<< FOOTSTOOL ENCOUNTERED ~ MAIN ~ UNSAFETY DANCE >>

MAGAZINE LAUNCHED

They removed the naked women, but it looks like they forgot to take out the cartoons:

Several Indonesian policemen have been hurt as hundreds of radical Muslim demonstrators threw stones at the Jakarta offices of Playboy magazine.

The magazine published a sanitised Indonesian edition for the first time last week containing no nudes, but the demonstrators have vowed to continue their attacks until the office is closed down.

About 300 members of the Islamic Defenders Front smashed windows and a gate at the magazine’s offices in South Jakarta demanding that it cease publication.

Similar, though less violent, attitudes towards the female body were once present in Australia. One hundred years ago.

UPDATE. Much more on this from Gateway Pundit.

Posted by Tim B. on 04/12/2006 at 01:28 PM
  1. American men would also riot if Playboy took out the naked women in it American edition.  Give the Muslims what they really want - naked women.

    Posted by perfectsense on 2006 04 12 at 01:41 PM • permalink

  2. They must be taking exception to the infidel whore showing her ankle on page 36.

    Posted by 2dogs on 2006 04 12 at 02:25 PM • permalink

  3. I read the Indonesian Playboy for the many articles… of clothing on the models.

    Posted by Jim Treacher on 2006 04 12 at 03:04 PM • permalink

  4. From Playboy’s (Indonesian Edition) Party Jokes:

    Scene: An unhappy couple in bed.
    Man: I’m sorry, baby. I just can’t find your clitoris.
    Woman: No wonder. A village elder tossed it in the trash when I was twelve.

    Posted by Drew W on 2006 04 12 at 03:46 PM • permalink

  5. Seems the only way to deal with muslim protestors is the old Suharto method that we found so offensive at the time.

    Posted by davo on 2006 04 12 at 05:21 PM • permalink

  6. #5, yes it does seem these days that even the old lefty complaint that Western “realist” support for authoritarian regimes helped create the radicals doesn’t hold much water anymore. More and more it seems that it merely held off the inevitable for a few decades. (Imagine a full-on Islamist movement during the Cold War, free to do a prequel to today’s Communist-Islamist alliances…what joy that would’ve been.)

    Posted by PW on 2006 04 12 at 06:11 PM • permalink

  7. Left-utopianism requires brute force to make it happen, then it implodes when the stark reality of its inability to deliver sinks in.
    Whether the force comes from a Central Committee or a Dictator, the “realpolitik” support for some less than wonderful regimes is open to both sides. Is supporting Musharraf the same as supporting Kim Jong Il?

    Posted by blogstrop on 2006 04 12 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  8. Back to the Indons - these are the swell guys we are supposed to be appeasing because they are numerous and our neighbours? I have no er…brief for Playboy, but the behaviour of deranged Islamics like these does not promise peaceful relations with the modern world.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2006 04 12 at 06:23 PM • permalink

  9. I thought this is a family friendly site. What is this with the lascivious pictures of 100 years ago?

    Posted by Rafe C on 2006 04 12 at 09:52 PM • permalink

  10. They’re only reading it for the articles.

    Posted by Ernst Blofeld on 2006 04 12 at 11:01 PM • permalink

  11. Ernst — “A”, “An,” and “The”?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 04 13 at 12:02 AM • permalink

  12. blogstrop,
    No.  Musharrif isn’t insane, while Li’l Kim is.  Mark Steyn pointed out that Musharrif being in charge rather than his rather less sensible predecessor Nawiz Sharif (democratically elected but terminally corrupt and flakey) during the Pakistani-Indian crisis a few years ago probably spared us a nuke war on the subcontinent.

    Among all the people I’ve read and heard denouncing the USA for allying with dictators against teh Commies I have never heard one of them complain about the US and Britain allying with Stalin against Hitler.  That is the classic example of allying with a noxious dictator to do down a slightly more noxious one.  It is hard to find them more noxious than those two.  If it was OK in WWII, it was OK in the Cold War is my view.  The ones we allied with then were nowher near as noxious as the ones we opposed.  Mushie is nowhere near as noxious as the Mullahs and Saddam.

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2006 04 13 at 12:04 AM • permalink

  13. What do Muslim men shout at an Islamic Strip joint.? “Show us your face”

    Posted by Howzat on 2006 04 13 at 06:21 AM • permalink

  14. #13 Howzat.

    Classic.

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2006 04 13 at 08:13 AM • permalink

  15. In 1913, a mayor of a small Georgia USA town was arrested for appearing in public in a sleeveless swimsuit.

    Posted by The Sanity Inspector on 2006 04 13 at 11:12 PM • permalink

  16. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.