<< WAR GOOD FOR PLANET ~ MAIN ~ USE THIS INFORMATION CAREFULLY >>

LANDFILLS OVERFLOWING, FOR SOME REASON

People laughed when George W. Bush unveiled his ambitious homelessness plan, but look at the results:

Three years after the launch of the most aggressive nationwide strategy in a generation to solve homelessness, there is evidence that it may be working: The number of street people in cities across the United States has plummeted for the first time since the 1980s.

 

Posted by Tim B. on 05/15/2006 at 03:12 AM
  1. Yeah but we ‘know’ why don’t we ;)
    GWB’s grinding them up and converting the poor buggers into fuel his carrier fleets.

    Posted by pick-your-pun on 2006 05 15 at 03:34 AM • permalink

  2. There are plenty of homes for the homeless in Melbourne. It’s called railway trains. I wouldn’t mind so much if they didn’t urinate on the seats, which are upholstered in multi-coloured fabric so you don’t know that they are wet until you sit on them.

    Posted by ilibcc on 2006 05 15 at 03:36 AM • permalink

  3. It’s from Bush’s program to release the California Condor, a huge vulture with an impatient streak.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2006 05 15 at 03:44 AM • permalink

  4. I was homeles for exactly one night, once. I slept on a Perth beach and woke to a glorious sunrise. I like telling this story.

    Posted by Daniel San on 2006 05 15 at 04:36 AM • permalink

  5. But the sun would have risen over land!
    That’s just not natural.

    Posted by entropy on 2006 05 15 at 04:44 AM • permalink

  6. Where are you hiding them all Wronwright??

    Posted by Hank Reardon on 2006 05 15 at 05:07 AM • permalink

  7. #4 - Daniel - And what a meandering, charming and entertaining story it is.

    Posted by Ck on 2006 05 15 at 05:12 AM • permalink

  8. #1, soylent green, soylent green!!!!

    Posted by darrinh on 2006 05 15 at 06:47 AM • permalink

  9. I was homeless too. Dreadful experience, locked out of home, thank god the Marriot was just down the street. Not a chain I particularly like, but my harrowing tale of survival and redemption will one day make for a best selling Oprah approved memoir.

    Posted by erin_j on 2006 05 15 at 07:58 AM • permalink

  10. Erin - Hmm, that just doesn’t have the same pathos as Daniel’s story. 

    Took up more words though. 

    The Marriot mention could lead to a bit of sponsorship.

    I’d don’t know: I think Daniel had a more gripping tale and a more dramatic ending.

    Posted by Ck on 2006 05 15 at 08:04 AM • permalink

  11. It’s easy to get rid of the street bums.

    In Philadelphia during the GOP convention, the cops bussed them all ‘somewhere’ for 4 days.

    Voila, no bothersome street bums.

    Posted by trainer on 2006 05 15 at 08:05 AM • permalink

  12. #10 Did I forget to mention that at the time I was a recovering crack addict with 4.5 multiracial children and a husband in jail for high treason?

    I am now blonde, poised, well dressed and the children are kept locked in the basement, ready for their Oprah moment. The husband hasn’t been seen since 2001.

    Posted by erin_j on 2006 05 15 at 08:12 AM • permalink

  13. How many languages do each of the children speak and how many different colours are they?

    “High treason”? 

    No-one will believe you and it sounds far too uppity, the common people won’t be able to relate.

    Posted by Ck on 2006 05 15 at 08:15 AM • permalink

  14. Would it be unethical to hunt them for sport?.

    Posted by Daniel San on 2006 05 15 at 08:22 AM • permalink

  15. The homeless or those multiracial children of Erin’s?

    Yes to the former.

    No to the latter, especially if they have multiracial names.

    Posted by Ck on 2006 05 15 at 08:25 AM • permalink

  16. “Two men enter, one man leave!”

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 05 15 at 08:31 AM • permalink

  17. This is all too much pressure. I’ve never popped a sprog and my husband fled the country last month. Note to my publisher: please let me keep my advance, I’ll come up with a better story tomorrow.

    But then, if I were going to name four children, Bailey, Riley, McKeznie and Madison do come to mind… cre8tively spelt, of course. Tempting, very, very tempting.

