<< FOOD 101 ~ MAIN ~ RULING IN ON HAND-HOLDING >>

DOUBLE-STANDARDS WATCH

Andrew Sullivan found himself the target of left-wing unpleasantness a few years ago. Essentially, he was accused of being a slut and a hypocrite. Sullivan was understandably distraught over this. In response, he condemned his attackers for their “sexual McCarthyism”.

Michelle Malkin currently finds herself the target of left-wing unpleasantness. Essentially, she is accused of being a slut and a hypocrite. Malkin is not amused by this. You might expect Sullivan to empathise. Instead, he writes:

Michelle Malkin does not have a sense of humor.

Just laugh it off, Michelle. You know, exactly like Andy did(n’t).

UPDATE. A personal aside from Michelle.

Posted by Tim B. on 10/01/2006 at 01:21 PM
  1. He’s like a soap opera on it’s last legs watched by a few but the viewership is aging with one foot in the grave….insane plots are created in order to garner a “new” audience.  “As Sullivan Becomes Irrelevant”

    Posted by zenpig on 2006 10 01 at 01:54 PM • permalink

  2. #1. An even better title would be “Gays of Our Lives”

    Seriously, how long until the racial slurs against Malkin start coming from the left?

    Posted by Attmay on 2006 10 01 at 02:09 PM • permalink

  3. Seriously, how long until the racial slurs against Malkin start coming from the left?

    Oh, that ship sailed a long time ago. Read her archives.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 10 01 at 02:16 PM • permalink

  4. “Monseiur, as a man you are passable. But as a woman, you are a dog...”
    —Murder By Death

    Posted by mojo on 2006 10 01 at 02:18 PM • permalink

  5. The other thing is that it wasn’t presented as a satire against Ms. Malkin, as was the Photoshop of LGF’s Charles as Eva Braun, but was published as a fact (and continued to be) even after Ms. Malkin pointed out problems with it obviously being a fraud.

    Posted by andycanuck on 2006 10 01 at 02:32 PM • permalink

  6. Andrew Sullivan causes within me a strong desire to nap.

    I mean, how exactly is he even relevant, nowadays?

    Posted by ushie on 2006 10 01 at 02:46 PM • permalink

  7. The wheels came off Andy’s wagon 3 years ago, and he hasn’t said anything intelligent since,

    Posted by David A on 2006 10 01 at 02:51 PM • permalink

  8. A bikini shows duplicity, if nothing else.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2006 10 01 at 02:58 PM • permalink

  9. A bikini shows duplicity, if nothing else.

    I thought bikinis showed any excessive flab-bergastiness?

    Posted by Grimmy on 2006 10 01 at 03:03 PM • permalink

  10. What everyone thinks, and what no one will say, is that Sullivan is slipping intellectually.  He can’t work things out anymore.  It’s sad.  I used to like reading his blog because I thought he said a lot of sensible things.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 10 01 at 03:15 PM • permalink

  11. < nods to Rebecca >

    I don’t know why anybody mentions/thinks about/remembers AS. It’s as unseemly as piling on the ball carrier in rugby. He’s down—let him be.

    Posted by HelenW on 2006 10 01 at 03:38 PM • permalink

  12. Sullivan will say anything to ingratiate himself to the left-leaning blogs these days in order to distance himself from a war he supported in its inception, rather than go through all the hard work of thinking about how to make it better.

    And of course he still carries a grudge against all those who supported Bush despite his stance on the FMA.

    Posted by Mark V. on 2006 10 01 at 03:50 PM • permalink

  13. Tim’s right, this is absolutely devastating to Sullivan’s credibility. His big issue is legalizing gay marriage, and he was highly effective in neutralizing conservative opposition by arguing that such marriages will promote values conservatives find important – monogamy, reduced promiscuity, etc. When the Left publicized his highly promiscuous personal life he was not amused and made a big deal about personal privacy and “sexual McCarthyism.”

    But when Michelle Malkin’s credibility is attacked with vile, racist sexual comments, and she is wrongfully accused of sexual hypocrisy, he dismisses her objections with, “Michelle Malkin does not have a sense of humor.” What a flaming hypocritical asshole.

    Posted by Bruce Rheinstein on 2006 10 01 at 04:18 PM • permalink

  14. Andrew who?  Never heard of the guy.

    Posted by Greg Hlatky on 2006 10 01 at 04:20 PM • permalink

  15. AIDS dementia.

    Posted by Dave S. on 2006 10 01 at 04:52 PM • permalink

  16. Once Bush decided he was against gay marriage Andrew Sullivan suddenly discovered that he furious about Guantanamo and that he vigourously opposed the war on terror, the war in Iraq amd pretty much everything else. I’ve got no problem with people changing their minds but Sullivan’s motivation is so obvious it is embarrassing to read him.

    Posted by Ross on 2006 10 01 at 04:55 PM • permalink

  17. For all their posturing, in the end, the Left is really just all about elite self interest.  Ross nails it.  No matter what else is going on in the world, acts of terrorist depravity, etc, everything gets boiled down to Sullivan’s sexual preference.

    Notice how fast they abondoned all of their “principles” to attack Malkin on grounds of “lookism”, “sexism” and “racism”.  If anyone on the Right attempted to use these criteria for purposes of judgement or criticism, it would be Katie bar the door!

    Posted by Vanguard of the Commentariat on 2006 10 01 at 06:13 PM • permalink

  18. even if it is michelle, at least she doesn’t take it up the bum

    Posted by murph on 2006 10 01 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  19. Mmmm, so the picture of Malkin was taken back in 1992 (and very fetching she is too).

