<< DOWN WITH COMPRESSION-IGNITION SOUL DRAINERS ~ MAIN ~ GESTURES FORCED >>

“NO SPECIES WAS SAFE”

It’s not often one happens upon a story combining issues of architecture, environmentalism, institutes of higher learning and accidental avian windowcide, let alone such a story written in a manner joyously suggestive of B-grade horror movie previews. For this, we thank the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and journalist Andrea Jones:

It is one of Emory University’s most environmentally friendly buildings, a hallmark of the institution’s efforts to “go green.” To hear John Wegner describe it, it’s also a slaughterhouse.

The soaring glass windows in Emory’s Mathematics and Science Center reflect the woodsy view, confusing hapless birds who smash into it at full speed.

“The building killed 60 birds in the first year,” said Wegner, Emory’s chief environmental officer. “It was the wall of death.”

Magnolia warblers, Swainson’s thrushes, ovenbirds - no species was safe.

Read on. If you dare!

(Via Jack C.)

Posted by Tim B. on 11/26/2007 at 10:55 AM
  1. I suspect emus were fairly safe from the wall of deathy…

    Posted by Baron on 2007 11 26 at 11:02 AM • permalink

  2. “Avian homicide”?

    The birds are killing people?

    Can I give them a name or two for their list?

    Posted by Parker on 2007 11 26 at 11:03 AM • permalink

  3. Pigeons, starlings, bluejays… no species was safe.

    Hey, bring on the wall of death! We need fewer pigeons in this world!

    Posted by Dr Alice on 2007 11 26 at 11:04 AM • permalink

  4. “Avicide”, obviously.

    But what about the Chupacabras, man?

    Posted by mojo on 2007 11 26 at 11:05 AM • permalink

  5. Now if that would only work for Canada geese.  Except, they’d be replacing the glass with every collision, because those birds are big honkers!

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 11 26 at 11:06 AM • permalink

  6. Just clicked over to the article…

    After getting the brush-off from the administration and architects, Wegner stuffed a couple of dead birds into his pockets and whipped them out during a meeting with his boss. Suddenly, he had an audience.

    Funniest. Article. Ever. The mental image evoked here made me shriek with laughter.

    Posted by Dr Alice on 2007 11 26 at 11:06 AM • permalink

  7. On further consideration, this makes total sense because birds have basically monocular vision; their eyes are set to the sides of their heads with very little overlap of the frontal visual field. Therefore it’s very difficult for them to sense the difference between a reflection of trees and actual trees.

    But it’s still a very funny article.

    Posted by Dr Alice on 2007 11 26 at 11:10 AM • permalink

  8. On a serious note.

    They have a big problem with this vis-a-vis the big wind turbines in the west.  Evidently, they chew-up vast amounts.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 11 26 at 11:13 AM • permalink

  9. Diesel is the way to go on environmentally friendly world-spanning zeppelins.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2007 11 26 at 11:15 AM • permalink

  10. #4, Mojo

    But what about the chupacabras, man?

    Coming in late January of 2009.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 11 26 at 11:16 AM • permalink

  11. Alfred Hitchcock, call your office.

    #10 Yojimbo: I thought the chupacabras turned out to be bald coyotes.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 12:01 PM • permalink

  12. Just the right post, me thinks.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 26 at 12:04 PM • permalink

  13. The building killed 60 birds in the first year,”

    The damned thing’s a serial killer! Naturally, it must be torn down.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 12:08 PM • permalink

  14. How the hell did ovenbirds get all the way up there? Methinks students + catapult = good times.

    Posted by Don Charleone on 2007 11 26 at 12:11 PM • permalink

  15. Turns out, environmentally friendly buildings are often bird killers.

    Has anyone been out to Cate Blanchett’s house and checked on the residents of all nearby aviaries?

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 11 26 at 12:15 PM • permalink

  16. Sydney Greenstreet: “You have the falcon in your possession, Mr. Spade?”

    Humphrey Bogart: “No, no falcons, Mr. Gutman. But I’ve got a brown-headed cowbird and a barn swallow I can let you have. The cowbird’s pretty smashed up, but the barn swallow just clipped a microwave antenna, so it’s still intact.”

    Director: “Cut!”

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 12:25 PM • permalink

  17. Hmmmm.

    For some reason this makes me want to build a 400’ tall glass wall right in the migratory path of migrating birds.

    No idea why.

    Posted by memomachine on 2007 11 26 at 12:41 PM • permalink

  18. Maybe we should build the border fence with Mexico out of glass.

    Kill two birds with one stone - sort of.

