<< RAMSEY ATTACKS SELF ~ MAIN ~ SAME OLD STORY >>

J-MO SHOW

The latest from Jesus and Mo:

image

(Via Stephen Dawson, who recommends the strip as “clever, deep, and offensive to all believers!”)

Posted by Tim B. on 02/12/2006 at 07:29 AM
  1. Ahh, so thats what Jesus looks like.

    Posted by Nic on 2006 02 12 at 07:38 AM • permalink

  2. Aggression isn’t yet domesticated in the Muslim world, as in American football, marriage, and a good prose style.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2006 02 12 at 07:47 AM • permalink

  3. Or is it Mark Latham wrapped up in a sheet?

    Posted by Rafe on 2006 02 12 at 07:48 AM • permalink

  4. bonus points for the tubes both are sucking on.  Offends whowsers on both sides of the religous divide (water into wine? foregetaboutit!).

    Posted by entropy on 2006 02 12 at 07:54 AM • permalink

  5. I wonder which of those 2 options appeals to the mentaly challenged??

    Q:Jesus, a rational lefty and a peace loving muslim fanatic were locked in a room with $1,000,000 and the lights went out. When they came back on the money was missing
    Who stole the money??

    A: Jesus the other 2 are only imaginary.
    (no Im not a devil dodger, not that theres anything wrong with that)

    Thats wrapped me up 2 fatwas for tonight.

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2006 02 12 at 08:04 AM • permalink

  6. I believe Jesus (peace be upon him) and Muhammad (oeace be upon him), would get along very well, and would both be offended by the cartoons.

    Posted by proud2be@muslimah on 2006 02 12 at 08:24 AM • permalink

  7. Id prefer to think of them both being a little more upset by people commiting violence in thier names. But thats just me.

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2006 02 12 at 08:34 AM • permalink

  8. Good Lord, That Fake, P2b, is back! This the fourth post she has hijacked, always getting off subject. She was unmasked several posts back by Francis H who commented: ““I agree that Proud2 etc was a fake. The consciously corrupted spelling which immediately corrected when challenged, the sudden claim that she was a girl, the claim to be just a poor widdle high school student and the claim to be a 10th generation aussie. Sorry but unless your aboriginal that’’s very unlikely; my forebears came out in the 1830s and i’’’’m still only 4th generation (and no i’’m not that old).””
    Moreover, P2b adds nothing to the illumination of facts because she is either delusional or a liar. Take one example, as expressed in several posts back, that P2b can’’t pass judgement on a Muslim , and so cannot pass judgement on Osama. Moreover, P2b certainly can’’t do so, she/he/it says, because ““she never met him””. Most Christians have never met Hitler, but have no problem passing judgement. Oh, I forget, we read the wrong newspapers and see dubbed videos. This is the way “it” ignores all facts., including Osama’s confession and the call by Holy Inmans to butcher innocents. According to the newspapers “it” reads, it was the Zionists who produced 9/11. The tape containing Osama’’s confession, why that was dubbed, and the news photos of Palestinians dancing in the streets on the West Bank and Gaza on news of 9/11, also dubbed, and the Arabs dancing in the streets of Brooklyn on that same day, before my very eyes, why my eyes also dubbed.After all, why consider the facts that are right in front of your veil? And when asked about the murder of the Catholic Priest in Turkey by one of her Muslim high school collegues, she answered ““No Muslim would condone such an act””. Yet one did kill him, giving as a reason these rediculous Motoons. Figure that. And how about suicide bombings? According to P2b, No Muslim would condone that, either. Her response to my comment, ““So, all those Hamas-Arafites suicide bombers must have been Zionists”” was that Hamas has not produced a suicide bomber since 2001 and so, according to her, they are reformed. Dodge, Dodge, Dodge. If a fact is uncomfortable, say it’’s not true, throw in a few selected verses from some ancient relgious tome, or other, throw in few oily remarks about the lack of politenes of everyone else and a piggy ending of ““peace”” and that is enough to erase the brutalities, the be-heading, the murders, rapes, kidnapping, child-sacrifice suicide bombings; the fact that from the Middle East, India, Phillipines, Iraq, and on and on, Muslims are creating outrages of the most vicious kind against the locals, be they Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Anamists,(oh, and the cartoonists) on and on, and finally against those few Muslims themselves if they don’’t agree with the beasts within. And now “it” has the nerve to elevate Mo over Jesus, and to insult us by speaking in the name of Jesus the most inane remarks (Jesus would have agreed with the Muslims anout the cartoons, implying that he would have supported the slashing and burning and murder that the Muslies are indulging in.) Sorry, PB2, you are in no position to tell us what Jesus would believe on anything, since you cannot believe what is in front of your veil..

    Posted by stats on 2006 02 12 at 09:34 AM • permalink

  9. Are you sure this is a cartoon? It so closely fits the facts of the present moment that it could have come from the mouths of J and M themselves!

    Fact is: They could well be the best of friends. And maybe are.

