<< BEST OPTION SHUNNED ~ MAIN ~ FLOOD SURVIVED >>

FACTS NEGLECTED, IGNORED

Czech President Vaclav Klaus on modern totalitarianism:

The environmentalist paradigm of thinking is absolutely static. They neglect the fact that both nature and human society are in a process of permanent change, that there is and has been no ideal state of the world as regards natural conditions, climate, distribution of species on earth, etc.

They neglect the fact that the climate has been changing fundamentally throughout the existence of our planet and that there are proofs of substantial climate fluctuations even in known and documented history.

Their reasoning is based on historically short and incomplete observations and data series which cannot justify the catastrophic conclusions they draw.

They neglect the complexity of factors that determine the evolution of the climate and blame contemporary mankind and the whole industrial civilization for being the decisive factors responsible for climate change and other environmental risks.

It’s unusual to read something so absolutely correct. Read on.

(Via Garth Godsman)

UPDATE. According to Kevin Rudd:

The science of this is pretty basic. All the scientists around the world agree that we have got to reach a point whereby we actually bring total emissions down.

So he’ll be embracing nuclear power for Australia any day now.

(Via Alan R.M. Jones)

Posted by Tim B. on 06/10/2007 at 11:46 AM
  1. More of the wisdom of Vaclav Klaus available at his web site:
    http://www.vaclavklaus.cz/klaus2/asp/default.asp?lang=EN&CatID=YJrRHRsP

    Posted by TimShell on 2007 06 10 at 12:03 PM • permalink


  2. #2: Spot on, Richard. I’ve read similar sentiments from other Africans, and as someone who is involved in the financing of international trade, I would say it’s almost impossible to understate the effects of corruption at all levels of political and economic activity. And the African bankers and businessmen I talk to are not at all shy about lamenting what they’re up against in dealing with kleptocrats in their own countries.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 10 at 12:23 PM • permalink

  3. #2, good point about AIDS, too, and how the unrelenting press it gets has siphoned off research money from other diseases that kill millions more people yearly than AIDS ever will.

    Their reasoning is based on historically short and incomplete observations and data series which cannot justify the catastrophic conclusions they draw.


    So Mr. Klaus could read:  “Their reasoning is based on historically short and incomplete observations and data series, and their heartless political self-interest...”

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 06 10 at 12:39 PM • permalink

  4. #3: “Overstate” not “understate”. Duh!

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 10 at 01:35 PM • permalink

  5. good to see the blairtosphere appreciating the czech approach to glarble warmering

    Posted by KK on 2007 06 10 at 02:21 PM • permalink

  6. kevin rudd’s assessment of the science of climate change & carbon targets as pretty basic shows just what a cretin he really is

    Posted by KK on 2007 06 10 at 02:26 PM • permalink

  7. Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism. This ideology preaches earth and nature and under the slogans of their protection – similarly to the old Marxists – wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central (now global) planning of the whole world.

    President Klaus is my hero for life.

    Re #2, richard, that is precisely why I stopped donating to international charities long ago.  I am extremely finicky on who gets my spare cash.  Anything promoted by elderly celebrities has two strikes against them.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 06 10 at 03:10 PM • permalink

  8. First:  Vaclav Klaus is a politician. Politicians are supposed to be clueless idiots. How can anyone take this guy seriously as a President of a nation is he keeps showing that he actually understands the issues?

    Second: On the whole commie-rat-bastard = ecotard thing…

    Well duh. Deep Ecology and Social Ecology, the primary militant political systems underpinning misanthropic environmentalism were both founded by moronites that found rabid radical revolutionary marxism to be too tame.

    Posted by Grimmy on 2007 06 10 at 03:24 PM • permalink

  9. Thank to all for the links.  What a joy to read sense in the midst of what seems to be a permanent state of mass hysteria.

    I wonder why these things are not being said by the supposed leader of the free world, and proponent of Capitalism.

