<< SNOW IN ENGLAND, OF ALL PLACES ~ MAIN ~ PIG ESCAPES >>

HEADLINE WAR CONTINUES

The battle for media attention between environmentalists Tim Flannery and Bob Brown is currently running Brown’s way following a brilliantly hysterical move by the Greens senator. Flannery had earlier claimed an advantage with this powerful gambit:

It is no longer socially acceptable for Australia to keep exporting coal knowing the damage it is doing, according to the scientist and Australian of the Year, Tim Flannery.

Professor Flannery said that in the future, coal would be seen as just as dangerous as asbestos is now. “As the situation unfolds and the matters get more critical, the world is not going to allow people to pollute our common atmosphere, as occurs at the moment,” he told ABC television.

“The social licence to operate those old polluting technologies will be withdrawn.”

He also advocated shutting down the coal-fired power stations that provide the bulk of Australia’s electricity. “I think that we do need to ultimately close down those coal-fired power plants, but first we need to build the bridge to the new energy future.”

A lesser competitor would have given up in the face of what seemed an unbeatably stupid series of points; after all, what room for further insanity remained once Flannery had compared coal to asbestos, called for coal exports (worth about $25 billion per year) to be scrapped, and urged that electricity plants be shut down?

But Brown isn’t Australia’s leading enviro-crank by accident. Picture him poring over that Flannery news item, and seizing on this line:

“ ... first we need to build the bridge to the new energy future.”

That’s all Brown needed. The next day, he launched an anti-coal proposal free of any concerns for future bridge-building:

Federal Greens Leader Bob Brown today proposed that Australia should shut down its $25 billion a year coal industry within three years to help reduce global greenhouse emissions.

Coal is Australia’s major commodity export. Some 30,000 people are involved directly in the coal export trade. Shutting it down would be, let’s say, complex. Brown isn’t particularly worried:

He admits a sudden ban on exports would be massively dislocating but believes coal exports should stop within the term of one government or three years ...

“We do need extreme measures compared to what’s happened in the past, but the extremists here are the Howard Government,” he said.

Senator Brown says new jobs can be created in the renewable energy sector ...

Sensational! More on these jokers from Andrew Bolt.

Posted by Tim B. on 02/09/2007 at 10:34 PM
  1. “Let them burn hemp and eat free-range soybeans!”

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2007 02 09 at 10:47 PM • permalink

  2. What sane, rational folk we have representing us. You can bet your bollocks to a barn dance I’m glad my taxes pay their wages.

    Thank heavens I’m still a drinker.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 02 09 at 10:59 PM • permalink

  3. Senator Brown says new jobs can be created in the renewable energy sector ...

    ...which will no doubt have to be “nationalized” as one of the “extreme measures”  to keep the evil profit motive from derailing its altruistic intentions.  And then, Venezuela Baby!

    Posted by Vanguard of the Commentariat on 2007 02 09 at 11:06 PM • permalink

  4. “Senator Brown says new jobs can be created in the renewable energy sector .”

    40,000 places on treadmills?
    Punkawallas with fans?
    Coolies?
    Bob Brown groupies?

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2007 02 09 at 11:14 PM • permalink

  5. I’m sure coal can be replaced with exports of bio-mass; although a shipload of kangaroo turds would certainly represent a greater assult on the olfactory glands.

    Posted by paco on 2007 02 09 at 11:27 PM • permalink

  6. Brown eyes Flummery with envy?

    Methinks Brown just made himself a whole lotta enemies in the Energy sector, ‘Green’ or otherwise.

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 09 at 11:31 PM • permalink

  7. Why is the Year Zero, in one thin disguise or another, so irresistably attractive to these asshats?

    Posted by Don't Bogart that Midget, Comrade! on 2007 02 09 at 11:40 PM • permalink

  8. Brown and Chavez would get along splendidly.

    Posted by bondo on 2007 02 09 at 11:41 PM • permalink

  9. Bob should sprout these words directly to the workers in the Bowen basin. I’d venture he would wind up in one of those long coal trains headed for Hay Point

    Posted by Spag_oz on 2007 02 09 at 11:53 PM • permalink

  10. Like true knobheads, Tim and Bobby are battling for the hand of the Fair Gaia. Go for it guys, maybe things could be heated up better than a Globula Warming session with Al Gore, if we had paper mache heads and tom tom drums at ten paces. With mung beans and tofu hotdogs for an interval snack.

