<< ACADEMICS CHECKED ~ MAIN ~ TREES WORSE THAN CARS >>

MAYOR BOJO

London changes:

Boris Johnson last night notched up the Tories’ greatest electoral success since John Major’s surprise victory in the 1992 general election when he unseated Ken Livingstone as mayor of London.

Ecstatic Conservatives cheered at London’s City Hall, at the end of a count lasting more than 15 hours, as the man who had been dismissed as the Bertie Wooster of British politics took charge of one of the biggest political offices in Britain.

Smaller offices also changed:

Mr Johnson’s win followed the trend of local elections results across England and Wales, which saw support for Labour slump dramatically and a surge in popularity for the Tories.

It’s Labor’s worst result in four decades. Boris had celebrity assistance, writes Craig Brown:

The day of the mayoral election, The Guardian ran a piece headed “Don’t choose the clown!” in which a raggle-taggle collection of 34 different people - among them Vivienne Westwood, Bianca Jagger and Alan Rickman - queued up to say, in an oddly self-congratulatory way, just why they wouldn’t be voting for Boris Johnson.

It seemed that Boris’s joke-telling skills were the principal reason. “I’m happier with giving Ken another chance than I ever would be letting a joker like Johnson in,” said someone called Ty, billed as a hip-hop artist ...

Perversely, some comedians - Arabella Weir, David Mitchell - chose to denounce Boris for being a comedian. “Lovely to see other comedians getting work, but four years is a bit long for a comedy routine,” declared Mitchell, without saying why.

Strange people. Brown concludes with:

As GK Chesterton once pointed out, the opposite of funny is not serious: the opposite of funny is not funny.

UPDATE. A reader calls to say that the 1.00pm news on Radio National reported a mayoral victory to Boris Yeltsin.

Posted by Tim B. on 05/02/2008 at 10:47 PM
  1. Like Ty hip-hop artist might say red sauce Ken Livingstone not so hip so hoped out. HamAss will not be pleased.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 02 at 10:57 PM • permalink

  2. The Guardian ran a piece headed “Don’t choose the clown!” in which a raggle-taggle collection of 34 different people - among them Vivienne Westwood, Bianca Jagger and Alan Rickman - queued up to say, in an oddly self-congratulatory way, just why they wouldn’t be voting for Boris Johnson.

    B-but what did Posh, Becks and Jordan have to say?

    Posted by cuckoo on 2008 05 02 at 10:59 PM • permalink

  3. Dear Alan Rickman,

    “Yippie-ki-yay, motherfucker!”

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2008 05 02 at 11:02 PM • permalink

  4. If only Boy George had weighed in with his expert opinion.

    Posted by Merlin on 2008 05 02 at 11:05 PM • permalink

  5. Joke’s on them, I guess.  It takes more than snarky egomania to run things.

    Posted by Tex Lovera on 2008 05 02 at 11:08 PM • permalink

  6. The people have spoken.  Sucks to be celebrities, who thought they knew what the people would say.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2008 05 02 at 11:12 PM • permalink

  7. Ecstatic Conservatives cheered at London’s City Hall, at the end of a count lasting more than 15 hours, as the man who had been dismissed as the Bertie Wooster of British politics took charge of one of the biggest political offices in Britain.

    “Well, Jeeves, it seems that we’ve purged London of its Bolshevik mayor.”

    “Yes, sir.”

    “Time to restore a proper appreciation for the traditions that made England a - what’s the word, Jeeves? Something like ‘demitasse’”.

    “I believe, sir, you are referring to a line from William Shakespeare’s Richard II: ‘This other Eden, demi-paradise/This fortress built by Nature for herself/ Against infection and the hand of war…’”

    “Yes, that’s it. What would you say, Jeeves, to getting in the spirit of things by donning knee-breeches, a swallow-tail coat and powdered wig?”

    “No, sir.”

    “It would be the feudal thing to do.”

    “I’m afraid, sir, that it would be perceived, at best, as little more than a show of sartorial eccentricity, and at worst, a move toward recidivist reaction.”

    “Ah! Well, I suppose ‘No Popery’ is simply not on, then.”

    “I fear such a program would be needlessly divisive, sir.”