    I wonder, too, how long Africa will continue to act as a mule carrying the burden of the West’s altruistic virtue.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 06 10 at 04:35 PM • permalink

  10. My 15 year old daughter rented An Inconvenient Truth yesterday and I watched it last night.

    I reccomend it for its sheer awfulness. Science for morons combined with it’s all about Al Gore.

    How this piece of vacuous rubbish could persuade anyone is beyond me. Or maybe the reason they are showing it to primary school kids is that anyone educated beyond that level would recognize it for the drivel it is.

    BTW, my daughter agreed with my science for morons assesment.

    Posted by phil_b on 2007 06 10 at 04:37 PM • permalink

  11. I would be far less suspicious of greenhouse science if its proponents gave the adaptation policy response (i.e. live with the warming, rather than avoid it) fair consideration.

    A purely scientific argument would consider both policy responses (avoidance and adaptation) and try to assess the costs and benefits of each.

    But its not about the science, its about about “illiberal measures” as Klaus puts it.  With an adaptation policy, everyone looks after their own stuff.  It doesn’t give the environmentalists the control they crave, so it is never spoken of.

    Posted by 2dogs on 2007 06 10 at 04:58 PM • permalink

  12. I’m waiting for the inevitable headline:
    NEWCASTLE FLOODS DUE TO CLIMATE CHANGE

    Posted by chrisgo on 2007 06 10 at 05:03 PM • permalink

  13. Vaclav Havel should have become the new UN Secretary General. Boy, would that have caused a bunching of the shorts among many.

    And, phil_b, people get convinced by this crap because they *want* to be convinced.  Just like they believe Gore won in 2000 and buy ‘carbon offsets’ will save the world. I.e., they’re morons.

    Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2007 06 10 at 05:16 PM • permalink

  14. #11, phil_b:

    How this piece of vacuous rubbish could persuade anyone is beyond me. Or maybe the reason they are showing it to primary school kids is that anyone educated beyond that level would recognize it for the drivel it is.

    Other indicators taken from various presentations, seminars and speeches quoted at Sigmund Carl and Alfred tend to support your supposition.

    “Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances to our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It’s up to you as teachers to make all these sick children well – by creating the international child of the future”- Dr. Chester M. Pierce, address to the Childhood International Education Seminar, 1973

    Is but the first sample of the degeneracy caused by intellectual inbreeding that has always bound itself to some degree with the ideals of comprehensive public education.

    Dr. Sanity’s site has some interesting things to say on the subject too. One of the quotes she highlights also backs up your position:

    “Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished ... The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are ‘obstructive’ and verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective ... It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
    Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810

    SiggyCarl&Alfred; and Dr. Sanity are both interesting sites. NeoNeoCon and ShrinkWrapped are also worth visits.

    Additional note: I realize the above quotes are psycho field oriented and not specific to professional educators but the psycho/socialists have long held disproportionate influence on the entire endeavor of comprehensive public education and the damage they do grows exponentially from generation to generation.

    There is now the beginnings of a movement in CA, USA to make all public school sites to also serve as comprehensive mental hygiene facilities for all students, their families and the remainder of the community within each school site’s boundaries.

    Right now it’s only showing up in competitive grants but the writing is on the wall. Schools will have to provide office space and budget for psych staff to equal or exceed their teaching and site maintenance staff combined.

    Posted by Grimmy on 2007 06 10 at 05:42 PM • permalink

  15. All the scientists around the world agree that we have got to reach a point whereby we actually bring total emissions down.

    I say convert them to secretions.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2007 06 10 at 06:06 PM • permalink

  16. I reckon that Rudd has backed himself into a corner with this position and ridiculous “science is pretty basic” statements

    Posted by Jack Lacton on 2007 06 10 at 06:33 PM • permalink

  17. I believe in tangible, practical science, the kind that gave me a great idea for a 30th wedding anniversary present for Mrs. Paco next year: Behold, tater mitts!