    Posted by thekite on 2006 02 12 at 09:41 AM • permalink

  10. maybe p2b thinks turning the other cheek means flashing your bum

    but who cares, it’s a troll incapable of rational thought.  as stats says, you don’t need to know osama to judge the instigator of 9/11 as evil

    Posted by KK on 2006 02 12 at 09:42 AM • permalink

  11. Unlike you stats, I was totally on the topic.. And stats, I can type my age if I wish, or I can tye the way I type and write for school, and since you all requested I reform my spelling I did so for your benefit.

    if u lyk i can go back to the old way. take ur pick? which shall it be? and i corrected the tenth generation thing ages ago, i said it was 7th generation, not including the guy that came here. i went and checked the family tree just for ur benefit, and infact we do believe there may be some aboriginal somewhere, but its not confirmed, and so i will not say.

    and, wat i meant by those statments was that no muslim who understood islam would condone them. obviously some muslims think its ok to riot and burn… but they obviously have missed something somewhere since we can’t even cut down trees in war..

    thefrollickingmole, they would no doubt condemn the violence, I thought that went without saying.

    Posted by proud2be@muslimah on 2006 02 12 at 09:44 AM • permalink

  12. KK of course the instigator was evil, I just don’t know if I agree it was Osama, and I am not the onlyh one who believes so. Many non-Muslims agreem see 9/11 in plane site, and many other documentaries). I have a right to my opinion. I said if it was a Muslim then they were no doubt wrong and deserve punishment.

    Posted by proud2be@muslimah on 2006 02 12 at 09:47 AM • permalink

  13. And KK , unlike you, I don’t have a perverted mind.

    Posted by proud2be@muslimah on 2006 02 12 at 09:48 AM • permalink

  14. OOPs! This is the fifth post Pb2 has hijacked. Her insults of Christianity can be found in two posts back “Palestinian Outrage Redirected” and there are sufficient comments by others on that score. I mistakenly posted #8 here which should have been posted on the “Redirected” post. But it works here too; Pb2 has already started to get off topic at #11 and will continue to wander into the swamps of delusion as we go along. Example. #11 states “and, wat i meant by those statments was that no muslim who understood islam would condone them. obviously some muslims think its ok to riot and burn… but they obviously have missed something somewhere since we can’t even cut down trees in war..” So some Muslims have  
    something somewhere, eh? Maybe it’s you, PB2, who have missed the ugly barbarisms
    being displayed by your co-religionists.

    Posted by stats on 2006 02 12 at 09:56 AM • permalink

  15. PB@ in #12,#13 continues to wander off topic, as predicted. Now “its’ shedding its veil and exposing the seething anger underneath. You, KKK, have a perverted mind, unlike PB2 who has no mind at all, because of your #10. Sensitive creatures these Muslies, and we must dhimmify ourselves before their sensitivity.

    Posted by stats on 2006 02 12 at 10:00 AM • permalink

  16. Sorry stats, wrong again, no seething anger insite, I’m actually smiling.

    Posted by proud2be@muslimah on 2006 02 12 at 10:03 AM • permalink

  17. stats, back off. Proud2be, don’t start. You were on topic, stay that way.

    Now in order to respond to your first comment, no one is questioning anyone’s right to be offended. What they are questioning is the response to that offense. We non-Muslims don’t believe that the current Muslim practice (well no one else has joined in so it’s a practice currently confined to Muslims) of destroying property, killing random non-Muslims, threatening more violence and mayhem, and telling non-Muslims they have to live by Muslim rules (and not just Muslim rules, but special, for-non-Muslims-only rules), is the wrong response to being offended by the cartoons. For example, I rather doubt the mildly offensive caricature of Jesus in the cartoon above is going to result in any riots, murders of people who may not even have known of the existence of this cartoon, and death threats.

    In short, you can complain how offended you and other Muslims are about the Mohammed drawings until the cows come home, it is entirely beside the point.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 02 12 at 10:26 AM • permalink

  18. I have been trying to find a damn quote for the last 2 hours and finaly give up. I will be indebted to anyone who can find it for me.
    it was the duke of wellington and went something like ” It doesnt matter which way Bonaparte lays down his poker, it is essential that I immediately snatch it up and lay it oppisite to his intent” Im sure Ive mangled it badly but it sums up what should be intelligent peoples response.
    It doesnt matter what a 7th century desert survival cult demands of us, it should be opposed just on principle.

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2006 02 12 at 10:33 AM • permalink

  19. #18 thefrollickingmole:
    Here it is.

    Go to this page and search for poker.  You did mangle it somewhat.

    Posted by Melanie on 2006 02 12 at 11:05 AM • permalink

  20. Just an offside chime-in:  Many of the younger people at work email and talk in ptb’s style informally, but write in formal English when required.  It seems to be a generational thing.