    Posted by joe bagadonuts on 2007 11 26 at 12:49 PM • permalink

  19. By the way, WTF! is an “ovenbird”?

    All I can remember is that old Fog Horn Leghorn cartoon.

    Henery Hawk: “Hey, he called you a chicken”

    Foghorn Leghorn: “That’s what I’ve been - I say, that’s what I’ve been telling you, boy! I am a chicken!”
    Henery hits Foghorn on the head with a shovel and drags him away
    Henery Hawk: “He talked me into it”

    Foghorn Leghorn: “I’m just a loud-mouthed schnook”

    Henery Hawk: “Chicken or schnook, in our oven he’ll look good”

    Posted by joe bagadonuts on 2007 11 26 at 12:57 PM • permalink

  20. I just think it’s a shame the windows of Prius showrooms don’t have the same effect on eco-mentalists.

    Posted by Don Charleone on 2007 11 26 at 12:59 PM • permalink

  21. #20:they do.

    A clear texbook case of;

    A)  media bias, or
    B)  media ineptitude

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 11 26 at 01:51 PM • permalink

  22. All these dead birds are hard for me to swallow; it’s shameful how this seemingly pheasant building is robin them of their freedom. Mind you, they’re not too swift to fly into the glass horizontally like that; it would make more sense if they dove (perhaps off of cranes). Of course, what with all those falling bodies you have to duck I’d be chicken to walk outside there myself, and call me a loon but I’d certainly cast an eagle eye at whatever grilled mystery meat the street vendors were trying to hawk. It’s really upsetting how that young starlet died: she raptor head around the facade. She was such a pretty gull, too.

    Posted by Mr. Bingley on 2007 11 26 at 02:05 PM • permalink

  23. #22: Absolutely auk-inspiring, Bingley.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 02:08 PM • permalink

  24. #23

    Egret that you didn’t thing of that?  Well, just man-up from heron out and you’ll be ok..:)

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 11 26 at 02:18 PM • permalink

  25. *think*  I guess I have to swallow another mistake.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 11 26 at 02:19 PM • permalink

  26. I live on a prominent hill in a rural location. Great views but the reason I don’t have glass surrounding my verandahs (here we call them handrails) is because there would be too many birds flying into them. Birds snotting themselves against our windows are a regular event.
    I’m a dumb Howard hugging climate denialist but I understand that birds do not know the difference between glass and clear air.
    I just don’t understand how all these idiot green luvvies and high paid architects can’t also understand the bleeding obvious.

    Posted by Harold on 2007 11 26 at 02:43 PM • permalink

  27. Yep, Harold, I was going to point out that birds smacking into glass is a long standing problem.  Or source of humor for TV commercials.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 11 26 at 03:02 PM • permalink

  28. “Is that a dead bird in your pocket, or are you just not so glad to see me?”

    Wait until ecotards discover how much avicide is at the hands of eagles, falcons, crows, ravens, possums, mongeese, et al., etc.

    They will need medications and government programs.

    Posted by Harry Bergeron on 2007 11 26 at 03:10 PM • permalink

  29. On reflection it may have been a bad idea to put so much glass on a flight path, but it would be a real pain to change it now.

    Posted by surfmaster on 2007 11 26 at 03:20 PM • permalink

  30. And in other news, which writer kicked the italics jar over in the breaking news section of todays Daily Telegraph?  It looks kind of strange.

    Posted by surfmaster on 2007 11 26 at 03:24 PM • permalink

  31. Half a league, half a league,
    (well, one hundred feet) skyward
    Emory’s Building of Death
    flew the Six Hundred.
    “Forward, the Flight Brigade!
    “Charge for the blinds!” he said:
    Into the Wall, Wall of Death
    Flew the Six Hundred.

    Flash’d all their bottoms bare
    Flash’d as they turn’d in air
    Beaking the gutters there
    Charging a mirror, while
    those inside wonder’d
    Plunged in those feather’d folk
    Right thro’ the neck they broke
    Pigeon and Sparrow
    Reel’d from the Window’s stroke
    Shatter’d and sunder’d
    Then they flew back, but not
    Not the Six Hundred.

    How can their plumage fade
    (window washer’s craft displayed)
    those inside wonder’d.
    Clean up the mess they made!
    Honor the Flight Brigade,
    Stupid Six Hundred.

    Posted by Mr. Bingley on 2007 11 26 at 03:30 PM • permalink

  32. Darwin = one hardass mammyjammer

    Posted by Carl H on 2007 11 26 at 03:32 PM • permalink

  33. Who needs new commenters when we have the polymathic Mr. Bingley? Well done, old top!

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 03:37 PM • permalink

  34. You are too kind, dear paco.

    Posted by Mr. Bingley on 2007 11 26 at 03:44 PM • permalink

  35. 22 Bingley

    Quail done from starlings to finches. I laughed me peacock off.

