<< DEATH HOUR ~ MAIN ~ HUFFINGTON LOST >>
JUST SAY MOO
If you prefer your milk laced with opiates, you may wish to visit the “Dairy of an Australian Heroin Addict”.
UPDATE. Fixed! The Dairy is now a standard old narcotics Diary.
I don’t break into houses or sell drugs to survive but rather I design computer information systems. Yes I work and I am considered a professional. Unfortunately I can’t put in a standard 8-10 hour day at an office so I work from home. This allows me to work when I am fit enough but also keeps me tied to my work 7 days a week.
Unfortunately, I don’t think this guy is doing as well as he thinks he is.
Fighting a heroin addiction is a helluva battle. Spelling mistakes are the least of his problems.
Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 23 at 06:14 PM • permalinkWow, a junkie doesn’t want people to vote for John McCain.
Johnny Mac must be devastated.
Posted by Young and Free on 2008 03 23 at 06:52 PM • permalinkhere’s the comment I left him, I’m reposting it here because I know he’ll delete it
----------------Yes poor McCain. He’s lost the “I collapsed my life into a degenerate pit of drug abuse and depression and it’s Andrew Bolt’s fault” demographic.
There’s a reason Tim Blair linked to you, you’re a case study in why everything you believe in leads to dysfunction and misery. Good Lord your life is hell, even I felt depressed reading some of your entries, and what I find amazing, and not a little ironic, is that from a position of complete failure, you can lecture “God-fearing, right wing Australia” on everything under the sun, as if you aren’t an utter, utter fuckup and we should all respect YOUR OPINION.
Incredible.
Heheh. About a couple of years ago ago, I was scanning through on-screen TV listings and selected Diary of a Madman (1963). My Kiwi wife misread the title and thought it was Dairy of a Madman and thought it might be about an insanely managed convenience store. Would’ve made a better movie....
#11
Amos, I gathered the reason Tim linked to that site was because he’d found an amusing typo. How on earth did you manage to infer that he meant to describe its author, Terry Wright, as:"an utter, utter fuckup"
who, "from a position of complete failure", provides:
"a case study in why everything you believe in leads to dysfunction and misery”?
Talk about taking the ball and running with it.
Posted by Ant Rogenous on 2008 03 23 at 08:15 PM • permalinkHis victim mentality shines in today’s Australia where excess social baggage morphs into thousands and thousands of ‘caring’ jobs.
He has taken the ‘no responsibility’ clause out of his own life’s framework. The guy who supplies him with h is also supplying the next generation of social welfare recipients and psychotics.
I wonder how he’d be viewed in Singapore, or Iran.
#15
Here’s Terry Wright’s response to what he rightly describes as your ‘bullying’:Amos: "I collapsed my life into a degenerate pit of drug abuse and depression and it’s Andrew Bolt’s fault"
No, it’s not Andrew Bolt’s fault, it’s mine.
I wrongly turned to alcohol and drugs when I woke up beside my dead wife one morning. I was later diagnosed with bi-polar and have been told I will probably be on opiate treatment for the rest of my life. It is my fault I started drinking and using heroin. I was born with bi-polar and certain chemical imbalances and this is my concern only, no one is to blame.If your attacking me about my health and the reasons I have to take opiates, then that really says more about you than me. If you disagree with my politics, you’re stooping pretty low to get your opinion across. Pretty nasty comments really.
Surely, ...surely you have better things to do than bully a “an utter, utter fuckup”? Maybe I’m just easy pickings and it’s easier for you here because you don’t get taken seriously elsewhere?
Big man, aren’t you Amos?
Posted by Ant Rogenous on 2008 03 23 at 09:03 PM • permalink"I wrongly turned to alcohol and drugs when I woke up beside my dead wife one morning.”
Oh poor fucking Terry.
This bloke spent 65 hours next to his dead wife, under tonnes of fucking concrete.
His heroin addiction should be kicking in any time now. Obviously it’s delayed in some circumstances.
By the way Ant, how long have you been waiting at the cat flap?
"I wrongly turned to alcohol and drugs when I woke up beside my dead wife one morning.”