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 10 at 06:42 PM • permalink

  18. KevNIMBY: wealthy nations continue as usual, buying carbon credits from lessers who are forced to go nuke with its alleged unsavoury problems?

    Simple.

    Next rubber-stamping?
    Where’s the tea lady?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 06 10 at 08:01 PM • permalink

  19. Actually, those look like a neat invention. Though I do pretty good with a standard vegetable peeler.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2007 06 10 at 08:01 PM • permalink

  20. #18 paco - Say what happens if Mrs Paco, so overcome with enthusiasm for her new Tatter Mitts, turns and gives you a hug of appreciation!

    Posted by Wand on 2007 06 10 at 08:06 PM • permalink

  21. I was left with one nagging question after watching An Inconvenient Truth.

    Normally, such displays of deep ignorance and shallow self-absorbtion make me cringe with embarassment for the person.

    Nary a cringe, and I wondered why?

    It was the flagrant hucksterism aimed squarely at the suckers out there that did it.

    Posted by phil_b on 2007 06 10 at 08:07 PM • permalink

  22. #21: Hmm. Guess I’ll just have to run for it.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 10 at 08:25 PM • permalink

  23. #20 Andrea: We’ve got one of those; must be 25 years old and still going strong.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 10 at 08:35 PM • permalink

  24. “All the scientists around the world agree…”

    That, ladies and gentlemen, is your basic, fundamental, lie.

    Posted by Hucbald on 2007 06 10 at 09:52 PM • permalink

  25. What I love about Mr Klaus is his clarity on this issue:

    Less freedom=more death

    As one who grew up behind the Iron Curtain, he should know.

    Posted by Stace on 2007 06 10 at 10:33 PM • permalink

  26. ALL the scientists? Every one of them? In every field of science? Agrees totally on the issue of AGW?

    Why can’t someone call him on this rubbish at his next glad-handing doorstop.

    ‘Mr Rudd, this list of several thousand climatologists disagreeing with your assessment, indicates that you may have been dismissive and telling porkie pies about your ‘ALL the scientists’ claim. What do you say to those who think you are a fucking moron?’

    Posted by CB on 2007 06 11 at 01:11 AM • permalink

  27. It is instructive to read someone like Mr. Klaus, and then to read someone like Rudd or Gore.  The contrast is not only stark, but the respect—or lack thereof—shown for the listener is a study in the speaker’s fundamental view of man.  Gore sounds like he is speaking to children.  Mr. Klaus assumes his audience is made up of thinking adults.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 06 11 at 01:56 AM • permalink

  28. O/T But heres an inconvenient truth of another kind.

    “Studies Say Death Penalty Deters Crime”

    Can we expect Krudd to jump on the pro excution side of the arguement now??

    //crickets

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2007 06 11 at 02:04 AM • permalink

  29. So the science is pretty basic? I’ll say it is, AGW science is basically a crock! and Crudd basically stupid.

    Posted by Louis on 2007 06 11 at 04:01 AM • permalink

  30. #18 Paco

    I believe in tangible, practical science, the kind that gave me a great idea for a 30th wedding anniversary present for Mrs. Paco next year: Behold, tater mitts!

    You’ve been married this long and still don’t know the cardinal rule for staying happy and surviving at least until next anniversary?? Here it is, for your enlightenment (and continued existence): Kitchen tools are NOT gifts!!

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2007 06 11 at 04:38 AM • permalink

  31. We should take notice of a Czech, experienced in the disinformation and subordination required by a totalitarian power. There’s a useful idiot born every minute: then you’ve got trouble, right here in River City.
    But there remain unanswered questions. Every time there is an IED explosion in Iraq, should there not be (at least) a Predator drone firing a Hellfire missile at some troublemakers in Iran?
    USA - cat got your nerve?
    This administration’s ranks are thinning. Rumsfeld’s gone, many are gone. Gates might stick, but will he stick it to them? Colin Powell gone and wimping out, and his understudy going the soft power route in the State Department, where are the people who will hold Iran to account?