    “What about all these mussulmen? I mean to say, it’s a bit unnerving to be strolling about this other Eden, this demi-paradise, and congratulating oneself on the singular good fortune of having been born in Merry England, only to round the corner and get run over by some cove in a turban roaring by on a motorcycle. We shall have to, er, take prompt steps through the proper channels, I daresay.”

    “Undoubtedly, sir.”

    Posted by paco on 2008 05 02 at 11:21 PM • permalink

  8. One remembers when Bianca Jagger bravely endorsed the Sandinistas as well…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2008 05 02 at 11:26 PM • permalink

  9. #7 excellent work, pacomeister. have you got the boxed set of the hugh laurie/stephen fry wooster/jeeves? it’s a cracker

    as to BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! BORIS! all i can say is yah boo sucks to red ken & all the luvvies who sailed in him

    Posted by KK on 2008 05 02 at 11:50 PM • permalink

  10. #7 Paco, you rule!

    I had to call the missus (a Wodehouse fan nonpareil) from the other room just to enjoy the prose.

    Well done, old bean.

    Separately, Country/Western singers reflect that US & Aussie soldiers service is valued but who tells the British soldier he/she is revered? The Brit celeb/creeps seem unrelentingly anti-military and it must wear on a young squadie!

    Does anyone know who might sing in the UK to keep morale up?

    Posted by JDBagain on 2008 05 02 at 11:52 PM • permalink

  11. A reader calls to say that the 1.00pm news on Radio National reported a mayoral victory to Boris Yeltsin.

    Still less of a Commie than Red Ken.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2008 05 03 at 12:04 AM • permalink

  12. Flight from Labour (or a “lurch to the right” as our taxpayer-funded media generally refer to it) is always good news, but are the British Conservatives really up to the job?

    Posted by cuckoo on 2008 05 03 at 12:11 AM • permalink

  13. #12

    Flight from Labour (or a “lurch to the right” as our taxpayer-funded media generally refer to it) is always good news, but are the British Conservatives really up to the job?

    That we even should have to ask this question of the Party of Churchill and Thatcher is kind of pathetic.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2008 05 03 at 12:16 AM • permalink

  14. #12 - “but are the British Conservatives really up to the job?”

    Irrelevant. Modern Britain is governed from Brussels. Don’t let the currency fool you - Britain has not been a sovereign nation for over a decade, as Christopher Booker (in The Telegraph) has been pointing out, in vain, for years.

    Posted by walterplinge on 2008 05 03 at 12:20 AM • permalink

  15. #10 - hope this helps.  Boris’s view.

    Posted by mr creosote on 2008 05 03 at 12:49 AM • permalink

  16. but are the British Conservatives really up to the job?

    Crikey. Britain has sported a limp dick for more than decade, you can’t expect to have the tumesence of an elephant’s cock after the first stirring. All in good time my friend. Toodle pip!

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2008 05 03 at 01:01 AM • permalink

  17. #14 Took USA time to get on its own two feet and away from Mother England. Some still long for England to regain her colonies.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 03 at 01:10 AM • permalink

  18. #17

    Took USA time to get on its own two feet and away from Mother England. Some still long for England to regain her colonies.

    I’d like to see her regain her cojones.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2008 05 03 at 01:15 AM • permalink

  19. What could be better than Paco and Wodehouse?  Simply smashing old bean.

    Posted by tabitharuth on 2008 05 03 at 01:18 AM • permalink

  20. Boris YELTSIN?

    Woohoo, not concentrating.

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 03 at 01:20 AM • permalink

  21. Looks like Australia was sailing against the wind of change when it elected Rudd. France, Germany, Canada, Italy and now Britain have shifted right. NZ too may soon ditch Mr Helen Clark according to some pundits.

    Seems to recall being told by the left that Australia under Howard was out of step with the rest of the world when these countries had leftist governments.

    Posted by Contrail on 2008 05 03 at 01:51 AM • permalink

  22. Whoah, did the Brits just wake up?

    Yep,St. Boris’s Day

    Posted by saint on 2008 05 03 at 02:39 AM • permalink

  23. #21 Young Oz bought the spin of Kev07. Seems rest of the world has waken up to the left.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 03 at 02:40 AM • permalink

  24. Londoners fed up with Greens?

    Posted by egg_ on 2008 05 03 at 02:42 AM • permalink

  25. #2
    Oi Jagger, it’s London Calling ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2008 05 03 at 02:45 AM • permalink

  26. #24

    Londoners fed up with Greens?