    Posted by BJM on 2007 02 09 at 11:58 PM • permalink

  11. “Jobs in the renewable energy sector” eh?

    Working on farms growing wheat for ethanol?

    Wait until the coal miners of the Bown basin work out this means they will be required to pass up their comparitively cushy number in exchange for agricultural work…

    Posted by Steve at the pub on 2007 02 09 at 11:59 PM • permalink

  12. If any politician managed to rob our country of $25 billion dollars worth of exports, they’d be killed within weeks, simple as that. I’m not suggesting any type of sinister corporate conspiracy but it would ruin the livelihoods of enough people to make it inevitable.

    Posted by AussieJim on 2007 02 10 at 12:03 AM • permalink

  13. “ ... first we need to build the bridge to the new energy future.”

    I propose we construct it out of gaia fanciers. 10 lanes each way. No bus lane. No transit lane. No tolls.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2007 02 10 at 12:06 AM • permalink

  14. If this extremist nutter gets a chauffeured limo to “work”, he deserves to be pelted with eggs at every opportunity; wouldn’t mind doing it in person :)

    I’m sure KRuddy says: “thanks for the hospital pass, ‘mate’”!

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 12:10 AM • permalink

  15. Ah, greenies. So considerate and loving of their fellow man.

    Posted by Ian Deans on 2007 02 10 at 12:10 AM • permalink

  16. #13
    “ ... first we need to build the bridge to the new energy future.”

    I’m sure even KRuddy thinks that’s a bridge too far ....

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 12:13 AM • permalink

  17. Brown is suggesting some sort of “hot rocks” solution.

    No, I’m not joking.

    Posted by Quentin George on 2007 02 10 at 12:24 AM • permalink

  18. Warmocalypse speak is starting to make my ears bleed.  I propose we fire all warmeningentalists and sentence them to three months of nonstop Al Gore speeches.  That will shut them up forever, ah blessed silence.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 02 10 at 12:26 AM • permalink

  19. Captain Planet said the Australia is a wealthy country, and could afford to compensate miners for their losses; an incredible display of economic acumen. Just where does Bob think Australia’s wealth springs from- a magic pixie money tree deep in the Tarkine? Sales of reality television show? Out of his bot?

    The really sad thing is that many mongs will agree with him, and continue to vote for him and his band of bampots.

    I trust close attention will be paid to Bobs energy consumption from now on, and how that energy is generated- somehow I doubt his parlimentary and electoral offices have solar panels, or gerbil*-powered treadmills.

    *Now there’s a hazardous occupation- you’d want danger kibble.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 10 at 12:34 AM • permalink

  20. Bob Brown and Flannery are playing with fire here.  Just think for a moment how the Chinese might react to our cutting off their energy supply. 
    My guess is Brown & the Flannelled Fool never read too much history or else they’d recall that one of the reasons Japan went to war in 1941 was that the United States, which at the time supplied 80% of Japan’s oil, embargoed further exports to Japan.  This threatened to cripple Japan’s economy and its military forces.
    Perhaps the Chinese might decide, if we are too stupid to mine our coal, simply to help themselves.  Who would stop them?  The UN? The EU? The Kiwis? Pardon my mirth.  The United States with a Democrat in the White House?  The Dems can’t stomach the loss of 3,000 in Iraq - can’t see them wanting to risk the lives of millions in a war with China.
    I’d rather risk the consequences of a bit of global warming than those associated with cutting off energy to the Chinese, thanks very much.

    Posted by Ubique on 2007 02 10 at 12:36 AM • permalink

  21. Tim Flannery on one side - Bob Brown on the other both basically wanting to bankrupt the Australian economy. Finally the masks are off and we find their true intentions. Also don’t think these bumpkins will stop with just shutting down coal - ooohhhh nooooo next on the menu will be quite a few other energy intensive industries, probably every other mining activity you can think of. Much as I dislike the fact that we rely so heavily on it - it is fact that without mining our economy would probably tank.

