meanwhile, John Howard maintains a narrow lead in this crucial poll.

(Via Doug Cox)

UPDATE. Joe Hildebrand reports live from the Fork in the Road Tour.

Posted by Tim B. on 12/11/2006 at 06:05 PM
  1. Not exactly the love fest that occured when Latham was elected but a love fest all the same.  I voted for Howard in the poll, had to…he’s my hero.

    Posted by allan on 2006 12 11 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  2. Marvellous isn’t it, three days as opposition leader and the idiot voters have Rudd within 2 points of the PM as preferred Prime Minister.  Never has the 80/20 rule been more obvious - 80% have no idea.

    Posted by Bundy on 2006 12 11 at 06:25 PM • permalink

  3. Bridges, carp, forks - what’s a metaphor?

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 12 11 at 06:30 PM • permalink

  4. The bridge too far by not going far enough was a wonderful piece of complete garbage.

    I really wish he would stop invoking what is an excellent WWII movie.

    Bittrich’s Aide: [Walking across Arnhem Bridge with a white flag]

    Major Harry Carlyle: That’s far enough

    Bittrich’s Aide: My General says that there is no point in continuing this fight and is willing to discuss terms of surrender.

    John Frost: [in the background - sotto voce] Tell them to go to hell!

    Major Harry Carlyle: Sorry, we don’t have the proper facilities to take you all prisoner… Sorry, We’d like to…

    [Bittrich’s Aide turns away confused]

    Major Harry Carlyle: [Carlyle to Frost] Rather gracious of me don’t you think?

    Posted by attilathepun on 2006 12 11 at 06:56 PM • permalink

  5. #3 - a meta is phor confusing the layman, makes us inteligenzia smart bastards look good.

    Posted by surfmaster on 2006 12 11 at 07:27 PM • permalink

  6. Ooh goody - I found out how to use strike.  Next step, italics!!!!

    Posted by surfmaster on 2006 12 11 at 07:29 PM • permalink

  7. Kevin Rudd as Kermit

    Turn left when you come to a fork in the road.

    Posted by noir on 2006 12 11 at 07:32 PM • permalink

  8. #4
    KRuddy: Send for more supplies urgently Major, we’re down to our last few read pens

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 11 at 07:43 PM • permalink

  9. #3
    European Carp beneath the bridge-too-far?

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 11 at 07:47 PM • permalink

  10. customary carping

    Hey, I thought that carp - especially European Carp - were a noxious feral species in Australia’s ecosystem.

    They can’t be eaten and they eat everything, but they can be caught and chopped up to make fertilizer.

    Now that’s a good idea…

    Posted by Apparatchik on 2006 12 11 at 07:48 PM • permalink

  11. If you move a bridge at all you’ve already taken it too far. Leave them where they belong.

    As for carp, under bridges is okay. It’s when they get in tunnels that you have a problem.

    Posted by triticale on 2006 12 11 at 08:00 PM • permalink

  12. Talk about no cliche left unturned! Is this what passes for intellectiual debate in the Politics Department at LaTrobe?

    “Hansonisation of Australian politics”: does this mean we can expect to see more pollies ballroom-dancing on TV?

    “Sexual puritanism”: nothing like throwing in the odd sexual reference when the argument is getting a bit mind-numbing.

    Posted by mr magoo on 2006 12 11 at 08:23 PM • permalink

  13. Manne-watchers will recall that the Perfesser postulated that if Beazley made an iron-clad promise to tear up Howard’s IR laws (which he did) he would win in a landslide.  Now we will never know.  Will Ruddy make the same ironclad promise?  Manne, after all, is the genius who screamed long and loud for an ALP victory in the last election, and then, as soon as they lost, published an op-ed saying “Well, of course, I always knew they were going to lose.”  Y’see, the Prof is never wrong.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2006 12 11 at 08:24 PM • permalink

  14. I think it was Darryl Zanuck who said “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.”  That sounds about right for the ALP.

    They would be wise to cut down on the excessive emphasis on equality.  It is a very bad idea to elevate a single political or philosophical good to absolute status (a mistake most libertarians make too).  As Lord Acton noted about the French Revolution: the passion for equality made vain the hope of liberty.  Since that time the socialists have all but abandoned liberty and exalted equality to the single desirable good, with appalling results even in the West.  Dumbasses.

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2006 12 11 at 08:27 PM • permalink

  15. Manne: ‘The economist Maynard Keynes once famously remarked: “Ideas are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.”’

    #13
    Manne, after all, is the genius who screamed long and loud for an ALP victory in the last election, and then, as soon as they lost, published an op-ed saying “Well, of course, I always knew they were going to lose.”

    Q.  How do you get 5 opinions?
    A.  Lock 4 economists in a room together.

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 11 at 08:58 PM • permalink

  16. Dear Proletariat

    Let the glorious group-think begin! Dissent shall be crushed, comrades!  Smash the reactionary bourgeois running dog capitalist class oppressors!  But leave me enough tax breaks to maintain my wealthy faux-socialist lifestyle.

    Yours in perpetual victimhood,

    Robert Manne

    Posted by bondo on 2006 12 11 at 09:01 PM • permalink

  17. Would someone remind Mr. Rudd that forks are for kicking?

    Jaysus, he ain’t even run yet and already I’m tired of the fool.

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 12 11 at 09:11 PM • permalink

  18. “...a bridge too far on climate change by not going far enough.”

    I hope that some responsible party will make sure that this quote is archived in The Museum Of Quintessential Lameness.

    Posted by Harry Bergeron on 2006 12 11 at 09:26 PM • permalink

  19. If Manne is capable of parrotting Rudd correctly (which is not a given) what he has done here is reveal Rudd’s intellectual shallowness, enthrallment to simiplistic ideological nostrums and general conceptual inadaquacy - no consciousness revealed of the fact that Australia is NOT a laissez-faire society but actually has a great deal of regulation, or that it is quite highly taxed. No concept, either, of the fact that under Howard’s moderate liberalism standards of living have increased dramatically for all.

    Of course, the Howard-hating brigade like Manne lost all their credentials to be taken seriously as people of intelligence or perception when they supported Mark Latham to be Prime Minister of Australia - as we should never cease to remind both them and the public!

    Posted by McAnzac on 2006 12 11 at 10:15 PM • permalink

  20. It’s a bad day for Perfessers in
    history and economics.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2006 12 11 at 10:19 PM • permalink

  21. #20
    Do Manne’s quals allow him to comment on all (“History Wars”, et al) and still get it wrong?

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 11 at 10:33 PM • permalink

  22. #21.  Yes, Manne’s stupidity pretty much makes him ‘Professor Emeritus’ of horseshit across all disciplines.

    Posted by cuckoo on 2006 12 12 at 12:05 AM • permalink

  23. In an Ulster accent

    “Where’s this forking bridge, your man can find?”

    Posted by phil_b on 2006 12 12 at 03:22 AM • permalink

  24. Hey, what about the “Schlaussen Cutoff”?

    Posted by mojo on 2006 12 12 at 12:30 PM • permalink

  25. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.