    No. Reds.

    I’d say this is still not enough to prevent the Londonistan predictions.

    Posted by Dan Lewis on 2008 05 03 at 03:59 AM • permalink

  27. #26
    Inverse watermelon: red on the outside Green on the inside ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2008 05 03 at 04:24 AM • permalink

  28. #21, Contrail

    Just goes to show - Oz leads the way!

    Before too long “young Oz” will (once again) wake up to the left and ditch the Rudd Government (hopefully before too much damage is done). Failing a viable alternative - the Greens are really past their use-by date - it will elect a conservative Government, but this time one led by Malcolm Turnbull.

    Posted by ann j on 2008 05 03 at 04:27 AM • permalink

  29. One wonders what Rickman, Westwood, et all said about the situation in Zimbabwe? Surely both they and the Guardian called Mugabe worse? Non?

    Posted by Nic on 2008 05 03 at 04:31 AM • permalink

  30. #29 Mugabe is above criticism by Rickman, Westwood, et all and the Guardian to them that would be racism.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 03 at 04:46 AM • permalink

  31. #28—a conservative government lead by Malcoln Turnbull….. Is that anything like a Toyota car designed by Mitsubishi, or an apple growing at the top of an orange tree. 

    Treasurer, perhaps.

    Posted by Rod C on 2008 05 03 at 04:48 AM • permalink

  32. I think the incoming would be wise to count the Guildhall silver very carefully

    Posted by Rod C on 2008 05 03 at 04:52 AM • permalink

  33. #31, Rod - Who else do you think could be leader? 

    Surely you don’t think Brendan’s going to last beyond the current financial year?

    Posted by ann j on 2008 05 03 at 05:06 AM • permalink

  34. In all fairness, the contributions of a local firm should be credited with this massive success.

    Posted by captain on 2008 05 03 at 05:13 AM • permalink

  35. O/T
    Has Kevvie implemented his Kev07 Policies in Cuba?

    Cuba puts first computers on sale to the public

    Computers have been sold on Cuba’s black market for years — at prices comparable to the US$780 (euro505) now seen in the store. But now that computers are available legally, some consumers expect black market prices to fall.

    The radio report said that the computers would be for sale for the equivalent of about $800; keeping in mind that the monthly earnings for average Cubans is $20.

    Many people were just looking at the computers through the shop windows.

    They won’t have the internet. It’s illegal.

    Hey, all the leftards who think that Cuba and Venezuela and so on are just paradise, try living there as a Joe Ordinary Citizen.

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 03 at 05:17 AM • permalink

  36. #33 Nelson should stay maybe until the end of the year, to soak up the continuung krud honeymoon,  Get Mal Brough in at a by- election - safe seat anywhere. 
    Turnbull is a capable man, especially in finance, but no conservative in my view

    Posted by Rod C on 2008 05 03 at 05:27 AM • permalink

  37. A reader calls to say that the 1.00pm news on Radio National reported a mayoral victory to Boris Yeltsin.

    23 years after being appointed Mayor of Moscow.  That must be the Queensland ABC.

    Posted by monaro on 2008 05 03 at 05:44 AM • permalink

  38. #36.

    I’d support Mal Brough, but don’t think it’s going to happen.

    Posted by ann j on 2008 05 03 at 05:47 AM • permalink

  39. Turnbull is an unreformed trendy who’ll ditch ‘the conservative cause’ as soon as he has no further use for it, while Nelson has never seen a bandwagon he didn’t want to jump on.

    Can you imagine the lather that the luvvies would work themselves into over Mal Brough?  Electoral gold!  That’s why they won’t let him near the indigenous ‘war cabinet,’ they don’t want to raise his profile.

    But then I’d sooner have Rob Brough than Nelson.

    Posted by monaro on 2008 05 03 at 06:40 AM • permalink

  40. #39- I reckon Julie Bishop has the potential to be an antipodean Iron Lady, but she needs some grooming from this savvy spinmeister and switched-on svengali to make the nut.