    Labor having courted the green vote are now being tarnished with the brush of economic destruction proposed by these two air heads.

    Howard must be sitting back laughing his ass off at this spectacle which will get the labor party dissolving into a bickering mess. Is this some sort of master plan for the next election?

    Karl Rove - eat your heart out!!!

    Posted by rbresca on 2007 02 10 at 12:45 AM • permalink

  22. I guess Bob Brown is heading up the “Make Poverty the Future” campaign.

    Posted by johnt4103 on 2007 02 10 at 12:48 AM • permalink

  23. Every time I hit the INTERNET or a newspaper for news, I find another envirotard jockeying for winner of The Most Stupid Statement Evah™ award. 

    And they only keep digging themselves deeper.  Does it ever stop?

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2007 02 10 at 12:49 AM • permalink

  24. From the lips of master Brown:

    ” the challenge is now to Rudd Labor - will you endorse us coming up with a plan within three years to phase out the export of coal.”

    Gold - pure election gold, ta ta to any marginal seats in coal mining territory.

    Posted by rbresca on 2007 02 10 at 12:56 AM • permalink

  25. #21 Hell, doesn’t it just gladden the heart.

    Posted by BJM on 2007 02 10 at 12:58 AM • permalink

  26. First comment in Bolt’s thread:
    Tell em where doomed Andrew coal is worth a pitiful $23 billion a year in a $ 1 trillion dollar economy,wander how much money and jobs are lost when green industries are forced to relocate to Europe China and even the USA!
    Regards Julien

    Does this f’tard have any idea of the (‘Green power’) industry:
    • Wind turbines made in Denmark, world’s largest supplier [Vestas]
    • AFAIK BP Solar Australia moved their solar panel manufacturing offshore in the early naughties, due to lack of local demand.

    The $ follows the path of least resistance, like much else ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 01:01 AM • permalink

  27. Greenies to the right of them
    Greenies to the left of them
    Greenies in front of them
    Volley’d and thunder’d.

    Posted by Ian Deans on 2007 02 10 at 01:04 AM • permalink

  28. KRuddy, Mad Max & the Garrett’ll be burning the midnight oil to get outta this mine shafting ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 01:14 AM • permalink

  29. #5 Paco
    I don’t think kangaroo turds smell so much.

    Now, dingo turds, or tasmanian devil turds, they’d have a strong pong.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 01:19 AM • permalink

  30. The really sad thing is that many mongs will agree with him, and continue to vote for him and his band of bampots.

    #19, you’re right - there’s well over 200 nutcases agreeing with Brown on the poll on the Tele’s page alone.

    Daily Tele

    Posted by Art Vandelay on 2007 02 10 at 01:20 AM • permalink

  31. #28 I forgot about the Midnight Oil factor Garrett. How is going to re-assure the coal miners that Labor will leave them alone if elected, the man is practially an acolyte of the likes of Flannery and his ilk. Also after that “debate” he had the other night he has painted himself into a bit of a corner here haha!

    Does it get any better than this?

    Posted by rbresca on 2007 02 10 at 01:26 AM • permalink

  32. Stop this dirty coal business, let’s export sunshine!
    Not only the solar variety; the one shining out of Flannery’s ass, too.

    Posted by Honkie Hammer on 2007 02 10 at 01:30 AM • permalink

  33. Garrett/Turnbull Debate 8/2/07.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 01:34 AM • permalink

  34. Has Bobby Brown done the thing we have all been waiting for and committed political suicide? It is one thing to run around like a demented fairy at logging protests but it another to want to pull the rug out from under country’s economy. Will people who voted green because they thought it meant helping koalas now realise the man is seriously unhinged.

    Why, his coal policy strikes at the very existance of his own supporters. Only a rich country tolerates the anarchist welfare parasites that travel the country acting as shock troops for the Greens. Only a rich country can afford to hand out millions of dollars to talentless artists and tedious actors staging predictable and childish plays. Only a rich country can afford to elect a dickhead like Bob Brown to parliament, fly him around the country, put him up in hotels, supply him with a car and a massive pay packet for giving nothing, not a thing, in return.

    Silly, Bobby.