Wow, immediately, like he had it right there on the nightstand? You know, instead of drinking a glass of water or something, he immediately started injecting…
Also, I don’t think that opiates are a treatment for bipolar disorder. I have bipolar friends, and none of them are on opiates, though tranquilizers like Xanax are prescribed. What he probably means is his doctors probably consider his mental state is currently too fucked up to be able to stand withdrawal.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2008 03 23 at 09:45 PM • permalinkI forgot to add: if he really meant what he said about “wrongly” turning to drug abuse, he wouldn’t have a self-justifying website about how he’s really okay despite his little habit, which is only a minor inconvenience now that he’s arranged his whole life around it (the job from home, the partner who probably does most of the scutwork and brings in most of the money, etc.).
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2008 03 23 at 09:47 PM • permalinkYou know what? I’m just going to leave you guys enjoying the view from your moral high-ground as you sink the slippers into a heroin addict with a long-term mental illness.
Tim, thank heavens you employ an “administrator” here—otherwise people might, you know, get carried away and make utter arseholes of themselves.
Posted by Ant Rogenous on 2008 03 23 at 09:57 PM • permalinkwell I give him kudos for recognising his mistakes and trying to turn his life around.
What bothers me are things like the title of the blog- “The Australian heroin diaries” suggests a continuing obsession with the drug; statements like “heroin is the new aspirin” and other things that show that he still doesn’t really get it.Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 23 at 10:07 PM • permalinkHeroin binge but Federal Government has ruled out prohibition on alcohol as it moves to crack down on binge drinking.
Posted by stackja1945 on 2008 03 23 at 10:23 PM • permalinkEver watch someone slide downhill from drug abuse, Ant? From your attitude, I’d guess not, or else you think drug abuse is OK.
Trust me, it ain’t pretty, and my experiences weren’t even with close friends.
Maybe, just maybe, some of these people you’re abusing have a worse experience than mine, and know exactly what this guy is doing to himself.
And, AFAIK, blogging about an addiction isn’t necessary therapeutic. In this case, I think it’s narcissistic, and unhealthy in reinforcing his addiction.
Nope, this dude might be funny, but his life ain’t. Unless he kicks the Big H, he’s just committing slow suicide.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 03 23 at 10:54 PM • permalinkTRJ I agree with most of that. I’ve seen up close the utter destruction of drug addiction (not me, though… not quite that close).
However, blogging is probably a positive, therapeutic exercise. There’s evidence that journaling is good for your mental health, so blogging is probably the same.What this guy has to make decide is if he’s writing about dealing with a disability, or whether he’s advocating a lifestyle of heroin use. ie fundamentally whether he’s for drugs or against them. The impression I get is that he’s currently on the fence.
Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 23 at 11:26 PM • permalinkThe impression I get is that he’s currently on the fence.
Maybe, daddy dave. We’ll just have to wait and see.
Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2008 03 24 at 01:40 AM • permalink#19 He’s been chilling in the litter box longer than he’s been waiting at the cat flap Pogria.
Junkies, even self deluded ones like Terry Wright are champions of the left and not one but two leftard blogs are singing the praises of this loser.
I for one am not surprised.Posted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 24 at 06:57 PM • permalink"Junkies, even self deluded ones like Terry Wright are champions of the left”
...or more accurately, the Left are champions of junkies. They are usually poor, social outsiders, and victims. They’re a natural consituency. Plus, the sixties was powered by drugs, so boomers look on them nostalgically as just hippies who went too far.
Addiction has no intrinsic politics. It’s older than politics. Junkies however can see who their political sponsors are, and go along for the ride. The anti-American conspiracy theories fit well with people who already have a strong sense of alienation.
Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 24 at 07:19 PM • permalinkBullshit, ;;;;. The two blogs in question are criticising the vicious heartlessness of the lovely people here, not singing anyone’s praises.
#34 Some of the comments here and at heroindiaries are over the top, and pretty nasty. It’s a characteristic of online flame wars that I’m personally not particularly fond of. I don’t like it, and I don’t support it.
But on the other side of the coin, the portrayal by you and grods of Terry Wright as being some innocent well-meaning guy who just got mobbed is not quite accurate either.
The blog in question is not just about Terry’s personal journey. I wish he had left it at that, because that’s something I can at least give him two cheers for.