    Nelson must sit down to piss, he’s wetter than a frogs foreskin and the Canberra bureau of the ABC has been harder on our secretion-swallowing PM and his pilot-fish and remora like retinue of retards; Turnbull is a North Shore luvvie out of central casting and probably belongs with this equally well-adjusted and reality-aware agitators moreso than any “conservative” group, but then again if he joined his fellows he’d be about as likely of scoring the top job as I have of being introduced to a Big Brother contestant and not setting them on fire.

    Posted by Habib on 2008 05 03 at 07:13 AM • permalink

  41. “We apologise for our earlier error. It was of course Boris Karloff who won the mayoral election…”

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2008 05 03 at 07:15 AM • permalink

  42. Sure it wasn’t Boris the Black Night?

    Posted by Habib on 2008 05 03 at 07:34 AM • permalink

  43. No!

    Boris Becker!

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 03 at 07:38 AM • permalink

  44. Boris Badenov

    Posted by monaro on 2008 05 03 at 07:44 AM • permalink

  45. #40

    Bravura performance, that!

    MarkL
    Canberra

    Posted by MarkL on 2008 05 03 at 07:44 AM • permalink

  46. And now we see the folloy of Labor’s attempt to wrest control of the Brisbane Mayoralty from conservative “Can Do” Campbell Newman- they should have pre-selected this candidate, who also has the ear of Fearless Leader.

    Posted by Habib on 2008 05 03 at 07:48 AM • permalink

  47. Boris the Spider

    Posted by monaro on 2008 05 03 at 07:50 AM • permalink

  48. #44- Synchronicity* at work, or feeble minds think alike. 

    *If of course you have a live rat in your head rather than a functioning brain, like marathon horizontal folk-dancer Gordie.

    Posted by Habib on 2008 05 03 at 07:54 AM • permalink

  49. #21 - We have fallen victim to another type of Drones Club.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2008 05 03 at 08:00 AM • permalink

  50. For lefties, greenies, warmies and islamies, it was a very not funny thing at all; no sir, not all!

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2008 05 03 at 08:06 AM • permalink


  51. Chesterton is suddenly back in vogue.
    C.L.‘s Chesterton allusion is much more apposite than Brown’s.
    For a start, it makes sense.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2008 05 03 at 08:07 AM • permalink

  52. (I heartily recommend Fangs Anal Satan Vol 1- can’t wait for volume 2.

    Posted by Habib on 2008 05 03 at 08:09 AM • permalink

  53. #12 At present, no, nopt if you mean actually doing something when they form a government. Cameron & co are wonkier than “New Labour”.

    I was in London visiting my socialist sister just after Boris announced his candidacy. I thought it was great that he was running but everyone laughed that he didn’t have a dog’s chance.

    Oh frabjous day, callooh-callay.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2008 05 03 at 08:21 AM • permalink

  54. [url=http://www.stopboris.org]http://www.stopboris.org[/url]

    Our campaign has failed. We did our best, but it wasn’t good enough to compete with Lynton Crosby and the massed ranks of the right-wing press.

    The next four years will be very sad years for our great city.

    Oh my God!

    Call Professor Quatermass.

    The archfiend Lynton Crosby has summoned the dark god Ba’al to ravage the city of London.

    Posted by monaro on 2008 05 03 at 08:27 AM • permalink

  55. Lynton Crosby ... the English Karl Rove.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2008 05 03 at 08:32 AM • permalink

  56. Almost as good as Ken Livingstone losing is that George Galloway’s bid to get elected to the Greater London Assembly flopped badly even though he only needed about 5% of the vote for a seat.

    Go Boris.

    Posted by Ross on 2008 05 03 at 08:42 AM • permalink

  57. I’ve never understood the celebrity-factor when it comes to politics.
    I mean, Allan Rickman is a wonderful actor whereas Bianca Jagger is solely known to be another ex-wife of Mick, but what does that have to do with anything regarding their political views?

    You see the same thing in the US when the Dems trawls Hollywood to get as many celebs as possible to endorse the hopeful candidates. Who gives a f*ck whether Angelina Jolie or George Clooney endorses one candidate or the other?

    Sure, it gets the celebs a bit of extra airtime, but do the spin-doctors behind the politicians really think that people are daft enough to think the celeb-factor will haul in enough votes to make a difference? Apparently, which should make one sad.

