<< UNIMPACTING ADAMS ~ MAIN ~ CANADIAN TORTURE >>

CREDIT CAPTURED

Kofi Annan wants to capture a moment that, had it been up to him, would never have been available:

The success of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq has created an exciting moment of opportunity. It matters greatly that Iraq’s transition is a success. I am determined to make certain that the United Nations will play its full part in helping the Iraqi people achieve that end ...

Precisely because the United Nations did not agree on some earlier actions in Iraq, it now has much-needed credibility with and access to Iraqi groups that must agree to join in the new political process if peace is to prevail. Now is the time for us to draw on that capital.

I want to capture this moment, and I encourage the international community to come together around Iraq through the United Nations.

The credit-claiming fraud.

Posted by Tim B. on 02/12/2005 at 11:54 PM
  1. “Precisely because the United Nations did not agree on some earlier actions in Iraq, it now has much-needed credibility with and access to Iraqi groups that must agree to join in the new political process if peace is to prevail.”

    We have legitimacy because we did absolutely nothing to acheive this election.

    There is a novel argument if ever I heard one.

    Posted by Cheesie on 2005 02 13 at 01:13 AM • permalink

  2. I suppose he is keen to set up an oil for votes fund?

    When is he going to apologise and better yet compensate for the defrauding that the UN not only let happen but participated in? What a joke.

    Posted by rbresca on 2005 02 13 at 01:17 AM • permalink

  3. At least he’s an honest bastard: He wants to capture a moment whose arrival he apposed.

    Posted by Patton on 2005 02 13 at 02:53 AM • permalink

  4. Or “opposed”, as it turns out. Whatever. He’s still a bastard.

    Posted by Patton on 2005 02 13 at 02:54 AM • permalink

  5. it now has much-needed credibility with and access to Iraqi groups that must agree to join in the new political process

    That would be the neck slitting, kidnapping, bomb blasting islamofascists he has credibility with. Right?

    Posted by gubbaboy on 2005 02 13 at 03:02 AM • permalink

  6. It’s only hypocritical if you overlook the subtext:

    The success of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq has created an exciting moment of opportunity.

    ...to spur terrorists into more urgent action.

    It matters greatly that Iraq’s transition is a success.

    ...at discouraging further proactive strikes by the USA in defending itself.

    I am determined to make certain that the United Nations will play its full part in helping the Iraqi people achieve that end ...

    Yes, helping the neck slitting, kidnapping, bomb blasting islamofascists to achieve the end of discouraging further proactive strikes by the USA

    Precisely because the United Nations did not agree on some earlier actions in Iraq, it now has much-needed credibility with and access to Iraqi groups that must agree to join in the new political process if peace is to prevail.

    Yes, those neck slitting, kidnapping, bomb blasting islamofascists again. Peace, of course, means “peace in our time”.

    Now is the time for us to draw on that capital.

    with the neck slitting, kidnapping, bomb blasting islamofascists.

    I want to capture this moment, and I encourage the international community to come together around Iraq through the United Nations.

    to encourage and better still, subsidise, the neck slitting, kidnapping, bomb blasting islamofascists.

    Posted by Jim Geones on 2005 02 13 at 03:37 AM • permalink

  7. Since when did word salads become understandable?

    Posted by J. Peden on 2005 02 13 at 03:39 AM • permalink

  8. I don’t think he’s claiming credit for anything.  He’s just saying that since he opposed the war, he’d have lots of credibility with the enemy.  I think he should meet them.  The interesting question is what ransom demand would be forthcoming, and from which side.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2005 02 13 at 04:48 AM • permalink

  9. I’ll throw in a quarter.  Either way.

    Posted by Sluggo on 2005 02 13 at 04:53 AM • permalink

  10. An exciting moment of opportunity would have been to exceed the UN restrictions on the aims of the first Gulf War (which was to merely oust Iraqi forces from Kuwait) and settle Saddam’s hash then.
    All are paying for that observance of “propriety”.

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 02 13 at 05:19 AM • permalink

  11. Words fail me.  The UN claims credit for doing nothing.  The ultimate in nihilism, perhaps?

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 02 13 at 05:46 AM • permalink

  12. Precisely because the United Nations did not agree on some earlier actions in Iraq, it now has much-needed credibility

    He is (probably accidentally) saying something we can agree with: If the UN had been for the “actions”, they would (per definition?) have been the wrong things to do: The UN is consistently wrong.

    Posted by jorgen on 2005 02 13 at 06:26 AM • permalink

  13. Just In :

    The moment has been captured by French commandos, and will be held perpetually to make sure that nothing like this ever happens again.

    US rescue teams are on their way, to release it before it is “shot while trying to escape”.

    Posted by Zoe Brain on 2005 02 13 at 07:15 AM • permalink

  14. So since he and his organization sucked up to Saddam, and took bribes from him, and worked tirelessly to prevent his overthrow, the UN now has cred… credit… cre…

    Sorry, I just can’t finish it.  If Kofi murdered both his parents, I’m sure his legal defense would be to ask for clemency on the grounds that he’s now an orphan.

    Posted by Steve Skubinna on 2005 02 13 at 08:25 AM • permalink

  15. Credibility? 


    Iraq, hide your daughters.

    Posted by Patricia on 2005 02 13 at 01:02 PM • permalink

  16. In a “lowered expectations” sort of way, I was cheered by Kofi’s remarks.  Of course, he’s seizing credit and arguing for his own credibility by annexing a state of affairs he actively sought to prevent - but that is what the U.N. does.  Nothing new there.  So what’s the good news?

    IMO, by jumping on board now, the U.N. has effectively conceded that the elections were a success, that a democratic Iraq is a worthwhile goal, and that the Iraqi’s can and should have the support of the world in their pursuit of freedom and self-determination. 

    Let’s just hope they [the UN] don’t screw it up.

    Posted by debo.v2 on 2005 02 13 at 05:08 PM • permalink

  17. “We helped Saddam stand on your necks for 30 years.  Now we are ready to come back and help you…”

    Frankly, if I was an Iraqi, I’d invite them back just to get some of them in reach…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2005 02 13 at 08:21 PM • permalink

  18. Richard
    Was that the real reasone the UN had its butt blown off in Iraq?

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 02 14 at 06:35 AM • permalink

  19. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.