Instead, heroindiaries is actually a far-left blog with an anti-Howard, anti-american angle, for instance using words like “Americanazism” in the title of posts. (no such titles for actual totalitarian states like Iran, Burma, or China, but I digress). Heroindiaries launched an attack on right witng blog
A Western Heart, including (eerie similarity here) criticising them because they “can’t spell,” because they use American English, not British English.
heroindiaries has described Andrew Bolt (a friend of Tim Blair’s in case it missed anyone’s attention) as a “whacker” and a “fuckhead” , and uses both Bolt and Blair routinely as examples of the kind of people and politics that he despises. The blog displayes unmitigated contempt for conservatives… readers of the Daily Telegraph are “morons” for example.
This is all strong, hateful, frequently insulting language, and it’s in a public arena. If heroindiaries had a readership similar in size to Blair, what would have been the response to the “sic em” on A Wester n Heart? Probably similar if not worse. Readers at beroindiaries complain they’ve been banned from that blog… without knowing the details, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was justified.
This is all to make two points. First, Terry has waded into the political arena with an agressive partisan attitude, and gives the impression he’s itching for a fight. If he doesn’t want to play ball he would be well advised to stick more closely to drug-related issues. If that was the case, I might actually become an occasional reader. It’s an interesting journey he’s on,after all.
Secondly, the blog is guilty of everything that Blair is guilty of… although Blair himself is not guilty. In Blair’s post there is no “this guy is a fuckhead”. And there were no secret emails or messages “go get this guy”. Just a link to a mildly humourous typo. Some people responded in a very hostile way, others did not.
Finally, the hostility is due to the negative attitude many people have towards drug addicts. There’s a reason for this: Drug addicts cause a lot of damage, destruction and misery in our society, to people who love them and to total strangers. That’s not a “right wing rant” that’s an empirical fact. We can go toe-to-toe all day about responsibilities, legalisation and so forth but none of that will escape the fact of the misery and tragedy that surrounds drug addicts.
I don’t have that amount of anger that I can aim squarely at a drug addict, especially one who seems to be trying to “make good”, in part because heroin has profoundly affected me through the addiction of someone close. Maybe some would think that would make me more angry but it has had the effect of personalising it. Others don’t have my history or my attitude. It’s an emotive topic, and if you want to go public about your habit, you’re going to tap the full range of attitudes and emotions on the subject that are out there. Given the highly controversial nature of the subject, it is poor judgement to mix it with extreme partisan politics.
To Terry I would say, if you want to have a private, invitation-only blog through which you can journal, update friends, and explore various issues, then I applaud the initiative. If you want to enter the public discourse, then here you are.
Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 24 at 09:44 PM • permalinkDaddy Dave, two points:
First, we were careful in the Grods post not to comment on Terry’s politics or paint him as some “innocent well-meaning guy who just got mobbed”. To claim, as you have, that that’s what we’ve done is at best a misreading of our post and at worst, disingenuous.
Second, we commented on the attacks on Terry Wright that were made at a personal level. You state that “Terry has waded into the political arena with an agressive (sic) partisan attitude, and gives the impression he’s itching for a fight”. I don’t disagree with this—but, again, the disgusting comments that were made here and at his blog about his personal situation had nothing to do with his politics. If the people who’d attacked him did so purely on his political stance, it would have been fair enough play.
Posted by Ant Rogenous on 2008 03 24 at 09:56 PM • permalinkFirst, we were careful in the Grods post not to comment on Terry’s politics or paint him as some “innocent well-meaning guy who just got mobbed”. To claim, as you have, that that’s what we’ve done is at best a misreading of our post and at worst, disingenuous.
It was a misreading that I’m still making. Your wrote “Terry writes a very personal blog about his battle with heroin addiction. He also writes...” thus loading the important information up front, with the rest as a sort of afterthought. personal. his battle. Then the theme of the article is about the behavior of Blair commenters. I count three commenters that made what could be described as objectionable comments. I wasn’t one of them. I made more comments on this thread than anyone else, but I guess I don’t fit the narrative. Lying by omission, Ant. This was not about mob behavior, it was individual behavior.
The entire thesis of your blog entry about group behavior, hidden messages from Blair and so on, is just plain wrong.Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 24 at 10:30 PM • permalinkRighto. We’ll just go with disingenuous, then.