    Posted by Contrail on 2007 02 10 at 01:37 AM • permalink

  35. But the Government can make up the $25 billion because they own the mint where they make the money don’t they?

    Posted by chrisgo on 2007 02 10 at 01:43 AM • permalink

  36. #Thanks for the link!

    PETER GARRETT: Well, look, the first thing is, you need targets. If you don’t know where you’re going, then how are you going to get there? You need targets, and we are committed to a 50 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

    Oh dear - 50% over what time frame? That’s a lot of coal stations going under hmmmmm can we join the dots?

    Posted by rbresca on 2007 02 10 at 01:47 AM • permalink

  37. #31
    ‘Blue Sky Mining’ postponed?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 01:48 AM • permalink

  38. Multi-skilled arse.

    Sun shines out of it.
    And he talks through it.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 01:50 AM • permalink

  39. Maybe they can all get jobs growing tobacco… that’s an excellent export product…

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2007 02 10 at 01:57 AM • permalink

  40. Aw, you square-headed conservative types just don’t wanna have any fun.

    It’d be really cool!

    Sure, we’d destroy our industrial base and any hope of prosperity, health and longevity, but we’d save the whole wide planet from corporate greed ’n’ stuff. Besides, it wouldn’t be so bad. We could all trade in our gas-guzzling cars and trucks for Gaia friendly HappyWheels kombi vans and meet up in the hills around Nimbin or maybe up in the Daintree. All 20 million of us; there’s plenty of space up there in the northern rainforests for everyone, man. And the bourgeois capitalist fascists couldn’t stop us ‘cause it’d be an emergency.

    Then, while we wait for the UN to take decisive action, you know, like pass a resolution and airlift in relief supplies, we could just smoke lots of pot, set up magic mushroom soup kitchens, strum guitar and sing happy hippy rainbow songs. Just imagine it. Peace, good vibes and free love, frolicking naked in the warm tropical mud… just like they did at Woodstock!

    Posted by splice on 2007 02 10 at 01:58 AM • permalink

  41. Howard doesn’t need to open his trap to gallop home in the next election. This pair of Industrial Strength Dunces are handing it to him on a platter. Keep on talkin’ fellas!

    It’s funny to see the Fairfax press trying to report this lunacy. Deep down, even the extremists over at the Death Star know that these two are spouting absolute rubbish. Problemeno! Brown and Flannery are Fairfax Pin-up Boys - how do the Herald/Age report their wild ravings without making these two look like utter ratbags? How do they report it at all considering the extremism of their rants? How do they do it while protecting KRudd from the inevitable fallout? How on earth do they editorialise on it without injuring the pin-up boys?

    Delicious dilemma. All our friends are getting skewered and it’s not going to go away any time soon. Howard must be almost sick with laughter.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2007 02 10 at 02:06 AM • permalink

  42. #33 Kae, I for one was extremely disappointed in the “debate”.

    It is apparent that our Dark Lord Master Rove has decreed that our side plays lip service to the popular need to be seen to be doing something about climate change, and hey, who am I to argue against the wishes of Lord Rove.

    However, I wish Malcolm Turnbill had addressed his true thoughts during the “debate”.....

    Posted by Kaboom on 2007 02 10 at 02:06 AM • permalink

  43. #42 KaBOOM

    Er, I didn’t bother to watch it.

    Peter Garrett, the talking corpse?

    RAOTFLMAO.

    Global Warming is now mentioned in EVERY item on the radio. Everything mentioned is followed by some reference to whether it is affected by or causes Global Warming Climate Change. There is an advert I saw on Teev today for solar hot water. “Do your bit for Global Warming Climate Change”, showing COOLING TOWERS. Bloody advertising idiots.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 02:13 AM • permalink

  44. Greenpeace propaganda in support of the IPCC report. Watch the video The Angry Kid. Very threatening kid, pale face. He comes straight out of Omega Man. He will certainly appeal to hoodies. Thought it was funny initially. But this is a step too far. The message to kids is your parents are bad people who are threatening your future, from a very threatening kid.

