<< MOBILE MCDONALD'S ~ MAIN ~ IRON MIKE >>

ACADEMIC NEVER WRONG

As usual, the Amazing Quiggin is proved correct!

Posted by Tim B. on 12/13/2006 at 08:31 AM
  1. That beardy bastard should go into politics- he’s quite agile at trying to make black for all intents and purposes appear white, convincing himself, a few fellow travellers and no one else that this is indeed the case.

    Utterly shameless, and an utterly blinkered ideologue. I think parliament deserves no better.

    Want Spending Bigger?  Vote For The Quigger!

    (Send it down the dunny, it’s other bastards money).

    I might have to indulge in some direct wealth redistribution*- the Quiggster would no doubt prefer it to filter through several levels of wasteful bureaucracy, but bugger that, I’m going to swipe his no doubt swish stereo, and collection of Yes LPs.

    *This blithing idiot is so disconnected, he really cannot fathom the seething rage that thieving governments and wastrel public fund siphons elicits in the productive. At least in the scrub, you can detach a leech with a lit ciggie- these leeches want to throw you in jail for lighting one up.

    Posted by Habib on 2006 12 13 at 08:54 AM • permalink

  2. He’s confusing (Tim I’ve never heard you advocate income and expenditure policies as the Quiggler attests), one one hand spending and taxing is bad! On the other its good from a ‘social democrat’ point of view!

    I’m glad I’m not in his lectures.

    Posted by Nic on 2006 12 13 at 09:00 AM • permalink

  3. I like how he tries to argue infrastructure spending now is putting back what was cut then.
    Reality is infrastructure wasn’t cut then and after 10 years of very strong economic growth say 4% average gee could it be we are due for some increased infrastructure spending in line with the much larger economy.
    I note that these leftie economists were predicting dire consequences quickly, I did not hear the line “yes it will be fine to cut back spending for a few years then as long as we increase back up again all will be well”.
    Quiggin at the time predicted the sky would fall down by lunch time tomorrow. It didn’t.
    I’d be willing to wager he was one of the sky is going to fall down brigade over the GST too.

    Posted by the nailgun on 2006 12 13 at 09:02 AM • permalink

  4. That sort of economics is just typical of Bush - instead he got stuck trying to figure out how many plastic turkeys he would need.  Haw!

    Yes, I know I’m a pompous ass, but why won’t you debate me?  Go on, Andrea ban me if you date!

    Yours sincerely,

    ThePirateKing

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2006 12 13 at 09:12 AM • permalink

  5. Ban me if you date?

    Nah ... It’d be too cheap.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 12 13 at 09:23 AM • permalink

  6. Glad to meat you,
    TheBurgerKing
    ?

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 13 at 09:25 AM • permalink

  7. Ban me in the date maybe. That’d more PK’s style from what I’ve seen.

    Posted by geoff on 2006 12 13 at 09:26 AM • permalink

  8. I’ve read Quiggin’s post forwards, backwards, upside down, and I still don’t see how he arrives at the conclusion that Tim has conceded anything… Maybe I’m just not one of those clever economonistic types that understand how a government stealing wealth from productive individuals and pissing it into the pockets of people like Quiggin makes a country wealthier.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 12 13 at 09:29 AM • permalink

  9. This is a great line from the link

    If you’re going to run a social democracy, pick social democrats to do it - they want to make the system work.

    Perhaps like in France eh?

    I’m so grateful we in OZ are on an island far away from Europe and their wonderful social democratic successes

    Posted by aussiemagpie on 2006 12 13 at 09:46 AM • permalink

  10. Want Spending Bigger?  Vote For The Quigger!

    class!