Posted by Ant Rogenous on 2008 03 24 at 10:33 PM • permalinkJeremy (34) what amuses me is that both you and the circle-jerkers are all jumping to Terry’s defence here but in other circumstances you are more obsessive about orthography than Tim has been here.
In any case you lot are not above jumping in mob handed yourself now and then.
The truth of the matter is that Terry Wright does not deserve any special treatment because he is a Junkie and the more I see of his of his own viciousness in his commentary I think that he is just getting a dose of his own medicine.Posted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 24 at 11:09 PM • permalinkThe truth of the matter is that Terry Wright does not deserve any special treatment because he is a Junkie and the more I see of his of his own viciousness in his commentary I think that he is just getting a dose of his own medicine.
This coming from a greasy, unassimilable immigrant, whose main hobby is blog-stalking, and creating noddy cars on the taxpayer’s time.
Whilst Australia is ;perniciously; multicultural, it would still be nice for people such as yourself, Niceperson, to at least learn the native language of your hosts. That, and stop accusing others of ‘viciousness’, when threatening to get rival bloggers sacked.Oh Christ, you’re not trying to actually reason with these retards are you? They’re leftist wankers, the stupidest people on the face of the earth. In fact, considering the relative historical novelty of the capitalist excess of production that allows them to live their pampered lives dissociated from the adverse consequences of their bad ideas, they may in fact be the stupidest people the human race has ever produced in the entire course of it’s history.
You might as well try to reason with a rock, or, of you are one of those sensitive souls who have taken exception to my harsh words for this degenerate fuckup junkie, my dick, which I invite you to suck.
Now that’s enough of that, before my potty mouth gets me banned.
THR, your post is vile unwarranted racism and abuse against another commenter. I hope you get booted off here.
Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 25 at 03:08 AM • permalink#42. You’re an idiot Hall [Nice Person]. You are just pissed at Terry because he told you to “fuck off” after you told him to kill himself. You then whinged and sooked like the retarded goose you are.
You have just swanned in here to try and stick the boot in. Like THR says, you are an immigrant who refuses to work.
I googled your name and the second result was very interesting.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 03:21 AM • permalink#45. Maybe you should moderate this blog instead of a moderator who lets vile racist slurs stay here to appear on Media Watch.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 03:26 AM • permalink#43 As predictable as ever Hap and just as full of vile lies and slurs
Yawn....
Junkies and plagiarists as heroes of the left is what we have come to expect. and it is hardly surprising that you should be leading the charge.Posted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 04:26 AM • permalinkHey ‘NICE.PERSON’, aka Iain Hall… weren’t you getting on your high horse recently about people attacking others from behind pseudonym? And I also read on another Internet site that a blogger has a court trial transcript containing several mentions of your good self - what’s all that about?
Help us out here: I’m sure you don’t want us to think we’re dealing with a hypocritical crim.
They’re leftist wankers, the stupidest people on the face of the earth ... they may in fact be the stupidest people the human race has ever produced in the entire course of it’s history.
Hey Amos, quick tip - when you’re going to accuse a legion of people of gross stupidity, try learning where apostrophes go first. Might make you look a little less like a dick.
Emily P, never met you before, but a quick Google search brought me to a conversation here a couple of years back:
Vanguard of the Commentariat: You know, I actually miss old Mushtaq. Now there was a troll’s troll. These modern day trolls just can’t seem to keep a thread going. These days its pop in, call a few names, cast a few aspersions, then run back to hide in Kosworld. Righties are mean because they want to keep more of their own money, or they’re racist because they want to protect their homes and families from the thugs of the world. Standard troll boilerplate. Not like the good old days. No siree. They don’t make trolls like they used to.
lingus4: You dont think the Emily P’s of this World can, after much training in the art of trollery, rise up to the standard set by Mushtaq?
Vanguard of the Commentariat: I dunno L4, the old Emster tries hard. Problem is, you can tell she probably has a good heart, she’s just very confused, and the big bad world scares her. She might even be halfway hot, no doubt in an urban decay, earnest social activist kind of way. But she doesn’t come across as a true believer. Maybe with more practice and a stint in a North Korean re-education camp. Jury’s still out.
