<< TEXAS SMARTER THAN CALIFORNIA ~ MAIN ~ BIRD VIRUS INCURABLE >>

BOB ON THE JOB

Picture Bob Ellis at his computer, tapping out another column for the weekly Byron Bay Bong Trader, stomach furrowed with concentration. Tap, tap ... sip ... tap ... gurgle ... taptap ...  clink ... CLANK! ... oh no! Shiraz* all over the keyboard! Computer broken, and column due tonight! Must write column using trusty old wine-resistant typewriter. That’ll mean no internet-enabled fact-checking, but Bob’s pretty sure he’ll get his story straight:

It looks like it was wrong of Saddam Hussein to kill or approve the killing of 143 people some of whom had tried to kill him, and he should therefore (I suppose) hang by the neck until he is dead for his immoderacy.

This seems fair enough. But it also seems by the same measure, or a worse one, wrong of George Bush to kill or approve the killing of one hundred thousand people in Afghanistan because one or two, or ten or twenty of them, tried to kill him and his Congress on 9/11, and he should therefore, what, fry in Old Sparky ...

How many people were killed on 9/11? Can’t remember; let’s just leave that out. One hundred thousand dead in Afghanistan? Yep; no forgetting Lancet’s famous report. They should try something like that in Iraq! To stop readers flicking past to the Mostly Mao ads, Bob again bemoans the destruction of Saddam’s luxury yacht—a dark episode that has haunted Ellis for nearly two years. And to conclude, a brief examination of international trade:

How many deaths, how many divorces, how many ruined childhoods and fractured educations does globalism have to cause before we see it, and condemn it, as the pandemic it is?

Not to mention all the ruined yachts of dictators! Speaking of potential divorce causes, I wonder how baby Juliet is doing these days ...

(Via Ellis editor Raff)

Posted by Tim B. on 10/26/2005 at 03:47 AM
  1. “I was not always as you see me now.”

    Posted by blogstrop on 2005 10 26 at 05:00 AM • permalink

  2. Psst, Tim, I’m beginning question your credentials as a journalist.

    It’s Shiraz, not Chiraz, a second year cadet knows that.
    ;-)


    —Nora
    PS The Chardonnay I’m drinking now is delicious.

    Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2005 10 26 at 05:31 AM • permalink

  3. You’re cruel Tim!
    Last I saw of the ‘Bobster’ he was using a shopping trolley to hold himself upright in the carpark of ‘Woolworths’ Byron Bay.
    I’ts not nice to make fun of a dipsomaniac.

    Posted by Lucky Nutsacks on 2005 10 26 at 05:33 AM • permalink

  4. ew ew ew ew ew eeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwww thatlink to Juliet is disgusting, not for the kid thing but for the Ellis puffery at the top of the page

    shame Tim shame

    Posted by KK on 2005 10 26 at 05:49 AM • permalink

  5. Was it just me or did anyone else find no coherent arguement there. I had trouble finding a train of thought that wasnt immediately derailed over the ravine of his loathing for anyone other than Unkle     Sa(dda)m.
    The 14 year old grandson he uses in his article is the one killed in the gun battle that saw Saddams sons killed.
    Um.. civillians usualy surrender Bob, some might even send their own kid out under a flag of truce then go out fighting. Keeping a kid in the room with you while you fight it out with the yanks will get you dobbed in by childrens services in most states in Oz.
    What an old tossbag.

    Posted by thefrollickingmole on 2005 10 26 at 05:53 AM • permalink

  6. I think your “tap to sip/gurgle” ratio is way too high, Tim.  I think Bob is drinking more than he’s typing.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2005 10 26 at 06:01 AM • permalink

  7. Nora
    My neighour’s come over for dinner. I cooked her some fish on the barbie and she in return has bought some chiraz and it’s shilled. Quite unusual really.

    Posted by gubbaboy on 2005 10 26 at 06:25 AM • permalink

  8. #7: Shrist! What happened after dinner Gubba?

    Posted by Lucky Nutsacks on 2005 10 26 at 06:43 AM • permalink

  9. Chit! Thanks for pointing out that spelling error. Chame on me.

    Posted by Tim B. on 2005 10 26 at 07:04 AM • permalink

  10. Tim, your secret’s safe with me.

    :-)

    —Nora

    Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2005 10 26 at 07:09 AM • permalink

  11. How many millions of people have to be freed from grinding poverty and choronic disease by the spread of free trade and the progress that flows from liberalisation and deregulation, before Bob and the socialists change their tune.

    Posted by Rafe on 2005 10 26 at 07:30 AM • permalink

  12. The second part of Ellis’s writing makes the first part look almost sane by comparison.

    Posted by Susan Norton on 2005 10 26 at 07:38 AM • permalink

  13. Bo Bellis wrote, “It wasn’t just, or nice, to burn to the waterlevel Saddam’s luxury yacht, an exploitable treasure as tourist-magnetic as Blenheim Palace on which young students could sail upriver to Babylon for the next two hundred years ...”

    Wow. I knew that Marlborough family were talented, but I never realised they had built an amphibious palace!

    Incidentally, did anyone see the film allegedly based on Bob’s life as a teenager, “The Nostradamus Kid”? He both wrote and directed it, and portrayed himself as a sort of weird religious geek with obsessions about the end of the world - who nevertheless managed to shag every young woman within range.

    Only worthwhile for those who liked Eowyn from LOTR (Miranda Otto). You’ll (ahem) get to see a bit more of her in this film.