    Posted by erin_j on 2006 05 15 at 08:36 AM • permalink

  18. Correct me if I’m wrong, but hasn’t it been established that the homeless are mostly crazy people who wont accept help when offered?.

    Posted by Daniel San on 2006 05 15 at 08:38 AM • permalink

  19. If you’re not watching, go put on Lateline

    Posted by Ian Deans on 2006 05 15 at 09:00 AM • permalink

  20. Correct me if I’m wrong, but hasn’t it been established that the homeless are mostly crazy people who wont accept help when offered?.

    Yeah, that’s been found to be pretty much how it is here in Cleveland.  I believe San Francisco’s problem (for example) is largely due to the benefits offered by the homeless living in the city, etc.

    Posted by RyanOH on 2006 05 15 at 09:05 AM • permalink

  21. How about the homeless figures in Mexico? I reckon they would shoot up through the roof and into space if the Yanks sent a quarter of the illegal immigrants in the US back home. Imagine if they gave some of these homeless people the Mexican’s jobs, they’d have no unemployment.

    Posted by cjblair on 2006 05 15 at 09:06 AM • permalink

  22. #18: I believe a lot of them are former mental patients who were released from hospitals and treatment centers as a result of well-intentioned but misguided concerns over their civil rights. I have a vague recollection that William Tucker wrote an article on this subject many years ago, but can’t remember for sure.

    Posted by paco on 2006 05 15 at 09:12 AM • permalink

  23. I know what they do with homeless people in South Africa…take them to the zoo.

    http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=457272005

    Posted by cjblair on 2006 05 15 at 09:15 AM • permalink

  24. We’ve been shipping them to Gitmo.

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 05 15 at 09:35 AM • permalink

  25. Yes, Paco—the mental institutions (many of which’s staffs treating their patients cruelly) were shut down to allow the patients their “rights” as citizens.  Now they live unprotected, unmedicated, as prey for criminals…

    As for a solution, I got nothing.

    When I was a kid, back in the ‘60s, one of my friends’ mom worked at Pennshurst, kinda notorious.  She said the general public didn’t know that there were actually some real mutants warehoused in there, people born with scales, looking like fish…

    Posted by ushie on 2006 05 15 at 09:49 AM • permalink

  26. “The number of street people in cities across the United States has plummeted for the first time since the 1980s.”
    Oh, since Reagan and Bush the Elder were presidents? Funny coincidence, innit?

    Posted by Latino on 2006 05 15 at 09:49 AM • permalink

  27. #12 Are you the recovering crack addict/author Andrew Deign-to is putting on a pedestal-er interviewing with Aunty tonite?
    Couldn’t just be a mere run of the mill author ..it HAS to be a recovering crack addict.
    Tonite ABC news whilst detailing the Feds’ anti drugs campaign- a guy (unidentified but probably Kezza’s grandson) was twice shown rolling weed and inhaling with great effect.
    Also did anyone catch the Sandy McHucheon Austraya Talks Back recently when a dipshot -presumabably on delay- was allowed to make the comment on air “John COWARD is a LYING HUNT..that’s an ANAGRAM”..and dear Sandy said thank you very much…..

    Posted by crash on 2006 05 15 at 09:54 AM • permalink

  28. @27 Didn’t Mediaswatch bag a commercial tv station recently for running promos on screen BENEATH a programme (was it Whale Rider?) and they thoughtfully provided a mini rerun sans the flyer because it was so “meaningful” a film.
    So they will be cutting to ABC about the low level flyers for Peking to Paris,which have been appearing over the top of the credits and even during some programmes won’t Nanny Attard!

    Posted by crash on 2006 05 15 at 10:00 AM • permalink

  29. I imagine it would be a shock to most liberals to find out that homelessness didn’t plummet during the Clinton years.

    I was homeless for a month once, slept on the couch of a friend in a luxury apartment building on Wall Street. Homeless in a nicer apartment then I ever could afford on my own.