The_Real_JeffS: Vanguard, I agree, the world scares Emily, that’s why she lashes out at it so viciously. But I’m not so sure about the confused part; if she does have a good heart, it’s well buried beneath years of hate and contempt for herself and her culture, an attitude that is well settled in her soul. Any lingering doubts would require an epiphany of epic proportions to bring to the surface. But until she ceases with the denial (if denial it is), she will remain an amoral wretch. Or a fool acting like one, which amounts to the same thing.
We will see.
In the meantime, she’s just another half-assed troll.
Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 25 at 06:10 AM • permalinkLet me get this right. Amos and Hall are saying that Terry is a no good degenerate loser because he is left-wing. News flash: Right-wingers also have problems with drugs.
No one is giving Terry the green light or the OK to take drugs Amos and Hall, what “the left” are doing is trying to support him and help him get his self esteem back so he doesn’t return to bad habits. What you two obtuse morons advocate is to keep him down so he continues his habit and feels shit about himself. You’re a pair of gutless wonders.
Oh and Iain AKA NICE PERSON Hall, THR is not lying about you. You are an immigrant who refuses to work and instead spends tax payers money on building noddy cars.
I love your statement about immigrants:
If they are seeking to come here for purely economic reasons then by any measure they are not “Refugee’s” nor are the “asylum seekers ” they re illegal; immigrants pure and simple.
Keep up the blogging Iain, everyone needs a laugh.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 06:12 AM • permalink#51
Of course we should not for Forget that Mushtaq Omar was a sock puppet of the supposedly dead leftist David Heidelberg or that Bridgitr Gread /Emily P has her own blog and it is a hoot that is almost as funny as her playing the orthographic Nazi on a thread taking the piss out of a fellow leftist’s spelling faux pas.
#52
Your compassion for the addicted would be admirable if you actually had any understanding at all about addiction(which you don’t) The thing is most addicts are very skilled at bullshit to those around them and more importantly to themselves. Terry’s blog tries very hard to sell the line that you can manage an addiction by periods of abstinence/replacement followed by “rewards” of Heroin. Self delusion at best, at worst it give s the impression that such strategies are a successful way to manage a serious habit. In another place where he wrote a comment suggesting that he wished his parents had given him “smack” I made the retort that a “hot shot” would cure what ails him, now he got rather upset about this But you think that someone who wears his weakness as a badge of honour would be a little more sanguine about being mocked using the terminology of his poison of choice…
Finally I don’t deny my name by posting as Niceperson here but I seldom comment here and this user name was the one I could find the pass word for.
Cheers ComeradesPosted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 03:39 PM • permalinkYou’re a fuckhead Hall. How are the fake blogs coming along by the way? Anymore on the horizon?
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 03:57 PM • permalinkThe minions of the left always seem to be entirely lacking any sense of humour,and “Stuntman Bob” is no exception.
LOLPosted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 04:34 PM • permalink#53: Don’t be ridiculous, Hall. The “Bridgit Gread” blog you link to is not written by the person who goes by that pseudonym on the internet (she blogs at GrodsCorp) - it’s published by you, where you take her actual posts and then bugger them up. You actually go so low as to literally declare her a fan of Adolf Hitler.
Frankly, I don’t know how you find the time to have so many internet identities, what with all that wor… oh, I see.
The thing is most addicts are very skilled at bullshit to those around them and more importantly to themselves
Just like you Iain Hall. You are a bullshit artist. You are the author and owner of the fake Gread blog. Should I put an another example of your lies up here?
You go around the net pretending to be a woman. How is that going for you? What the hell would your kids and wife think?
Let’s look at a classic quote from Iain Hall. Now this is funny:
This is a woeful idea , mainly because UHT milk always tastes so bad. Not it is impossible to drink this stuff bad, but burnt and very processed bad.
How is that going for you Hall. Being a dickhead?
As I said before, keep up your try-hard blogging. Everyone needs a laugh.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 06:04 PM • permalink#56
Jeremy seeing that you are a barrister and all show me please where in the statute books here or anywhere else it says that one can “own” an internet pseudonym. Further you seem just as lacking in a sense of humour as every other lefty who drops in here.
Now with regard to Bridgit Gread/ Emily P I offer this quote from Emily P to this esteemed web journal
Hall, you can repost comments or posts of mine at your leisure - particularly if they’re about you. I don’t give a damn about copyright issues
Add to that the fact that the law does not see it as actionable to “defame” a pseudonym and there is only reason to laugh at your protestations here.