    Owl swallows me pride and hens it to ya.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 26 at 03:49 PM • permalink

  36. Maybe they should construct pyramid shaped buildings instead.  Then, when the birds hit them, they bounce off at an angle.

    And they get a pointy topped building to go over their pointy little heads.

    Posted by mr creosote on 2007 11 26 at 03:59 PM • permalink

  37. OT

    British Teacher Faces 40 Lashes for Naming Class Teddy Bear ‘Muhammad’

    A British primary school teacher arrested in Sudan faces up to 40 lashes for blasphemy after letting her class of 7-year-olds name a teddy bear Muhammad.

    Gillian Gibbons, 54, from Liverpool, was arrested at at Khartoum’s Unity High School yesterday, and accused of insulting the Prophet of Islam.

    Her colleagues said that they feared for her safety after reports that groups of young men had gathered outside the Khartoum police station where she was taken and were shouting death threats.


    Fox News

    I can see NO redeeming value, in Islam…NONE!

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 26 at 04:07 PM • permalink

  38. #37 Oh, FFS, they’re a precious lot, aren’t they?

    Posted by Ash_ on 2007 11 26 at 04:13 PM • permalink

  39. Hey, window-kill’s good eatin’. Tufted titmouse casserole, rufous-sided towhee on a stick, finch fries . . .mmmmmm.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 04:56 PM • permalink

  40. #37: Well, someone once said that mosquitos were put here to make us think better of flies. Maybe Islam was put here to make us think better of communism (or vice versa).

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 04:57 PM • permalink

  41. Might be a good place to open a Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise.

    Posted by Mystery Meat on 2007 11 26 at 05:05 PM • permalink

  42. Paco

    Dude, you just described Islam to a T…mosquitos and flies.

    Gosh, wonder how many lashes that would get me?...After beheading of course.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 26 at 05:07 PM • permalink

  43. And the best thing about the birds and the windows is…It’s tenderized.

    Speaking of….

    2 Pheasant breasts
    2 tablespoons Lemon juice
    1/2 teaspoon Salt
    1/2 teaspoon Pepper
    3 tablespoons Butter
    1 teaspoon Shallots; peeled, chopped
    2 tablespoons Brandy
    1/3 cup Dry white wine
    1/3 cup Heavy cream
    1 tablespoon Meat Glaze
    2 dashes cayenne
    1 tablespoon Truffles or morels; cut into thin strips
    2 tablespoons Mushrooms; thin strips

    Key ingredients for Pheasant Under Glass.

    Posted by El Cid on 2007 11 26 at 05:15 PM • permalink

  44. “Hey, you’ve done a great job decorating the place, George! Say, can I sit in your chair? Just for ten minutes. Five minutes, one minute, George, please?”

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 05:33 PM • permalink

  45. First they came for the tits, but I was a booby, so I didn’t care…

    Posted by andycanuck on 2007 11 26 at 05:53 PM • permalink

  46. #45 Andy,

    RAOTFLMAO!!!!!

    Posted by Pogria on 2007 11 26 at 05:54 PM • permalink

  47. #45 Andy,

    That would be a “man-booby”?

    Posted by Pogria on 2007 11 26 at 05:55 PM • permalink

  48. 1:  I have 5 large Eucalypts in my back garden. During a recent storm, a branch broke, and the nest with some magpie larks fell out. They died.
    Is it the storms fault, or the trees fault?

    2: I have a lizard who lives under my front porch. He has lost his tail, but it will grow back (I think one of the dogs chased him).
    His name is Mohammed (The lizard, not the dog).

    Posted by wanglese on 2007 11 26 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  49. #45 >giggle<

    and all this talk of birds is making me hungry

    Posted by missred on 2007 11 26 at 06:31 PM • permalink

  50. I used to be an autodidact, but I gave it up because of the, y’know, hair…

    Posted by mojo on 2007 11 26 at 06:38 PM • permalink

  51. Wait a minute…

    The glass is reflective. It becomes like a mirror during the day.

    Why didn’t the birds get out of the way of the equally sized bird coming the other way?

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 11 26 at 06:47 PM • permalink

  52. 44l; Further info on the great (big) man’s visit.

    Posted by dean martin on 2007 11 26 at 06:47 PM • permalink

  53. Now I understand why all those Lefties would smash the windows of McDonalds and Starbucks every time there was an anti-globalisation protest.

    They were actually saving the world.