    Posted by bondo on 2006 12 13 at 09:51 AM • permalink

  11. #8: Dear fellow, as someone who has alternately slept and doodled his way through several economics courses, permit me to explain it to you. You see, it’s all based on what’s known as the velocity of money (Economist-commenter Havesy will confirm this). The government takes your money through taxes, money which - admit it now! - you would most likely have simply kept in the bank, or used to buy fairly useless things like, say, food. The money is then transferred to a subsidized high-roller like Quiggin, whose wallet is like a sliding-board greased with vaseline. The money passes from Quiggin with blinding speed to a great variety of businesses offering numerous useful products: flea powder, beard combs, hairnets, Grecian Formula, and so forth. So, instead of sitting uselessly in a bank vault, like a pile of moldy, forgotten rags in the back of your garage, against the advent of some dubious need, like health care or your childrens’ education, your money is released into the wild, where it goes frisking through the boscage like so many cute Disney forest creatures, spreading sweetness and light.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 09:53 AM • permalink

  12. #10
    To the tune of (Hey) “Big Spender”

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 13 at 09:55 AM • permalink

  13. #11 Correction: that’s Economist-commenter “hayesey”.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 09:59 AM • permalink

  14. #11

    That explains that, then! The Perfectly Acceptable ‘Conomic Oracle has done its educational work once more.

    I had a beard like Quiggin’s, once. Unfortunately, I had to let it go. It never returned to me, so I guess it was never really mine…

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 12 13 at 10:03 AM • permalink

  15. Plastic Turkey?

    Pirate king, what are you talking about?

    Your post reminds me of a scene from one of the Batman movies where Jim Carey played The Joker. The line?

    “Was that over the top? I can never tell.”

    I just have to believe that you are posting ironically. Either way, Andrea is not in the business of banning entertaining posters. At least until we figure out whether you are being intentionally, or unintentially entertaining. This is not the DU or Kos where posters who diagree are banned.

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 10:05 AM • permalink

  16. #14: I had a beard like Quiggin’s, once. Unfortunately, I had to let it go. It never returned to me, so I guess it was never really mine

    It’s probably cadging food from tourists in Yellowstone Park if it was anything like Quiggins’.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 10:07 AM • permalink

  17. It’s probably cadging food from tourists in Yellowstone Park if it was anything like Quiggins’.

    Well, it WAS smarter than the average beard.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 12 13 at 10:12 AM • permalink

  18. Your post reminds me of a scene from one of the Batman movies where Jim Carey played The Joker.

    Jim Carey played the Riddler. Jack Nicholson played the Joker.

    Posted by Rob Crawford on 2006 12 13 at 10:14 AM • permalink

  19. If you’re going to run a social democracy, pick social democrats to do it - they want to make the system work.

    It’s a liberal democracy you bearded twit, let the Liberals* run it.

    (*the conservative party in Australia)

    Posted by lingus4 on 2006 12 13 at 10:21 AM • permalink

  20. If you’re going to run a social democracy, pick social democrats to do it - they want to make the system work.

    Like the Attlee Labor Government in Britain - took them six months in 1946 to get Britain’s standard of living lower than it had been in 1942.

    Posted by McAnzac on 2006 12 13 at 10:27 AM • permalink


  21. If you’re going to run a social democracy, pick social democrats to do it .

    Quite right. They’ll discredit it faster than anybody else.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 10:34 AM • permalink

  22. Do you reckon he’s compensating for something with that beard?

    With apologies to Shrek.

    Posted by Hanyu on 2006 12 13 at 10:36 AM • permalink

  23. I retract what I said about PK here, after his posts in other threads.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 13 at 10:42 AM • permalink

  24. Guys, look at the name in the comments field before you react. Comment #4 was Stop Continental Drift! doing what you guys call “taking the piss.” You were a little too convincing, SCD!

    Posted by Andrea Harris, Administrator on 2006 12 13 at 11:03 AM • permalink

  25. #25
    Thought that was assumed, as didn’t ref the post no.
    Might also help if junior posters check others profiles before advocating their senior’s ousting (AS?)

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 13 at 11:15 AM • permalink

  26. [red faced smiley (with egg) goes here]

    However, Lefties are so beyond parody. It is both too easy and too difficult. I am not sure that even Cervantes or Swift could do it.

    Every time I think they can’t be serious, it turns out they are. And, it seems when I think they are serious, they aren’t.