Posted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 07:09 PM • permalinkAs I’ve said before, I don’t really care about Iain Hall’s idiotic fake blogs because anyone with a modicum of brains can see they’re his handiwork. They reveal more about their creator than they do about me.
Iain, what do your compatriots here think about you being long-term unemployed? Also, why do you keep dodging questions about your criminal history? It leaves me to think BB might be on to something.
Again you twist someone else’s words Hall. Emily P didn’t say you could change the wording of her posts to make her look like a Nazi worshipping lesbian.
Pseudonym or not Hall. You are still a thief.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 08:09 PM • permalinkOh and when BB does make public your dubious criminal past Hall, you won’t have any recourse because BB is a pseudonym.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 08:14 PM • permalinkBridgit, that must be three or four times now that you have expressed indifference about thisblog yet your pals don’t listen do they?
SMB without claiming authorship of the blog in question I will suggest to you that taking something upon which all claims of copyright are ceded, as “Bridgit” does again here,is by no stretch of the imagination theft.
Posted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 08:59 PM • permalink"The minions of the left always seem to be entirely lacking any sense of humour,and “Stuntman Bob” is no exception. “
I don’t know Iain, that Iain Hall article is pretty funny.
“Noddy, the little man in the red and yellow car....”
As for your fake Bridgit Gread site - that’s not funny. It’s not “cruel satire” as you’ve called it in the past, it’s a sad attempt at defamation.
We have proof it’s yours. Are you going to admit it before we make an arse of you?
Posted by MEAN.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 09:03 PM • permalinkCheck the Law “mean Person” and you will find that you can not defame a pseudonym.
Posted by NICE.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 09:12 PM • permalinkThat’s doesn’t make it okay, Noddy. Your repeated bleatings of this only make you look more pathetic.
If it’s NOT defamation, then why not admit what we already know? The sites are authored by you!
Posted by MEAN.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 09:17 PM • permalinkAnd with the proof at hand Iain has shat his pants and removed his fake blog instead of admitting he owns it.
Now that’s funny.
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 09:18 PM • permalinkThere’s been nary a moniker on this thread that I recognise for some time now, yet you all seem to know each other. Did you all go to the same fucking high school?
Niceperson/meanperson, why are you using multiple accounts? That’s kind of fucked up. As for the lefties; Stuntman bob, Emily, FHR, et al, why are you spending your days harrassing some poor sod who by your own account doesn’t amount to much? Shouldn’t you be attacking Japanese whaling vessels and forming picket lines around McDonald’s restaurants?
Just fuck off, the lot of you.Posted by daddy dave on 2008 03 25 at 09:37 PM • permalinkI hope your mother reads the language you use here. God forbid this website become cliquey.
Read http://www.iainhall.com to find why he is so popular.
Posted by MEAN.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 09:41 PM • permalinkMaybe Iain could co-moderate this blog with Andrea in between cashing his dole cheque at the local Scottish restaurant that we are all dancing merrily around?
Posted by Stuntman Bob on 2008 03 25 at 10:09 PM • permalinkDespite the temptation to wait until Stuntman Bob has explained his last cryptic (to say the least) comment (Scottish restaurant? As the French say, hein?) I have banned him, and also THR. Both are new signees and immediately abused the privilege.
MrLefty, Ant Rogenous, and Emily P are old trolls whose membership was allowed to continue out of Tim’s generosity. They would do well to remember that.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2008 03 25 at 11:15 PM • permalinkRead it all at http://www.iainhall.com Andrea Harris, Administrator.
Posted by MEAN.PERSON on 2008 03 25 at 11:18 PM • permalinkDude, well, if you’ve signed up here just to be an asshole, that can easily be taken care of with a couple of clicks.
In any case, if you want to advertise your website on Tim’s blog, I suggest you pay for a blog ad. Link on the main page sidebar. You can link to it of course through your profile page, but that’s all I’ll permit.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2008 03 25 at 11:24 PM • permalinkBy the way, I still don’t understand the thing about the Scottish restaurant. Also, I don’t really care.
Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2008 03 25 at 11:25 PM • permalink
Page 1 of 1 pages
Members:
Login | Register
| Member List
If one MUST ingest opiates in beverage form, this has to be an improvement over Ouzo! At least aesthetically!