    Posted by ushie on 2006 02 12 at 11:30 AM • permalink

  21. O/T, ushie, it’s a side effect of using cellphones to send text messages.  There’s a lot of shorthand used. 

    Back on thread…...proud2be, as Andrea noted, this is not about Jesus or Mohammed.  It’s about the relative maturity of their followers. 

    My rule of thumb:  expect riots for stupid reasons from the Mohammed crowd.  This is supported by empirical evidence provided by your fellow Muslims.  Do consider that.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 02 12 at 11:36 AM • permalink

  22. I believe Jesus (peace be upon him) and Muhammad (oeace be upon him)...would both be offended by the cartoons.

    Bullshit. Neither one of these guys was a pussy. Only pussies are “offended”, especially by friggin’ cartoons.

    For instance, the fact you lend credence to 9/11 conspiracy theories that exculpate the jihadists and implicate the innocent, despite the fact that only Muslims were celebrating it and only Muslims were taking credit for it, does not offend me. It just makes me think you’re an asshole.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 02 12 at 11:44 AM • permalink

  23. bonus points for the tubes both are sucking on.  Offends whowsers on both sides of the religous divide (water into wine? foregetaboutit!).

    Entropy — S’okay.  Big Mo’s got a can of Infidel’s Blood Lite.*

     

    *Right, cuz there ain’t so much red blood in Yurp these days…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 02 12 at 11:47 AM • permalink

  24. I believe Jesus (peace be upon him) and Muhammad (oeace be upon him), would get along very well, and would both be offended by the cartoons.

    Being a Christian myself (Methodist) I can’t for the life of me imagine why Jesus (peace already upon him) would get offended by this cartoon.  Nothing the cartoonist has him saying seems to be opposed to Jesus’ life and behavior.  From the evidence in the Gospels and other writings, he seems to have been a big proponent of rational discussion.  His logic knocked the scribes and Pharisees into silence lots of times (and that sort of discourse was well-known and practiced by the rabbis as well). 

    Why on earth should he be offended?  I don’t even think he’d be offended by the Southpark Jesus!

    Posted by suellen on 2006 02 12 at 12:08 PM • permalink

  25. Now this cartoon is funny!  And like every other funny thing, it has an essential kernel of truth to it.  Thanks for my first laugh of the day, Tim.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 02 12 at 12:56 PM • permalink

  26. The Real Jeff S:  These dang kids today, talking on them newfangled talking machines, usin’ their fingers in ways Jesus never meant…we had to use our fingers to fend off the wolves who’d chase us as we pushed our plows, walking through the snow, six miles up hill to school every consarned day…(channeling long-dead thread)

    Posted by ushie on 2006 02 12 at 02:25 PM • permalink

  27. And P2B:  Jesus made a habit of his not to call down heavenly fire on those who mocked him.  Surely your Mohammed is equal to doing the same.

    Posted by ushie on 2006 02 12 at 02:33 PM • permalink

  28. LOL, ushie!  I forgot about them plows, having spent the latter part of my childhood programming computers using homemade IBM cards that I punched by hand.  Screw text messaging, I want my punch cards back!

    OTOH, Mohammed does not call down heavenly fire.  Nor do the rioting Muslims—I think they are using Molotov Cocktails.

    Ironically—note the caption of the first photo in the last link.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 02 12 at 03:41 PM • permalink

  29. #24 Suellen, jesus would be offended because the cartoonist made him sound like an escapee from the New York Times editorial page.

    Posted by entropy on 2006 02 12 at 05:30 PM • permalink

  30. You know, you may be right, entropy ;-) hadn’t thought of that!

    maybe that’s why I like the southpark Jesus better (especially the episode where he says “lock and load”)

    Posted by suellen on 2006 02 12 at 05:50 PM • permalink

  31. #28, o/t: Please don’t remind me of HALP; I dropped an 1800-card stack on the floor once, back in 1970, and I still have nightmares about it….

    (P.S. for you young’un’s: Hollerith Assembly Language Program; it was bad enough to do batch programming in assembler, but to have to make all them damn punch cards and carry them to the card reader, which was invariably across the room and two feet higher than the nearest table.)

    Posted by Challeron on 2006 02 12 at 05:57 PM • permalink

  32. #31 Sincere sympathy for your dreadful experience, Challeron.

    I used to be able to read the tape off the telex machine…

    Those were the days!

    Posted by kae on 2006 02 12 at 10:01 PM • permalink

  33. I don’tknow, because Jesus could get quite irate at times:

    Jesus entered the Temple area and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. ‘It is written,’ he said to them, ‘My house will be called a house of prayer but you are making it a den of robbers.’
    (Matthew 21:12-13)

    Cheers
    JMH

    Posted by J.M. Heinrichs on 2006 02 12 at 10:02 PM • permalink

  34. Melanie
    Thanks for that.

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2006 02 12 at 11:12 PM • permalink

  35. kae — teletype machines and timesharing on a mainframe!  Ah, the memories…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 02 13 at 02:35 AM • permalink

  36. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.