    Posted by blogstrop on 2007 06 11 at 07:55 AM • permalink

  32. #31: Nah, I was just kiddin’, Albury. But Tater Mitts was just too funny a product name not to work into a comment, somehow.

    #32: I’m with you, blogstop. Jules Crittenden posed the same strategy a while back, and I agree that we’re making it more difficult for ourselves in Iraq by letting the Iranians interfere with impunity.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 11 at 07:58 AM • permalink

  33. paco, 

    you sir, are a hopeless romantic, the little lady must consider herself pretty darn lucky…..  It’s gonna be tough to type with a cast on though.

    blogstrop,

    Why is it when anyone goes to the State Department they must have their spine removed??  You left out the POTUS now talking about gerbil warmongering solutions too…..

    Posted by Old Tanker on 2007 06 11 at 08:03 AM • permalink

  34. BTW,

    I’m writing in Vaclav Klaus for the next election but alas, he has far too much common sense to win an election in the U.S.

    Posted by Old Tanker on 2007 06 11 at 08:05 AM • permalink

  35. #18: Whew.  I thought I would have to give Paco the keys to the Tardis again to get himself out of another scrape with the better half! 

    Elizabeth
    Imperial Keeper

    Posted by Elizabeth Imperial Keeper on 2007 06 11 at 12:49 PM • permalink

  36. #36 Elizabeth: Mrs Paco is assured of my undying devotion. Why, just the other day it was her birthday, and some of my employees were curious about what I was getting her. I was, too, so I called her and asked what I had bought for her, and she said a pink rose bush, and thanks.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 11 at 01:30 PM • permalink

  37. If you like Czech common sense on global warming, try Lubos Motl’s blog

    Posted by moptop on 2007 06 11 at 07:07 PM • permalink

  38. #15 Grimmy, thanks for the links. I only occasionally pop onto these places of sane thinking.

    I can’t believe that the people who wrote this Orwellian Crap, that your links are reporting, were Americans in the ‘50s and ‘60s. I guess communist propagandists took the long view. Trouble was, communism fell and left the acolites naked in the Great Sandy Desert.

    Their lives were saved by a parsing ecologist and tout-a-coup their “West/Capitalism/Whitey/Imperialist” mantra is rejustified.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 06 11 at 07:42 PM • permalink

  39. #32 blogstrop, I haven’t seen a Secretary of State NOT be absorbed by the FGB (Foggy bottom Borg). I was somewhat disheartened to see they had even absoprbed Condi - a rally cute and strong and smart chick.

    What is it? Something in the water around there - or soma?

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 06 11 at 07:48 PM • permalink

  40. #40 wimpy canadian

    That’s it ! It’s soma!

    All we have to do is stop taking it and all this lunacy will end.

    Posted by Pickles on 2007 06 11 at 09:40 PM • permalink

  41. #40 They don’t call it Foggy Bottom for nothing.  One enters into the fog and immediately bottoms out.  It’s the swamp gas.  Rots the brain, melts the spine, and renders a person . . . well, renders them.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 06 12 at 03:11 AM • permalink

  42. #37:  That’s good.  One of the reasons I’m divorced is that the ex would purposefully start a fight, usually 3 days before a specific event such as a birthday or anniversary, and then use that as an excuse for not getting a gift or taking me out to dinner. 

    And then act surprised when I called him on it.  Mr. Romantic, he wasn’t. 

    Elizabeth
    Imperial Keeper

    Posted by Elizabeth Imperial Keeper on 2007 06 12 at 10:58 AM • permalink

  43. Warminger: “All the scientists of the world agree…”
    Skeptic: “Um, here’s a list of some scientists that don’t agree.”
    Warminger: “stop moving the goalposts! Of course you can’t get 100% agreement!”

    (courtesy of the Hoofnagle denialism blog. apologies for paraphrasing)

    Posted by daddy dave on 2007 06 12 at 11:31 AM • permalink

  44. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.