<< DAMS FLANNED ~ MAIN ~ FRANCOIS LEAVES HOME >>

COMFORT ZONE INHABITED

No surprises here:

The BBC has failed to promote proper debate on major political issues because of the inherent liberal culture of its staff, a report commissioned by the corporation has concluded.

The report concludes BBC staff must be more willing to challenge their own beliefs ...

It reads: “There is a tendency to ‘group think’ with too many staff inhabiting a shared space and comfort zone.”

A staff impartiality seminar held last year is also documented in the report, at which executives admitted they would broadcast images of the Bible being thrown away but not the Koran, in case Muslims were offended.

There’s a lot of this “fear of offence” getting around at the moment.

(Via Instapundit)

Posted by Tim B. on 06/18/2007 at 10:50 AM
  1. A new link from Insty:

    CHRIS MATTHEWS: “This country was built on biased reporting.”

    <http://newsbusters.org/node/13495>

    It’s too bad the BBC can’t get into the broadcasting BUSINESS. If they had shareholders to please things might be a bit different.

    Posted by Some0Seppo on 2007 06 18 at 11:12 AM • permalink

  2. No surprises here…..Exactly right Tim. I seem to recall that Royal Navy ships turned off the BBC channel early on in the Iraq war because of the over the top bias.

    Posted by greene on 2007 06 18 at 11:15 AM • permalink

  3. Wonder how much it cost them to “discover” what’s been obvious for years.

    Posted by SandiM on 2007 06 18 at 11:16 AM • permalink

  4. Tim, the link sends us to a previous post, rather than to the original article.

    Posted by Texas Ranger on 2007 06 18 at 11:21 AM • permalink

  5. Personally, the day I get to hear the words: “This is the BBC Ten O’Clock News, brought to you by Pepsi Cola” can’t come soon enough for me.

    Posted by ThinAndBritish on 2007 06 18 at 11:26 AM • permalink

  6. #4: Apologies - link fixed.

    Posted by Tim B. on 2007 06 18 at 11:42 AM • permalink

  7. Interesting aside: Winston Churchill, for many years, was at odds with John Reith, the Chairman of the BBC and an enormously tall Scotchman. He once referred to him as, “that wuthering height.”

    Not sure why governments really need to fund broadcast media. Well, obviously, they don’t, they just like to use these communication channels as additional means of control; so, I’m with ThinandBritish at #5.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 18 at 12:57 PM • permalink

  8. What is there to say but, “well, DUH!”  I’m with SandiM; my first thought was that I could have told them that, and a whole lot more, for a lot less than I’m sure they paid.  But I have no doubt that there have been plenty of people to tell them without paying—with taxpayer money—for a study.  Perhaps they ought to read their mail.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 06 18 at 12:58 PM • permalink

  9. #8 Salty

    They don’t listen to those people.  That’s why it’s called an “echo chamber”.

    Posted by yojimbo on 2007 06 18 at 01:04 PM • permalink

  10. Personally, the day I get to hear the words: “This live event is the first anniversary of the salting of all land around the ruins of BBC buildings” can’t come soon enough for me.

    Posted by Rob Read on 2007 06 18 at 02:17 PM • permalink

  11. BBC staff must be more willing to challenge their own beliefs

    Nonsense.  The BBC staff have the correct beliefs, therefore there is no need to challenge them.  If you don’t believe me, just ask the BBC staffers themselves.

    Posted by rbj1 on 2007 06 18 at 02:18 PM • permalink

  12. But I have no doubt that there have been plenty of people to tell them without paying—with taxpayer money—for a study.

    Yes, but then there would have been no big-bucks contract for the Partisanship Assessment Consultancy Organization.

    Posted by Achillea on 2007 06 18 at 03:00 PM • permalink

  13. #12, Achillea,

    Oh, dear, I hadn’t thought about that.  Stupid me.  I’m for anything that will bring dividends from my load of PACO CORP stocks (which I’m sure are in the mail, even though the prez has ignore my inquiry into their location.  I’m sure its just an oversight, and not anything deliberate like hoping I’ll just forget about them).

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 06 18 at 03:14 PM • permalink

  14. Damn.  Maybe Paco is ignoring me because I can’t spell.

    Posted by saltydog on 2007 06 18 at 03:14 PM • permalink

  15. When the Caliphate is reality, and they start lining up all the BBC’s gay and feminist journalists for execution, perhaps the staff will begin to challenge their beliefs.  Or maybe not.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2007 06 18 at 03:28 PM • permalink

  16. #12: Yes, but then there would have been no big-bucks contract for the Partisanship Assessment Consultancy Organization.

    And we can’t have that, now, can we?

    #13 Salty: You’re shares are in the mail! And don’t be alarmed if they look like stock certificates from the defunct Packard Automobile Corporation; everyone says that.

    #15 rebecca: My guess is that they’ll be fighting over the one koran in the execution yard in order to swear an oath of allegiance to their new overlords.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 18 at 04:09 PM • permalink

  17. Actually, Salty, I misspoke. You are not shares in the mail; “your” shares are in the mail.

    Posted by paco on 2007 06 18 at 04:10 PM • permalink

  18. Sounds like the ABC!

    Posted by 1.618 on 2007 06 18 at 06:17 PM • permalink

  19. From previous:

    Former staffer making a case for Scrapping the BBC.
    Applicable to our ABC ...
    ... it should operate more like newspapers and allow strong opinions and viewpoints rather than being a balanced and an impartial observer.
    Makes the case that to show ‘impartiality’,the Beebs bashes the incumbent Govt; Privately owned media is truthful or readers wouldn’t buy it (FauxFax?)

    Posted by egg_ on 2007 06 18 at 08:52 PM • permalink

  20. #17 ‘You are shares in the mail’

    I like that. Poetic. And certainly better than being dust in the wind…

    Posted by JonathanH on 2007 06 18 at 10:40 PM • permalink

  21. “Your shares are in the mail.”

    “Of course I’ll respect you in the morning.”

    “I’m from the Government and I’m here to help you.”

    Posted by Michael Lonie on 2007 06 18 at 11:29 PM • permalink

  22. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.