    “Unless drastic action is taken soon,

    All fish will be gone
    No rainforests
    Both icecaps gone
    Entire countries will have disappeared
    Life expectancy reduced”

    “MY future…maybe kids today but tomorrow will be different…. Starting from today the lines are drawn you have to choose sides… you’re a friend or you’re an enemy….last time will be talking to you…we will not be denied our future..”

    At youtube

    Greenpeace propaganda for kids

    Some refer to the Global Warming War. it seems it is on and child soldiers are being recruited. Would like to know if Brown endorses it.

    Posted by Ros on 2007 02 10 at 02:24 AM • permalink

  45. #43- that’s what tickles me more than anything else- this is a better racket than the Y2K flimflam, which had an end date. This one keeps on going- and if nothing happens they’ll say it’s happening next year, or change back to an incipient ice age- all the while sales of useless, inefficient gimcracks, poorly written books and badly produced, unresearched fact-free fillums grows bigger than the national debt (which Bob Brown will pay off through Cash Converters if he takes power). A nice little earner, which goes unquestioned and uninvestigated by a Chicken Little filled compliant media (who also love nothing more than a panic, great for circulation/ratings).

    What shits me though is the inevitible hosing I’m going to get through carbon taxes etc- JWH and Co may well know that gerbil wormening is at best a posibility which can not be affected by human activity, but he’s never going to knock back a chance to siphon more bikkies from taxpayers, and gain some more control over business and private activities- a fan of small government he sure aint.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 10 at 02:30 AM • permalink

  46. #45 Habib, that’s exactly right! 

    Governments love taxes, and the hysteria over climate change would seem to be an unsurpassed opportunity for a “but it’s for your own good!” tax, which would be accepted (if not supported) by the majority of dimwits in this country.

    I have decided that I am going to be a Carbon Credit Broker when I grow up - imagine, clipping the ticket at both ends for a small percentage of vast sums of money, with full support of all the governments in the world!

    Of course, I shall be based in Vanuatu, or the Isle of Guernsey, or the Carribean, so as to enhance the value-added factor of my global business….

    Just you wait - Pacific Atlantic Carbon Offsets Enterprises will eventually list on most major boards - get in early, you know the routine…

    Posted by Kaboom on 2007 02 10 at 02:51 AM • permalink

  47. #41
    Envirotard Industrial Strength Dunces: brilliant irony!

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 03:30 AM • permalink

  48. Bob Brown’s been a ‘coal driller’ himself from way back.

    Seriously, there is a kind of racism here. Australians are the baddies because they sell the stuff. There is never any criticism about how its used when it gets to countries such as China. They haven’t got the balls.

    Bob and his buddies are happy to stroll down to Bunnings and buy a cheap drill though have no concept of where these goods come from or why they are so cheap. They think that by not selling coal, the whole pollution issue will magically go away. Thet really have no idea.

    Posted by Nic on 2007 02 10 at 03:46 AM • permalink

  49. Wait, he wants to severely damage Australia’s economy and put 30,000 people, at least, out of a job and Howard is the extremist?

    Nitwit.

    Posted by chrisbg99 on 2007 02 10 at 04:30 AM • permalink

  50. Nitwit was just spruiking on the news about stopping the coal mining and use - Australia’s the worlds worst contributor to greenhouse gases.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 04:33 AM • permalink

  51. #44. Ros, I’ll bet the idiots that produce this kiddy propaganda are also the same ones who bleat on ad nauseum about McDonald’s advertising aimed at children.

    Posted by Nilknarf Arbed on 2007 02 10 at 04:41 AM • permalink

  52. I really liked bob’s deployment of the our children gambit.  Considering his lifestyle choices preclude progeny, I found this argument particularly deft.

    Posted by lotocoti on 2007 02 10 at 05:02 AM • permalink

  53. #52
    Was that deft or daft?

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 05:04 AM • permalink

  54. “we need to build the bridge to the new energy future.”

    I suggest making it a human-powered Bridge on the River Kwai.
    Brown could play the part of a [very tall]
    sunken-faced Jap Commandant, and Tim Flummery looks just right for the Alec Guinness role.
    What a team!  We’d all be the slave-workers, dying of lack of energy of course.

    Posted by Barrie on 2007 02 10 at 05:15 AM • permalink

  55. Tim!  So yuo are impressed by the epic battle between Flappery and Groen do compete on their greenie creds?

    I propose to ban all coal mining and to close down all coal-fored power plants retroactively.