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 11:43 AM • permalink

  27. #25 Andrea

    Guys, look at the name in the comments field before you react. Comment #4 was Stop Continental Drift! doing what you guys call “taking the piss.” You were a little too convincing, SCD!

    He was! It was a bit jarring to say the least. It took me a second to realise it was satire…

    Posted by Spiny Norman on 2006 12 13 at 12:16 PM • permalink

  28. I retract what I said about PK here, after his posts in other threads.

    Shit, that’s what I get for early morning blogging.  My apologies, PK.

    SCD, if you are going to pull that stunt, at least misspell the name in the post?  Look a little less convincing, and maybe use a “/sarcasm” tag, hmmmmmm?

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 13 at 12:22 PM • permalink

  29. “If you’re going to run a social democracy, pick social democrats to do it - they want to make the system work.”

    Oh, doesn’t he ever wish, the Quigster. Just three problems: 1) What if the majority don’t want to run a social democracy? 2) Even if they do, what if a social democracy can’t be run successfully in the long term? 3) And even conceding that one can run it successfully, what makes you think that “wanting” to make the system work is synonymous with being competent to make it work? Isn’t that generally the biggest problems with you lefties, the lack of applicable real-world skills?

    Seriously, would this guy even be capable of passing an introductory course in logic? He’s obviously well-versed in Bullshitting 801, though.

    Good thing I’m not a lefty, or I’d have to accuse Quiggin of making a victim out of me…if people make fun of me in the future because I actually bothered to get a degree in economics, it’s almost certainly going to be because guys like him are ruining our collective reputation.

    Posted by PW on 2006 12 13 at 12:49 PM • permalink

  30. #11 Curiously, the velocity of money has the same units as the Hubble constant.

    I don’t want to engage in idle speculation like the economists, but it does suggest that the velocity of money was infinite at the big bang.

    This means you needed very little of it, if prices were stable.

    If it goes negative, it means the world is collapsing, and shopkeepers pay you to take their stuff.

    Posted by rhhardin on 2006 12 13 at 01:02 PM • permalink

  31. From G & S

    Oh, better far to live and die
    Under the brave black flag I fly,
    Than play a sanctimonious part,
    With a pirate head and a pirate heart.
    Away to the cheating world go you,
    Where pirates all are well-to-do;

    But I’ll be true to the song I sing,
    And live and die a Pirate King.

    For I am a Pirate King!
    And it is, it is a glorious thing
    To be a Pirate King!

    For I am a Pirate King!

    Someone got the reference SCD. How much in grant money is the well-to-do Quiggin <strike>plundering</strike> being granted from the public purse? Arr.

    Posted by Zoe Brain on 2006 12 13 at 01:19 PM • permalink

  32. Good ol’ Quiggin.  Always good for a laugh.

    Posted by aaron_ on 2006 12 13 at 01:32 PM • permalink

  33. I predict stocks will go up.

    Posted by aaron_ on 2006 12 13 at 01:34 PM • permalink

  34. “Blair Concedes Defeat”. And to back it up, he can now quote this thread’s headline.

    Posted by Dminor on 2006 12 13 at 01:57 PM • permalink

  35. I find that lefties, as the degree of their errors increase, spin their fantasies faster and faster in response.  Quiggie is currently approaching relativistic speeds with his current post.

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 13 at 02:15 PM • permalink

  36. The problem is that you Aussies are just like the damn Americans. You refuse to defer to your betters.

    Don’t ever change.

    Posted by Veeshir on 2006 12 13 at 02:56 PM • permalink

  37. Hey!  That’s supposed to be “damn Yankees”!  Get the jargon right, wouldja, Veeshir? 

    ;-P

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 13 at 03:03 PM • permalink

  38. Tsk, Tim, you will persist in sending us to that site where we have to look at that beard.  I swear, it’s like the joke picture my dad used to draw for me, where it looked like a face no matter which way you turned it.

    Posted by RebeccaH on 2006 12 13 at 03:28 PM • permalink

  39. OT - The Age is reporting that Mr Rudd has decided to reject socialism. And to think it only took 15 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union!