    Posted by Lionel Mandrake on 2005 10 26 at 08:12 AM • permalink

  14. He was a seventh day adventist?
    Michelle Fawdon who played Mary Magdalene?

    Posted by crash on 2005 10 26 at 08:24 AM • permalink

  15. Yeah Lionel, I forced myself to watch the Nostradamus Kid to make sure that I was nothing like him.

    it is a semi autobiography of his childhood.  The reason I was interested is that like Bob, I grew up as a Seventh Day Adventist in Lismore in Northern New South Wales, and drifted away once I got to Uni.  The similarities end there however.

    Bob, of course, went to Sydney Uni in the sixties (whereas I was at UQ in the eighties - I am sure that is the reason I am not a Chiraz drinking ☺, failed intellectual), and has tried to keep up with the Germaine Greers, Clive James etc. of the time.  The fact that he did not have the intellectual capacity is blamed on his religious upbringing. 

    What the film does show is that he is incapable of operating without some kind of faith to underpin his belief system.  He has substituted the ALP and the anti-globalisation shtick (he did, after all coin the phrase ‘the true believers’) for the fundamentalist christianity of his youth. 

    The ironic thing was, there was a lot to the early part of the movie that I could relate to (and a lot of semi identifiable characters), although his memories of SDA beliefs are heavy on the lunar right hyperbole to make the story interesting and to justify his future actions.

    Posted by entropy on 2005 10 26 at 08:45 AM • permalink

  16. # 14 Bobby was indeed a 7th Day Adventist in the movie, but I don’t recall that actress. Just had a quick look on IMDb and she’s not listed on the cast.

    I thought it was actually OK by the standards of 90s Australian movies - which unfortunately isn’t saying very much.

    Posted by Lionel Mandrake on 2005 10 26 at 08:46 AM • permalink

  17. How many deaths, how many divorces, how many ruined childhoods and fractured educations does globalism have to cause before we see it, and condemn it, as the pandemic it is?

    Geez, I dunno.  Gimme a hint

    Posted by jlc on 2005 10 26 at 09:42 AM • permalink

  18. But it also seems by the same measure, or a worse one, wrong of George Bush to kill or approve the killing of one hundred thousand people in Afghanistan because one or two, or ten or twenty of them, tried to kill him and his Congress on 9/11, and he should therefore, what, fry in Old Sparky

    I thought it was stupid right-wingers who wrongly thought that the hijackers were Afghanis.

    Posted by Andjam on 2005 10 26 at 09:47 AM • permalink

  19. Nora

    What’s the name of the Shardonnay?

    I’m looking for stuff from the Coalition of The Willing.

    Not some chit that Shirac would drink.

    {Gawd we’ve all been Margeauxed and Lowensteined-now we gotta read Ellis?}

    Posted by madawaskan on 2005 10 26 at 10:15 AM • permalink

  20. It looks like it was wrong of Saddam Hussein to kill or approve the killing of 143 people some of whom had tried to kill him, and he should therefore (I suppose) hang by the neck until he is dead for his immoderacy.

    Trust a lefty to call the murder of 143 people (“some” of whom tried to kill him) “immoderate”.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2005 10 26 at 10:28 AM • permalink

  21. I think what he meant to say was

    ‘How many deaths, how many divorces, how many ruined childhoods and fractured educations does globalism have to PREVENT before we see it, and PRAISE it, as the SAVIOUR it is?’

    Posted by Flying Giraffe on 2005 10 26 at 10:47 AM • permalink

  22. RebeccaH - can he name 6 of those 143 who tried to kill him?

    Posted by jlc on 2005 10 26 at 10:49 AM • permalink

  23. Gee, under Saddam Iraq had the best opera in the Middle East? Anybody who thinks THAT’S not worth a few hundred thousand dead citizens just ain’t civilized. And the best welfare system? I guess so, when the Head Actuary himself was in a position to cut down on long-term costs through the simple expedient of fixing mortality rates with clinical exactitude. Some people are born foolish, which is sad and regrettable; what I can’t understand is why people like Ellis actually aspire to follishness.

    Posted by paco on 2005 10 26 at 12:02 PM • permalink

  24. Or “foolishness”, too, for that matter. Although, “follishness” is a kind of interesting malapropism, implying a tendency toward “folly”, or perhaps even toward “folie de grandeur”.

    Posted by paco on 2005 10 26 at 12:18 PM • permalink

  25. #19
    Good morning Madawaskan - We’ve been drinking a lot from the McWilliams range - here’s someinfo on the Chardonnay.

    —Nora

    Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2005 10 26 at 04:29 PM • permalink

  26. Never forget:

    Amnesty International, 1999: “Refugees from Afghanistan: The world’s largest single refugee group.”

    UNHCR, 25 June 2005: “More than 3.5 million Afghans have returned to their homeland since the end of 2001.”

    Spread the word.

    Posted by werner on 2005 10 26 at 07:02 PM • permalink

  27. Mmm, chardonnay. I’m drinking one right now—Redwood, out of California.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 10 26 at 07:11 PM • permalink

  28. Cheers Andrea
    Did you get out of the hurricane unscatched?

    —Nora

    Posted by The Thin Man Returns on 2005 10 26 at 11:50 PM • permalink

  29. There were only tropical storm winds in my neighborhood. Didn’t even lose power.

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2005 10 27 at 12:41 AM • permalink

  30. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.