    That’s right people, if elected i will go back to 1949 when commie gaia despoilers ran the country and singlehandedly shut down all of this stuff, thus saving future generations from the death and dstruction of globule worming

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 02 10 at 05:51 AM • permalink

  56. BTW, anyone here know who was the first black man to fly the Atlantic?


    Alcock and Brown

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 02 10 at 05:53 AM • permalink

  57. Sorru about the italics and underlines, but I did turn of the bold when I left the room.

    Geez, I’ll be glad when the footy season starts and I’ll be able to spend my saturday arvos in HCMC more productively.

    Go Bombers

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 02 10 at 05:56 AM • permalink

  58. As always perview is my fiend

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 02 10 at 05:58 AM • permalink

  59. Ohh sure you are all focussed on coal but what are you doing about the cows!!!!
    http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=warming

    Boy is India in trouble with its giving cows sacred status.

    Posted by the nailgun on 2007 02 10 at 06:01 AM • permalink

  60. #56

    Sammy Davis Jnr?

    (that’s the punchline)

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 06:05 AM • permalink

  61. strewth

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 06:08 AM • permalink

  62. underline is out of control I don’t know if I can fix it!

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 06:09 AM • permalink

  63. OK, who let the italics out?

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 06:10 AM • permalink

  64. That’s buggered the budget for another month!

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 06:11 AM • permalink

  65. wtf?

    Posted by Stevo on 2007 02 10 at 06:13 AM • permalink

  66. kae ... you beat me by 2 minutes ... hmmm ... i like to be beaten ... softly ...

    Posted by Stevo on 2007 02 10 at 06:16 AM • permalink

  67. #52
    (Brown’s) lifestyle choices preclude progeny

    Thank God for the Darwin Awards ...

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 06:32 AM • permalink

  68. #66
    Maybe Brown has masochistic fantasies about being beaten manfully by some coal miners?

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 06:35 AM • permalink

  69. #66

    he he, it was three.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 06:36 AM • permalink

  70. #67 & 52

    Call it “Natural Selection”.

    Posted by kae on 2007 02 10 at 07:00 AM • permalink

  71. #70
    Natural non-election ... to executive government (again: thank God!)

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 02 10 at 07:19 AM • permalink

  72. Rather than building a bridge to the future, I suggest telecommuting to the future.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2007 02 10 at 07:19 AM • permalink

  73. Apropo of almost nothing, my grandmother knew Alcock (or it might have been Brown) I don’t recall. She also saw Buffalo Bill when he came to the UK around 1900.

    And, Fisk may remember the snow in Maidstone in ‘63’ but we had real snow up in Essex. Nothing between Harlow and the Ural mountains over 300 feet. So nothing to stop those Siberian winters coming our way.

    Posted by phil_b on 2007 02 10 at 07:32 AM • permalink

  74. PACO Enterprizes (Asia).com.nl.Ltd, headquartered here in sunny Ho Chi Minh city apologizes for failing to close the I and UL doors.

    In compensation, we offer a fine line of Vietnamese letters at considerably reduced prices.  This is really the offer of a lifetime. If you have Vietnamese friends or are planning a trip to this wonderful country in the near future, you cannot afford not to take advntage of this offer.

    Alas, Andrea does not allow me to display my wares here, but YOU WILL BE SURPRIZED AND ASTONISHED AND AMAZED by your ability to write fluently in Vietnamese from the moment you download our extraordinary program

    Posted by Jack from Montreal on 2007 02 10 at 07:36 AM • permalink

  75. Shut down the coal industry within three years?

    Ooooooh yes! I knew it was only a matter of time! Australia finally has her very own Great Leap Forward!

    How can we resist such an inspiring vision?

    Posted by Penguin on 2007 02 10 at 07:41 AM • permalink

  76. Sky News viewer poll suggests 57% of respondents think we can shut down coal exports in 3 years.  In other news 57% of poll respondents found to be dickheads…

    Posted by anthony_r on 2007 02 10 at 08:08 AM • permalink

  77. ”Perhaps the Chinese might decide, if we are too stupid to mine our coal, simply to help themselves.  Who would stop them?  The UN? The EU? The Kiwis? Pardon my mirth.  The United States with a Democrat in the White House?  The Dems can’t stomach the loss of 3,000 in Iraq - can’t see them wanting to risk the lives of millions in a war with China.”