    A dark day for the comrades! link

    Posted by Ian Deans on 2006 12 13 at 03:34 PM • permalink

  40. #39 rebecca, it kind of reminds me of this.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 03:40 PM • permalink

  41. O/T.

    To rinardman, should he be reading this thread: sorry for my previous dyslexic incompetence, I rush too many posts.

    Posted by Dminor on 2006 12 13 at 03:51 PM • permalink

  42. Aw, give the guy a break Timbo.
    He’s an academic.
    Being an academic means never having to say you’re sorry.
    He’s ‘llowed to be a numbsksull.

    Posted by Bonmot on 2006 12 13 at 04:23 PM • permalink

  43. You tell me

    Ironic or Moronic?

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 04:49 PM • permalink

  44. Here is a little taste of the above referenced post.

    Finally, God (the new testament one, not the old) bless George Galloway

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 04:53 PM • permalink

  45. Finally, God (the new testament one, not the old) bless George Galloway

    The New Testament God killed two people for lying in order to look good (Acts 5). That’s exactly the kind of blessing Galloway needs.

    Posted by AlburyShifton on 2006 12 13 at 04:59 PM • permalink

  46. #44: TO THE WRIGHT-RIGHT: ARE YOU AFRAID OF THE TRUTH?

    This was obviously directed to Wronwright by the semi-literate commenter. I wouldn’t take that kind of stuff if I were you, Wron!

    Some choice rabid moonbat froth over there. The guy’s getting pistol-whipped by the other commenters, though. Good site, Moptop.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 05:13 PM • permalink

  47. It seems that to academics like Quiggin, a unfalsifiable theory is a good thing.  Must be from the old school - you know, the ones that used to work out how many angels can fit on a pin head.

    Posted by Brett_McS on 2006 12 13 at 05:33 PM • permalink

  48. #48: Must be from the old school - you know, the ones that used to work out how many angels can fit on a pin head.

    I’m more interested in how many bogus economic ideas can fit inside a pin-head. Quiggin affords ample scope for research.

    Posted by paco on 2006 12 13 at 06:02 PM • permalink

  49. Thanks paco.

    I should have given the link to the blog.

    No Pasaran! Who needs Goebbels when they have the BBC?

    For the finest moonbattery, and every true connoiseur knows this, Europe remains unrivalled, despite the best efforts of California. France, once again, enjoys a vintage year.

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 06:02 PM • permalink

  50. You were a little too convincing, SCD!

    Oops, sorry.  But I’ve thrown down the gauntlet, together with a half eaten bowl of Cincinnati chilli, to the PiratePorker here.

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2006 12 13 at 06:04 PM • permalink

  51. “And to back it up, he can now quote this thread’s headline.”

    Too right! Ain’t irony wonderful.

    Posted by John Quiggin on 2006 12 13 at 06:14 PM • permalink

  52. Even better is meta-irony that prompts the target of the original ironic remark to make a dumb comment in response. Hi John!

    Posted by PW on 2006 12 13 at 06:19 PM • permalink

  53. #27
    Too right!
    SCD, is TPK a parody of a former troublesome troll?

    Posted by egg_ on 2006 12 13 at 06:30 PM • permalink

  54. #39

    Looks to me like Quigg’s visage has made it to the top left corner of the main page on so called timblair.net

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2006 12 13 at 06:48 PM • permalink

  55. The problem is that you Aussies are just like the damn Americans. You refuse to defer to your betters.

    We’ll defer to them all right - if we ever find them.

    Posted by SwinishCapitalist on 2006 12 13 at 06:49 PM • permalink

  56. Hi, PW. BTW, I meant to congratulate you on your detective work a couple of threads back leading to the inference that I had been “quietly put out to pasture” at UQ.

    Posted by John Quiggin on 2006 12 13 at 06:56 PM • permalink

  57. John Quiggin tag?  C’mon Margo’s Maid, that’s really you isn’t it?

    Surely to God not even the most egotistical academic - even one who’s never wrong - would find the need to enter here?  ROFL!