    So fourteen years ago Ms Malkin looked good in a swimming costume, which now means that in 2006 she can’t comment on “raunch culture” and its impact on young girls. Say what?

    1. People are allowed to change their mind.
    2. The pornographication of culture as it relates to girls does not mean that women can’t express their sexuality.
    3. I wish I looked that good in a bikini.

    Posted by abcd on 2006 10 01 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  20. Perhaps I should add (I see Murph and I were commenting at the same time).

    4. Murph, how do you know and who cares if she does?

    Posted by abcd on 2006 10 01 at 06:20 PM • permalink

  21. So she may have worn a bikini once. Inside. Bloody hell, what a fuss over nothing.

    Posted by daddy dave on 2006 10 01 at 06:38 PM • permalink

  22. Her ethnicity and gender should make leftism Michelle’s default choice. Instead she chose to use her brain and think about the issues, which essentially makes her a traitor in the eyes of the moonbats.
    Having used the word I ought to admit that I have no idea what MM’s ‘ethnicity’ is. Safe bet though that blond-haired blue-eyed Aryan types aren’t prominent in the family tree - obviously no disadvantage.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2006 10 01 at 07:11 PM • permalink

  23. Darlene: Actually, the picture of Malkin was taken a year or two ago… then was photoshopped so that it could be placed on another photo of some other woman that was also apparently taken recently and then the photoshopper claimed that it was taken in 1992.

    Just wanted to clear that up.

    Posted by JSchuler on 2006 10 01 at 07:43 PM • permalink

  24. See her on TV you’ll realise she’s too petite for that body.

    But even forgetting about authenticity…

    What’s hypocritical about being photographed in swimwear?

    Is she an advocate for Sharia law?

    Posted by Henry boy on 2006 10 01 at 07:47 PM • permalink

  25. What a disgusting fag.

    Posted by Stone Cold on 2006 10 01 at 08:04 PM • permalink

  26. Yes, it’s the old “you people are humourless” line.  “Just having a bit of a go”….”Our humour is based on making fun of ourselves….yours is about making fun of other people”

    Posted by Rich Banner on 2006 10 01 at 08:32 PM • permalink

  27. Andy’s intellect was overriden by his rage years ago.  I’ve observed that in such cases, sooner or later, insanity prevails.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 10 01 at 08:42 PM • permalink

  28. Sullivan, like a Feminist Bookstore, “has no humor section.”  He’s aging about as gracefully as Nora Desmond.  (And looks about as good.)

    Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 10 01 at 09:30 PM • permalink

  29. He’s aging about as gracefully as Nora Desmond.  (And looks about as good.)

    I’m still big! It’s the blogs that got small!

    Posted by Dr Alice on 2006 10 01 at 11:30 PM • permalink

  30. Mercy, what a blog opera from a pair of drama queens. Whatever happened to the wry one-liner?

    Posted by slammer on 2006 10 01 at 11:51 PM • permalink

  31. Why are all the Right Wingers so good looking?

    Posted by Phatso Phil on 2006 10 02 at 12:38 AM • permalink

  32. #31- Our successful dads married beautiful gold-diggers!

    Posted by slammer on 2006 10 02 at 12:42 AM • permalink

  33. Of course, if some left-wing female got treated like this, it would be all over the MSM as an example of the outrageous sexism/racism etc of conservatives.

    I feel I am pretty inured to leftist idiocy but some days they just make me want to puke.

    Posted by Scott W on 2006 10 02 at 12:48 AM • permalink

  34. Sullivan was one of the first blogs I read when I went on the web.  Then he jumped the shark over gay marriage, as though that were the most important issue facing the world today, showing how truly shallow he is.  Too bad. 

    I’m waiting for the Left to start physically lynching people.  It seems they’ve picked up every other bad habit of the KKK, all that’s left is the lynching. They already attempt to emotionally lynch anyone who disagrees with them.

    Posted by saltydog on 2006 10 02 at 04:12 AM • permalink

  35. How does this not qualify as gob-smackingly vile?  Shouldn’t St. Andi be filled with heart-ache?

    Posted by Sean M on 2006 10 02 at 06:58 AM • permalink

  36. I disagree as to when Sully went leftward over the edge. It actually happened when he got a boyfriend. Andy “changed his mind” to keep domestic tranquility with his lefty lover.

    As for Michelle, she can model a bikini for me anytime.

    Posted by Some0Seppo on 2006 10 02 at 09:15 AM • permalink

  37. #34 IIRC from LGF, it has already started as a few US military personnel have been swarmed and beaten in California. (Although no hangings—yet.)

    Posted by andycanuck on 2006 10 02 at 01:02 PM • permalink

  38. Mercy, what a blog opera from a pair of drama queens.

    Slammer sums it up.

    Posted by Kyda Sylvester on 2006 10 02 at 01:20 PM • permalink

  39. I’m sure Michelle looks a lot better in a bikini than I do (although the photo I saw was obviously photoshopped).
    Now, my question is when do we see Glenn Reynolds in a thong?

    Posted by tioedong on 2006 10 02 at 07:50 PM • permalink

  40. When’s Andy gonna stand up for Congressman Foley?

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 10 03 at 08:09 PM • permalink

  41. The original photo has been found, proving (for our intellectually-retarded leftist halfwits out there) that it is indeed a Photoshop:
    http://tinyurl.com/en3cb

    Posted by andycanuck on 2006 10 04 at 01:51 PM • permalink

  42. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.