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2007 11 26 at 06:49 PM • permalink

  54. Why didn’t the birds get out of the way of the equally sized bird coming the other way?

    They were playing chicken, Dan.

    Posted by andycanuck on 2007 11 26 at 07:50 PM • permalink

  55. #22:  Don’t make me come over there and thrush you for that one…

    Posted by Vexorg on 2007 11 26 at 08:19 PM • permalink

  56. Simple solution. Stick pictures of cats on the windows.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 11 26 at 08:50 PM • permalink

  57. Some birds just don’t get it.
    On the other hand, some birds really don’t deserve to live.

    Posted by Pogria on 2007 11 26 at 09:38 PM • permalink

  58. A genuinely cute polar bear story.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 10:03 PM • permalink

  59. #58

    WOW!!!

    Posted by Pogria on 2007 11 26 at 10:05 PM • permalink

  60. #17
    Greeniebaiting?

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 26 at 10:06 PM • permalink

  61. #57
    Shit!
    Bird won’t be doing that again.

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 26 at 10:11 PM • permalink

  62. #37
    Religion of peace.

    Called a teddy bear by a common name and she’s in trouble for reviling the prophet?

    He was a paedophile war lord. Get over it.

    Religion of peace. Cult of death.

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 26 at 10:15 PM • permalink

  63. That religion could really teach us a lot about tolerance.

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 26 at 10:15 PM • permalink

  64. #50
    Furballs?

    Posted by kae on 2007 11 26 at 10:20 PM • permalink

  65. Would the wall of death (Fresh Bird Catcher Tenderiser) be available as a BBQ accessory?  Paco?

    Posted by Big Jim on 2007 11 26 at 11:21 PM • permalink

  66. Why didn’t the birds get out of the way of the equally sized bird coming the other way?

    Because birds descended from dinosaurs, who are, if you recall, extinct.  Ever wonder why?

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 11 26 at 11:38 PM • permalink

  67. #66: Dinosaurs . . . giant windows. . .

    Say, Rebecca, that beats the asteroid collision theory all to hell!

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 26 at 11:48 PM • permalink

  68. #6, I agree, that has to be quote of the year.

    Is there somewhere you can nominate?

    Posted by Admonkeystrator on 2007 11 26 at 11:51 PM • permalink

  69. Are you having problems, friends, with birds crashing into your fancy, glass-walled buildings? Then you should get the Poultry-Architecture Collision Obviater®. PACO®: because sometimes the glass ceiling shouldn’t be broken.

    Posted by andycanuck on 2007 11 27 at 01:05 AM • permalink

  70. It’s possible that what the birds need viz a viz the building is a ‘deal’, you know like the one they have with cars.  (apologies to the, by all accounts, long suffering Larry David & Co)

    Posted by Big Jim on 2007 11 27 at 02:46 AM • permalink

  71. And #37 et al on the OT topic of the Scouse woman accused of calling a Teddy Bear Mamed:
    If the name is so sacred, then why is every second goat shagging, thieving, sinner on certain parts of God’s earth called that. A harmless teddy bear has got nothing on most Mameds walking on two legs.  Al Fayed of Harrods fame - there’s but one example.

    Posted by Big Jim on 2007 11 27 at 03:00 AM • permalink

  72. Whenever I have a particularly satisfying bowel movement, I will now name the result Mohammed

    Posted by squawkbox on 2007 11 27 at 03:56 AM • permalink

  73. #72 - Not the satisfying ones. Save it for the real ring stinging, rectum busting, after grog and curry dumps that leave you in search of anusol and medicated wipes.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 11 27 at 04:08 AM • permalink

  74. Will they be sued by Atticus Finch? I don’t mean to snipe or grouse, but I think anyone else woodcock it up.

    Posted by Simon Darkshade on 2007 11 27 at 04:14 AM • permalink

  75. Someone earlier in this thread mentioned Darwin. I think that we are seeing a splendid example here, of natural selection at work. Thanks to Emory’s valuable contribution, succeeding generations of birds will be able to tell glass from clear air, the ones who failed to do so having self-selected themselves out of the gene pool.

    Posted by ErnieG on 2007 11 27 at 12:15 PM • permalink

  76. #69: That’s right, Andy!

    Paco Enterprises: Serving birds since the first thanksgiving.

    Posted by paco on 2007 11 27 at 01:20 PM • permalink

  77. 7 swans, 6 geese, 4 calling birds, 3 French Hens, 2 turtle doves and a partridge appear to be the latest victims. Must be a seasonal thing.

    Posted by Irobot on 2007 11 28 at 01:04 AM • permalink

  78. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.