    But if so, how’d that cool million go down, eh?

    Posted by Stop Continental Drift! on 2006 12 13 at 07:24 PM • permalink

  58. Can’t say too much SCD, cos what happens in Vegas…

    Doh! - wrong tag.

    Posted by Margos Maid on 2006 12 13 at 07:40 PM • permalink

  59. I am sure that Quigg’s arguments have been “generally accepted” among like-minded socialist economists who will take high unemployment over economic growth any day of the week as long as nobody drives a car too much nicer than anybody else.

    However, as to the post riposte back and forth of the internet, he is clearly out of his depth. It has long been held as true on the right that lefties are without a sense of irony. I am still waiting for the exception that proves that rule.

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 07:40 PM • permalink

  60. One can see why the good proffesori is so keen for government investment in the fillum industry to continue.

    Posted by Habib on 2006 12 13 at 08:38 PM • permalink

  61. Vote Quiggin to embiggen.

    Posted by Infidel Tiger on 2006 12 13 at 08:50 PM • permalink

  62. “And to back it up, he can now quote this thread’s headline.”

    Too right! Ain’t irony wonderful.

    Of course, to quote that headline means a link back to Tim’s post, and the entire thread here.  I’m sure Professor John Quiggin, academic and renowned economist, would not quote someone without a reference to the original discussion, just to insure the proper context is maintained. 

    Isn’t that right…...“Professor” Quiggin?

    Posted by The_Real_JeffS on 2006 12 13 at 08:55 PM • permalink

  63. Can’t say too much SCD, cos what happens in Vegas…

    ah, so it’s Father Ted hiding behind that beard.

    Posted by burrah on 2006 12 13 at 09:01 PM • permalink

  64. SCD could learn something from this video.

    Posted by moptop on 2006 12 13 at 09:20 PM • permalink

  65. How can I defer to my betters when they have those dirty boot marks all over their heads?  (Buggered if I’m letting them up just for that…)

    Posted by richard mcenroe on 2006 12 13 at 09:21 PM • permalink

  66. #40, so the socialists are rudderless?

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2006 12 13 at 09:22 PM • permalink

  67. ...then why did they elect him?

    Up the creek without a rudder???

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2006 12 13 at 09:23 PM • permalink

  68. #65 Moptop, what a loser a she is. She doesn’t understand the difference between IRONY and sarcasm. I think she meant IRONY. Stupid bitch.

    Posted by Wimpy Canadian on 2006 12 13 at 09:29 PM • permalink

  69. poor Perfessor Quiggin..
    poor Wandering One…

    Posted by crash on 2006 12 13 at 09:45 PM • permalink

  70. “a social democracy”

    What’s that?  A totalitarian state where we get to vote for who the tyrants are going to be this year?

    Count me out.

    Posted by Dave Surls on 2006 12 13 at 09:56 PM • permalink

  71. “this is an argument that has now been pretty generally accepted”

    I wish I had that line for use in my exams at high school.  Maybe he got it from his students.

    Posted by allan on 2006 12 13 at 10:17 PM • permalink

  72. richard mcenroe,  when asked to see one’s “superior” the proper response is, “I *have* not superiors and damn few equals.”

    And wasn’t it an American patriot who, when asked by a Btitish officer, “Who is your superior?” answered, “The sunavabich hasn’t been born.”?

    Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 12 14 at 01:43 AM • permalink

  73. Whoops! PIMF.  ‘not superiors’ should read ‘no superiors.’

    Posted by JorgXMcKie on 2006 12 14 at 01:44 AM • permalink

  74. I meant to congratulate you on your detective work a couple of threads back leading to the inference that I had been “quietly put out to pasture” at UQ.

    Yes, how’s the window office? :)

    Posted by PW on 2006 12 14 at 05:01 AM • permalink

  75. Page 1 of 1 pages

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Please note: you must use a real email address to register. You will be sent an account activation email. Clicking on the url in the email will automatically activate your account. Until you do so your account will be held in the "pending" list and you won't be able to log in. All accounts that are "pending" for more than one week will be deleted.