    Posted by tim maguire on 2006 05 15 at 10:24 AM • permalink

  30. Plenty of rooms, er, room, I mean, in our landfills in NJ.

    Posted by Mr. Bingley on 2006 05 15 at 10:28 AM • permalink

  31. Mental institutions : Erving Goffman wrote a book _Asylums_ in the 60s, the point of which was how people adapt to institutions of any sort ; a wonderful book, written by a sociologist who was a master of ironic observation.

    The book was misunderstood as about how doctors preyed on the patients, and the social construction of the medical model for them.  As if there was an alternative.

    So anyway they all got shut down and the patients are as you see them today.

    From _Asylums_ http://home.att.net/~rhhardinl/goffman.underlife.txt

    More Goffman, on Merry-go-rounds : http://home.att.net/~rhhardin8/goffman.merry.txt

    On apologies : http://home.att.net/~rhhardind/goffman.apology.txt

    A guy worth reading.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2006 05 15 at 12:07 PM • permalink

  32. But the ACLU meant well.  Their hearts were in the right place.  And they feel good. Their self-esteem jumped.

    Besides, The Safeway chain in SF can always get new carts.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2006 05 15 at 01:51 PM • permalink

  33. 22 & 25: The striking thing about the story is that the desperate, presumptively incompetent bottom 20% of the homeless who were dumped on the streets after their custodial care was shut down are, under the program, being taken off the streets and placed in (guess what?  no, go on, guess!) “permanent supportive housing.”  Um, custodial care, anyone?
    Plus ca change ...

    Posted by Celaeno on 2006 05 15 at 02:48 PM • permalink

  34. ... hunt them for sport?

    Just make sure none of them look like Ice-T.

    Posted by Achillea on 2006 05 15 at 04:31 PM • permalink

  35. A lot of homeless people are what they always were: drunks and drug addicts who prefer to spend what money they have on drink or drugs instead of shelter.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 05 15 at 06:22 PM • permalink

  36. I imagine it would be a shock to most liberals to find out that homelessness didn’t plummet during the Clinton years.

    And a lot of folks expecting to move into Whitewater were particularly inconvenienced…

    Here in LA we had a model homeless program, run by black activist Ted Hayes, that was actually working.  Then Ted received an award from a Republican group and the Democratic landlord immediately revoked their lease.  He told Ted to his face, “I’d never have rented to you if I’d know you were a Republican.”

    To its credit, the White House ordered HUD to take over and relocate the project within 24 hours of the announcement.

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 05 15 at 08:32 PM • permalink

  37. Generally speaking, if we’re talking about a given night of homelessness (mine were usually spent in a variety of junkers that I drove), about 1/3 have mental/emotional problems, about 1/3 have addiction problems (with some overlap between these two groups of course), and about 1/3 are down on their luck.

    If we’re talking about long-term homelessness, it’s more like 40+% in each of the first two categories and less than 10% in the down on their luck category.  This is why homelessness is such an enduring problem.  Probably 75% or more of them prefer to be on the street to their other choices (and they do have them).

    In the US it has been illegal to forcibly remove them from the street unless they’re ‘a danger to themselves or others’ which is not much help given that a street person in NYC was allowed to remain on the street after twice attacking passers-by with concrete chunks, severely hurting one.

    And I believe that in Denver three long-term homeless have been shown to create about $1M per year in health costs (emergency room visits, multiple hospital stays, etc).

    Quite a system.

    Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 05 15 at 10:43 PM • permalink

  38. #37 Now in my dotage, reading your post, I begin to recall just how many times I was homeless (and why, which will remain sub-rosa) and how I “made my own luck”.

    Example: I once took a job as a dog agitator (ok, so I’ve got thrill issues) to buy a warm coat and enough food to get me to the next province, to pick fruit to get me to the nearest port to sign onto the neaest vessel to get me to the next country, to wash dishes to get me to the next building site to pour cement to get me back home to get a job roughnecking to pay for university to get me where I am today.

    A dog agitator.

    Posted by MentalFloss on 2006 05 16 at 12:33 AM • permalink

  39. Oh yeah?  Well I was a cock teaser at Rooster-rama!  My job was to enrage the bantams before the cockfights ...
    [/firesign]

    Posted by Stoop Davy Dave on 2006 05 16 at 06:04 PM • permalink

  40. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.