Tim Blair

Monthly Archives

• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
• August 2007
• July 2007
• June 2007
• May 2007
• April 2007
• March 2007
• February 2007
• January 2007
• December 2006
• November 2006
• October 2006
• September 2006
• August 2006
• July 2006
• June 2006
• May 2006
• April 2006
• March 2006
• February 2006
• January 2006
• December 2005
• November 2005
• October 2005
• September 2005
• August 2005
• July 2005
• June 2005
• May 2005
• April 2005
• March 2005
• February 2005
• January 2005
• December 2004
• Complete Archives

Most recent entries

• WEEK ONE
• DAY ONE
• SITE MOVED
• BIG LOSERS STILL BIG LOSERS
• GLOBAL CHEF WANTS LOCAL FOOD
• CITIES RATED
• DISPUTES NOTED
• SHALLOW ANALYSIS
• THE REFFOS RUDD REJECTS
• GOOD NEWS FOR ALL
• PITY THE FUEL
• HONEYMOON SURVIVED
• BAD SHOES NOW GOOD
• JOCK PAULL
• ENFORCEMENT BRANCH STRIKES

Syndicate

• RSS 1.0
• RSS 2.0
• Atom

Statistics

• This page has been viewed 10105680 times
• Page rendered in 0.7731 seconds
• Referrers

Powered by ExpressionEngine

<< GUARDIAN INFILTRATED ~ MAIN ~ THE WAY IT IS >>

NEWS YOU CAN USE

Check out this big dog.

1. Heh. That dog would certainly challenge the “large pets allowed” clause at a lot of the apartment complexes in my town.

   Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 07 17 at 12:43 PM • permalink



2. I was gonna say “Who got Philco the dog suit,” but then I read on and realized Adams has never protected anybody…

   Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 07 17 at 12:53 PM • permalink



3. his hulking frame conceals a big soft spot for the most unlikely of companions – Maggie the cat.

   Looking at the picture, I hope they didn’t mean that in a physically literal sense...I’d hate to think there’s a poor cat buried underneath the dog.

   Posted by PW on 2005 07 17 at 03:54 PM • permalink



4. Okay, help an American out here—what’s 140kg in pounds?

   Posted by Achillea on 2005 07 17 at 04:03 PM • permalink



5. is it journalist error? i.e. is Philco the dogs fav cat called Margo (not Maggie)?

   Posted by Rob Read on 2005 07 17 at 04:05 PM • permalink



6. 140kg in pounds

   309 lbs.

   Posted by PW on 2005 07 17 at 04:47 PM • permalink



7. Could be that he’s waiting for Maggie to fatten up a little bit.

   Posted by paco on 2005 07 17 at 06:34 PM • permalink



8. 309lbs??!  A mastiff that big, the cat’s lucky it doesn’t drown in all the drool.

   Posted by Achillea on 2005 07 17 at 08:19 PM • permalink



9. I thought dinosaurs were extinct.

   Posted by marcus on 2005 07 17 at 09:49 PM • permalink



10. There’s a lot of good eatin’ on that dog! Uhh.. if you like that sort of thing, I mean.

    Posted by BruceW on 2005 07 17 at 10:08 PM • permalink



11. Imagine having to rake the yard afterwards.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 07 17 at 10:17 PM • permalink



12. There’s a lot of good eatin’ on that dog! Uhh.. if you like that sort of thing, I mean.

    Hmm, now there’s an idea for an export industry to Korea (although that dog could be one on its own) - future expansion could even solve the feral cat problem.

    Posted by entropy on 2005 07 17 at 10:30 PM • permalink



13. I must say I’m a tad surprised that Guiness took the ‘largest dog’ category out. Isn’t that book full of stupid and dangerous things?

    Posted by Jessica on 2005 07 18 at 12:20 AM • permalink



14. He’s 980 in human kilograms

    Posted by TonyD on 2005 07 18 at 12:33 AM • permalink



15. ...his hulking frame conceals a big soft spot for the most unlikely of companions – Maggie the cat.

    Liz Taylor’s in Oz?

    Posted by mojo on 2005 07 18 at 11:52 AM • permalink



Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.