    Posted by Mikael on 2008 05 03 at 09:22 AM • permalink

  58. #58
    Mikael
    The sad fact is that many people will choose a celebrity; many people will hang on a celbrity’s every word; many people will believe everything that the celebrity spruiks.

    Which just goes to show that many people are just plain stupid.

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 03 at 09:25 AM • permalink

  59. Boris Jeltsin?

    Posted by Mikael on 2008 05 03 at 09:29 AM • permalink

  60. I’m surprised Red Ken would allow elections at all. 

    Still he’s still got time to call out the troops; get a tank at each crossroads; have Boris beaten to within an inch of his life; and organise a “recount” of the vote…..

    Posted by Ubique on 2008 05 03 at 09:30 AM • permalink

  61. Red Ken Mugabe?

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 03 at 09:31 AM • permalink

  62. The Grauniad et al are probably in a state of shock, stunned that the populace would dispatch the much-beloved Red Ken to the tumbrels.

    I spent 9 months in London not long after Maggie gave him the boot first time round, and whilst the press lavished praise on him like spittle on a well polished toecap, everyone I met loathed him.  He was as welcome as prawn shells in the hubcaps. 

    I am amazed though that Boris managed to scrape up enough votes to overcome the carefully constructed Ken Coalition of ethnic rent-seekers, media mudflaps, bone-idle public servants, unreconstructed socialist luddites, anarchists, lesbian interpretative dance collectives, drug addled squatters and green self-flagellators. 

    Brown is fucked because the horny-handed, blue collar “battlers” - the old core of the labour party - have simply decided to not turn up on election day to vote for his ilk anymore.  They won’t vote Tory, but not voting at all is what will kill Brown.  All he has left attached to him are the scum of the middle class - the putrescent giblets of the left.

    Posted by mr creosote on 2008 05 03 at 09:34 AM • permalink

  63. Wimpy Canadiam wrote:

    Lynton Crosby ... the English Karl Rove.

    No he’s the Australian Karl Rove, the UK just borrowed him.

    Posted by Ross on 2008 05 03 at 09:46 AM • permalink

  64. among them Vivienne Westwood, Bianca Jagger and Alan Rickman

    I love it when celebutards lose…

    Posted by anthony_r on 2008 05 03 at 09:55 AM • permalink

  65. #6 RebeccaH

    Sucks to be celebrities, who thought they knew what the people would say.

    I don’t know that it sucks to be a celebrity—I’d be lying if I said I’d hate to have more money than I could spend in my life and be able to sleep with just about anybody I liked—but it certainly does suck to have to listen to them.

    Posted by Mambo Bananapatch on 2008 05 03 at 10:59 AM • permalink

  66. Howard didn’t listen to Crosby Textor for a while before the debacle. It would have been better if he had listened to them instead of his family.

    Posted by KK on 2008 05 03 at 11:01 AM • permalink

  67. Conservatives are surging worldwide!  There is hope for Australia and the US yet, friends.

    Posted by blogagog on 2008 05 03 at 11:36 AM • permalink

  68. Ubique—I don’t think the four tanks and two platoons of Territorials the Brits have left after Brown’s budget cuts can cover all those intersections.

    And the opposite of funny pretty much IS modern comedy…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2008 05 03 at 03:11 PM • permalink

  69. #64 Thanks Ross. A fine example of the Anglosphere working in harmony.

    HOHO BOJO MOJO !

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2008 05 03 at 05:00 PM • permalink

  70. I go to London regularly to work in an office right next to that horrible town hall.

    I used to cringe as I walked past that commie enclave in More London.

    No more. I will stride proudly and freely through the streets of London. And no toothless pommie folksinger will make me change my mind.

    Posted by jlc on 2008 05 03 at 05:37 PM • permalink

  71. Celebrities suffer from the delusion that public prominence equals wisdom, and the understanding that will solve all the problems of the world.
    As for Galloway - victim of a Malkovitch Malediction, perhaps?

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2008 05 03 at 07:27 PM • permalink

  72. Some of the most successful politicians are ambiguous in their political beliefs. They will go to the party who they think offers the best career opportunities. Turnbull is in that category, Nelson too and probably Rudd.

    When Gough Whitlam told the other barristers at his chambers in Sydney he was going into politics, the first question they asked was “which party?” Despite the Labor myth, Whitlam was not a true believer until he decided to enter politics. He saw Labor as the best career path because they were mongrel lot of rusted-on commies and barbaric unionists who couldn’t eat with a knife and fork. The Libs, on the other hand, was overrun with people like him - rich, educated and erudite.