    Actually the country which is the main importer of Australian coal is, by far, Japan, and not China, which is a next exporter of the stuff.
    http://www.australiancoal.com.au/exports.htm

    And Japan does have form in invading countries when it is cut off from receiving its vital raw materials.

    Posted by Tempo on 2007 02 10 at 08:12 AM • permalink

  78. #44 - Greenpeace engaging children against their parents - it is the Red Guards and the cultural revolution all over again. These Greenpeace maggots are reading directly from Mao, Lenin and Marx, and using modern electronic media to disseminate the message.

    Appointing Flannery as AOY was masterstroke of genius. Give the Warmening kook a mouthpiece and he’ll start “outgreening” Labor and the Greens - which exposes their policies to attack from both sides, enabling swinging voters in suburban Mel/Syd/Bris to see their weakness AND destablise safe labor seats in QLD and WA (mining seats) the same way Latham’s environmental idiocy cost Labor seats in Tasmania in 2004.

    Posted by CanberraNeoCon on 2007 02 10 at 08:48 AM • permalink

  79. #77, you’re right about China’s coal production.

    From memory, Australian coal exports acount for 20% of coal traded but we’re really only small fry when it comes to total world coal production (I heard 3% on the news tonight). The difference of course arises from the fact that large coal producers such as China consume their production domestically rather than trade it internationally (if that makes sense).

    Shutting down the coal industry here (like limiting our CO2 emissions) would achieve very little apart from destroying jobs and income.

    Posted by Art Vandelay on 2007 02 10 at 09:00 AM • permalink

  80. I read Flanneriy’s jaw-dropping nonsense yesterday.

    He is a fool.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 02 10 at 10:44 AM • permalink

  81. #44, that is one scary kid. 

    Actually, if he were my kid, I’d be jerking a knot in him for speaking so disrespectfully to adults.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 02 10 at 10:54 AM • permalink

  82. And I don’t have a clue about economics, but its not just 30 000 workers and $25 billion. Its the knock on effect to all the communities, mostly in regional areas. The service industries, general commerce. After the drought crushes farmers, lets really go for the jugular in rural and regional Australia.

    And that’s before governments starts paying tens of billions of compensation to all the multinational coal mining companies for tearing up their long term mining leases. In essence, we would be nationalising an industry, then crushing it. Wonderful stuff. And on compensation, add the ports corporations. And the railway and road carriers. Logistics companies. There would be a huge line of companies with their hands (legitimately) out.

    And, of course, all adding immensely to our international commercial reputation in the cut-throat fight for development global capital.

    Posted by boxofmatches on 2007 02 10 at 12:12 PM • permalink

  83. Maybe Brown Bob sees the sacked mining workers and families participating in renewable, green energy production, Matrix-style?

    Posted by boxofmatches on 2007 02 10 at 12:25 PM • permalink

  84. #19 Habib, what’s a mong? Is it like a swampy?

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2007 02 10 at 01:05 PM • permalink

  85. “ ... first we need to build the bridge to the new energy future.”

    Let me be the first to say it ...

    nukenukenukenukenukenuke

    Posted by Achillea on 2007 02 10 at 05:11 PM • permalink

  86. Short for mongoloid, but in these cases I think it’s more of an insult to the chromosomally enhanced.

    Posted by Habib on 2007 02 10 at 07:59 PM • permalink

  87. Perhaps they are not as dickheaded as you all think they are. You see if 40,000 lose their jobs if coal is phased out, they then build 120,000 wind turbines. It has been found that you need about one maintenance/repair/administration people per 3 turbines, so there you have work for those 40,000, plus they generate an average of about 120,000/3= 40,000 MW of electricity to replace the coal based electrical generating plants. Wind is no problem. Timmy and Bobbie both generate enough wind for all the turbines.

    Posted by ElectronPower on 2007 02 10 at 08:28 PM • permalink

  88. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.