    Got that from Whitlam’s barristers clerk when I worked for him (the clerk) in 1967. .

    Posted by Contrail on 2008 05 03 at 07:55 PM • permalink

  73. Contrail - I heard a similar story that Whitlam basically chose Labor because he knew he wouldn’t rise far and fast in the Liberal Party of the day.

    Posted by Francis H on 2008 05 03 at 08:06 PM • permalink

  74. I’d say the Libs dodged a bullet there myself.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2008 05 03 at 09:02 PM • permalink

  75. …like Frank Sartor and a host of other Labor luminaries who joined the party five minutes before accepting their promised preselection.

    Posted by monaro on 2008 05 03 at 09:25 PM • permalink

  76. Best damned news I had in weeks!

    Posted by Penguin on 2008 05 03 at 09:29 PM • permalink

  77. The Libs actually have a good chance of attracting some serious talent at the moment. For someone contemplating a political career, the odds favour a cabinet position in a Liberal Government for someone with ambition and talent.

    Labor on the other hand has all its cabinet ministers for the next decade or two sitting in parliament now. Even an election loss won’t prise all these unionists and former staffers from their safe seats. The perks are too good.

    Posted by Contrail on 2008 05 04 at 03:08 AM • permalink


  78. #78 So what, then , makes a good politician?

    Posted by carpefraise on 2008 05 04 at 04:44 AM • permalink

  79. #80
    Someone who gives people hope of a better future.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 04 at 05:01 AM • permalink

  80. He/She’d want to be delivering more than hope.

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 04 at 05:06 AM • permalink

  81. #82
    People with hope work for a better future.
    National socialists provide illusions that make people lose hope. While a good politician provides inspiration.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 04 at 05:15 AM • permalink

  82. Yes, fair enough. They’d still have to be able to deliver more.
    Like work for the good/need/wants of their electorate.
    It’s not enough to inspire hope.
    They have to deliver.

    I had a call yesterday from some poll mob, asking, among other things, about my satisfaction with Kevin Rudd. (What I thought about China, Japan, Indonesia, India and their place in Australia’s future business/security, etc.)

    The interviewer said to me “So, you’re not very happy with his performance so far.”

    I replied “He hasn’t done anything except perform.”

    There’s no hope there.

    His words after the most recent death in Afghanistan were particularly annoying. I’m pretty sure it wasn’t just me that they annoyed.Link.

    I wonder how the people who voted for Kevin07 are feeling now.
    Disillusioned? Or are they really impressed by the “$orry” and other performances?

    Unfortunately, I think they are impressed by the smoke and mirrors.

    Posted by kae on 2008 05 04 at 05:48 AM • permalink

  83. #78

    Yes, I know a number of people who have joined.

    MarkL
    canberra

    Posted by MarkL on 2008 05 04 at 05:51 AM • permalink

  84. #78 Well, not someone who sniffs seats (Buswell in WA) or does media conferences in Speedoes (Debnam in NSW, who lost the unloseable election by doing so).

    Ideally, it is an intelligent manager who believes what he or she is doing is best for the country as a whole and not some sectional interest.

    Realistically, it is someone who wants power over wealth (otherwise you end up with the corrupt NSW government) and wise enough to known that to retain power, you have to manage well and not get too far in front of or behind the people. Great leadership is always being slightly in front, because you then control the direction things are moving.

    Posted by Contrail on 2008 05 04 at 06:12 AM • permalink

  85. #84
    With inspiration comes investment, private as well as public, which work for the good/need/wants of their electorate.
    Howard started to inspire but maybe got tired. MSM sucks life out of people. Rudd is just a wind-up toy, from which annoyance comes out. Epstein and Secord provide the smoke and mirrors. I tend to ignore the annoyance, heard it all before from other Laborites.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 04 at 06:16 AM • permalink

  86. #86
    MSM only reports some of the stories. Those you quote were ones the MSM liked. The Labor stories tend to get buried.

    Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 05 04 at 06:34 AM • permalink

  87. Boris and Natasha

    Posted by Zoe Brain on 2008 05 04 at 11:02 AM • permalink

  88. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.